OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£550RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

90%

5.9

Technical score

10%

6.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 56% of tablets
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

6.0

Display

16%

6.6

Camera

14%

4.7

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

5.9

Software & Features

5%

7.0

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 54% of tablets
6.9

User score

User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.5

Number of reviews

Based on 27 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 86% of tablets
  • samsung-galaxy-note-10-1-2014-edition-3gb-16gb-4g
samsung-galaxy-note-10-1-2014-edition-3gb-16gb-4g

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
3GB + 16GB3GB + 32GBCheck price
Other versions:
3GB + 64GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

6.0

Display

16%

6.6

Camera

14%

4.7

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

5.9

Software & Features

5%

7.0

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

5.9
User score
User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.5

Number of reviews

Based on 27 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.9
Popularity
Popularity
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB) has a popularity of 4.5 points, which is higher than 51.5% of Tablets.
4.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

6.0

Overall score

40%

7.6

Price

6.5
RAM capacity
3 GB
RAM capacity
3 GB
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 3 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 8.5% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Internal storage
16 GB
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
â–² Better than 64% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 64.1% of tablets and equal to those in 1.3% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2560×1600
Screen resolution
2560×1600
â–² Better than 78% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2560×1600 which is higher than that of 77.6% of tablets and equal to that of 10.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
299 ppi
Pixel density
299 ppi
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 299 ppi which is higher than that of 91.4% of tablets and equal to that of 1% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 69.8% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
8,220 mAh
Battery capacity
8,220 mAh
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 8,220 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 76.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
9 hours
Battery life
9 hours
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9 hours, which is shorter than that of 62.7% of tablets and equal to that of 6.8% of tablets.
web browsing
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
547 g
Weight
547 g
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 547 g which is heavier than 64.7% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
Backlit keyboard
yes
★ Better than 90% of models
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–² Better than 55% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2560×1600
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • 33.5% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    299 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (299 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    299 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 330
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 330 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 330 vs Mali-G51
  • Better main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    1080 x 60 fps
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 24.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    8,220 mAh
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8220 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    8,220 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 330
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 330 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 330 vs Mali-G51
  • 15% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.3 GHz
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 33.5% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    299 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (299 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    299 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2560×1600
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • 78 ppi higher screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    299 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (299 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    299 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 14 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    414 nits
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (414 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    414 nits vs 400 nits
  • Better main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    1080 x 60 fps
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 24.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    8,220 mAh
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8220 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    8,220 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    Suitable for drawing
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    Backlit keyboard
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    2
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • 2.12x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£550 vs £260).
    £550 vs £260
  • 15.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.94 vs 8.000).
    6.94 vs 8
  • 8.9% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.52 vs 7.1).
    6.52 vs 7.1
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    16 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • 1 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    3 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 30.8% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    450 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (450 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    450 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    1,600 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1600 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 14.1% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    12.8 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    987:1
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (987:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    987:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 1 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    9 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    9 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    Ethernet support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
    via USB Ethernet adapter
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 11.6% heavier
    Weight
    547 g
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (547 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    547 g vs 490 g
  • 6 older release date
    Release date
    2013
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    October 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • 43.1 mm taller
    Width
    243.1 mm
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (243.1 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    243.1 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

I
ign.com
08/11/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 - 2014 Edition Review - IGN
M
mobiletechreview.com
15/10/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition Review - MobileTechReview
P
pcmag.com
01/10/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Review - PCMag
T
theverge.com
01/10/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 review (2014 Edition) - The Verge
C
cnet.com
01/10/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) review (Includes Snapdragon 800 LTE variant notes)
T
tomshardware.com
08/07/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) Review: Wi-Fi vs. LTE
T
techpowerup.com
15/08/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Note 10.1 (2014) 4G Review (P605)
N
nextpit.com
15/01/2015
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) review: is it still worth buying in 2015? Would you like more technical specifications comparing the 4G LTE Snapdragon...
A
all-things-photography.com
01/12/2013
Summary of the review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition Review
W
wired.com
19/12/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) review - WIRED
L
liliputing.com
23/11/2013
Summary of the review
Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition Review - Liliputing
R
reviewed.com
21/11/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Tablet Review
I
itpro.com
12/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 review (2014)
W
whistleout.com.au
22/04/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) review
4
4g.co.uk
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 4G Review
S
stuff.tv
03/03/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) review (Updated for 4G/LTE context)
T
tomshardware.com
08/07/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Review: LTE version testing
E
expertreviews.co.uk
07/05/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 review Would you like to see a comparison of the benchmark scores between the 4G Snapdragon model and the Wi-Fi Exynos v...
P
pocket-lint.com
23/01/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 review (2014 Edition)
W
whathifi.com
23/01/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) review
U
uk.pcmag.com
04/09/2013
Summary of the review
Hands On With The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, 2014 Edition (LTE Performance focus)
C
connect.de
11/12/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition im Test - connect
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
03/01/2014
Summary of the review
Test: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) - COMPUTER BILD
(Translated)Show original
P
pcwelt.de
20/11/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition im Test - PC-Welt
(Translated)Show original
T
tech.de
06/12/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1: Test der 2014-Edition
(Translated)Show original
M
mobiflip.de
28/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
computerwoche.de
15/09/2013
Summary of the review
Neues Note-Tablet: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition im ersten Test Would you like more details on the technical differences between the LTE and W...
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
10/07/2015
Summary of the review
Test de la tablette Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
27/11/2013
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 Edition 2014
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshardware.fr
15/07/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) : Wi-Fi VS 4G
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
11/12/2013
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (Edition 2014)
(Translated)Show original
L
lesandroides.net
24/11/2013
Summary of the review
Test : Galaxy Note 10.1 Edition 2014, reine des tablettes 10 pouces
(Translated)Show original
C
computerhoy.20minutos.es
13/01/2014
Summary of the review
Análisis de Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (Edición 2014)
(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
14/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition, análisis
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
07/12/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition - Techzine.nl
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
18/12/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) | FWD
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
24/01/2014
Summary of the review
Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Review - Tweakers
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
01/12/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) (16 GB, LTE) - Externe Reviews
(Translated)Show original
L
laptopmedia.com
15/01/2015
Summary of the review
Video Review - Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 edition) Would you like help finding firmware updates or technical specifications specific to the SM-P60...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 27 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
Based on 2 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB)

  • Vibrant high-resolution 2560x1600 display with excellent color accuracy
  • Productive S Pen stylus with useful software integration like Action Memo
  • Exceptional multitasking capabilities with Multi Window and side-by-side views
  • Lightweight and portable build compared to previous models
  • Impressive processing power for gaming and creative apps
  • Side-firing stereo speakers provide clear sound quality

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB)

  • TouchWiz user interface can be buggy and prone to occasional lag
  • High initial retail price compared to competitors like the iPad or Nexus
  • Faux leather back cover and plastic chrome edges can feel 'chintzy'
  • Average battery life that may not last through heavy all-day use
  • Handwriting recognition is improved but still imperfect
  • Automatic brightness settings are often too dim

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition 4G is a high-performance tablet featuring a 10.1-inch Super Clear LCD with a sharp WQXGA (2560 x 1600) resolution at 299 ppi. This specific 4G/LTE variant (SM-P605) is powered by a 2.3GHz quad-core Snapdragon 800 processor paired with 3GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD up to 64GB. Key characteristics include the integrated S Pen with Wacom technology for precise handwriting and drawing, an 8,220mAh battery, and a sleek design with a faux-leather back. Its main pros are the vibrant, high-resolution display, excellent multitasking capabilities through Multi Window, and the productivity boost provided by the pressure-sensitive stylus. However, some cons include a software experience that can be sluggish or buggy at times, the 'chintzy' feel of the plastic faux-leather materials, and a relatively high price point compared to contemporary rivals.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Note 10 1 2014 Edition 4G (3GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found