OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Apple Watch Series 7 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£380Screen size:?Battery life:0.75 daysDisplay type:OLED

Apple Watch Series 7 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

8.1

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

Technical score

30%

8.7

Review score ( 10 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.7 · based on 22 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 37 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 87% of smartwatches
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components

24%

6.9

Health

21%

9.9

Fitness

16%

4.2

Battery

14%

9.2

Smart features

12%

8.9

Connectivity

9%

8.6

Display & Design

4%

7.7

Hardware

â–²Better than 83% of smartwatches
8.7

Review score

Review score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
3

7.4%

10

expertreviews.co.uk

7.4%

10

stuff.tv

7.4%

9.0

tomsguide.com

≈ estimated
1

4.7%

9.0

downtown-mag.com

Video reviews 3

3%

9.0

Dion Schuddeboom

3%

8.0

Ken Michael

3%

8.0

iPhonedo

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
★Better than 97% of smartwatches
  • apple-watch-series-7
apple-watch-series-7

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Apple Watch Series 7

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components:

24%

6.9

Health

21%

9.9

Fitness

16%

4.2

Battery

14%

9.2

Smart features

12%

8.9

Connectivity

9%

8.6

Display & Design

4%

7.7

Hardware

7.8
Review score
Review score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
3

7.4%

10

expertreviews.co.uk

7.4%

10

stuff.tv

7.4%

9.0

tomsguide.com

≈ estimated
1

4.7%

9.0

downtown-mag.com

Video reviews 3

3%

9.0

Dion Schuddeboom

3%

8.0

Ken Michael

3%

8.0

iPhonedo

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Popularity:
Apple Watch Series 7 has a popularity of 10 points, which is higher than 93.2% of smartwatches.
10
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components:

60%

8.1

Overall score

40%

8.5

Price

8.2
Brand name
Apple
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
yes
ECG
yes
â–² Better than 84% of models
This smartwatch supports ECG. 83.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
0.75 days
Battery life
0.75 days
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 0.75 days which is shorter than that of 98% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2% of smartwatches.
Converted from the reported 18-hour battery life.
Battery life in training mode
6 h
Battery life in training mode
6 h
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 6 h in training mode which is shorter than 83.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.1% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
6 h
Battery life with GPS on
6 h
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 6 h with GPS on which is shorter than 87% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.8% of smartwatches.
Battery power
309 mAh
Battery power
309 mAh
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 309 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 54.1% of smartwatches.
Battery capacity varies by case size/model variant.
Charge time
75 min
Charge time
75 min
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 75 min which is faster than 76.2% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 3.3% of smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 75 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
watchOS
Operating system
watchOS
★ Better than 96% of models
This smartwatch runs watchOS which is more advanced than the operating system in 95.7% of smartwatches and the same as that in 4.3% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
regular
Software update frequency
regular
★ Better than 94% of models
This smartwatch has regular software update support which is more active than that of 94% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6% of smartwatches.
Updates are released regularly throughout the year.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
â–² Better than 82% of models
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 82.2% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
Cellular support may depend on LTE/GPS+Cellular variant selection.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
â–² Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
?
Display type
OLED
Display type
OLED
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a OLED display type which is less advanced than that of 50.3% of smartwatches and the same as that of 9.6% of smartwatches.
Retina branding. LTPO panel wording.
Resolution
?
Pixel density
326 ppi
Pixel density
326 ppi
â–² Better than 46% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi which is higher than that of 46.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 8.1% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,000 nits
Display brightness
1,000 nits
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 1,000 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 59.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
2x 1.8 GHz
CPU speed
2x 1.8 GHz
â–² Better than 80% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 2x1.8 GHz which is faster than that in 80% of smartwatches and equal to that in 2.4% of smartwatches.
Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
Processor model
Apple S7
Processor model
Apple S7
★ Better than 94% of models
This smartwatch uses the Apple S7 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
RAM
1 GB
â–² Better than 31% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 31.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 45.8% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 32 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 84.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 13.4% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Apple Watch Series 7 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • ECG support
    ECG
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    regular
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This smartwatch receives regular software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are released regularly throughout the year.
    regular vs ended
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    watchOS
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (watchOS vs Proprietary OS).
    watchOS vs Proprietary OS
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
    Cellular support may depend on LTE/GPS+Cellular variant selection.
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • 63.4% more popular
    Apple Watch Series 7 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • ECG support
    ECG
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 45 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    75 min
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (75 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 75 minutes.
    75 min vs 120 min
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 24.5% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
    Cellular support may depend on LTE/GPS+Cellular variant selection.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • UWB chip
    UWB chip
    yes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This smartwatch includes a UWB chip, while the average smartwatch does not. 2.3% of smartwatches include UWB.
    U1 chip.
  • 400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    1,000 nits
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (1000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    1,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • Better case material
    Case material
    aluminum, stainless steel, titanium
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This smartwatch uses aluminum, stainless steel, titanium for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    aluminum, stainless steel, titanium vs polycarbonate
  • 13 g lighter weight
    Weight
    32.0 g
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (32 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    32.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Ion-X
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch uses Ion-X display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Ion-X vs mineral glass
  • 0.9 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    10.70 mm
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (10.7 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    10.70 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 7 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    35.0 mm
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (35 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    35.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • Better band material
    Band material
    silicone, leather, nylon
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather, nylon for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather, nylon vs silicone
  • 4 mm shorter watch height
    Height
    41.0 mm
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is shorter than the average smartwatch (41 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    41.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    regular
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This smartwatch receives regular software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are released regularly throughout the year.
    regular vs ended
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    watchOS
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (watchOS vs Proprietary OS).
    watchOS vs Proprietary OS
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • 28 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (32 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    32 GB vs 4 GB
  • Faster CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2 x 1.8 GHz
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 2x1.8 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
    2x1.8 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • More advanced processor model
    Processor model
    Apple S7
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This smartwatch uses the Apple S7 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Apple S7 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • No stress monitoring
    Stress monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 65.4% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • 6.25 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    0.75 days
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 0.8 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Converted from the reported 18-hour battery life.
    0.75 days vs 7 days
  • 14 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    6 h
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (6 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    6 h vs 20 h
  • 13.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    6 h
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (6 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    6 h vs 19.25 h
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP6X
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP6X vs IP68).
    Also reported with 50M water-resistance rating.
    IP6X vs IP68
  • Not compatible with Android
    Android compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch is not compatible with Android, the average smartwatch is. 95.3% of smartwatches are compatible with Android.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    OLED
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch uses OLED display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    Retina branding. LTPO panel wording.
    OLED vs AMOLED
  • 2.92x more expensive
    Apple Watch Series 7 is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£380 vs £130).
    £380 vs £130
  • No stress monitoring
    Stress monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 65.4% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • 5,534 m lower max altitude
    Maximum altitude
    3,000 m
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <3k m – >9.1k m
    This smartwatch supports a lower maximum altitude than the average smartwatch (3000 m vs 8534 m). The average smartwatch reaches 8534 m.
    3,000 m vs 8,534 m
  • 6.25 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    0.75 days
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 0.8 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Converted from the reported 18-hour battery life.
    0.75 days vs 7 days
  • 14 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    6 h
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (6 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    6 h vs 20 h
  • 13.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    6 h
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (6 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    6 h vs 19.25 h
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • Not compatible with Android
    Android compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch is not compatible with Android, the average smartwatch is. 95.3% of smartwatches are compatible with Android.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP6X
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP6X vs IP68).
    Also reported with 50M water-resistance rating.
    IP6X vs IP68
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    OLED
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch uses OLED display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    Retina branding. LTPO panel wording.
    OLED vs AMOLED
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • 10 °C lower max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    35.0 °C
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a lower maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    35.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Ken Michael
≈ estimated
02/07/2022
Microphone test · studio, traffic, crowd and wind
Verdict
Apple Watch Series 7 picks up voice well in noise, but strong wind muffles calls.
9.0
Dion Schuddeboom
≈ estimated
13/01/2022
Long-term review · 3 months of daily use
Verdict
Apple Watch Series 7 is the best smartwatch overall for most buyers, but add a screen protector to keep the display scratch-free.
8.0
iPhonedo
≈ estimated
17/10/2021
Hands-on review · screen, charging and app tests
Verdict
Apple Watch Series 7 works well and looks great, but there is not enough reason to switch from the Series 6.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 10 · 12

The display wins near-universal praise and charging is liked, but battery life disappoints and many see little upgrade value.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

theverge.com
13/10/2021
Not graded yet
theguardian.com
10/11/2021
Not graded yet
cnet.com
02/11/2021
Not graded yet
uk.pcmag.com
19/10/2021
Not graded yet
wired.com
13/10/2021
Not graded yet
trustedreviews.com
21/10/2021
Not graded yet
10
stuff.tv
✓ explicit
16/05/2022
Hands-on review · Bigger screen
Verdict
The Apple Watch Series 7 brings a bigger, brighter screen for iPhone users, but it isn't worth upgrading from Series 5 or 6.
t3.com
23/10/2021
Not graded yet
10
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
30/11/2022
Review · Design and battery
Verdict
The Apple Watch Series 7 is the top smartwatch for iPhone owners, but Series 5 or 6 owners will find little reason to upgrade.
9.0
downtown-mag.com
≈ estimated
10/08/2022
Long-term test · Everyday use
Verdict
The Apple Watch Series 7 suits iPhone users who want navigation and calls on the wrist, but its constant alerts can become a burden.
cnet.com
27/04/2022
Not graded yet
techradar.com
07/12/2022
Not graded yet
9.0
tomsguide.com
✓ explicit
05/04/2023
Hands-on review · Display and keyboard
Verdict
The Apple Watch Series 7 is the most practical version yet, with a bigger screen and QWERTY keyboard, but it adds no new health features this year.
notebookcheck.com
08/11/2021
Not graded yet
chip.de
12/01/2022
Not graded yet
heise.de
17/12/2021
Not graded yet
8.8
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
12/11/2023
Hands-on test · Comfort and features
Verdict
The Apple Watch Series 7 suits iPhone owners who want a comfortable, feature-rich watch, though its battery is short and WhatsApp is missing.
9.0
smart-home-fox.de
≈ estimated
20/01/2025
Test · Features and privacy
Verdict
The Apple Watch Series 7 is an easy-to-use all-rounder for iPhone owners who want workouts and health tracking, but its battery is short.
sport-passion.fr
21/09/2021
Not graded yet
midilibre.fr
20/10/2021
Not graded yet
jogging-international.net
24/03/2022
Not graded yet
8.0
global.techradar.com
✓ explicit
22/05/2024
Upgrade review · Series 6 comparison
Verdict
The Apple Watch Series 7 is essentially a Series 6 with a 20% bigger screen and faster charging: a good iPhone companion, but not a major upgrade.
frandroid.com
27/10/2021
Not graded yet
lesnumeriques.com
19/11/2021
Not graded yet
iphon.fr
02/11/2021
Not graded yet
phonandroid.com
28/03/2022
Not graded yet
palabraderunner.com
28/10/2021
Not graded yet
8.0
hablandodemanzanas.com
≈ estimated
21/01/2026
Long-term review · Nine months
Verdict
The Apple Watch Series 7 is the best pick for iPhone owners, with reliable notifications and a bright screen, but it needs charging almost daily.
computerhoy.20minutos.es
26/10/2021
Not graded yet
revistagq.com
13/10/2021
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Apple Watch Series 7

  • Significantly larger, edge-to-edge Retina display with thinner bezels compared to Series 6
  • Faster charging capabilities, reaching 80% in approximately 45 minutes
  • Improved durability featuring IP6X dust resistance and a more crack-resistant front crystal
  • Enhanced usability through exclusive UI elements like a full QWERTY keyboard and larger buttons
  • Accurate health and fitness tracking, including ECG, heart rate, and blood oxygen monitoring
  • Seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem and a wide selection of third-party apps

What we don't like about Apple Watch Series 7

  • Stagnant 18-hour battery life, which often requires daily charging, especially with sleep tracking
  • Lack of major new health sensors or revolutionary feature updates over the Series 6
  • Exclusive to iPhone users, with no support for Android devices
  • Sleep tracking metrics are considered basic compared to specialized competitors like Fitbit
  • Higher price point compared to the Apple Watch SE and older supported models
  • No support for third-party watch faces

Verdict

The Apple Watch Series 7 is a flagship smartwatch available in 41mm and 45mm case sizes, featuring an Always-On Retina LTPO OLED display with up to 1,000 nits of brightness and a nearly 20% larger screen area than its predecessor due to ultra-thin 1.7mm bezels. It is powered by the 64-bit dual-core S7 SiP and includes 32GB of storage, 50-meter water resistance, and an IP6X dust-resistance rating, the first for an Apple Watch. Main pros include its highly legible display that supports a full QWERTY keyboard, 33% faster charging than the Series 6 (reaching 80% in 45 minutes), and a robust health suite with ECG, blood oxygen (SpO2), and fall detection. However, it is limited by a persistent 18-hour 'all-day' battery life that typically requires daily charging, lack of compatibility with Android devices, and a lack of significant new health sensors compared to the previous generation.

Compare Apple Watch Series 7 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Apple Watch Series 7 and other Smartwatches

No results found