OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Imilab W02 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Screen size:1.85 inchBattery life:3.5 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Imilab W02 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 12 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

70%

5.7

Technical score

30%

8.2

Review score ( 1 · 11)

Review score 30% · 8.2 · based on 12 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–¼Worse than 55% of smartwatches
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

24%

5.9

Health

21%

7.7

Fitness

16%

4.0

Battery

14%

6.9

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.5

Display & Design

4%

6.9

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 65% of smartwatches
8.2

Review score

Review score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Grades by review (12)
1 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 1
✓ explicit
1

17.4%

7.7

mbreviews.com

Video reviews 5

8.7%

9.0

Roberto Jorge Tech

8.7%

9.0

Geeky Stuff

8.7%

8.0

Zi Reviews Tech

4.3%

9.0

SmartWatch Ticks

4.3%

8.0

Pro Gadget Savvy

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 78% of smartwatches
  • imilab-w02
  • imilab-w02
  • imilab-w02
  • imilab-w02
  • imilab-w02
  • imilab-w02
  • imilab-w02
imilab-w02
imilab-w02
imilab-w02
imilab-w02
imilab-w02
imilab-w02
imilab-w02

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Imilab W02

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

24%

5.9

Health

21%

7.7

Fitness

16%

4.0

Battery

14%

6.9

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.5

Display & Design

4%

6.9

Hardware

5.7
Review score
Review score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Grades by review (12)
1 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 1
✓ explicit
1

17.4%

7.7

mbreviews.com

Video reviews 5

8.7%

9.0

Roberto Jorge Tech

8.7%

9.0

Geeky Stuff

8.7%

8.0

Zi Reviews Tech

4.3%

9.0

SmartWatch Ticks

4.3%

8.0

Pro Gadget Savvy

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Popularity:
Imilab W02 has a popularity of 4.5 points, which is lower than 60.9% of smartwatches.
4.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Brand name
Imilab
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
?
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
3.5 days
Battery life
3.5 days
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 3.5 days which is shorter than that of 73.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.2% of smartwatches.
Up to 25 days standby.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
250 mAh
Battery power
250 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 250 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 70.6% of smartwatches and equal to those in 1.5% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Proprietary OS (RTOS).
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.85 inch
Screen size
1.85 inch
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.85 inch which is larger than the screens of 91.2% of smartwatches and equal to those of 2.3% of smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch uses a TFT LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 74.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 15.9% of smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 280
Resolution
240x 280
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x280 which is lower than that of 70.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.6% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
199 ppi
Pixel density
199 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 199 ppi which is lower than that of 93.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Realtek RTL8762C
Processor model
Realtek RTL8762C
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
This smartwatch uses the Realtek RTL8762C processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
0.016 GB
Internal storage
0.016 GB
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0.016 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 72.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.6% of smartwatches.
16 MB internal flash storage.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Imilab W02 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
    SOS feature has implementation limits (phone/app/subscription/activity dependent).
  • 0.45 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.85 inch
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.9 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.85 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 12 g lighter weight
    Weight
    33.0 g
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (33 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    33.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    March 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • 0.45 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.85 inch
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.9 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.85 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 12 g lighter weight
    Weight
    33.0 g
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (33 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    33.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
    SOS feature has implementation limits (phone/app/subscription/activity dependent).
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    March 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No low-power mode
    Low power mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a low power mode, the average smartwatch does. 92.5% of smartwatches include a low power mode.
  • 3.5 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    3.5 days
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 3.5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 25 days standby.
    3.5 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 50 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    250 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (250 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 25 days standby.
    250 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 127 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    199 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (199 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    199 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    240 x 280
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x280, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    240x280 vs 352x430
  • Less practical form
    Form
    square
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No widget support
    Widget support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 83.1% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • 3.98 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0.016 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    16 MB internal flash storage.
    0.016 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Roberto Jorge Tech
≈ estimated
09/08/2023
Hands-on review · app, watch faces and sports tracking
Verdict
Imilab W02 is a simple, attractive smartwatch with Bluetooth calling and long battery life, a good affordable pick.
8.0
Zi Reviews Tech
≈ estimated
28/06/2023
Unboxing and review · battery, heart rate and call tests
Verdict
Imilab W02 is a good budget smartwatch with all the expected features, but the app is the main drawback.
9.0
Geeky Stuff
≈ estimated
15/03/2023
Hands-on review · straps, calls, heart rate and app
Verdict
Imilab W02 is a very good smartwatch for its price, with a comfortable magnetic strap and solid heart rate tracking.
9.0
SmartWatch Ticks
≈ estimated
20/07/2023
First look · unboxing and setup
Verdict
Imilab W02 is a strong watch and a real contender for the wrist, with a surprisingly loud speaker.
9.0
SmartWatch Ticks
≈ estimated
20/07/2023
Quick overview · features, speaker and design
Verdict
Imilab W02 is a loud, bright, nicely designed watch with a comfortable magnetic strap and many features.
8.0
Pro Gadget Savvy
≈ estimated
26/11/2022
First impressions · feature tour and battery notes
Verdict
The Imilab W02 is feature-packed, affordable and worth buying, though the strap is heavy and the water rating is limited.
Hands-on video, no verdict

What reviewers agree on

Based on 1 · 12

Liked for its design, comfortable strap, decent health tracking and calls, though the companion app disappoints.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.7
mbreviews.com
✓ explicit
06/03/2023
Hands-on test · Apple Watch lookalike
Verdict
The IMILAB W02 is an Apple Watch lookalike with calls and a strong magnetic strap, but its bare-bones software and less vivid screen hold it back.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Imilab W02

  • Innovative magnetic strap that is secure and easy to put on
  • Premium build quality with a stainless steel/metal body for the price
  • Support for Bluetooth calling with a built-in speaker and microphone
  • Large 1.85-inch borderless touch screen with good visibility
  • Wide range of 100+ sports modes for activity tracking
  • IP68 water resistance rating suitable for daily use and swimming
  • Useful health monitoring features including SpO2 and heart rate tracking

What we don't like about Imilab W02

  • TFT display lacks the vivid colors and deep blacks of an AMOLED screen
  • Software is basic and feels like a clone of other operating systems
  • Heart rate monitoring accuracy may decrease during high-intensity interval workouts
  • Battery life drops significantly to less than two days when using Bluetooth calling frequently
  • Call volume can be low and difficult to hear in noisy environments
  • Lacks always-on display functionality
  • No built-in GPS; relies on a connected phone for route tracking

Verdict

The Imilab W02 is a budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a large 1.85-inch borderless TFT touch display with a 240x280 resolution and a high 81% screen-to-body ratio. Key specifications include a 280mAh battery offering 3–5 days of typical use, IP68 water resistance, and a 24H Smart Bio Tracker for monitoring heart rate, SpO2, and sleep. Its main characteristics include an innovative magnetic quick-release strap, Bluetooth calling via a built-in speaker and microphone, and support for over 100 sports modes. While it offers impressive value with its dual strap system and voice assistant compatibility, notable cons include the lack of an AMOLED panel, which results in less vivid colors, the absence of built-in GPS, and potentially reduced heart rate accuracy during high-intensity workouts.

Compare Imilab W02 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Imilab W02 and other Smartwatches

No results found