OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,948 independent expert reviews and 5,024 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Amazfit Bip U Pro Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Screen size:1.43 inchBattery life:9 daysDisplay type:IPS LCD

Amazfit Bip U Pro Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 24 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

70%

5.6

Technical score

30%

8.3

Review score ( 12 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.3 · based on 24 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 3 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–¼Worse than 56% of smartwatches
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components

24%

5.4

Health

21%

7.1

Fitness

16%

5.4

Battery

14%

5.1

Smart features

12%

4.7

Connectivity

9%

5.6

Display & Design

4%

4.9

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 68% of smartwatches
8.3

Review score

Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Grades by review (24)
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
3

7.5%

8.0

techradar.com

6%

8.9

basic-tutorials.com

6%

7.0

androidauthority.com

≈ estimated
2

6%

9.0

uzone.id

6%

9.0

mansworldindia.com

Video reviews 3

3%

9.0

Thomas Tech

3%

9.0

JDubb

3%

8.0

TechieSetup

estimated from the review
12 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 80% of smartwatches
  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit Bip U Pro

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components:

24%

5.4

Health

21%

7.1

Fitness

16%

5.4

Battery

14%

5.1

Smart features

12%

4.7

Connectivity

9%

5.6

Display & Design

4%

4.9

Hardware

5.6
Review score
Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Grades by review (24)
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
3

7.5%

8.0

techradar.com

6%

8.9

basic-tutorials.com

6%

7.0

androidauthority.com

≈ estimated
2

6%

9.0

uzone.id

6%

9.0

mansworldindia.com

Video reviews 3

3%

9.0

Thomas Tech

3%

9.0

JDubb

3%

8.0

TechieSetup

estimated from the review
12 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Brand name
Amazfit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
9 days
Battery life
9 days
â–² Better than 60% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 9 days which is longer than that of 60.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
9 h
Battery life in training mode
9 h
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 9 h in training mode which is shorter than 71.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.2% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
230 mAh
Battery power
230 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 230 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 77.1% of smartwatches and equal to those in 1.9% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Proprietary OS (RTOS).
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.43 inch
Screen size
1.43 inch
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.43 inch which is larger than the screens of 56.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 8.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartwatch uses a IPS LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 67.4% of smartwatches and the same as that of 6.6% of smartwatches.
Resolution
302x 320
Resolution
302x 320
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 302x320 which is lower than that of 60.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
308 ppi
Pixel density
308 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 308 ppi which is lower than that of 61.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.3% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
400 nits
Display brightness
400 nits
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 400 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 93.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Dialog DA14697
Processor model
Dialog DA14697
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
This smartwatch uses the Dialog DA14697 processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Internal storage
0 GB
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 73.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.4% of smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit Bip U Pro vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • 14 g lighter weight
    Weight
    31.0 g
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (31 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight includes strap/bracelet.
    31.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Weight tracking may rely on manual app entry or smart-scale sync.
  • 2 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    9 days
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 9 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    9 days vs 7 days
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 63.4% more popular
    Amazfit Bip U Pro has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • 63.4% more popular
    Amazfit Bip U Pro has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Weight tracking may rely on manual app entry or smart-scale sync.
  • 2 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    9 days
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 9 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    9 days vs 7 days
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • 14 g lighter weight
    Weight
    31.0 g
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (31 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight includes strap/bracelet.
    31.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 6.5 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    35.5 mm
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (35.5 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    35.5 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 4.1 mm shorter watch height
    Height
    40.9 mm
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is shorter than the average smartwatch (40.9 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    40.9 mm vs 45 mm
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 79.7% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch uses IPS LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    IPS LCD vs AMOLED
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 79.7% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • 20 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    60
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (60 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 60 exercise modes.
    60 vs 80
  • 10.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    9 h
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (9 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    9 h vs 19.25 h
  • 70 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    230 mAh days
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (230 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    230 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch uses IPS LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    IPS LCD vs AMOLED
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 200 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    400 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (400 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    400 nits vs 600 nits
  • Less practical form
    Form
    square
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    302 x 320
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 302x320, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    302x320 vs 352x430
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 4 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    No local user storage for apps/media
    0 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Thomas Tech
≈ estimated
26/12/2025
Hands-on review · fitness, battery and smart features
Verdict
Amazfit Bip U Pro feels well above its price, covers the essentials, and easily makes a short list at this price.
8.0
TechieSetup
≈ estimated
04/07/2021
Hands-on review · GPS accuracy, screen, battery and app
Verdict
Amazfit Bip U Pro is a great budget tracker with accurate GPS, though the phone app is clunky and syncing can be slow.
9.0
JDubb
≈ estimated
16/04/2021
Hands-on review · tracking, design and GPS comparison
Verdict
Amazfit Bip U Pro feels premium and tracks well for the price; a great deal, though it can look small on larger wrists.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 13 · 12

Reviewers praise the long battery, solid fitness tracking and dependable GPS, but notifications, calls and the companion app frustrate many.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
18/08/2022
Hands-on test · Fitness tracker
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a strong fitness tracker, with accurate built-in GPS and 60+ sports modes, but Alexa and app syncing let it down.
7.0
androidauthority.com
✓ explicit
20/04/2021
One-week test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a light, accurate fitness watch with a nine-day battery, but its Alexa and syncing make it a poor pick for voice control.
9.0
mansworldindia.com
≈ estimated
19/04/2021
Review · GPS fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a light watch with built-in GPS and nine days of battery, but it can't store music and has no Spotify support.
9.0
uzone.id
≈ estimated
12/05/2021
One-week test · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a light fitness watch with nine days of battery, best suited to people who mainly want activity and sleep tracking.
8.9
basic-tutorials.com
✓ explicit
16/08/2021
Everyday test · Fitness tracker
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is mainly a fitness tracker: its GPS and health sensors work well, but it only pairs with the Zepp app and cannot answer calls.
wareable.com
25/01/2021
Not graded yet
techadvisor.com
18/02/2021
Not graded yet
7.0
android-user.de
≈ estimated
02/07/2021
Hands-on test · Four-watch comparison
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a light, comfortable fitness watch with nine days of battery, but it can't reply to messages.
8.9
basic-tutorials.de
✓ explicit
16/08/2021
Everyday test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a light, dependable tracker for heart rate and GPS-tracked runs, but it works only with the Zepp app and cannot take calls.
8.0
teltarif.de
≈ estimated
05/06/2021
Ten-day test · Four-model comparison
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a fitness watch with a sharp screen, accurate GPS and heart-rate readings, but its Alexa answers must be read off the screen.
7.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
02/07/2021
Full test · Design and screen
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a plain, Apple Watch-style fitness watch that handles baths and shallow pools, but its dim LCD is hard to read in strong sun.
7.0
metatrone.fr
≈ estimated
28/10/2023
Hands-on test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a light watch that tracks runs and rides well, lasts about eight days, but can only decline calls.
9.3
planetared.com
✓ explicit
14/11/2021
Review · Sports tracker
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a capable sports tracker with nine days of battery, but only its black version looks formal enough for serious events.
8.0
iphoneitalia.com
✓ explicit
26/05/2021
Hands-on test · Alexa smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a light watch whose Italian Alexa works well for home commands, but it has no speaker and cannot send messages or calls.
evosmart.it
12/02/2021
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit Bip U Pro

  • Excellent value for money given the feature set
  • Built-in GPS and GLONASS for accurate outdoor activity tracking without a phone
  • Comprehensive health monitoring, including 24-hour heart rate, SpO2, and detailed sleep tracking
  • Lightweight (31g) and comfortable for long-term wear
  • Strong battery life, typically lasting 5 to 9 days depending on usage
  • Vibrant and clear 1.43-inch color display with responsive touch

What we don't like about Amazfit Bip U Pro

  • Unreliable and patchy Amazon Alexa connectivity
  • Budget build quality with a polycarbonate body and 'cheap' feeling silicone straps
  • The Zepp companion app can be non-intuitive and occasionally difficult to navigate
  • Lack of third-party app support (e.g., Spotify, MyFitnessPal)
  • Basic notification management with no support for emojis or replying to messages
  • No automatic brightness adjustment or always-on display (AOD)

Verdict

The Amazfit Bip U Pro is a budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a 1.43-inch TFT LCD display with a 320x302 resolution and a lightweight 31g polycarbonate body. Its primary characteristics include built-in GPS and GLONASS for independent activity tracking, over 60 sports modes, and a BioTracker 2 PPG sensor for 24/7 heart rate and SpO2 monitoring. Main pros include its 5 ATM water resistance, a reliable battery life of up to 9 days, and integrated Amazon Alexa for voice commands. However, some cons include the lack of a built-in speaker for answering calls, unreliable Alexa connectivity in some regions, and the absence of an always-on display or third-party app support.

Compare Amazfit Bip U Pro with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit Bip U Pro and other Smartwatches

No results found