OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Montblanc Summit review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£780Screen size:1.39 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Montblanc Summit Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 11 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Montblanc Summit
6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

35%

5.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.4

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 82% of smartwatches
6.2

Value for money

Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

6.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 99%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

24%

4.3

Health

21%

6.5

Fitness

16%

5.0

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

4.8

Connectivity

9%

7.3

Display & Design

4%

3.1

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 75%
5.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models

5.4

Mark 7.1 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.0

Average grade

20%

7.4

Popularity

Grades by review (11)
9 reviews + 2 videos, average 6.5/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 81%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • montblanc-summit
  • montblanc-summit
  • montblanc-summit
montblanc-summit
montblanc-summit
montblanc-summit
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Montblanc Summit

Based on 9 · 2

Reviewers praise the gorgeous screen and premium build, but the crown disappoints and it lacks GPS and contactless payments.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Montblanc Summit

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components:

24%

4.3

Health

21%

6.5

Fitness

16%

5.0

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

4.8

Connectivity

9%

7.3

Display & Design

4%

3.1

Hardware

5.4
Reviews score
5.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

6.4

Price

6.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
1 day
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 1 day on a charge, which is shorter than 88.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 8.1% of Smartwatches.
Converted from the reported 24-hour battery life.
Battery life in training mode
24 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 24 h on a charge, which is longer than 56.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 4.7% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
358 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 358 mAh battery, which is larger than 64.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.1% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
OS detail: Wear OS (3).
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 59.8% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.39 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.39 inch screen, which is smaller than 51.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 9% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
400x 400
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 400x400 which is higher than that of 65.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.5% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
407 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 407 ppi, which is higher than 70.4% of Smartwatches and equal to 1.6% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
4x 1.2 GHz
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.2 GHz which is faster than that in 85.3% of smartwatches and equal to that in 3.1% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 2100
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 2100 processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
8 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 8 GB of internal storage, which is more than 65.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 11.3% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Montblanc Summit vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (3).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 81 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (407 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    407 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses rubber, leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    rubber, leather vs silicone
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 4 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (24 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    24 h vs 20 h
  • 53 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (358 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    358 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 81 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (407 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    407 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses rubber, leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    rubber, leather vs silicone
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (3).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 2x more internal storage
    This smartwatch has more internal storage than the average smartwatch (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Faster CPU speed
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.2 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    4x1.2 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • 49 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No automatic activity detection
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 81.8% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No route tracking
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 77% of smartwatches support route tracking.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 22.9% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models

    5.4

    Mark 7.1 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.0

    Average grade

    20%

    7.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (11)
    9 reviews + 2 videos, average 6.5/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.4 vs 7.0
  • 22.9% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models

    5.4

    Mark 7.1 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.0

    Average grade

    20%

    7.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (11)
    9 reviews + 2 videos, average 6.5/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.4 vs 7.0
  • 7.09x more expensive
    Montblanc Summit is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£780 vs £110).
    £780 vs £110
  • 24.4% worse value for money
    Montblanc Summit has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (6.24 vs 7.8).
    6.24 vs 7.76
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 4 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2017 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    May 2017
    2017 vs 2021
  • No automatic activity detection
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 81.8% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No route tracking
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 77% of smartwatches support route tracking.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No swim mode
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 76.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • 89 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (1 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    1 vs 90
  • No exercise tagging
    This smartwatch does not support exercise tagging, the average smartwatch does. 94.2% of smartwatches support exercise tagging.
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    Converted from the reported 24-hour battery life.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • Less current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a less current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4.1 vs 5).
    Bluetooth Low Energy support is indicated.
    4.1 vs 5
  • 49 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 16 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (61 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    61 g vs 45 g
  • 0.8 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.5 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    12.5 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 3.5 mm wider case
    This smartwatch has a wider case than the average smartwatch (46 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    46 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • 0.01 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.4 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.39 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No call controls
    This smartwatch does not offer call control, the average smartwatch does. 91.2% of smartwatches offer call control.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Watches Of the World India
≈ estimated
13/10/2019
Hands-on review · heart rate, drop and app tests
Verdict
Montblanc Summit is a good-looking watch with accurate heart rate readings, though its Android Wear apps lag behind.
9.0
Time+Tide Watches
≈ estimated
24/07/2017
Short overview · design and strap options
Verdict
Montblanc Summit looks and feels like a real watch, meant to be a full-time companion rather than an accessory.
9.0
WatchFlipr.com
≈ estimated
10/06/2017
Quick look · design and feature overview
Verdict
The Montblanc Summit is good value for a luxury tech watch, with stylish looks and a solid introduction to the brand's smartwatches.
8.0
EMKWAN REVIEWS
≈ estimated
21/03/2017
First look · first impressions of design, faces and charger
Verdict
Montblanc Summit makes an interesting first impression, and the creator promises a full hands-on review later.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
11/07/2017
Review · Luxury design
Verdict
The Montblanc Summit is a stylish metal watch with a large screen, but it lacks NFC and GPS, and it looks much like the LG Watch Urbane.
7.0
oracleoftime.com
≈ estimated
17/06/2017
Review · Luxury digital watch
Verdict
The Montblanc Summit feels like a real watch, with a bright screen and many dials, but it struggles to last a full day.
5.0
trustedreviews.com
≈ estimated
17/03/2017
Hands-on review · Luxury smartwatch
Verdict
The Montblanc Summit looks like a classic Swiss watch, but it feels light and a bit cheap, so it mainly suits Montblanc fans.
4.0
stuff.tv
≈ estimated
26/10/2021
Hands-on review · Design and features
Verdict
The Montblanc Summit is a big, bulky metal watch that feels two years too late, and it mainly suits existing Montblanc fans.
5.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
14/07/2017
Long-term review · Luxury Android watch
Verdict
The Montblanc Summit has a lovely screen and high-grade construction, but its ordinary design and missing NFC make it hard to recommend.
6.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
20/07/2017
Full review · Design and fitness
Verdict
The Montblanc Summit is a quality watch with a great screen, but it falls short as a fitness device and relies on its brand to sell it.
7.0
ablogtowatch.com
≈ estimated
16/03/2017
Hands-on test · Luxury smartwatch
Verdict
The Montblanc Summit is a comfortable, snappy smartwatch with 1858-style dials, but its 46mm case is too large for many wrists.
6.0
heise.de
✓ explicit
19/02/2018
Full review · Luxury Android watch
Verdict
The Montblanc Summit is beautifully made with a sapphire-glass screen, but without GPS or phone calls it falls short for a premium smartwatch.
8.0
smartworld.it
✓ explicit
17/08/2017
Hands-on test · Luxury Android Wear
Verdict
The Montblanc Summit is a configurable Android Wear watch with a bright screen and a full day of battery life, but its design lacks a little style.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Montblanc Summit

  • Exquisite luxury design and premium build quality using materials like titanium and stainless steel
  • Stunning, high-definition AMOLED displays protected by scratch-resistant sapphire glass
  • Exclusive, high-quality digital watch faces that mirror iconic Montblanc mechanical designs
  • Comfortable fit with various high-end strap options, including calf leather and rubber
  • Smooth interaction via the rotating crown on newer models like the Summit 3 and Summit Lite
  • Water resistance up to 5ATM (50 metres), making it suitable for swimming

What customers don't like about Montblanc Summit

  • Poor battery life, often barely lasting a single day with normal use
  • High price point that is difficult to justify compared to more capable, less expensive rivals
  • Laggy software performance and occasional sluggishness inherent to Wear OS
  • Limited and basic fitness tracking that lacks the depth of dedicated sports watches
  • Lack of a dedicated smartphone companion app to view detailed health and activity data
  • Missing key hardware features on earlier models, such as GPS and NFC for payments

Verdict

The Montblanc Summit 3 is a premium luxury smartwatch that blends traditional Swiss watchmaking aesthetics with modern technology, featuring a 42mm titanium case, a 1.28-inch AMOLED display (416 x 416 resolution), and scratch-resistant sapphire crystal. Powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100+ chipset with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of storage, it runs on Wear OS 3.0 and includes a comprehensive health suite for monitoring heart rate, sleep, and blood oxygen (SpO2). Key advantages include its sophisticated hand-brushed finish, 5ATM water resistance, and the inclusion of both leather and rubber straps in the box. However, it faces common criticisms for its high price point, mediocre 24-hour battery life, and lack of certain features like Google Assistant or full NFC functionality when paired with iOS.

Compare Montblanc Summit with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Montblanc Summit and other Smartwatches

No results found