OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£150RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:6.74 inchesMain camera megapixels:13 MP & 0.08 MP

vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

90%

5.9

Technical score

10%

8.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 72% of smartphones
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

25%

5.6

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

4.7

Display

15%

5.8

Battery

10%

8.6

Software

10%

6.0

Connectivity

4%

5.1

Audio

3%

6.5

Design

â–¼Worse than 75% of smartphones
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

8.1

Number of reviews

Based on 741 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 74% of smartphones
  • vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
  • vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
  • vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
  • vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
  • vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
  • vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
  • vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
  • vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g
vivo-y19e-4gb-64gb-4g

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components:

25%

5.6

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

4.7

Display

15%

5.8

Battery

10%

8.6

Software

10%

6.0

Connectivity

4%

5.1

Audio

3%

6.5

Design

5.9
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

8.1

Number of reviews

Based on 741 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Popularity:
vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 8.1 points, which is higher than 77.3% of smartphones.
8.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

9.7

Price

7.2
Brand name
vivo
Processor model
Unisoc T7225
Processor model
Unisoc T7225
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
This smartphone uses the Unisoc T7225 processor model which is slower than processors in 68.6% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
1.8 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
1.8 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 1.8 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 92.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 2% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14)
Android version
Android 14
Android version
Android 14
â–² Better than 49% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 14 which is newer than that found in 49.5% of smartphones and equal to that in 21% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
?
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP & 0.08 MP
Main camera megapixels
13 MP & 0.08 MP
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 13 MP & 0.08 MP which is lower than that of 90.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.3% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2 & f/2.2 & f/3.0
Main camera aperture
f/2.2 & f/2.2 & f/3.0
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 & f/2.2 & f/3.0 which is narrower than that of 95.2% of smartphones.
for front
Main camera sensor area
?
Main camera pixel size
?
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
2 Nano-SIM (Dedicated slot, no eSIM support)
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.74 inches
Screen size
6.74 inches
â–² Better than 66% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.74 inches which is larger than the screens of 65.7% of smartphones and equal to those of 2.2% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
720x 1600 px
Screen resolution
720x 1600 px
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 720x1600 px which is lower than that of 87.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.7% of smartphones.
Pixel density
260 ppi
Pixel density
260 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 260 ppi which is lower than that of 93.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.3% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Refresh rate
90 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,500 mAh
Battery capacity
5,500 mAh
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,500 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 67.7% of smartphones and equal to those in 3% of smartphones.
Charging speed
15 W
Charging speed
15 W
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 87.7% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.9% of smartphones.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
This smartphone does not support fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
Stereo speakers
no
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
â–² Better than 55% of models
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
â–² Better than 66% of models
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
167.3 mm
Height
167.3 mm
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 167.3 mm which is taller than 80.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Width
76.95 mm
Width
76.95 mm
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 76.95 mm which is wider than 72.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.19 mm
Thickness
8.19 mm
â–² Better than 58% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.19 mm which is thinner than 57.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Weight
199 g
Weight
199 g
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 199 g which is heavier than 55.1% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 3.2% of smartphones.
Device volume
101,536 cm³
Device volume
101,536 cm³
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 101,536 cm³ which is larger than 70.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Show more

vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 5.65x higher 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    3,435
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <133 – >2.4k
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark than the average smartphone (3,435 vs 608). The average score is 608.
    3,435 vs 608
  • 10% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    5,500 mAh
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5500 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    AI Erase, AI Photo Enhance, AI Documents
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Supports 360° panorama
    360° panorama
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • 0.07 inches inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    6.74 inches
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.74 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    FM radio
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Supports aptX
    aptX
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 3.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    vivo Y19e 4G
    the average smartphone
    vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.30 vs 8.000).
    8.3 vs 8
  • 73.3% cheaper
    vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£150 vs £260).
    £150 vs £260
  • 48.6% more popular
    vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (8.08 vs 5.4).
    8.08 vs 5.44
  • 5.65x higher 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    3,435
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <133 – >2.4k
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark than the average smartphone (3,435 vs 608). The average score is 608.
    3,435 vs 608
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    AI Erase, AI Photo Enhance, AI Documents
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Supports 360° panorama
    360° panorama
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • 0.07 inches inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    6.74 inches
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.74 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 10% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    5,500 mAh
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5500 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    FM radio
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Supports aptX
    aptX
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone has a newer release date than the average smartphone (2025 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones are released annually.
    March 2025
    2025 vs 2024
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.2 & f/2.2 & f/3.0
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.2 & f/2.2 & f/3 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    for front
    f/2.2 & f/2.2 & f/3.0 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Unisoc T7225
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc T7225 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc T7225 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    64 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    12 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    90 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 1.2% worse value for money
    vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (7.25 vs 7.3).
    7.25 vs 7.34
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Unisoc T7225
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc T7225 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc T7225 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    64 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    12 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 4 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    4 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 71.4% lower maximum RAM capacity
    Maximum RAM
    4 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 14 GB
  • 25% lower CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    1.8 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Supports older OpenGL version
    OpenGL version
    3.0
    Category Benchmark
    This smartphone supports a lower OpenGL version than the average smartphone (3 vs 3.2). The average smartphone supports OpenGL version 3.2.
    3.0 vs 3.2
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    2 x 1.8 GHz & 6 x 1.8 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x1.8 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x1.8 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 1 fewer memory channels
    Memory channels
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <2 – >4
    This smartphone supports fewer memory channels than the average smartphone (1 vs 2). The average smartphone supports 2 channels.
    1 vs 2
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.2 & f/2.2 & f/3.0
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.2 & f/2.2 & f/3 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    for front
    f/2.2 & f/2.2 & f/3.0 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    13 MP & 0.08 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (13 MP & 0.08 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    13 MP & 0.08 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    5 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (5 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    5 MP vs 16 MP
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartphone does not have a manual focus mode, the average smartphone does. 91.2% of smartphones offer manual focus.
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No NFC
    NFC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This smartphone does not have a gyroscope, the average smartphone does. 84.4% of smartphones feature a gyroscope.
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    90 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 34.2% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    260 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (260 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    260 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    720 x 1600 px
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (720x1600 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    720x1600 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 430 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    570 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <480 nits – >3.6k nits
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (570 nits vs 1000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    570 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 13.6% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    570 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (570 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    570 nits vs 660 nits
  • 54.5% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    15 W
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    15 W vs 33 W
  • No fast charging support
    Fast charging
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartphone does not support fast charging, the average smartphone does. 93.1% of smartphones feature fast charging.
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP64
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP64 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP64 vs IP67
  • 3.7 mm taller
    Height
    167.3 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (167.3 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    167.3 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 0.95 mm wider
    Width
    76.95 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (77 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    76.95 mm vs 76 mm
  • 1.4% heavier
    Weight
    199 g
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (199 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    199 g vs 196.2 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on 741 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Good phone quality and solid build
  • Excellent value for money and affordable price point
  • Smooth performance for everyday tasks like browsing, calling, and social media use
  • Long-lasting 5500 mAh battery with support for 15W fast charging and reverse charging
  • Bright and clear display (6.74-inch LCD, 90Hz refresh rate) that is good for media consumption
  • Stylish design and comfortable to hold
  • Dedicated microSD card slot for expandable storage (up to 2TB)
  • Comes with a clear phone case in some packages

What we don't like about vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Poor and bad quality camera, especially in low light conditions
  • Slow charging, with some users reporting it can take 1-2 hours for a full charge despite the 15W rating
  • Heating issues during use
  • Low call quality reported by some users
  • Wi-Fi connectivity issues, including frequent disconnections
  • Pre-installed OS occupies a significant amount of the 64GB internal storage
  • Not suitable for high-end gaming performance
  • UI experience is inconsistent, mixing stock Android and Funtouch elements, with some stuttering reported

Verdict

The Vivo Y19e 4G is a budget-friendly smartphone running Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14) on a Unisoc T7225 octa-core processor with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of expandable storage (up to 2TB). Its main features include a large 5,500mAh battery with 15W fast charging, a 6.74-inch HD+ LCD display with a 90Hz refresh rate, and IP64 dust and water resistance with military-grade shock resistance for enhanced durability. The phone has a dual rear camera setup (13MP main + 0.08MP depth) and a 5MP front camera, suitable for basic photography and video calls. A key pros is the excellent battery life, a large screen with a 90Hz refresh rate, and a durable build quality. Cons include basic camera performance, an entry-level processor that may not be ideal for high-end gaming, and some user reports of occasional lag when playing offline videos.

Compare vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of vivo Y19e 4G (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found