OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£190RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.6 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Score components

90%

7.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 67% of tablets
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

8.2

Camera

14%

6.7

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

8.1

Software & Features

5%

6.8

Design

3%

8.6

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 69% of tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £190

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
4GB + 64GB4GB + 128GB6GB + 64GB6GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components:

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

8.2

Camera

14%

6.7

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

8.1

Software & Features

5%

6.8

Design

3%

8.6

Audio & Multimedia

7.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Score components:

60%

7.0

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

7.8
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
Process node
6 nm
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 76.4% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
377 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
377 points
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 377 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 73.1% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
â–² Better than 59% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 58.7% of tablets and equal to those in 1.8% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2000×1200
Screen resolution
2000×1200
â–² Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2000×1200 which is higher than that of 58.2% of tablets and equal to that of 8.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
220 ppi
Pixel density
220 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 220 ppi which is lower than that of 50.2% of tablets and equal to that of 1.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 70% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
7,700 mAh
Battery capacity
7,700 mAh
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,700 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 67.2% of tablets and equal to those in 2.8% of tablets.
Charging speed
20 W
Charging speed
20 W
â–² Better than 60% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 20 W which is faster than in 60.4% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.2% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Battery life
12 hours
â–² Better than 66% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 50% of models
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP52
IP rating
IP52
â–² Better than 85% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of IP52 which is higher than that of 85% of tablets and equal to that of 6.2% of tablets.
Weight
465 g
Weight
465 g
â–² Better than 60% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 465 g which is lighter than 59.7% of tablets and equal to the weight of 1.8% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
yes
aptX Adaptive
yes
★ Better than 93% of models
This tablet supports aptX Adaptive. 93.1% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
Dolby Atmos support
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
N. of speakers
4
â–² Better than 71% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Faster storage type
    Storage type
    UFS
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 610
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1610:1
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1610:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,610:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    8 MP
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 more speakers
    N. of speakers
    4
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <1 – >6
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    Manual shutter speed
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Faster storage type
    Storage type
    UFS
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 610
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.4 GHz
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    Process node
    6 nm
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 20 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    24
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (24 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    24 vs 4
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1610:1
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1610:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,610:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 0.5 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    10.6 inches
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (10.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2000×1200
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2000×1200 vs 1920×1200
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    8 MP
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    Manual shutter speed
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 hours
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • 17% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    7,700 mAh
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7700 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    7,700 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • Supports live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    Dynamic theme
    yes
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    Extra dim mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    Clipboard warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Higher IP rating
    IP rating
    IP52
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP52 vs not rated
  • 2 more speakers
    N. of speakers
    4
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <1 – >6
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    LDAC support
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    aptX Adaptive
    yes
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This tablet supports aptX Adaptive, the average tablet does not. 6.9% of tablets include aptX Adaptive support.
  • Supports aptX Low Latency
    aptX Low Latency
    yes
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This tablet supports aptX Low Latency, the average tablet does not. 2.6% of tablets support aptX Low Latency.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • 48.3% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    377 points
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (377 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    377 points vs 729 points
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 4.81x less popular
    Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE (4GB + 64GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 22.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,466 points
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1466 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,466 points vs 1,891 points
  • 51.2 mm taller
    Width
    251.2 mm
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (251.2 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    251.2 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    400 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 4.81x less popular
    Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE (4GB + 64GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 48.3% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    377 points
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (377 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    377 points vs 729 points
  • 22.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,466 points
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1466 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,466 points vs 1,891 points
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    400 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 1.8% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    220 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (220 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    220 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 51.2 mm taller
    Width
    251.2 mm
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (251.2 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    251.2 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gizbot.com
23/08/2022
Summary of the review
Moto Tab G62 Review: A Good Companion For Home Entertainment
T
tech.hindustantimes.com
11/09/2022
Summary of the review
Moto Tab G62 LTE Review: Just one step short of being a budget all-rounder

Third-party reviews

What we like about Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE (4GB + 64GB)

  • Vibrant 10.6-inch 2K resolution display ideal for binge-watching and reading
  • Impressive 7,700 mAh battery life capable of lasting 2-3 days on a single charge
  • Rich and loud audio quality from a quad-speaker setup with Dolby Atmos support
  • Premium feel with a sturdy, metal and plastic dual-tone minimalist design
  • Clean, near-stock Android 12 software experience with no pre-installed bloatware
  • Inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and 4G LTE connectivity for calls and mobile data

What we don't like about Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE (4GB + 64GB)

  • Sluggish performance and lag during multitasking or scrolling caused by limited RAM and optimization
  • Underwhelming Snapdragon 680 processor that struggles with graphically intensive games
  • Extremely slow charging speeds, taking over 2-3 hours to fully juice the battery with the 20W adapter
  • Basic 60Hz refresh rate makes animations and scrolling feel less fluid compared to competitors
  • Biometric authentication is limited to a face unlock system that can be slow and unreliable
  • Necessary accessories like a stylus or keyboard case are not included and must be purchased separately
  • Cameras are basic and only suitable for document scanning or casual video calls

Verdict

The Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE is a budget-friendly 10.6-inch tablet featuring a 2K IPS LCD (2000 x 1200) display and powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 processor with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of expandable storage. Key strengths include its quad-speaker system with Dolby Atmos for an immersive audio experience, a large 7,700 mAh battery offering multi-day longevity, and a clean, bloatware-free Android 12 software experience with dedicated kids' and entertainment spaces. However, it is limited by a standard 60Hz refresh rate, slow 20W charging that takes nearly three hours for a full cycle, and performance stutters during heavy multitasking or intensive 3D gaming.

Compare Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Motorola Moto Tab G62 LTE (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found