OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

LG G Pad 8.3 LTE (2GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:8.3 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

LG G Pad 8.3 LTE (2GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 38 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

LG G Pad 8.3 LTE (2GB + 16GB)
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

35%

5.3

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.1

Reviews score

10%

8.2

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 51% of tablets
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–²Better than 50%
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

22%

5.2

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

6.0

Camera

14%

3.4

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

6.1

Software

5%

6.1

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

â–¼Worse than 78%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models

80%

7.9

Average grade

20%

9.0

Popularity

Grades by review (38)
21 reviews: 13 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 17 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 68%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • lg-g-pad-8-3-2gb-16gb-lte
lg-g-pad-8-3-2gb-16gb-lte
Where to buy
    N/A~ £260
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the LG G Pad 8.3 LTE (2GB + 16GB)

Based on 21 · 17

Reviewers praise the handy size and sharp screen, but agree the camera, battery life, connectivity and brightness disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the LG G Pad 8.3 LTE (2GB + 16GB)

Based on 160 owners sharing their experience in online comments

52%positive3%mixed45%negative

Owners praise the sharp, roomy display, smooth speed and gaming, while aging software, recovery failures and reliability problems frustrate many.

What owners dislike

  • After a failed flash, owners get stuck in download mode, fastboot or a bootloop, and the LG support tool often stalls at 4 percent.35
  • LG's support tool often fails to detect the tablet, stalls at 4 percent, or shows no upgrade items to fix, so recovery cannot be upgraded.16
  • Root tools fail on some builds, such as Lollipop 5.0.2, and a rooted tablet cannot install system updates, so owners get stuck on old versions.11
  • Owners report random one or two second freezes, and the Lollipop update made it noticeably slower; online videos sometimes lag on 4.4.2.9
  • Owners say LG never released official Lollipop firmware for some models, so the tablets stay on older Android versions.5
  • Owners report the screen going blank or turning white, a blue line across the display, and the screen edge coming loose from the frame.5
  • Some apps report the device as incompatible in the store, and some video files show an unsupported format message.5
  • Owners say the speakers sound muffled or distorted at low volume while headphones sound fine, and carrier calls don't play through them.4
  • Some tablets turn off or restart by themselves, sometimes non-stop, even after a full charge, with no changes made by the owner.4
  • Some owners returned it or switched to Nexus tablets and say the iPad or a faster phone felt better.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet LG G Pad 8.3 LTE (2GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

22%

5.2

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

6.0

Camera

14%

3.4

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

6.1

Software

5%

6.1

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

5.3
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.6
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 2 GB of RAM, which is less than 61.3% of tablets and equal to 15.5% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon 600, which is more advanced than 56.1% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a 1920×1200 screen, which is sharper than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
273 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 273 ppi, which is higher than 79.4% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 2
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass 2, which is more durable than 78.3% of tablets and the same as 1.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 80.9% of tablets and equal to 5.4% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.6
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.6, which is narrower than 87.6% of tablets and equal to 2% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
4,600 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 4,600 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 77.3% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
mixed use
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not support direct OS updates. 79.8% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
338 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 338 g, which is lighter than 85% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

LG G Pad 8.3 LTE (2GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 320 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 320 vs Mali-G51
  • 23.5% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (273 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    273 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 31% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (338 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    338 g vs 490 g
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 60 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (64 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    64 vs 4
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 68% of models

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    9.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (38)
    21 reviews: 13 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 17 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 68% of models

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    9.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (38)
    21 reviews: 13 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 17 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 320 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 320 vs Mali-G51
  • 60 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (64 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    64 vs 4
  • 23.5% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (273 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    273 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • More durable glass
    This tablet has more durable glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    via SlimPort adapter
  • 31% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (338 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    338 g vs 490 g
  • 48.8 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (126.5 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    126.5 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 800 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,066 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,066 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 15% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.7 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 30.8% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (450 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    450 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 5 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    March 2014
    2014 vs 2019
  • 14.1% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 56 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (345 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    345 nits vs 401 nits
  • 71 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (329 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    329 nits vs 400 nits
  • 1.8 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (8.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    8.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 3.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.6 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.6 vs f/2.2
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 30.3% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (4,600 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    4,600 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No keyboard accessory
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • 0.9 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    8.9 mm vs 8 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
MobileCupOfJoe
≈ estimated
27/05/2014
Full review · LTE coverage, software and multitasking
Verdict
LG G Pad 8.3 LTE is probably one of the best tablets for Verizon LTE data, but its software and LTE coverage are drawbacks.
4.0
Hands-On Tech
≈ estimated
09/05/2014
Hands-on review · screen, apps and price
Verdict
LG G Pad 8.3 LTE is not recommended: the screen is weak and preinstalled apps cannot be removed.
7.0
Hardware Canucks
≈ estimated
12/12/2013
Hands-on review · battery, performance and software
Verdict
LG G Pad 8.3 LTE has a place in the tablet market and does the job, but the custom interface and price hold it back.
9.0
PhoneArena
≈ estimated
16/10/2013
Full review · design, camera, audio and battery tests
Verdict
LG G Pad 8.3 LTE has a premium design and a sharp screen, though the camera is weak, and the reviewer calls it definitely worth it.
9.0
Unboxholics
≈ estimated
06/12/2013
Unboxing and first impressions · details and build tour
Verdict
LG G Pad 8.3 LTE has a solid build and smooth performance that make it worth the higher price for an 8-inch tablet.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
12/11/2013
Full review · Android tablet
Verdict
The G Pad 8.3 is a sturdy, sharp Android tablet that rivals the iPad mini 2, though its battery life and camera let it down.
8.0
cnet.com
✓ explicit
10/12/2013
Hands-on review · Stock Android tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 Google Play Edition suits Android purists who want stock Android 4.4 and updates, but it loses LG's useful extras.
6.0
t3.com
✓ explicit
13/01/2014
Review · Mid-sized Android tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is well built and nicely designed, with a memory card slot, but its display and camera are only average.
8.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
13/02/2014
Review · Budget small tablet
Verdict
The G Pad 8.3 is LG's best tablet yet and good value, with a microSD slot, but occasional lag means the Nexus 7 may be better.
10
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
15/04/2014
Review · Small Android tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 beats the Nexus 7 on screen size, processor speed and expandable storage, though the Nexus 7 is cheaper.
7.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
30/10/2013
Lab test · Multi-window tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is a slim, well-built Android tablet with handy multi-window mode, but it is not the best at anything and feels pricey.
8.0
whathifi.com
✓ explicit
13/12/2013
Full review · Premium 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad is a sharp, well-built 8-inch tablet with strong video, expandable storage and a premium look, but it struggles at its price.
8.0
coolsmartphone.com
≈ estimated
30/12/2013
Long-term review · Android tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is a strong tablet for films, music and reading, with a bright screen and IR remote, but its LG software makes it feel slow.
8.0
stuff.tv
✓ explicit
09/11/2013
Review · 8-inch Android tablet
Verdict
The G Pad 8.3 has a bright, sharp screen and a microSD slot its rivals lack, but it feels a touch slower than the Nexus 7.
6.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
17/03/2014
Lab test · Android tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is a fast tablet with strong multitasking and a TV remote, but its dim screen and short battery make video a letdown.
phonearena.com
05/11/2013
Not graded yet
7.4
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
07/03/2014
Lab test · Full HD tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is a light, well-built tablet with a sharp Full HD screen and long battery life, but it is dim outdoors and charges slowly.
8.0
connect.de
≈ estimated
14/01/2014
Full review · Value tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is a fast tablet with a fine screen and attractive price, but it lacks mobile data and cannot move apps to its memory card.
7.0
chip.de
≈ estimated
02/01/2014
Lab test · Mid-size tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is a solidly built tablet with a sharp screen and quick apps, but its average battery and Wi-Fi-only connection hold it back.
8.0
xataka.com
≈ estimated
03/01/2014
Full review · Mid-size tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is a light tablet for home use, with around seven hours of battery, but its screen is not bright enough for outdoors.
9.0
elespanol.com
≈ estimated
01/05/2014
Weeks of use · Mid-size tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is a light, smooth tablet with a vivid Full HD screen for home use, but its camera is weak and demanding games stutter.
7.8
smartworld.it
✓ explicit
09/12/2013
Expert review · Mid-size tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is an excellent tablet with a striking screen and comfortable build, but QPair is still rough and the software could look better.
7.0
tweakers.net
✓ explicit
01/11/2013
Benchmark test · Mid-size tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is a comfortable mid-sized tablet between 7 and 10 inches, but it lags on app launches and its LG software is cluttered.
8.0
bright.nl
≈ estimated
27/11/2013
First impression · Mid-size tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 lasts about a day with normal use and holds its own in its price range, though LG's own apps duplicate Gmail and Chrome.
8.0
tweakers.net
≈ estimated
07/09/2013
Trade-show hands-on · Mid-size tablet
Verdict
The LG G Pad 8.3 is a compact, light tablet with fast hardware and a contrasty screen, but its cluttered LG software needs trimming.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about LG G Pad 8.3 LTE (2GB + 16GB)

  • High-resolution 8.3-inch display (1920x1200) with crisp, sharp visuals
  • Premium build quality featuring a sleek aluminum back
  • Smooth performance powered by a quad-core processor and 2GB RAM
  • Convenient expandable storage via microSD card slot (up to 64GB or more)
  • Useful software features like 'Knock-On' to wake the screen and 'QPair' for smartphone syncing
  • Comfortable, lightweight design that is easy to hold with one hand

What customers don't like about LG G Pad 8.3 LTE (2GB + 16GB)

  • Screen brightness is lower than competitors, making it difficult to use outdoors
  • Average camera quality that lacks a flash and performs poorly in low light
  • Battery life is generally considered 'just okay' and falls short of major rivals
  • LG's custom user interface can sometimes cause lag or feel cluttered
  • Rear-mounted speakers can sound 'tinny' and are easily muffled during use
  • Initial high launch price compared to similar tablets like the Nexus 7

Verdict

The LG G Pad 8.3 LTE is an 8.3-inch Android tablet featuring a 1920x1200 Full HD IPS display with a pixel density of 273 ppi. It is powered by a 1.5 GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 processor paired with 2GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage, which is expandable up to 64GB via a microSD slot. Key characteristics include its premium-feeling aluminum back, dual stereo speakers, and 4G LTE connectivity. Its main pros are the sharp and vibrant display, a slim design that allows for a comfortable one-handed grip, and useful software features like KnockON for waking the screen. However, it is held back by relatively short battery life when using 4G data, a dim backlight that can affect outdoor visibility, and basic 5MP/1.3MP cameras that lack a flash and struggle in low light.

Compare LG G Pad 8.3 LTE (2GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of LG G Pad 8.3 LTE (2GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found