OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£660RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

90%

6.0

Technical score

10%

6.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 55% of tablets
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

22%

5.9

Performance

20%

5.9

Display

16%

6.6

Camera

14%

4.7

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.4

Software & Features

5%

6.8

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 53% of tablets
6.9

User score

User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.5

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

â–¼Worse than 86% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £660

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
3GB + 16GBCheck price3GB + 32GBCheck price
Other versions:
3GB + 64GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components:

22%

5.9

Performance

20%

5.9

Display

16%

6.6

Camera

14%

4.7

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.4

Software & Features

5%

6.8

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

6.0
User score
User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.5

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

6.9
Popularity
Popularity
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 4.5 points, which is higher than 51.5% of Tablets.
4.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

6.1

Overall score

40%

7.0

Price

6.4
RAM capacity
3 GB
RAM capacity
3 GB
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 3 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 8.5% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
â–² Better than 64% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 64.1% of tablets and equal to those in 1.3% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2560×1600
Screen resolution
2560×1600
â–² Better than 78% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2560×1600 which is higher than that of 77.6% of tablets and equal to that of 10.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
299 ppi
Pixel density
299 ppi
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 299 ppi which is higher than that of 91.4% of tablets and equal to that of 1% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 69.8% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
8,220 mAh
Battery capacity
8,220 mAh
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 8,220 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 76.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
9 hours
Battery life
9 hours
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9 hours, which is shorter than that of 62.7% of tablets and equal to that of 6.8% of tablets.
web browsing
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
?
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
547 g
Weight
547 g
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 547 g which is heavier than 64.7% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–² Better than 55% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2560×1600
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • 33.5% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    299 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (299 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    299 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 330
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 330 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 330 vs Mali-G51
  • Better main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    1080 x 60 fps
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 24.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    8,220 mAh
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8220 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    8,220 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 330
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 330 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 330 vs Mali-G51
  • 33.5% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    299 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (299 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    299 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2560×1600
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • 78 ppi higher screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    299 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (299 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    299 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Better main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    1080 x 60 fps
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 24.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    8,220 mAh
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8220 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    8,220 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    Suitable for drawing
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    2
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Tempered Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • 2.54x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£660 vs £260).
    £660 vs £260
  • 15.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.94 vs 8.000).
    6.94 vs 8
  • 11.4% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.37 vs 7.1).
    6.37 vs 7.1
  • 1,066 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    800 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • 1 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    3 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 30.8% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    450 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (450 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    450 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 14.1% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    12.8 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Tempered Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 5 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    396 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (396 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    396 nits vs 401 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    987:1
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (987:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    987:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 1 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    9 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    9 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    Ethernet support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
    via USB Ethernet adapter
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 11.6% heavier
    Weight
    547 g
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (547 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    547 g vs 490 g
  • 6 older release date
    Release date
    2013
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    October 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • 43.1 mm taller
    Width
    243.1 mm
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (243.1 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    243.1 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

I
ign.com
08/11/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 - 2014 Edition Review - IGN
M
mobiletechreview.com
15/10/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition Review - MobileTechReview
P
pcmag.com
01/10/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Review - PCMag
T
theverge.com
01/10/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 review (2014 Edition) - The Verge
C
cnet.com
01/10/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) review (Includes Snapdragon 800 LTE variant notes)
T
tomshardware.com
08/07/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) Review: Wi-Fi vs. LTE
T
techpowerup.com
15/08/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Note 10.1 (2014) 4G Review (P605)
N
nextpit.com
15/01/2015
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) review: is it still worth buying in 2015? Would you like more technical specifications comparing the 4G LTE Snapdragon...
A
all-things-photography.com
01/12/2013
Summary of the review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition Review
W
wired.com
19/12/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) review - WIRED
L
liliputing.com
23/11/2013
Summary of the review
Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition Review - Liliputing
R
reviewed.com
21/11/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Tablet Review
I
itpro.com
12/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 review (2014)
W
whistleout.com.au
22/04/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) review
4
4g.co.uk
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 4G Review
S
stuff.tv
03/03/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) review (Updated for 4G/LTE context)
T
tomshardware.com
08/07/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Review: LTE version testing
E
expertreviews.co.uk
07/05/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 review Would you like to see a comparison of the benchmark scores between the 4G Snapdragon model and the Wi-Fi Exynos v...
P
pocket-lint.com
23/01/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 review (2014 Edition)
W
whathifi.com
23/01/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) review
U
uk.pcmag.com
04/09/2013
Summary of the review
Hands On With The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition (LTE Performance focus)
C
connect.de
11/12/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition im Test - connect
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
03/01/2014
Summary of the review
Test: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) - COMPUTER BILD
(Translated)Show original
P
pcwelt.de
20/11/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition im Test - PC-Welt
(Translated)Show original
T
tech.de
06/12/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1: Test der 2014-Edition
(Translated)Show original
M
mobiflip.de
28/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
computerwoche.de
15/09/2013
Summary of the review
Neues Note-Tablet: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition im ersten Test Would you like more details on the technical differences between the LTE and W...
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
10/07/2015
Summary of the review
Test de la tablette Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
27/11/2013
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 Edition 2014
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshardware.fr
15/07/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) : Wi-Fi VS 4G
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
11/12/2013
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (Edition 2014)
(Translated)Show original
L
lesandroides.net
24/11/2013
Summary of the review
Test : Galaxy Note 10.1 Edition 2014, reine des tablettes 10 pouces
(Translated)Show original
C
computerhoy.20minutos.es
13/01/2014
Summary of the review
Análisis de Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (Edición 2014)
(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
14/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition, análisis
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
07/12/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition - Techzine.nl
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
18/12/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) | FWD
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
24/01/2014
Summary of the review
Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Review - Tweakers
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
01/12/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) (16 GB, LTE) - Externe Reviews
(Translated)Show original
L
laptopmedia.com
15/01/2015
Summary of the review
Video Review - Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 edition) Would you like help finding firmware updates or technical specifications specific to the SM-P60...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB)

  • Vibrant high-resolution 2560x1600 display with excellent color accuracy
  • Productive S Pen stylus with useful software integration like Action Memo
  • Exceptional multitasking capabilities with Multi Window and side-by-side views
  • Lightweight and portable build compared to previous models
  • Impressive processing power for gaming and creative apps
  • Side-firing stereo speakers provide clear sound quality

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB)

  • TouchWiz user interface can be buggy and prone to occasional lag
  • High initial retail price compared to competitors like the iPad or Nexus
  • Faux leather back cover and plastic chrome edges can feel 'chintzy'
  • Average battery life that may not last through heavy all-day use
  • Handwriting recognition is improved but still imperfect
  • Automatic brightness settings are often too dim

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition 4G (SM-P605) is a high-performance tablet featuring a 10.1-inch WQXGA Super Clear LCD with a 2560 x 1600 resolution and 299 PPI. This LTE variant is powered by a 2.3GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 processor paired with 3GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, expandable via a microSD slot up to 64GB. Key characteristics include the integrated S Pen for advanced productivity, an 8MP rear camera with LED flash, a 2MP front camera, and an 8,220mAh battery within a slim 7.9mm frame. Its main pros are the stunning high-resolution display, exceptional multitasking capabilities through Multi Window, and superior stylus integration. Notable cons include occasional software lag despite the high-end specs, an expensive launch price, and a faux-leather plastic back that some users find less premium than metallic alternatives.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found