OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Urban Titanium Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Screen size:?Battery life:5 daysDisplay type:IPS LCD

Urban Titanium Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 2 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

70%

5.3

Technical score

30%

7.3

Review score ( 1 · 1)

Review score 30% · 7.3 · based on 1 written review + 1 video
1 written review + 1 video count as 1.3 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 79% of smartwatches
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

24%

6.2

Health

21%

5.0

Fitness

16%

4.7

Battery

14%

5.0

Smart features

12%

2.9

Connectivity

9%

7.1

Display & Design

4%

8.1

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 77% of smartwatches
7.3

Review score

Review score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Grades by review (2)
Text reviews 1
≈ estimated
1

20%

8.0

financialexpress.com

Video reviews 1

5%

8.0

Honest Watch Reviews

estimated from the review
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 71% of smartwatches
  • urban-titanium
  • urban-titanium
  • urban-titanium
  • urban-titanium
  • urban-titanium
  • urban-titanium
  • urban-titanium
  • urban-titanium
  • urban-titanium
urban-titanium
urban-titanium
urban-titanium
urban-titanium
urban-titanium
urban-titanium
urban-titanium
urban-titanium
urban-titanium

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Urban Titanium

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components:

24%

6.2

Health

21%

5.0

Fitness

16%

4.7

Battery

14%

5.0

Smart features

12%

2.9

Connectivity

9%

7.1

Display & Design

4%

8.1

Hardware

5.3
Review score
Review score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Grades by review (2)
Text reviews 1
≈ estimated
1

20%

8.0

financialexpress.com

Video reviews 1

5%

8.0

Honest Watch Reviews

estimated from the review
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

5.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.1
Brand name
Urban
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
no
Distance tracking
no
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
This smartwatch does not support distance tracking. 96% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
5 days
Battery life
5 days
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 5 days which is shorter than that of 63.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
32 h
Battery life in training mode
32 h
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 32 h in training mode which is longer than 77.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.7% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
210 mAh
Battery power
210 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 210 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 83.4% of smartwatches and equal to those in 2.7% of smartwatches.
Charge time
150 min
Charge time
150 min
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 150 min which is slower than 88.7% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 7.2% of smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 150 minutes.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
?
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartwatch uses a IPS LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 67.4% of smartwatches and the same as that of 6.6% of smartwatches.
Resolution
454x 454
Resolution
454x 454
â–² Better than 80% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454 which is higher than that of 79.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
328 ppi
Pixel density
328 ppi
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 328 ppi which is higher than that of 55.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
600 nits
Display brightness
600 nits
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 600 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 38.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 14.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Urban Titanium vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • 12.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    32 h
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (32 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    32 h vs 19.25 h
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Supports ANT+
    ANT+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 11.7% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 40 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    120
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (120 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 120 exercise modes.
    120 vs 80
  • 6.5x cheaper
    Urban Titanium is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£20 vs £130).
    £20 vs £130
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 40 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    120
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (120 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 120 exercise modes.
    120 vs 80
  • 12.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    32 h
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (32 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    32 h vs 19.25 h
  • Supports ANT+
    ANT+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 11.7% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.1
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.1 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.1 vs 5.0
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Better band material
    Band material
    stainless steel
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    stainless steel vs silicone
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    454 x 454
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    454x454 vs 352x430
  • 33 mm shorter watch height
    Height
    12.0 mm
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is shorter than the average smartwatch (12 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    12.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    August 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • 48.8 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.2 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.2 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    1.2 m vs 50 m
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • 5.6% worse value for money
    Urban Titanium has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.12 vs 7.5).
    7.12 vs 7.52
  • 77.5% less popular
    Urban Titanium has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (3.45 vs 6.1).
    3.45 vs 6.12
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No distance tracking
    Distance tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartwatch does not support distance tracking, the average smartwatch does. 95.9% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
  • 90 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    210 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (210 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    210 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 2 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    5 days vs 7 days
  • 30 min longer charge time
    Charge time
    150 min
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges slower than the average smartwatch (150 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 150 minutes.
    150 min vs 120 min
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 48.8 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.2 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.2 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    1.2 m vs 50 m
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch uses IPS LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    IPS LCD vs AMOLED
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No gesture control
    Gesture control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 77.7% of smartwatches support gesture control.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
financialexpress.com
≈ estimated
18/09/2023
Hands-on test · Office smartwatch
Verdict
The Urban Titanium suits office workers, with a zinc alloy case, a 1.43-inch display and over a week of battery, though health and fitness features were only satisfactory.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Urban Titanium

  • Premium design featuring a metal strap and 'corporate' aesthetic
  • Bright 1.39-inch HD display with 600 nits brightness for good sunlight visibility
  • Advanced Bluetooth calling functionality with a noise-isolating microphone
  • Comprehensive health monitoring including SpO2, heart rate, and body temperature
  • Offers over 100 sports modes for diverse activity tracking
  • Competitive battery life, rated for up to 5 days on a single charge

What we don't like about Urban Titanium

  • Reports of poor physical durability, specifically regarding the on/off button breaking easily
  • Mixed feedback on app performance, with some users reporting sync issues and an unintuitive interface
  • General dissatisfaction with overall product quality in some units, labeled as 'unsuccessful' by some buyers
  • Lack of advanced smart features found in higher-end models, such as onboard GPS or a loudspeaker for music

Verdict

The Urban Titanium is a corporate-styled smartwatch featuring a 1.39-inch Ultra HD IPS display with 600 nits of brightness and a 60Hz refresh rate. Encased in a durable zinc alloy finish with a premium stainless steel strap, it includes advanced Bluetooth calling supported by a noise-isolating microphone and a dedicated speaker. Key health tracking capabilities include 24/7 monitoring of heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure, and a specialized body temperature sensor, alongside over 100 sports modes and customizable watch faces. While its pros include a sleek professional design, clear outdoor visibility, and a solid battery life of approximately 5 to 7 days, it lacks integrated GPS for standalone route tracking and does not support Wi-Fi or NFC for contactless payments.

Compare Urban Titanium with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Urban Titanium and other Smartwatches

No results found