OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Lenovo Miix 630 (8GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£880RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:12.3 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 835

Lenovo Miix 630 (8GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.2

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models
Score components

90%

7.3

Technical score

10%

6.7

User score

▲Better than 73% of tablets
7.3

Technical score

Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Score components

22%

7.6

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

6.9

Camera

14%

9.1

Battery

12%

8.0

Connectivity

8%

7.8

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

6.9

Audio & Multimedia

▲Better than 75% of tablets
6.7

User score

User score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

5.1

Number of reviews

Based on 2 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 89% of tablets
  • lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
  • lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
  • lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
  • lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
  • lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
  • lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
  • lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb
lenovo-miix-630-8gb-128gb

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
8GB + 128GB4GB + 128GBCheck price
Other versions:
4GB + 64GB4GB + 256GB8GB + 64GB8GB + 256GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo Miix 630 (8GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Score components:

22%

7.6

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

6.9

Camera

14%

9.1

Battery

12%

8.0

Connectivity

8%

7.8

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

6.9

Audio & Multimedia

7.3
User score
User score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

5.1

Number of reviews

Based on 2 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.7
Popularity
Popularity
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 52% of models
Popularity:
Lenovo Miix 630 (8GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 5.1 points, which is lower than 51.6% of Tablets.
5.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components:

60%

7.2

Overall score

40%

5.9

Price

6.8
RAM capacity
8 GB
RAM capacity
8 GB
▲ Better than 72% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
10 nm
Process node
10 nm
▲ Better than 68% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 10 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 68% of tablets and equal to the node used in 1.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Internal storage
128 GB
▲ Better than 57% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
▲ Better than 66% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 66.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1280
Screen resolution
1920×1280
▲ Better than 66% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1280 which is higher than that of 66.4% of tablets and equal to that of 1.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
▼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
188 ppi
Pixel density
188 ppi
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 188 ppi which is lower than that of 73.3% of tablets and equal to that of 0.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
▲ Better than 45% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
▲ Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
▲ Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
?
Charging speed
45 W
Charging speed
45 W
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 83.8% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
20 hours
Battery life
20 hours
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 20 hours, which is longer than that of 95.8% of tablets and equal to that of 1.4% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
▲ Better than 50% of models
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
▲ Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
Operating system
Windows
▼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
▲ Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
?
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
▼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
770 g
Weight
770 g
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 770 g which is heavier than 92.4% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
Backlit keyboard
yes
★ Better than 90% of models
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
▲ Better than 55% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
Dolby Atmos support
yes
▲ Better than 69% of models
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
▼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Lenovo Miix 630 (8GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 10 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    20 hours
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (20 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    20 hours vs 10 hours
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    Storage type
    UFS
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    45 W
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 2.2 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    12.3 inches
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 4 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    8 GB
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 540
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 540 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 540 vs Mali-G51
  • Wider color gamut
    Color gamut
    DCI-P3
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    Storage type
    UFS
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 4 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    8 GB
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 540
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 540 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 540 vs Mali-G51
  • 30% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.6 GHz
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 252 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    256
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (256 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    256 vs 4
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    29.8 GB/s
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 28.6% smaller process node
    Process node
    10 nm
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (10 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    10 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.2 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    12.3 inches
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Wider color gamut
    Color gamut
    DCI-P3
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1920×1280
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (1920×1280 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    1920×1280 vs 1920×1200
  • Supports PDAF
    Phase-detection autofocus
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.0
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 10 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    20 hours
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (20 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    20 hours vs 10 hours
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    45 W
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    DisplayPort over USB-C
    yes
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports eSIM
    eSIM support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    This tablet supports eSIM, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support eSIM.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Supports live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    yes
    ▲ Better than 65% of models
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Allows app offloading
    App offloading
    yes
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    Suitable for drawing
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    Backlit keyboard
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    Stylus tilt support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 0.7 mm thinner
    Thickness
    7.3 mm
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7.3 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    7.3 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    2
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports aptX Low Latency
    aptX Low Latency
    yes
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This tablet supports aptX Low Latency, the average tablet does not. 2.6% of tablets support aptX Low Latency.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Windows
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 57.1% heavier
    Weight
    770 g
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (770 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    770 g vs 490 g
  • 16.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    188 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (188 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    188 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • 34% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,249 points
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1249 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,249 points vs 1,891 points
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • 3.38x more expensive
    Lenovo Miix 630 (8GB + 128GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£880 vs £260).
    £880 vs £260
  • 19.6% lower user score
    User score
    6.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Lenovo Miix 630
    the average tablet
    Lenovo Miix 630 (8GB + 128GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.69 vs 8.000).
    6.69 vs 8
  • 34% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,249 points
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1249 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,249 points vs 1,891 points
  • 16.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    188 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (188 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    188 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 33 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    188 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (188 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    188 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    400 nits
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1000:1
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (1000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.1
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.1 vs 5.0
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Windows
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 57.1% heavier
    Weight
    770 g
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (770 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    770 g vs 490 g
  • 117.7 mm wider
    Width
    293.0 mm
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (293 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    293.0 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
trustedreviews.com
09/01/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630 hands-on Review
G
gstylemag.com
21/08/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630 – A Windows Laptop With the Heart of a Smartphone [Review]
N
neowin.net
03/09/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630 review: Windows on Snapdragon can only get better from here
W
windowscentral.com
20/07/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630 review: A solid Windows 10 on ARM PC for those who can wait
T
thegamerwithkids.com
21/08/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630 – 12-inch Windows 2 in 1 Laptop Review
T
techradar.com
08/01/2018
Summary of the review
Hands on: Lenovo Miix 630 review
N
notebookcheck.com
28/03/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630-12Q35 (Übersicht externer Tests)
(Translated)Show original
W
windowsarea.de
27/02/2019
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630: Weshalb Windows 10 ARM besser ist als das iPad
(Translated)Show original
N
notebooks-und-mobiles.de
21/08/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630 Convertible (Windows, ARM) im Test
(Translated)Show original
F
faz.net
15/09/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630 im Test: Auf den Arm genommen - FAZ
(Translated)Show original
W
windowsarea.de
22/12/2018
Summary of the review
Windows 10 ARM im Test Teil 1: Programme & Performance im Alltag
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
17/12/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 630-12Q35 (81F1000QGE) Test
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
14/12/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 630 im Review - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
L
laptopmedia.com
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630 - Spécifications, tests et prix Souhaitez-vous des précisions sur les performances d'émulation de ce modèle ou sur son autonomie réell...
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
18/12/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630 série (Synthèse de tests)
(Translated)Show original
E
es.gizmodo.com
09/01/2018
Summary of the review
Probamos el Miix 630: Lenovo asegura que este laptop con Snapdragon tiene 20 horas de batería
(Translated)Show original
T
tuttotech.net
28/02/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630: caratteristiche e video anteprima
(Translated)Show original
I
ilfattoquotidiano.it
23/11/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630, il notebook sempre connesso grazie alla nano SIM
(Translated)Show original
W
wired.it
24/10/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 630, un processore da smartphone dentro un computer: il nostro test
(Translated)Show original
A
andreagaleazzi.com
14/01/2019
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix630 RECENSIONE - Andrea Galeazzi
(Translated)Show original
B
bright.nl
20/01/2018
Summary of the review
Top 5: de beste nieuwe laptops van 2018
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 2 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
Based on 48 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Lenovo Miix 630 (8GB + 128GB)

  • Incredible battery life, often reaching 15–17 hours in real-world testing
  • Always-on 4G LTE connectivity for internet access without Wi-Fi
  • Fanless design allows for completely silent operation
  • Premium build quality with a high-end aluminum chassis
  • Includes essential accessories (keyboard cover and active pen) in the base price
  • Vibrant and crisp 12.3-inch display with 1920x1280 resolution
  • Instant-on capability similar to a smartphone

What we don't like about Lenovo Miix 630 (8GB + 128GB)

  • Compromised performance; the Snapdragon 835 can feel laggy even with basic tasks like web browsing
  • Major app compatibility issues due to the ARM processor, especially for x64 or complex third-party software
  • Keyboard cover is known for being buggy and frequently missing keystrokes
  • Ships with Windows 10 S, which restricts users to Microsoft Store apps only (though a free upgrade to Pro is available)
  • Limited physical ports, featuring only a single USB-C port and a headphone jack
  • Screen auto-brightness can be finicky and cause distracting flickering in some lighting conditions
  • Thick display bezels compared to more modern competitors like the Surface Pro

Verdict

The Lenovo Miix 630 is a versatile 2-in-1 detachable tablet featuring a 12.3-inch WUXGA+ (1920 x 1280) IPS touchscreen and an ARM-based Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 processor. This specific configuration includes 8GB of LPDDR4 RAM and 128GB of UFS 2.1 storage, offering improved multitasking over base models. Key characteristics include an incredibly thin 7.3mm fan-less metal chassis, integrated 4G LTE connectivity for constant on-the-go access, and a dual IR camera supporting Windows Hello facial recognition. Main pros are its exceptional battery life of up to 20 hours, silent operation, and the inclusion of a backlit keyboard and active pen in the box. However, it faces notable cons, such as limited port selection with only a single USB-C port and reduced app compatibility due to the ARM architecture, which struggles with 64-bit applications and intensive productivity tasks.

Compare Lenovo Miix 630 (8GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo Miix 630 (8GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found