OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£1,140RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:12 inchesChipset:Intel Core m3-6Y30

Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 39 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.5/10

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

35%

6.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.0

Reviews score

10%

8.6

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 71% of tablets
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

4.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 95%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

6.7

Display

16%

6.8

Camera

14%

6.2

Battery

12%

7.9

Connectivity

8%

7.2

Software

5%

5.7

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

â–²Better than 63%
8.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models

80%

7.7

Average grade

20%

9.0

Popularity

Grades by review (39)
32 reviews: 16 with a printed score, 16 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £1,140
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 128GBCheck price
Other versions:
8GB + 256GB

What reviewers say about the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB)

Based on 32 · 7

Reviewers love the excellent display, solid build and good battery life, but complain about limited connectivity and ports.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB)

Based on 47 owners sharing their experience in online comments

62%positive12%mixed26%negative

Owners praise the OLED screen and everyday performance, while battery life, keyboard stability, and reliability draw concern.

What owners dislike

  • Some owners say it charges very slowly, and a few report it shuts off or won't charge when a USB-C cable is plugged in.4
  • Owners say battery life is often short, with one reporting about 5.5 hours and another about 4 hours on weak Wi-Fi.3
  • Owners say the keyboard attachment is weak and fixed at one angle, so the tablet can pop off when used on a bed or soft surface.3
  • Owners say the keyboard sits close to the screen, so they touch the display by accident and sometimes leave marks on it.3
  • Owners say it has only one USB-C port and no microSD slot, which limits expansion and makes it feel short on connections.3
  • Some owners report the tablet failing within weeks, with repeated crashes, won't-turn-on problems and long repair waits.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components:

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

6.7

Display

16%

6.8

Camera

14%

6.2

Battery

12%

7.9

Connectivity

8%

7.2

Software

5%

5.7

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

6.7
Reviews score
8.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

4.5

Price

6.6
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 8 GB of RAM, which is more than 72.1% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process, which is smaller than 44.6% of tablets and equal to 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 256 GB of internal storage, which is more than 76.4% of tablets and equal to 15.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
448 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 448 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 60.7% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Chipset
Intel Core m3-6Y30
This tablet runs on Intel Core m3-6Y30, which is more advanced than 50.1% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
2160×1440
This tablet has a 2160×1440 screen, which is sharper than 67.5% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This tablet uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 92.5% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
216 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 216 ppi, which is lower than 52% of tablets and equal to 3.7% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 5 MP resolution, which is higher than 48.6% of tablets and equal to 19.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2, which is wider than 30.1% of tablets and equal to 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
5,200 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 5,200 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 62.4% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
29 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 29 W, which is faster than 71% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Battery life
10.5 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10.5 hours, which is longer than that of 60% of tablets and equal to that of 0.6% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
yes
This tablet includes NFC. 89.3% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
696 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 696 g, which is heavier than 88.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • Better display type
    This tablet features a better display type than the average tablet (OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD). The average tablet uses IPS LCD display technology.
    OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD
  • 4x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (Adobe RGB vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    95% Adobe RGB coverage reported.
    Adobe RGB vs sRGB
  • 199 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (600 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    600 nits vs 401 nits
  • 1.9 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (12 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    12 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (400000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    400,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 14.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 60% of models

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    9.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (39)
    32 reviews: 16 with a printed score, 16 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.0 vs 7.0
  • 14.7% higher sentiment score
    8.6 vs 7.5
  • 4x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Intel Core m3-6Y30 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Intel Core m3-6Y30 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2x more memory bandwidth
    This tablet has more memory bandwidth than the average tablet (29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, while the average tablet does not. 9.9% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 20 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (24 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    24 vs 4
  • 30.8% faster GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU faster than the average tablet (850 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    850 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 10% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better display type
    This tablet features a better display type than the average tablet (OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD). The average tablet uses IPS LCD display technology.
    OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (Adobe RGB vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    95% Adobe RGB coverage reported.
    Adobe RGB vs sRGB
  • 199 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (600 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    600 nits vs 401 nits
  • 1.9 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (12 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    12 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (400000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    400,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2160×1440 vs 1920×1200).
    2,160×1,440 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 240 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (240 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    240 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • 61.1% faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (29 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    29 W vs 18 W
  • 0.5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (10.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    10.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.3% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Includes NFC
    This tablet includes NFC, while the average tablet does not. 10.8% of tablets include NFC.
  • Faster USB ports
    This tablet has faster USB ports than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2).
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 1.7 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.3 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    6.3 mm vs 8 mm
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • 42% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (696 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    696 g vs 490 g
  • 59 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (341 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    341 nits vs 400 nits
  • 51.7% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (914 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    914 points vs 1,891 points
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 4.38x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£1,140 vs £260).
    £1,140 vs £260
  • 15% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.57 vs 7.6).
    6.57 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 51.7% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (914 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    914 points vs 1,891 points
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 38.5% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (448 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    448 points vs 729 points
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 3 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2016 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    March 2016
    2016 vs 2019
  • 59 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (341 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    341 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • 21.2% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (5,200 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    5,200 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.1 vs 5).
    4.1 vs 5
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 42% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (696 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    696 g vs 490 g
  • 115 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (290.3 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    290.3 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
eftm.com
≈ estimated
10/06/2016
Field review · Windows convertible
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G is a very light Windows tablet that can replace a laptop for office work and stays online wherever there is mobile signal.
7.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
05/07/2016
Full review · Laptop replacement
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is a beautiful, capable Windows computer, but a flimsy keyboard cover and short battery life frustrate day-to-day use.
6.0
itpro.com
✓ explicit
24/05/2016
Practical review · Office use
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is a bright, silent Windows tablet for light office work, but its flimsy keyboard cover rules it out as a laptop replacement.
7.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
23/03/2016
Benchmark review · Slim Windows tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is a slim, vivid Windows tablet with over 11 hours of battery life, but its modest processor and single port hold it back.
8.1
theverge.com
✓ explicit
01/04/2016
Real-world review · Travel computer
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is an excellent travel computer for work apps, but its 4GB of memory makes multitasking frustrating.
8.0
cnet.com
✓ explicit
29/03/2016
Editor review · Windows tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is a striking, long-lasting Windows tablet whose keyboard cover and two fixed screen angles are its weak points.
7.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
23/03/2016
Test results · Slim tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S suits anyone wanting a thin, bright Windows slate with excellent battery life, though its processor trails more powerful rivals.
8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
23/03/2016
Full review · Windows 10 tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is one of the thinnest premium Windows 10 tablets and best for video and reading, but its wobbly keyboard base is a letdown.
8.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
06/01/2016
Full review · Windows convertible
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is a good Windows 10 convertible with an excellent screen and long battery life, but few ports and modest performance hold it back.
8.0
stuff.tv
✓ explicit
15/04/2016
Full review · Laptop alternative
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is a slim Windows tablet with a punchy screen and long battery life, best for light work, but a shallow keyboard and few ports limit it.
6.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
07/04/2016
Full review · Windows 2-in-1
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S has a top-class screen and great battery life, but its wobbly keyboard cover and single port make it weaker as a laptop.
8.0
whathifi.com
≈ estimated
11/01/2016
Hands-on review · Windows 10 tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is a slim, light Windows tablet whose keyboard cover and natural-looking screen impress early on, though its plastic feel is less premium.
6.0
futurefive.co.nz
≈ estimated
27/06/2016
Hands-on review · Everyday tablet use
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S has a vivid screen and decent speakers, but its flimsy folio keyboard and modest Core M chip hold it back.
6.0
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
09/04/2016
Lab test · Windows 2-in-1
Verdict
The Galaxy TabPro S suits office work with its keyboard and fast performance, but its battery is short and it cannot run demanding games.
7.0
spiegel.de
≈ estimated
08/04/2016
Hands-on test · Windows 2-in-1
Verdict
The Galaxy TabPro S suits everyday web and office work, but its shallow keyboard, single USB-C port and uneven battery life limit it.
7.9
pcwelt.de
✓ explicit
08/04/2016
Lab test · Windows 2-in-1
Verdict
The Galaxy TabPro S runs Windows 10 desktop programs, but its single USB-C port, under five hours of Wi-Fi browsing and lack of a card reader limit it.
8.0
inside-digital.de
≈ estimated
16/03/2016
Hands-on test · Windows 2-in-1
Verdict
The Galaxy TabPro S suits business users who want a laptop replacement, with a bright screen and keyboard included, but at 12 inches it is awkward as a tablet.
8.0
notebooks-und-mobiles.de
≈ estimated
14/06/2016
Full review · Windows convertible
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is a thin, well-built convertible with a standout AMOLED screen, but its wobbly keyboard cover and single port weaken it as a laptop.
6.0
computerbase.de
≈ estimated
02/05/2016
Lab test · Surface comparison
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is thinner and lighter than the Surface Pro 4, but its single USB-C port and early slowdown under long load are its limits.
8.0
notebooks-und-mobiles.de
≈ estimated
27/08/2016
Lab test · Windows convertible
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S is a solid Windows convertible with an attractive build and bright screen, but speed drops under sustained load and it has one USB port.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB)

  • Incredibly slim and lightweight design, making it highly portable
  • Brilliant 12-inch Super AMOLED display with vibrant colors and deep blacks
  • Excellent battery life that can last over 10 hours for media playback
  • Includes a keyboard cover in the box, providing a 2-in-1 experience at no extra cost
  • Seamless 4G LTE connectivity for constant internet access on the go
  • Silent, fanless operation thanks to the Intel Core M processor

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB)

  • Extremely limited connectivity with only a single USB-C port for both data and charging
  • Keyboard cover is ergonomically limited with shallow keys and only two fixed screen angles
  • Underpowered performance for intensive tasks like gaming or 4K video editing
  • Lack of expandable storage, as there is no microSD card slot
  • Magnetic docking mechanism can be unstable when used on a lap
  • Stylus pen is not included and must be purchased separately

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G is a premium 2-in-1 Windows 10 tablet featuring a 12-inch Super AMOLED display with a 2160 x 1440 resolution and a 3:2 aspect ratio. This specific model is equipped with 8GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD, powered by a fanless 6th Gen Intel Core m3 processor for silent operation. It measures just 6.3mm thin and weighs approximately 693g, making it highly portable alongside its integrated LTE Cat 6 connectivity. Main pros include its vibrant, high-contrast OLED screen, exceptional battery life of up to 10.5 hours, fast-charging capabilities via USB-C, and the inclusion of a magnetic keyboard cover in the box. However, notable cons include the presence of only a single USB-C port for both data and charging, a keyboard that lacks a backlight and offers limited viewing angles, and the absence of a built-in stylus or microSD expansion slot.

Compare Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy TabPro S 4G (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found