OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£310RAM capacity:6 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:11 inchesChipset:Snapdragon 870

Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB)
8.4/10

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components

90%

8.3

Technical score

10%

9.5

User score

★Better than 90% of tablets
8.6

Value for money

Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

★Better than 97%
8.3

Technical score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 87% of models
Score components

22%

8.1

Performance

20%

8.5

Display

16%

8.9

Camera

14%

8.4

Battery

12%

7.0

Connectivity

8%

9.2

Software & Features

5%

7.7

Design

3%

8.0

Audio & Multimedia

▲Better than 87%
9.5

User score

User score
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

70%

9.3

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 97%
  • xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-pad-6-6gb-128gb-wifi
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
6GB + 128GB8GB + 128GBCheck price8GB + 256GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 87% of models
Score components:

22%

8.1

Performance

20%

8.5

Display

16%

8.9

Camera

14%

8.4

Battery

12%

7.0

Connectivity

8%

9.2

Software & Features

5%

7.7

Design

3%

8.0

Audio & Multimedia

8.3
User score
User score
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

70%

9.3

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.5
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 10 points, which is lower than 91.8% of Tablets.
10
Value for money
Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components:

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

8.6
RAM capacity
6 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 6 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 65.3% of tablets and equal to that of 7% of tablets.
Process node
7 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 7 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 70.2% of tablets and equal to the node used in 6.1% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,169 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 1,169 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 66.8% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Snapdragon 870
This tablet uses the Snapdragon 870 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 67.5% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2880×1800
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2880×1800 which is higher than that of 90.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz which is higher than in 91.2% of tablets and equal to that in 7.5% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
309 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 309 ppi which is higher than that of 93% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass which is stronger than that on 80.1% of tablets and equal to that on 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
8,840 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 8,840 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 82.4% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
33 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 33 W which is faster than in 74.8% of tablets and equal to speeds in 2.9% of tablets.
Battery life
16 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 16 hours, which is longer than that of 90% of tablets and equal to that of 2.2% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP53
This tablet has an IP rating of IP53 which is higher than that of 91.2% of tablets and equal to that of 0.7% of tablets.
Weight
490 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 490 g which is lighter than 49.3% of tablets and equal to the weight of 2.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
10 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 10 ms, which is higher than that of 56.8% of tablets and equal to that of 7.8% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
4
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 4 microphones, which is more than in 93% of tablets and equal to the number in 4.4% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 6 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (16 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    16 hours vs 10 hours
  • 60% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Snapdragon 870 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Snapdragon 870 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2880×1800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2880×1800 vs 1920×1200
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 650 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 650 vs Mali-G51
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 18.8% higher user score
    User score
    9.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.51 vs 8.000).
    9.51 vs 8
  • 20.5% better value for money
    Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.55 vs 7.1).
    8.55 vs 7.1
  • 2.08x more popular
    Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average tablet (10 vs 4.8).
    10 vs 4.81
  • 60% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Snapdragon 870 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Snapdragon 870 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 650 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 650 vs Mali-G51
  • 4,534 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (6,400 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    6,400 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3
  • 2.95x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (44 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    44 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 75.4% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (3,317 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    3,317 points vs 1,891 points
  • 2x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (6 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (7 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    7 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 60.4% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,169 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,169 points vs 729 points
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2880×1800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2880×1800 vs 1920×1200
  • 150 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (550 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    550 nits vs 400 nits
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 37.9% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (309 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    309 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 149 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (550 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    550 nits vs 401 nits
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    99% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • 0.9 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 88 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (309 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    309 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This tablet supports HDR10+, the average tablet does not. 8% of tablets include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1400:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,400:1 vs 1,015:1
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 6 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (16 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    16 hours vs 10 hours
  • 34.3% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8,840 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    8,840 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 83.3% faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (33 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    33 W vs 18 W
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This tablet supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP53 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP53 vs not rated
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1.49 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.5 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.51 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 4 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019).
    April 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • 3 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (4 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    4 vs 1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • 53.95 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (254 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    253.95 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 1 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (10 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    10 ms vs 9 ms
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • 53.95 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (254 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    253.95 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 1 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (10 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    10 ms vs 9 ms
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Vlad’s Gaming Tech World
≈ estimated
01/12/2024
Long-term test · one year of daily use
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi is an excellent budget option after a year, with strong battery life and value, though future updates are uncertain.
9.5
TechStation365
≈ estimated
05/05/2024
Hands-on review · value, build, monitor and gaming tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi is still the best value tablet at its price, though software gaps such as the missing external desktop mode remain.
9.0
Renzo Claros - Tech & Cameras
≈ estimated
22/04/2024
Long-term review · 100 days of desktop-style use
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi is a strong value Android tablet, though a dedicated iPad is better for demanding work.
9.0
C4ETech English
≈ estimated
21/12/2023
Long-term review · months of daily use
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi is a very good value tablet, though smudging, base storage and update support are its weak spots.
9.0
GSMArena Official
≈ estimated
04/08/2023
Full review · display, audio, battery and thermal tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi is a compact, well-rounded Android tablet with plenty of value, missing only a few extras.
9.0
TechNick
≈ estimated
25/07/2023
Detailed review · features, accessories and gaming tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi is one of the strongest mid-range tablets, with a flagship-like feel and a striking display.
8.0
ben's gadget reviews
≈ estimated
21/07/2023
Hands-on review · battery, keyboard and stylus tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi is very attractive for Android users at its Asian price, and less so in Europe.
9.0
My Next Tablet
≈ estimated
22/06/2023
Hands-on review · battery test and comparison with flagships
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi is highly recommended for its display, build and performance, though it cannot fully replace flagship tablets.
9.0
Sebastian Dylag
≈ estimated
11/08/2024
Review · daily use, stylus and display impressions
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi is still worth the money in 2024 and one of the best budget tablets for everyday productivity.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techadvisor.com
11/12/2023
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad 6 Review: The Mid-Range Android Tablet to Beat
G
gbatemp.net
28/07/2023
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad 6 Review (Hardware) - GBAtemp.net
P
pocket-lint.com
14/07/2023
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad 6 review: Budget tablet brilliance(www.gsmarena.com) | July 10, 2023 | Xiaomi Pad 6 review(www.androidauthority.com) | July 6, 2023 | Xiaom...
G
gsmarena.com
02/08/2023
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad 6 review
N
notebookcheck.net
03/07/2023
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad 6 - Notebookcheck.net External Reviews
P
pankajkara.com
02/07/2023
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad 6 Review: Value for money
C
chip.de
03/11/2023
Summary of the review
Gutes Mittelklasse-Tablet: Xiaomi Pad 6 im Test
(Translated)Show original
K
krone.at
22/09/2023
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad 6 im Test: Wo es punktet, wo es täuscht
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
10/08/2023
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Pad 6: la nouvelle référence des tablettes de milieu de gamme!
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
20/10/2023
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Pad 6: la nouvelle reine des tablettes milieu de gamme
(Translated)Show original
C
clubic.com
04/10/2023
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Pad 6: vous ne trouverez pas meilleure tablette à ce prix-là
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
14/11/2023
Summary of the review
Test de la Xiaomi Pad 6: la tablette de milieu de gamme de référence?
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
20/08/2023
Summary of the review
Test de la Xiaomi Pad 6: tablette améliorée avec prise en charge du stylet
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
12/11/2023
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Pad 6 : la nouvelle tablette championne du milieu de gamme ?
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
14/08/2023
Summary of the review
Recensione Xiaomi Pad 6: le scelte giuste
(Translated)Show original
T
techprincess.it
08/12/2023
Summary of the review
La recensione di Xiaomi Pad 6, il pacchetto completo
(Translated)Show original
C
corriere.it
16/10/2023
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad 6 recensione: il tablet da divano per eccellenza
(Translated)Show original
S
startupitalia.eu
14/06/2024
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad 6, lavoro e svago compatti in un unico tablet
(Translated)Show original
S
sportmediaset.mediaset.it
17/08/2023
Summary of the review
Recensione Xiaomi Pad 6: rilancia la sfida all'iPad
(Translated)Show original
T
tech.everyeye.it
26/10/2023
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad 6 Recensione: il miglior tablet di fascia media?
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB)

  • Excellent value for money with high-end specifications at a mid-range price
  • Premium all-metal unibody design that feels sturdy and high-quality in the hand
  • Vibrant 11-inch WQHD+ display with a smooth 144Hz refresh rate
  • Strong performance from the Snapdragon 870 chipset, capable of handling demanding games
  • Impressive quad-speaker system with Dolby Atmos support for immersive audio
  • Good battery life that typically lasts through a full day of mixed use
  • Useful first-party accessories like the Smart Pen 2nd Gen and keyboard cover

What customers don't like about Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB)

  • Lack of biometric security options such as a fingerprint sensor or secure face unlock
  • MIUI software can have bugs, including persistent notifications or odd navigation choices
  • Recurring Widevine L1 issues for some users, limiting streaming quality to SD on Netflix or Prime
  • No expandable storage via microSD or support for SIM cards for mobile data
  • Missing 3.5mm headphone jack
  • Camera bump is large and causes the device to wobble when placed flat on a table
  • Some users report the tablet can get warm during extended high-intensity gaming sessions

Verdict

The Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) is a premium mid-range tablet featuring an 11-inch WQHD+ LCD display with a smooth 144Hz refresh rate and 550 nits of peak brightness. It is powered by the capable Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 processor, paired with LPDDR5 RAM and UFS 3.1 storage for reliable performance in gaming and multitasking. Main pros include its sleek aluminum unibody design, immersive quad-speaker system with Dolby Atmos, and a large 8,840mAh battery that supports 33W fast charging. However, some cons to consider are the lack of a fingerprint sensor, no cellular connectivity or GPS, and the absence of a microSD slot for storage expansion.

Compare Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Pad 6 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found