OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Lenovo Tab P10 4G (3GB + 32GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£270RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 450

Lenovo Tab P10 4G (3GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications, 22 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Lenovo Tab P10 4G (3GB + 32GB)
6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

35%

6.2

Technical score

30%

6.2

List score

25%

6.2

Reviews score

10%

6.2

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 81% of tablets
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

▼Worse than 83%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 52% of models
Score components

22%

5.1

Performance

20%

5.4

Display

16%

6.7

Camera

14%

6.1

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

7.5

Software

5%

6.3

Design

3%

8.0

Audio

▲Better than 52%
6.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 65% of models

6.2

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

8.5

Popularity

Grades by review (22)
17 reviews: 10 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 65%
6.2

List score

List score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 138 lists (1%)
★Better than 90%
  • lenovo-tab-p10-3gb-32gb-4g
lenovo-tab-p10-3gb-32gb-4g
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
3GB + 32GB
Other versions:
4GB + 64GB

What reviewers say about the Lenovo Tab P10 4G (3GB + 32GB)

Based on 17 · 5

Reviewers praise the solid build, clear display and good speakers, but complain about slow performance and a poor camera.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo Tab P10 4G (3GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 52% of models
Score components:

22%

5.1

Performance

20%

5.4

Display

16%

6.7

Camera

14%

6.1

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

7.5

Software

5%

6.3

Design

3%

8.0

Audio

6.2
Reviews score
6.2
List score
6.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

7.0
RAM capacity
3 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 3 GB of RAM, which is less than 52.9% of tablets and equal to 8.4% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process, which is smaller than 44.6% of tablets and equal to 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 32 GB of internal storage, which is less than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
168 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 168 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 95.8% of tablets and equal to 1.2% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, which is more advanced than 55% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a 1920×1200 screen, which is sharper than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi, which is higher than 50.1% of tablets and equal to 11.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 5 MP resolution, which is higher than 48.6% of tablets and equal to 19.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2, which is wider than 30.1% of tablets and equal to 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
7,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 7,000 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 53.7% of tablets and equal to 3.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
15 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 15 hours, which is longer than that of 85.6% of tablets and equal to that of 4.1% of tablets.
web browsing
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
440 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 440 g, which is lighter than 69.2% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.7% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Lenovo Tab P10 4G (3GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 506 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 506 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 506 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 506 vs Mali-G51
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • 50% faster touch response
    This tablet samples touch faster than the average tablet (180 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    180 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Fingerprint unlocking
    This tablet supports fingerprint unlocking, while the average tablet does not. 16% of tablets offer this.
    Rear-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • 10.2% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (440 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    440 g vs 490 g
  • 1 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    7 mm vs 8 mm
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 21.5% lower list score
    List score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 138 lists (1%)
    6.2 vs 7.9
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • 77% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (168 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    168 points vs 729 points
  • 59.7% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (762 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    762 points vs 1,891 points
  • 21.5% lower list score
    List score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 138 lists (1%)
    6.2 vs 7.9
  • 11.4% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models

    6.2

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (22)
    17 reviews: 10 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.2 vs 7.0
  • 17.3% lower sentiment score
    6.2 vs 7.5
  • 7.2% worse value for money
    Lenovo Tab P10 4G (3GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (7.04 vs 7.6).
    7.04 vs 7.55
  • 77% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (168 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    168 points vs 729 points
  • 59.7% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (762 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    762 points vs 1,891 points
  • 933 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (933 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    933 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 50% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 49.9% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (7.5 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    7.46 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 1 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 10% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 1 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (1000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.2 vs 5).
    4.2 vs 5
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 66.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (242 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    242 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Hands-On Tech
≈ estimated
20/04/2019
Hands-on review · several weeks of use with Alexa features
Verdict
Lenovo Tab P10 4G is a strong mix of Android tablet and smart display, though many Echo features are still missing.
8.0
Engadget
≈ estimated
29/03/2019
Hands-on review · smart display mode and tablet tests
Verdict
Lenovo Tab P10 4G is a good mix of tablet and smart display, though the Alexa setup has quirks and some features are missing.
8.0
My Next Tablet
≈ estimated
19/11/2018
Hands-on review · battery test and software tour
Verdict
Lenovo Tab P10 4G is a good pick with a solid build and screen if missing Netflix HD playback does not bother you.
7.0
Neowin
≈ estimated
30/03/2019
Unboxing · first impressions · one week of use
Verdict
Lenovo Tab P10 4G is a good concept, but performance could be better and Google features are missing.
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
08/02/2019
Hands-on review · Alexa dock tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Smart Tab P10 is a basic tablet with a slick design, only worth buying if you want it to double as an Alexa display.
6.0
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
26/03/2019
Hands-on test · Smart display tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Smart Tab P10 is a capable Android tablet and Alexa display, but weak speakers and missing calling features hold it back.
7.5
phonearena.com
✓ explicit
23/04/2019
Lab test · Alexa smart display
Verdict
The Lenovo Smart Tab P10 is a premium-looking Alexa smart display with long battery life, but its slow performance, weak camera and slow charging hold it back.
7.0
thecanadiantechie.com
≈ estimated
29/04/2019
Hands-on review · Echo Show alternative
Verdict
The Lenovo Smart Tab P10 works well as an Alexa smart display, but as a tablet its Snapdragon 450 lags and freezes too often.
8.0
engadget.com
≈ estimated
29/03/2019
Hands-on review · Dock and smart display
Verdict
The Lenovo Smart Tab P10 is a good Alexa smart display with a useful dock, but as a standalone Android tablet it is mediocre and sluggish in games.
8.0
t3.com
✓ explicit
04/07/2022
Hands-on review · Teen and kitchen tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Smart Tab P10 is a premium-looking tablet with built-in Alexa, a good first tablet for a teen or kitchen, though it isn't the quickest.
8.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
06/03/2019
Hands-on review · Tablet with speaker dock
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab P10 is a sharp, long-lasting tablet whose speaker dock adds a handy Alexa display, though it can't match an iPad for speed.
8.3
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
21/01/2019
Benchmark test · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab P10 performs much like the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5, but its graphics performance trails most tablets.
5.0
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
18/02/2019
Product test · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab P10 lasts over 16 hours per charge and feels well built, but it works slowly and its cameras take pale, noisy photos.
9.0
winfuture.de
≈ estimated
22/11/2018
Hands-on review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab P10 feels premium with its glass body and fingerprint sensor, but Android 8.1 and Netflix capped at standard definition hold it back.
8.0
pcwelt.de
✓ explicit
11/02/2019
Hands-on test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab P10 has a bright Full HD screen and battery life that matches the iPad, with moderate speed, making it a clear buy on a tight budget.
de.readly.com
14/02/2019
Not graded yet
8.0
lalibre.be
≈ estimated
06/05/2019
Hands-on review · Family tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab P10 feels light and well finished, with a wide-angle IPS screen and four speakers, but its low-resolution cameras disappoint.
8.0
tuexperto.com
≈ estimated
20/09/2019
Hands-on test · Smart display tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Smart Tab P10 works as a tablet and an Alexa speaker dock with surround sound, but 32GB of storage and a wobbly dock hold it back.
8.3
notebookcheck.org
✓ explicit
23/01/2019
Lab test · Family tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab P10 is light, thin and well equipped for families, but its security updates lag and it can't match stronger Android tablets.
7.0
androidworld.nl
≈ estimated
28/04/2019
Three-week test · Family tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab P10 is a family tablet with a premium look and accurate colors, but its glass body is fragile and it wakes from sleep slowly.
7.0
androidworld.be
≈ estimated
24/04/2019
Hands-on comparison · Family tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab P10 suits family use with its premium look and sharp colors, but its fragile glass and old Android software hold it back.
8.3
notebookcheck.nl
✓ explicit
23/01/2019
Lab test · Benchmark results
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab P10 performs in line with other Snapdragon 450 tablets in benchmarks, but trails the Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 in graphics.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Lenovo Tab P10 4G (3GB + 32GB)

  • Premium glass and metal design that feels high-end
  • Excellent value for money compared to higher-priced rivals
  • Vibrant 10.1-inch FHD display with good viewing angles
  • Long-lasting battery life (up to 12-15 hours)
  • Four front-facing Dolby Atmos speakers provide loud, clear audio
  • Innovative 'Show Mode' that turns the tablet into an Alexa smart display when docked
  • Fast and reliable fingerprint sensor for multi-user secure login

What customers don't like about Lenovo Tab P10 4G (3GB + 32GB)

  • Slippery glass surface makes it difficult to hold and prone to sliding off tables
  • Underpowered processor (Snapdragon 450) leads to occasional lag and poor gaming performance
  • Finicky and unreliable docking connection that often drops out
  • Alexa software can be buggy and difficult to set up initially
  • Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity issues reported by multiple users
  • Lack of necessary DRM rights to play Netflix in HD
  • Older version of Android (8.1 Oreo) at launch with slow update cycles

Verdict

The Lenovo Tab P10 4G is a mid-range 10.1-inch Android tablet featuring a premium dual-glass and metal-frame design, a Full HD (1920 x 1200) IPS display, and 4G LTE connectivity for on-the-go access. It is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 octa-core processor paired with 3GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage, which is expandable via microSD. Key characteristics include four front-facing speakers with Dolby Atmos support, a multi-user fingerprint reader for secure family accounts, and an impressive 7,000mAh battery that offers up to 12–15 hours of video playback. Main pros include its sleek high-end build, vibrant display, and excellent battery life, though it faces cons such as sluggish performance during multitasking or high-end gaming and a slippery glass exterior that easily attracts fingerprints.

Compare Lenovo Tab P10 4G (3GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo Tab P10 4G (3GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found