OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Fire Boltt Asteroid Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Screen size:1.43 inchBattery life:7 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Fire Boltt Asteroid Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 12 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

70%

5.6

Technical score

30%

8.0

Review score ( 0 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.0 · based on 12 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–¼Worse than 60% of smartwatches
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

24%

6.1

Health

21%

6.7

Fitness

16%

5.2

Battery

14%

5.0

Smart features

12%

3.7

Connectivity

9%

6.1

Display & Design

4%

6.8

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 67% of smartwatches
8.0

Review score

Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Grades by review (12)
Video reviews 10

9.5%

9.0

RD TECHNICAL

9.5%

9.0

TechnoAmmu

9.5%

9.0

Blue Boy

9.5%

9.0

Aman Dhingra

9.5%

8.0

Techarsh

9.5%

7.0

Techpoke !

9.5%

3.0

Mr B Does Electronics

4.8%

9.0

Tech Manzil

4.8%

9.0

Tech At 6

4.8%

7.0

IE Tech

estimated from the review
12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 64% of smartwatches
  • fire-boltt-asteroid
  • fire-boltt-asteroid
  • fire-boltt-asteroid
  • fire-boltt-asteroid
  • fire-boltt-asteroid
  • fire-boltt-asteroid
  • fire-boltt-asteroid
  • fire-boltt-asteroid
  • fire-boltt-asteroid
  • fire-boltt-asteroid
  • fire-boltt-asteroid
fire-boltt-asteroid
fire-boltt-asteroid
fire-boltt-asteroid
fire-boltt-asteroid
fire-boltt-asteroid
fire-boltt-asteroid
fire-boltt-asteroid
fire-boltt-asteroid
fire-boltt-asteroid
fire-boltt-asteroid
fire-boltt-asteroid

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Fire Boltt Asteroid

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components:

24%

6.1

Health

21%

6.7

Fitness

16%

5.2

Battery

14%

5.0

Smart features

12%

3.7

Connectivity

9%

6.1

Display & Design

4%

6.8

Hardware

5.6
Review score
Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Grades by review (12)
Video reviews 10

9.5%

9.0

RD TECHNICAL

9.5%

9.0

TechnoAmmu

9.5%

9.0

Blue Boy

9.5%

9.0

Aman Dhingra

9.5%

8.0

Techarsh

9.5%

7.0

Techpoke !

9.5%

3.0

Mr B Does Electronics

4.8%

9.0

Tech Manzil

4.8%

9.0

Tech At 6

4.8%

7.0

IE Tech

estimated from the review
12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.4
Brand name
Fire
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
Readings are for wellness use, not medical diagnosis.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
no
Distance tracking
no
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
This smartwatch does not support distance tracking. 96% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 7 days which is longer than that of 38.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 17.1% of smartwatches.
Up to 2 days with bluetooth calling.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
335 mAh
Battery power
335 mAh
â–² Better than 61% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 335 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 61.1% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.4% of smartwatches.
Charge time
180 min
Charge time
180 min
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 180 min which is slower than 96.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 2.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Proprietary OS (RTOS).
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.43 inch
Screen size
1.43 inch
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.43 inch which is larger than the screens of 56.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 8.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
466x 466
Resolution
466x 466
â–² Better than 87% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466 which is higher than that of 87.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 10.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
461 ppi
Pixel density
461 ppi
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 461 ppi which is higher than that of 84.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
500 nits
Display brightness
500 nits
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 500 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 70% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.6% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0.125 GB
Internal storage
0.125 GB
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0.125 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 66.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.4% of smartwatches.
128 MB internal storage
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Fire Boltt Asteroid vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 43 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    123
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (123 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    123 vs 80
  • 135 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    461 ppi
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (461 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    461 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    466 x 466
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    466x466 vs 352x430
  • 6.5x cheaper
    Fire Boltt Asteroid is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£20 vs £130).
    £20 vs £130
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 43 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    123
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (123 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    123 vs 80
  • 35 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    335 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (335 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 2 days with bluetooth calling.
    335 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • 135 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    461 ppi
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (461 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    461 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    466 x 466
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    466x466 vs 352x430
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    August 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No distance tracking
    Distance tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartwatch does not support distance tracking, the average smartwatch does. 95.9% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No distance tracking
    Distance tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartwatch does not support distance tracking, the average smartwatch does. 95.9% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
  • No achievement tracking
    Achievements
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch does not support achievements, the average smartwatch does. 85.8% of smartwatches support achievements.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 60 min longer charge time
    Charge time
    180 min
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges slower than the average smartwatch (180 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    180 min vs 120 min
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 3.3 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    14.90 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (14.9 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    14.90 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 15 g heavier weight
    Weight
    60.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (60 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    60.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 100 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    500 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    500 nits vs 600 nits
  • 6.1 mm wider watch width
    Width
    48.1 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (48.1 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    48.1 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 4.2 mm taller watch height
    Height
    49.2 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (49.2 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    49.2 mm vs 45 mm
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch does not support calendar sync, the average smartwatch does. 94.8% of smartwatches support calendar sync.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 3.88 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0.125 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0.1 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    128 MB internal storage
    0.125 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

3.0
Mr B Does Electronics
≈ estimated
08/11/2023
Unboxing and hands-on test · heart rate, watch faces and speaker
Verdict
Fire Boltt Asteroid is not recommended: its heart rate sensor failed and watch face sync was very slow.
9.0
Blue Boy
≈ estimated
02/09/2023
Unboxing and feature walkthrough · calling and battery tests
Verdict
Fire Boltt Asteroid is a feature-packed round smartwatch worth buying, with clear calling and a loud speaker.
9.0
Aman Dhingra
≈ estimated
30/08/2023
Hands-on review · design, sensor checks and calling test
Verdict
Fire Boltt Asteroid is a stylish, comfortable round smartwatch with clear calls and smooth software, a good pick for the price.
9.0
Tech Manzil
≈ estimated
02/10/2023
Unboxing and short review · display, calling and battery
Verdict
Fire Boltt Asteroid is a smooth, feature-rich watch with a large AMOLED display at a budget price.
Not graded
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 0 · 12

Reviewers love the clear calls and loud speaker and like the display, but health readings divide opinion, leaning unreliable.
Praised
Mixed views
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Fire Boltt Asteroid

  • Vibrant 1.43-inch AMOLED display with high 466x466 resolution
  • Sleek and premium design featuring a zinc alloy middle frame
  • Comprehensive health suite including 24/7 heart rate and SpO2 monitoring
  • Supports Bluetooth calling directly from the wrist
  • Extensive sports tracking with over 100 dedicated modes
  • Always-On Display (AOD) functionality for quick time checks
  • Affordable price point offering high-end aesthetic appeal

What we don't like about Fire Boltt Asteroid

  • Battery life varies significantly, often lasting only 2-3 days with AOD or heavy usage
  • Limited app ecosystem and lack of advanced features like ECG
  • Inconsistent sensor accuracy for steps and heart rate compared to medical-grade devices
  • Common user complaints regarding poor after-sales service and warranty support
  • IPX7 rating is splash-proof but may not withstand deep or prolonged submersion
  • Minimal options for third-party watch face customization

Verdict

The Fire-Boltt Asteroid is a premium-styled smartwatch featuring a circular 1.43-inch Super AMOLED Always-On Display with a high 466x466 resolution and 500 nits peak brightness. Encased in a durable zinc alloy middle frame, it offers comprehensive health tracking including 24/7 heart rate, SpO2 monitoring, and sleep analysis, alongside support for 123 sports modes. Its core functional pros include a versatile rotating crown for navigation, one-tap Bluetooth 5.2 calling with an integrated mic and speaker, and a 350mAh battery providing up to 7 days of typical usage. However, notable cons include an IP67 water resistance rating that is limited to shallow splashes, a lack of built-in GPS for independent route tracking, and a closed app ecosystem that restricts third-party software integration.

Compare Fire Boltt Asteroid with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fire Boltt Asteroid and other Smartwatches

No results found