OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Oukitel BT101 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Screen size:?Battery life:12.5 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Oukitel BT101 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 7 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Technical score

30%

7.9

Review score ( 1 · 6)

Review score 30% · 7.9 · based on 1 written review + 6 videos
1 written review + 6 videos count as 4 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–²Better than 62% of smartwatches
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components

24%

5.8

Health

21%

8.2

Fitness

16%

7.0

Battery

14%

6.8

Smart features

12%

3.2

Connectivity

9%

8.4

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

â–²Better than 60% of smartwatches
7.9

Review score

Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Grades by review (7)
1 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 1
✓ explicit
1

20%

8.0

gadreview.com

Video reviews 3

10%

9.0

J. Williams

10%

8.0

Bbnet Technology

10%

6.0

Family Pop TV

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 61% of smartwatches
  • oukitel-bt101
  • oukitel-bt101
  • oukitel-bt101
  • oukitel-bt101
  • oukitel-bt101
  • oukitel-bt101
  • oukitel-bt101
oukitel-bt101
oukitel-bt101
oukitel-bt101
oukitel-bt101
oukitel-bt101
oukitel-bt101
oukitel-bt101

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Oukitel BT101

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components:

24%

5.8

Health

21%

8.2

Fitness

16%

7.0

Battery

14%

6.8

Smart features

12%

3.2

Connectivity

9%

8.4

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

6.6
Review score
Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Grades by review (7)
1 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 1
✓ explicit
1

20%

8.0

gadreview.com

Video reviews 3

10%

9.0

J. Williams

10%

8.0

Bbnet Technology

10%

6.0

Family Pop TV

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
Oukitel BT101 has a popularity of 7.2 points, which is higher than 60.5% of smartwatches.
7.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Score components:

60%

7.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.9
Brand name
Oukitel
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
?
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Distance tracking may depend on phone GPS/app on some models.
Show more
Battery life
12.5 days
Battery life
12.5 days
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 12.5 days which is longer than that of 75.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
382 mAh
Battery power
382 mAh
â–² Better than 73% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 382 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 72.8% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Uses a proprietary OS with companion-app ecosystem support. OS detail: Proprietary OS (RTOS).
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
?
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
320x 390
Resolution
320x 390
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 320x390 which is lower than that of 53.6% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
352 ppi
Pixel density
352 ppi
â–² Better than 62% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 352 ppi which is higher than that of 62.2% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0.125 GB
Internal storage
0.125 GB
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0.125 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 66.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.4% of smartwatches.
128 MB internal storage
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Oukitel BT101 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
    SOS feature has implementation limits (phone/app/subscription/activity dependent).
  • 5.5 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    12.5 days
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 12.5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    12.5 days vs 7 days
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • 2.89x cheaper
    Oukitel BT101 is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£45 vs £130).
    £45 vs £130
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • 5.5 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    12.5 days
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 12.5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    12.5 days vs 7 days
  • 82 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    382 mAh days
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (382 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    382 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass
    â–² Better than 46% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass vs mineral glass
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
    SOS feature has implementation limits (phone/app/subscription/activity dependent).
  • 3 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2024 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    September 2024
    2024 vs 2021
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • 1.7 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    13.30 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (13.3 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    13.30 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 13.3 mm taller watch height
    Height
    58.3 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (58.3 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    58.3 mm vs 45 mm
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • 1.7 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    13.30 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (13.3 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    13.30 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 13.3 mm taller watch height
    Height
    58.3 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (58.3 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    58.3 mm vs 45 mm
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • 4.1 mm wider watch width
    Width
    46.1 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (46.1 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    46.1 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No gesture control
    Gesture control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 77.7% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • 3.88 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0.125 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0.1 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    128 MB internal storage
    0.125 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 3 · 6

Reviewers like the value, battery life and toughness, but GPS is missing and sensor readings aren't very accurate.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Oukitel BT101

  • Excellent value for money and looks more expensive than its actual price point.
  • Large 2.02-inch AMOLED display that is clear, vivid, and responsive.
  • Impressive battery life, typically lasting between 5 to 10 days depending on usage.
  • Rugged and durable build quality suitable for outdoor sports and hiking.
  • Easy initial setup with the Da Fit app on both Android and iOS.
  • Good call quality and seamless Bluetooth connectivity for notifications.

What we don't like about Oukitel BT101

  • Inconsistent accuracy in health metrics, specifically sleep tracking and heart rate monitoring.
  • Requirement to open the mobile app daily to synchronize data between the watch and phone.
  • The watch is noted to be quite bulky or 'chunky,' which may not suit all users.
  • Soft silicone strap can cause excessive sweating; some users recommend replacing it with a third-party band.
  • Reports of occasional software glitches or connection issues with specific apps like Fitcloudpro.

Verdict

The Oukitel BT101 is a military-grade rugged smartwatch featuring a large 2.02-inch AMOLED display with a 320x390 resolution and Corning Gorilla Glass protection. Designed for durability, it is MIL-STD-810H certified, 5ATM/IP69K waterproof, and operates in extreme temperatures ranging from -30°C to 70°C. Key specifications include a 410mAh battery providing up to 10 days of active use (30 days standby), Bluetooth 5.3 for hands-free calling, and comprehensive health monitoring for heart rate, SpO2, and blood pressure. Main pros include its extensive 100+ sports modes, AI voice assistant, and rapid 2-hour charging, though some users report cons such as a bulky design and occasional inaccuracies in sleep and step tracking data.

Compare Oukitel BT101 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oukitel BT101 and other Smartwatches

No results found