OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£310RAM capacity:1.5 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:8 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 400

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 17 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB)
5.8/10

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

35%

5.1

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.1

Reviews score

10%

5.1

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 93% of tablets
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 93%
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

22%

5.3

Performance

20%

3.9

Display

16%

4.8

Camera

14%

3.8

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software

5%

6.7

Design

3%

4.6

Audio

â–¼Worse than 85%
5.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

5.1

Mark 6.9 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

6.6

Average grade

20%

8.2

Popularity

Grades by review (17)
6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 88%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-4-8-0-1-5gb-16gb-3g
samsung-galaxy-tab-4-8-0-1-5gb-16gb-3g
Where to buy
    N/A~ £310
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB)

Based on 6 · 13

Reviewers appreciate the multitasking and battery life, but agree the camera is poor and are split on the display.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB)

Based on 78 owners sharing their experience in online comments

49%positive9%mixed42%negative

Owners praise its speed, screen, and value, while lag, update troubles, and unlit buttons frustrate many.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report games like Modern Combat and Spider-Man lag or stutter, and the tablet slows and hangs after several months of use.8
  • Owners say the Lollipop update either fails to install and leaves the tablet on Android 4.4.2, or never appears on the device.7
  • The touch navigation buttons below the screen have no backlight, so owners cannot see the menu and back buttons in a dark room.3
  • Owners say battery life is weaker than an iPad, and a carrier-preloaded video that starts after locking the screen drains it.3
  • Owners report it shuts off by itself and will not turn back on until a couple of hours later.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

22%

5.3

Performance

20%

3.9

Display

16%

4.8

Camera

14%

3.8

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software

5%

6.7

Design

3%

4.6

Audio

5.1
Reviews score
5.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

6.7
RAM capacity
1.5 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 1.5 GB of RAM, which is less than 76.8% of tablets and equal to 1.2% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon 400, which is more advanced than 51.1% of tablets and equal to 1% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
189 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 189 ppi, which is lower than 66.5% of tablets and equal to 6.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
3.15 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 3.15 MP resolution, which is lower than 89.8% of tablets and equal to 2.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 80.9% of tablets and equal to 5.4% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4, which is narrower than 70% of tablets and equal to 17.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
4,450 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 4,450 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 78.7% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
320 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 320 g, which is lighter than 88.5% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
?
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
1
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 1 speakers, which is fewer than in 90.3% of tablets and equal to the number in 9.6% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 305 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 305 vs Mali-G51
  • 34.7% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (320 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    320 g vs 490 g
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • 51.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (124 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    124 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 305 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 305 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • 34.7% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (320 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    320 g vs 490 g
  • 51.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (124 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    124 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 27.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

    5.1

    Mark 6.9 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (17)
    6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.1 vs 7.0
  • 4.85 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (3.2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    3.15 MP vs 8 MP
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 27.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

    5.1

    Mark 6.9 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (17)
    6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.1 vs 7.0
  • 32.0% lower sentiment score
    5.1 vs 7.5
  • 12.4% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.72 vs 7.6).
    6.72 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2.5 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1.5 GB vs 4 GB
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 30.8% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (450 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    450 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 5 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    May 2014
    2014 vs 2019
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 2.1 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 51 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 63 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (337 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    337 nits vs 400 nits
  • 14.5% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (189 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    189 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (991:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    991:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 4.85 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (3.2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    3.15 MP vs 8 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 32.6% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (4,450 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    4,450 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 1 fewer speakers
    This tablet has less speakers than the average tablet (1 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

5.0
Pallab Hazarika
≈ estimated
13/08/2014
Full review · unboxing, UI, browser, camera and speaker tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G is fine for light daily use, but overpriced compared with faster tablets that cost less.
6.0
mobiscrub
≈ estimated
28/07/2014
Hands-on review · gaming, camera and display tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G is a decent midrange tablet, but its current price is hard to justify.
7.0
GadgetsToUse
≈ estimated
20/07/2014
Unboxing and quick review · sensors, benchmarks, games and GPS
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G is a decent tablet, though weak sensors and indoor GPS make it limited.
8.0
korguenkomodo
≈ estimated
06/07/2014
Hands-on review · gaming, video and app tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G suits buyers who want something decent without spending much, though it is entry-level.
4.0
underKG
≈ estimated
26/05/2014
Hands-on review · performance, screen, software and value
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G performs acceptably, but is overpriced for its hardware and only worth keeping as a gift.
6.0
The YouTube Tech Guy
≈ estimated
20/05/2014
Gaming review · four games and sound tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G runs games well overall, though sound and speaker placement are real problems.
5.0
Android Authority
≈ estimated
18/05/2014
Hands-on review · battery, camera and software tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G is hard to recommend, with competitors offering better options for less money.
7.0
The eBook Reader
≈ estimated
15/05/2014
Walkthrough · dual-window, gaming and screen tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G has a good screen and useful dual-window mode, with limits in text clarity and app support.
4.0
itechcenter
≈ estimated
06/11/2025
Retro review · performance, battery and app tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G is too slow and outdated for modern use, worth it only as a nostalgia project.
7.0
Sim Feng
≈ estimated
15/04/2023
Hands-on review · performance, gaming and build
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G is a big step up from last year's model and performs well for its price, though Pro models are better.
7.0
The YouTube Tech Guy
≈ estimated
11/05/2014
Benchmark test · processor and graphics scores
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G has decent benchmark results, with no sluggishness expected for regular users.
8.0
Karl Conrad
≈ estimated
11/05/2014
Hands-on review · performance tests and multitasking
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G is a clear step up from last year's model, running smoothly day to day but slowing in 3D games.
More graded video reviews (1)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
27/05/2014
Lab test · Mid-sized Android tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 is a reliable, affordable 8-inch tablet, but its low-resolution screen and battery life show its age.
6.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
29/08/2014
Hands-on review · 4G tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 4G is a decent 8-inch tablet with a phone SIM slot, but outdated hardware and a high price make it poor value against rivals.
6.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
18/01/2017
Lab test · Budget 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 is a competent budget tablet with smooth Android performance and long battery life, but it doesn't do enough for the price.
5.0
androidauthority.com
≈ estimated
17/05/2014
Hands-on review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 performs well with a bright, vivid screen and long battery life, but its steep price is hard to justify against better rivals.
7.0
androidcentral.com
≈ estimated
11/06/2014
Extended hands-on test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 is well built and good value for the money, well suited to couch video, but its low-density screen and weak speaker hold it back.
7.0
hothardware.com
✓ explicit
03/07/2014
Full review · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 is a good value for the money, with very long battery life and family features, but its low-resolution screen is its weak point.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB)

  • Compact and lightweight 8-inch design that is easy to hold in one hand
  • Long battery life suitable for several hours of continuous heavy use
  • Smooth performance for basic tasks like web browsing and email
  • Expandable storage via a microSD card slot (up to 64GB supported)
  • Useful software features like Multi-Window multitasking and Kids Mode

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB)

  • Low screen resolution (1280x800) resulting in visible pixelation and fuzzy text
  • Poor camera quality with no flash or autofocus, producing grainy and dull photos
  • Sluggish performance when running 3D games or memory-intensive applications
  • Single rear-facing speaker that sounds tinny and is easily blocked by hands
  • Plastic build quality that lacks a premium feel compared to rivals
  • Capacitive navigation buttons do not light up, making them difficult to use in the dark

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (SM-T331) is a portable mid-range tablet featuring an 8-inch WXGA TFT display with a resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels. It is powered by a 1.2GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor paired with 1.5GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage, which is expandable up to 64GB via a microSD slot. Key characteristics include 3G HSPA+ connectivity for mobile data, a 4,450mAh battery, and a lightweight 320g design with a textured faux-leather back. Main pros include its comfortable one-handed grip, smooth multitasking with the Multi Window feature, and integrated IR blaster for universal remote functionality. However, it is held back by its relatively low-resolution screen compared to competitors, mediocre 3MP rear and 1.3MP front cameras, and a single rear-facing speaker that lacks depth and volume.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 3G (5GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found