OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Screen size:1.69 inchBattery life:7 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 7 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

70%

5.6

Technical score

30%

8.0

Review score ( 0 · 7)

Review score 30% · 8.0 · based on 7 videos
7 videos count as 3.5 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 59% of smartwatches
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

24%

5.9

Health

21%

7.3

Fitness

16%

5.7

Battery

14%

4.8

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.4

Display & Design

4%

8.0

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 67% of smartwatches
8.0

Review score

Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Grades by review (7)
Video reviews 7

10%

9.0

Technoarzoo

10%

9.0

AR Smart Reviews

10%

9.0

Mr LazyTech

10%

9.0

Online Chashka

10%

8.0

Curious SR

10%

8.0

WhySoTechie

10%

7.0

Vimal Chintapatla

estimated from the review
7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 66% of smartwatches
  • noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
  • noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
  • noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
  • noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
  • noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
  • noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
  • noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz
noise-colorfit-pulse-go-buzz

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components:

24%

5.9

Health

21%

7.3

Fitness

16%

5.7

Battery

14%

4.8

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.4

Display & Design

4%

8.0

Hardware

5.6
Review score
Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Grades by review (7)
Video reviews 7

10%

9.0

Technoarzoo

10%

9.0

AR Smart Reviews

10%

9.0

Mr LazyTech

10%

9.0

Online Chashka

10%

8.0

Curious SR

10%

8.0

WhySoTechie

10%

7.0

Vimal Chintapatla

estimated from the review
7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.4
Brand name
Noise
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
Readings are for wellness use, not medical diagnosis.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 7 days which is longer than that of 38.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 17.1% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
300 mAh
Battery power
300 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 300 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 44.5% of smartwatches and equal to those in 6.7% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Proprietary OS (RTOS).
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.69 inch
Screen size
1.69 inch
â–² Better than 80% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.69 inch which is larger than the screens of 79.7% of smartwatches and equal to those of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch uses a TFT LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 74.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 15.9% of smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 280
Resolution
240x 280
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x280 which is lower than that of 70.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.6% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
218 ppi
Pixel density
218 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 218 ppi which is lower than that of 86% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
500 nits
Display brightness
500 nits
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 500 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 70% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.6% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 21.9 g lighter weight
    Weight
    23.1 g
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (23.1 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    23.1 g vs 45.0 g
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • 0.29 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.69 inch
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.69 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 6.5x cheaper
    Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£20 vs £130).
    £20 vs £130
  • 63.4% more popular
    Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • 6.5x cheaper
    Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£20 vs £130).
    £20 vs £130
  • 63.4% more popular
    Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • 21.9 g lighter weight
    Weight
    23.1 g
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (23.1 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    23.1 g vs 45.0 g
  • 0.29 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.69 inch
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.69 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 6.8 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    35.2 mm
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (35.2 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    35.2 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No swim mode
    Swim sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 74.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No swim mode
    Swim sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 74.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • 108 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    218 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (218 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    218 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 100 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    500 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    500 nits vs 600 nits
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    240 x 280
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x280, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    240x280 vs 352x430
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch does not support calendar sync, the average smartwatch does. 94.8% of smartwatches support calendar sync.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Technoarzoo
≈ estimated
01/10/2022
Unboxing and review · calling, features and app tests
Verdict
Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz is a good pick for Bluetooth calling and features, especially when bought on offer.
7.0
Vimal Chintapatla
≈ estimated
06/09/2022
Hands-on review · calling tests and battery life
Verdict
Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz is a budget calling watch with a good display, held back by average battery life and no calculator app.
9.0
Online Chashka
≈ estimated
06/09/2022
Hands-on review · calling, interface and value for money
Verdict
Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz is good value for money, a worthwhile pick for anyone who wants to take calls on their wrist.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 0 · 7

Reviewers love the calling and solid design, but nearly everyone agrees the battery life falls short.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz

  • Affordable price point for a Bluetooth calling smartwatch
  • Bright 1.69-inch TFT LCD display (500 nits) with good outdoor visibility
  • Clear audio quality for calls through the built-in speaker and microphone
  • Wide selection of over 150 cloud-based watch faces
  • Lightweight and comfortable polycarbonate build with soft silicone straps
  • Comprehensive health suite including 24/7 heart rate and SpO2 monitoring
  • IP68 water and dust resistance rating

What we don't like about Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz

  • Battery life drops significantly from 7 days to 1-2 days with heavy calling
  • Lack of a built-in calculator app for quick utility
  • Companion app does not support data sharing with Strava or Google Fit
  • Limited memory for contacts (only saves up to 10 favorite contacts)
  • Outdoor call quality can be challenging due to ambient noise
  • Occasional accuracy issues with heart rate and sleep tracking reported by some users
  • Lacks GPS for independent outdoor activity tracking

Verdict

The Noise ColorFit Pulse Go Buzz is a budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a 1.69-inch TFT LCD display with 500 nits of brightness and a 240x280 pixel resolution. Its core characteristic is the Bluetooth calling capability supported by Tru Sync technology for stable one-step pairing, a built-in speaker, and a microphone. The device includes a comprehensive health suite with 24/7 heart rate monitoring, SpO2 tracking, stress monitoring, and sleep analysis, alongside 100+ sports modes with auto-detection. Main pros include its lightweight 23.1g polycarbonate design, IP68 water resistance, and a 300mAh battery that offers up to 7 days of typical usage. However, notable cons include a significant battery drop to about 2 days with heavy calling usage, the lack of built-in GPS, and the absence of a calculator app.

Compare Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Noise Colorfit Pulse Go Buzz and other Smartwatches

No results found