OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G (2GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£280RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Exynos 4412

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G (2GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.6

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

90%

5.3

Technical score

10%

8.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 71% of tablets
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

22%

4.6

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

5.6

Camera

14%

4.6

Battery

12%

6.0

Connectivity

8%

6.9

Software & Features

5%

6.6

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 77% of tablets
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

â–²Better than 77% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £280

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
2GB + 16GBCheck price
Other versions:
2GB + 32GB2GB + 16GB2GB + 16GB2GB + 32GB2GB + 32GB2GB + 64GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G (2GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components:

22%

4.6

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

5.6

Camera

14%

4.6

Battery

12%

6.0

Connectivity

8%

6.9

Software & Features

5%

6.6

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.3
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

8.3
Popularity
Popularity
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G (2GB + 32GB) has a user popularity of 7.8 points, which is lower than 76.2% of Tablets.
7.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

60%

5.6

Overall score

40%

9.0

Price

6.6
RAM capacity
2 GB
RAM capacity
2 GB
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
32 nm
Process node
32 nm
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 32 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 82.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Exynos 4412
Chipset
Exynos 4412
â–² Better than 76% of models
This tablet uses the Exynos 4412 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 75.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.5% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1280×800
Screen resolution
1280×800
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1280×800 which is lower than that of 68.1% of tablets and equal to that of 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Pixel density
149 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi which is lower than that of 86.8% of tablets and equal to that of 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.9 MP
Front camera megapixels
1.9 MP
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.9 MP which is lower than in 79.1% of tablets and equal to that in 0.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.6
Main camera aperture
f/2.6
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.6 which is narrower than that of 87.5% of tablets and equal to that of 2% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,000 mAh
Battery capacity
7,000 mAh
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 54% of tablets and equal to those in 3.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Battery life
10 hours
â–¼ Worse than 40% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
600 g
Weight
600 g
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 600 g which is heavier than 76.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.7% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
20 ms
Pen latency
20 ms
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 20 ms, which is higher than that of 67.9% of tablets and equal to that of 8% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G (2GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 4412
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 4412 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 4,412 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    Suitable for drawing
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    Stylus tilt support
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 4 points higher iFixit repairability score
    Repairability score (iFixit)
    8 points
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <0 points – >10 points
    This tablet has a higher repairability score than the average tablet (8 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    8 points vs 4 points
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 4412
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 4412 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 4,412 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    Suitable for drawing
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    Stylus tilt support
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 4 points higher iFixit repairability score
    Repairability score (iFixit)
    8 points
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <0 points – >10 points
    This tablet has a higher repairability score than the average tablet (8 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    8 points vs 4 points
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3.1 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.9 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.9 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.9 MP vs 5 MP
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-400 MP4
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-400 MP4 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 7.3% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G (2GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.62 vs 7.1).
    6.62 vs 7.1
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-400 MP4
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-400 MP4 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • 30% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.4 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.29x larger process node
    Process node
    32 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (32 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    32 nm vs 14 nm
  • 1,066 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    800 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    6.4 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 38.5% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    400 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (400 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    400 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Older DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR2
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1280×800
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1280×800 vs 1920×1200
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    821:1
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (821:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    821:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 72 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    149 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    400 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 3.1 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.9 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.9 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.9 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    720 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    5 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.6
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.6 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.6 vs f/2.2
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G (2GB + 32GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 22.4% heavier
    Weight
    600 g
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (600 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    600 g vs 490 g
  • 11 ms higher pen latency
    Pen latency
    20 ms
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (20 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    20 ms vs 9 ms
  • 7 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019).
    August 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • 0.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    8.9 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    8.9 mm vs 8.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dedoimedo.com
17/05/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 review - A surprise - Dedoimedo
A
avforums.com
03/03/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 Review - AVForums
T
tweaktown.com
22/10/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 Tablet Review
X
xda-developers.com
05/02/2013
Summary of the review
Device Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 - XDA Developers
C
cnet.com
29/08/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 review - CNET
T
theverge.com
15/08/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 review
M
mobiletechreview.com
20/08/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 Review - MobileTechReview These links provide in-depth analyses of the 3G model (GT-N8000).
T
thessdreview.com
08/10/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 Tablet Review - A Hit And A Miss
W
whathifi.com
03/10/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 review | What Hi-Fi?
T
themobileindian.com
08/10/2012
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8000 - The Mobile Indian
T
trustedreviews.com
15/02/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 Review - Trusted Reviews
H
hifitest.de
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
technische Daten Tablets - Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8000
(Translated)Show original
C
computerwoche.de
03/11/2012
Summary of the review
Tablet mit Stylus und Telefonfunktion: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
21/08/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 - Test
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
06/09/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1: Test des Tablet-PCs mit Stift
(Translated)Show original
K
konsument.at
23/11/2012
Summary of the review
Tablet-PCs im Vergleich - Mit vielen Abstrichen
(Translated)Show original
F
futurezone.at
24/08/2012
Summary of the review
Galaxy Note 10.1 im Test: Mit Stift, ohne Stil
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/12/2012
Summary of the review
Test Galaxy Note 10.1, un concept tout en reconnaissance (d'écriture)(www.clubic.com) | 24/08/2012 | Test Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1: la tablette qui so...
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
13/09/2012
Summary of the review
Test : La Galaxy Note 10.1, une tablette de choc pour des créatifs exigeants
(Translated)Show original
T
tablette-tactile.net
05/10/2012
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1
(Translated)Show original
Z
zonamovilidad.es
22/10/2014
Summary of the review
Prueba Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1. TAB Nos hace los deberes ¿Necesitas información técnica adicional sobre el S-Pen o la conectividad 3G de este modelo...
(Translated)Show original
E
elespanol.com
18/10/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1: Review a fondo y experiencia de uso
(Translated)Show original
T
tuexperto.com
16/08/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, análisis a fondo
(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
15/08/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, análisis
(Translated)Show original
T
tech.everyeye.it
19/03/2012
Summary of the review
Provato Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 - Everyeye Tech
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
10/08/2012
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 GT-N8000
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
17/08/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1: met scherpe pen - Review
(Translated)Show original
D
droiddoc.nl
01/01/2022
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8010-N8000-N8020 (2012) Upgrade
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
10/08/2012
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 GT-N8000 - Pagina 8 van 8
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
28/02/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1: tablet met stylus (Preview/Hands-on)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G (2GB + 32GB)

  • Powerful quad-core Exynos processor and 2GB RAM provide smooth multitasking and fast app loading.
  • Precise S Pen stylus allows for high-quality sketching, note-taking, and pressure-sensitive drawing.
  • Innovative split-screen multi-window feature enables true side-by-side app usage.
  • Front-facing stereo speakers offer clear audio quality compared to many other tablets.
  • Expandable storage via microSD slot supports up to 64GB.

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G (2GB + 32GB)

  • Plastic chassis and glossy finish can feel cheap and are prone to fingerprints.
  • Display resolution (1280x800) is lower than contemporary 'Retina' or 1080p competitors.
  • Battery life is generally considered only average, especially under heavy usage.
  • Uses a proprietary 30-pin charging connector instead of the more universal microUSB.
  • Camera quality is mediocre, with grainy low-light performance.
  • Lack of NFC support limits some modern connectivity and sharing features.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 N8000 is a 3G-capable tablet that features a 10.1-inch PLS TFT display with a 1280 x 800 resolution and is powered by a 1.4 GHz quad-core Exynos 4412 processor. This specific variant combines 2GB of RAM with 16GB or 32GB of internal storage, expandable up to 64GB via a dedicated microSD slot, and includes a 5MP rear camera with LED flash alongside a 1.9MP front-facing camera. Its primary strengths are the integrated S Pen with Wacom digitizer for precise input, advanced multitasking through 'Multiscreen' functionality, and a large 7,000 mAh battery that supports extensive use. However, notable drawbacks include a relatively low pixel density of 149 ppi compared to competitors, a plastic build that lacks a premium feel, and its reliance on the older Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich operating system (upgradable to 4.4.2 KitKat).

Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G (2GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 N8000 3G (2GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found