Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Withings ScanWatch Horizon review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£440Screen size:?Battery life:30 daysDisplay type:OLED

Withings ScanWatch Horizon Review: Compare 127 technical specifications, 42 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Withings ScanWatch Horizon
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

6.3

Technical score

30%

6.3

List score

25%

8.3

Reviews score

10%

9.0

Sentiment score

▲Better than 53% of smartwatches
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

▼Worse than 73%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

24%

7.4

Health

21%

8.9

Fitness

16%

7.1

Battery

14%

3.4

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

6.5

Display & Design

4%

3.1

Hardware

▼Worse than 51%
8.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

8.8

Popularity

Grades by review (42)
30 reviews + 12 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 73%
6.3

List score

List score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 119 lists (1%)
▲Better than 76%

What reviewers say about the Withings ScanWatch Horizon

Based on 9 · 13

Reviewers almost universally love the stylish design and long battery life, but the missing built-in GPS disappoints many.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Withings ScanWatch Horizon

Based on 71 owners sharing their experience in online comments

55%positive8%mixed37%negative

Owners praise its classic design and long battery life, while heart rate accuracy and repair support frustrate many.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say support does not help and repair is refused, since the case cannot be opened, even for a faulty side button after warranty.7
  • Heart rate readings drop or go wild during hard efforts, above about 130 beats per minute, and can read far too low on a cross-trainer.6
  • Nightly breathing scans can drain up to 20 percent in one night and cut battery life to 3 to 7 days.4
  • Notifications often fail to arrive, calls are the most reliable, and a missed alert cannot be brought back up on the watch later.4
  • Step counts can be up to a third low, with many indoor steps missed, such as pushing a shopping cart.3
  • Overnight oxygen gives only an OK or not OK result with no graph, and sleep tracking relies on movement alone.3
  • Moisture can get inside the case, and the back can come loose or start to wiggle after about one to two years.3
  • The crown is often pressed by accident when worn on the left wrist, starting a workout, and the side button can become faulty.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Withings ScanWatch Horizon

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

24%

7.4

Health

21%

8.9

Fitness

16%

7.1

Battery

14%

3.4

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

6.5

Display & Design

4%

3.1

Hardware

6.3
Reviews score
8.3
List score
6.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

7.4
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
yes
This smartwatch supports ECG. 82% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
30 days
This smartwatch lasts 30 days on a charge, which is longer than 95.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 1% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
320 mAh
This smartwatch has a 320 mAh battery, which is larger than 53.6% of Smartwatches and the same as 1% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 120 min, which is quicker than 13.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 44.6% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS, which is less advanced than the system in 54.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 42% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 69.3% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 59.8% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
?
Display type
OLED
This smartwatch uses OLED, which is less advanced than the screen in 53.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 9.1% of Smartwatches.
Grayscale panel.
Resolution
80x 116
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 80x116 which is lower than that of 97.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
282 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 282 ppi, which is lower than 71.7% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
400 nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 400 nits, which is lower than 93.4% of Smartwatches and equal to 2.5% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Withings ScanWatch Horizon vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 23 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (30 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    30 days vs 7 days
  • ECG support
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 18.1% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.2% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 18.6% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (42)
    30 reviews + 12 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 7.0
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, stainless steel for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, stainless steel vs silicone
  • 18.6% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (42)
    30 reviews + 12 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 7.0
  • 20.0% higher sentiment score
    9.0 vs 7.5
  • ECG support
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 18.1% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • 23 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (30 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    30 days vs 7 days
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.2% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, stainless steel for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, stainless steel vs silicone
  • Hybrid watch design
    This smartwatch has a hybrid design, the average smartwatch does not. 8.6% of smartwatches have a hybrid design.
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • 20.3% lower list score
    List score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 119 lists (1%)
    6.3 vs 7.9
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No always-on display
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 70.3% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 20.3% lower list score
    List score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 119 lists (1%)
    6.3 vs 7.9
  • 4x more expensive
    Withings ScanWatch Horizon is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£440 vs £110).
    £440 vs £110
  • 4.9% worse value for money
    Withings ScanWatch Horizon has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.4 vs 7.8).
    7.4 vs 7.76
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • 60 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (30 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    Reported as at least 30 exercise modes.
    30 vs 90
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • No always-on display
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 70.3% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Weaker ingress protection
    This smartwatch has weaker ingress protection than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    Also reported with 10 ATM water-resistance rating.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 27 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (72 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    72 g vs 45 g
  • 350 nits dimmer screen
    This smartwatch has a dimmer screen than the average smartwatch (400 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    400 nits vs 750 nits
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (OLED vs AMOLED).
    Grayscale panel.
    OLED vs AMOLED
  • Lower resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 80x116, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    80x116 vs 360x360
  • 1.58 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (13.3 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    13.28 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • No touchscreen
    This smartwatch does not have a touch screen, the average smartwatch does. 91.5% of smartwatches have a touch screen.
  • 44 ppi less sharp screen
    This smartwatch has a less sharp screen than the average smartwatch (282 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    282 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No call controls
    This smartwatch does not offer call control, the average smartwatch does. 91.2% of smartwatches offer call control.
  • No passcode
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 70.4% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No phone finder
    This smartwatch does not include phone finder, the average smartwatch does. 96.4% of smartwatches include phone finder.
  • No widget support
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 84.4% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • No gesture control
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 79.6% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • No camera remote
    This smartwatch does not include built-in camera remote control, the average smartwatch does. 85.5% of smartwatches that are equipped with a camera include built-in camera remote control.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
ZDNET
≈ estimated
21/06/2022
Hands-on review · alarm, sport modes and design
Verdict
Withings ScanWatch Horizon suits buyers who want a classic look with basic fitness tracking.
9.0
Mike O'Brien
≈ estimated
03/06/2022
Hands-on review · heart rate, floor and weight tests
Verdict
Withings ScanWatch Horizon looks great and lasts about a month per charge, despite no NFC and a heavy case.
9.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
02/06/2022
Full review · two weeks of daily use
Verdict
Withings ScanWatch Horizon has a classic look and strong heart monitoring, but it is expensive and its sleep tracking is rough.
6.0
Product Impressions
≈ estimated
14/05/2022
Hands-on review · one week of wear, sleep and activity tests
Verdict
Withings ScanWatch Horizon is stylish and comfortable with fine heart and oxygen readings, but its sleep tracking is unreliable.
7.0
The Quantified Scientist
≈ estimated
29/12/2021
Scientific test · heart rate, sleep and SpO2 accuracy
Verdict
Withings ScanWatch Horizon is good enough for basic sleep and SpO2 tracking, but weaker on detailed sleep stages and heart rate during movement.
9.0
Esbjorn Reviews
≈ estimated
15/11/2021
Hands-on review · design, app and battery
Verdict
Withings ScanWatch Horizon is not perfect and no replacement for automatic watches, but a strong option for watch fans.
6.0
Eanicus Tech Channel
≈ estimated
09/01/2023
Long-term wear · return decision after daily use
Verdict
Withings ScanWatch Horizon is attractive and feature-rich, but too heavy for daily wear, so the reviewer is sending it back.
Brand video
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
18/05/2022
Week-long review · Diver-style hybrid
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon is a classic-looking diver's watch with clinical health tracking and a battery lasting over a week, but its bulk and weak workout tracking limit it.
8.0
cnet.com
✓ explicit
02/06/2022
Hands-on review · Hybrid health watch
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon suits people who want a classic dive watch that tracks health, but its tiny screen and lack of voice control limit everyday use.
8.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
14/06/2022
Hands-on review · Diver-style hybrid
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon is a striking, sturdy health watch that suits casual wearers, while serious runners and fans of detailed heart data will find it lacking.
8.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
27/06/2022
Hands-on test · Classic dive watch
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon suits health-focused buyers who want a dive watch and lasts about nine days with every tracker on, though it's heavy and lacks GPS.
9.0
eftm.com
≈ estimated
07/07/2022
Hands-on review · Classic watch look
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon suits watch lovers who want a classic look with health tracking, lasting around three weeks between charges.
9.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
11/07/2022
Hands-on review · Premium metal hybrid
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon suits buyers wanting a premium metal dive watch, though its weight and missing GPS may put off active wearers.
8.6
pickr.com.au
✓ explicit
20/07/2022
Hands-on test · Diver-style smartwatch
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon has an analog look and lasts close to two weeks between charges, but it has no GPS or mobile payments.
8.0
livescience.com
✓ explicit
13/09/2022
Hands-on review · Everyday health monitor
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon is a good-looking everyday health monitor with ECG and blood-oxygen tests, but its workout feedback is not detailed enough for keen exercisers.
7.0
androidauthority.com
✓ explicit
07/08/2022
Hands-on review · Luxury health watch
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon is a handsome, medically certified watch for ECG and sleep-apnea tracking, but it does little as a fitness or smartwatch.
8.0
techguide.com.au
✓ explicit
08/07/2022
Hands-on review · Dive-style smartwatch
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon suits people who want a stylish dive watch with long battery life, though it's heavy and needs your phone for routes.
9.0
the-gadgeteer.com
≈ estimated
04/07/2022
Hands-on test · Hybrid fitness watch
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon is a luxury-looking watch with well-validated ECG checks, but step counts can drift and alarms need the phone.
8.0
mensfitness.co.uk
✓ explicit
01/09/2022
Hands-on review · Premium hybrid watch
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon suits buyers who want a classic watch that tracks health and lasts weeks, not a GPS sports watch or app-based smartwatch.
Z
zdnet.com
21/06/2022
✓ explicit
10
Summary of the review
T
thegamerwithkids.com
01/06/2022
≈ estimated
9.5
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
17/05/2022
≈ estimated
9.0
Summary of the review
8.0
tomsguide.fr
✓ explicit
18/07/2022
Long-term test · Diver-style hybrid
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon suits watch lovers who want a diver-style look with health tracking, but its single button and lack of GPS limit sport use.
8.0
presse-citron.net
✓ explicit
26/12/2021
One-month test · Diver-style hybrid
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon suits fans of discreet watches who want full health sensors, but flat glass that shows fingerprints and a bracelet that scratches easily spoil the look.
9.0
verygoodlord.com
≈ estimated
28/10/2021
Hands-on test · Diver-style hybrid
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon is a diver-style watch that tracks heart and sleep well and suits classic-watch fans, but it is heavier than the 38mm ScanWatch.
6.0
smarthealth.live
≈ estimated
24/02/2022
Three-month test · Switching from Fitbit
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon suits Fitbit users who want a classic watch, but it misses REM sleep and gives poor heart-rate readings during workouts.
9.0
mensup.fr
≈ estimated
21/09/2022
Hands-on test · Classic-looking health watch
Verdict
The Withings ScanWatch Horizon looks like a classic watch and tracks health reliably with a month-long battery, but its lack of built-in GPS is its main limit.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Withings ScanWatch Horizon

  • Exceptional battery life (up to 30 days)
  • Premium 'luxury dive watch' design with stainless steel and sapphire glass
  • Clinically validated health features including medical-grade ECG and SpO2
  • High-quality build with 10 ATM (100m) water resistance
  • Comprehensive and user-friendly Health Mate companion app
  • Included toolkit for easy adjustment of the metal link band
  • Automatic activity detection for over 30 different sports

What customers don't like about Withings ScanWatch Horizon

  • Lack of built-in GPS (requires a smartphone connection for route mapping)
  • Small OLED screen can be difficult to read for long notifications
  • Bulky and heavy profile may be uncomfortable for small wrists or sleeping
  • Limited 'smart' functionality (no NFC, voice assistant, or call answering)
  • Basic sleep tracking lacks REM stage detection and can be inaccurate
  • Weak magnetic charger connection that can easily become unaligned
  • No ability to store or control music directly from the watch

Verdict

The Withings ScanWatch Horizon is a premium hybrid smartwatch designed as a medical-grade diver's timepiece, featuring a 43mm 316L stainless steel case, a unidirectional rotating bezel, and scratch-resistant sapphire glass with an anti-reflective coating. Its standout health suite includes a clinically validated 30-second electrocardiogram (ECG) for Atrial Fibrillation detection, a medical-grade pulse oximeter (SpO2), and overnight respiratory scanning for breathing disturbances. Key pros include an exceptional battery life of up to 30 days (plus 20 additional days in power reserve), 10 ATM water resistance (100m), and a discrete PMOLED screen that displays essential metrics and notifications without compromising the classic analog aesthetic. However, notable cons include its significant weight (72g watch only), the absence of built-in GPS (relying on a connected smartphone), a lack of REM sleep tracking, and a small monochrome display that can make reading long text notifications difficult.

Compare Withings ScanWatch Horizon with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Withings ScanWatch Horizon and other Smartwatches

No results found