Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£670RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:10.5 inchesChipset:?

Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB)
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.2

Technical score

10%

7.2

User score

▲Better than 71% of tablets
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

▼Worse than 52%
7.2

Technical score

Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

8.3

Performance

20%

5.2

Display

16%

7.2

Camera

14%

7.1

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

9.2

Software & Features

5%

7.1

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

▲Better than 73%
7.2

User score

User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 82%
  • microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
  • microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
  • microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
  • microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
  • microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
  • microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
  • microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
microsoft-surface-go-4-8gb-256gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Tablets model ranking

Ranked #185 of 1,145 models in Tablets (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of tablet Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

8.3

Performance

20%

5.2

Display

16%

7.2

Camera

14%

7.1

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

9.2

Software & Features

5%

7.1

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

7.2
User score
User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.2
Popularity
Popularity
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB) has a user popularity of 5.4 points, which is lower than 54.2% of Tablets.
5.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

7.1
RAM capacity
8 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
10 nm
This tablet is built on a 10 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 68% of tablets and equal to the node used in 1.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,224 points
This tablet scored 1,224 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 68.9% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.3% of tablets.
Chipset
?
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1280
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1280 which is higher than that of 66.4% of tablets and equal to that of 1.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
220 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 220 ppi which is lower than that of 50.2% of tablets and equal to that of 1.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass which is stronger than that on 80.1% of tablets and equal to that on 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,663 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 3,663 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 91.5% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
45 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 83.8% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
12.5 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12.5 hours, which is longer than that of 75.4% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
yes
This tablet supports NFC. 89.1% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
521 g
This tablet weighs 521 g which is heavier than 60.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
2
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 85% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    12.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • 85% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3
  • 2,934 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (4,800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    4,800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2.58x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (38.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    38.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 28 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (32 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    32 vs 4
  • 67.9% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,224 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,224 points vs 729 points
  • 28.6% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (10 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    10 nm vs 14 nm
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (1920×1280 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    1920×1280 vs 1920×1200
  • 0.4 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (10.5 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10.5 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 2.5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    12.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports NFC
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • More Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports more Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This tablet supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.1 vs 5.0
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 4 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019).
    October 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • 44.3% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3,663 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    3,663 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • 51 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • 2.58x more expensive
    Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£670 vs £260).
    £670 vs £260
  • 11.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Microsoft Surface Go 4
    the average tablet
    Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.15 vs 8.000).
    7.15 vs 8
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • 51 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 1.8% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (220 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    220 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 44.3% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3,663 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    3,663 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 6.3% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (521 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    521 g vs 490 g
  • 45 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (245 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    245.0 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
30/01/2024
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
03/02/2025
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com
19/02/2024
Summary of the review
C
creativebloq.com
14/11/2023
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
03/02/2025
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
03/02/2025
Summary of the review
C
charlestech.fr
02/09/2024
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
25/03/2024
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
03/02/2025
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
24/11/2023
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
21/12/2023
Summary of the review
O
overclocking.com
15/01/2024
Summary of the review
L
laptopspirit.fr
28/01/2024
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
03/02/2025
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.biz
24/11/2023
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
03/02/2025
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
03/02/2025
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
03/02/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB)

  • Extremely portable and lightweight (521g), making it ideal for travel and field work.
  • Premium magnesium alloy build with a robust, highly adjustable built-in kickstand.
  • High-quality 10.5-inch PixelSense display with accurate colors and a 3:2 aspect ratio.
  • Silent, fanless operation even under load.
  • Useful security features for business, including Windows Hello facial recognition and NFC support.
  • Improved repairability compared to previous generations, with replaceable display and battery.

What customers don't like about Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB)

  • Underwhelming performance from the Intel N200 processor, struggling with multitasking or demanding creative apps.
  • Poor value for money, as the essential Type Cover and Surface Pen are sold separately.
  • Battery life typically falls short of advertised claims, often lasting only 5–7 hours in real-world usage.
  • Limited port selection with only one USB-C port for both charging and data.
  • Thick display bezels give the device a somewhat dated appearance.
  • Slow UFS storage in lower-capacity models compared to faster NVMe SSDs found in larger laptops.

Verdict

The Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB) is a highly portable 10.5-inch Windows 11 Pro tablet featuring an Intel N200 quad-core processor and a 1920 x 1280 PixelSense touchscreen with a 3:2 aspect ratio. It stands out for its premium magnesium build, integrated 165-degree kickstand, and a lightweight 521g frame that makes it ideal for field work and travel. Key advantages include its sharp, colour-calibrated display, 1080p front and 8MP rear cameras, and versatile connectivity via USB-C, a microSDXC card reader, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. However, its main drawbacks are the modest CPU performance which struggles with intensive tasks, slow UFS-based storage compared to standard SSDs, and the fact that essential accessories like the Type Cover and Surface Pen are sold separately.

Compare Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Microsoft Surface Go 4 (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found