OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£670RAM capacity:12 GBInternal storage:512 GBScreen size:6.78 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 50 MP & 12 MP

vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

8.2

Overall score

Score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

90%

8.2

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 92% of smartphones
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

25%

8.7

Performance & Hardware

18%

9.0

Camera

15%

7.6

Display

15%

8.0

Battery

10%

8.0

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.9

Audio

3%

7.4

Design

★Better than 92% of smartphones
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £670

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
12GB + 512GB12GB + 256GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components:

25%

8.7

Performance & Hardware

18%

9.0

Camera

15%

7.6

Display

15%

8.0

Battery

10%

8.0

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.9

Audio

3%

7.4

Design

8.2
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

8.2

Overall score

40%

7.0

Price

7.9
Brand name
vivo
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
★ Better than 90% of models
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 processor which is faster than processors in 90% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.1% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
12 GB
RAM capacity
12 GB
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 12 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 59% of smartphones and equal to that of 24.3% of smartphones.
Internal storage
512 GB
Internal storage
512 GB
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 512 GB which is larger than the storage of 77.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 17.2% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
3 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
3 GHz
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 3 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 75.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 13
Android version
Android 13
Android version
Android 13
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 13 which is older than that found in 50.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 16.5% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 50 MP & 12 MP
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 50 MP & 12 MP
â–² Better than 71% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 50 MP & 12 MP which is higher than that of 70.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.6 & f/1.75 & f/2.0
Main camera aperture
f/1.6 & f/1.75 & f/2.0
★ Better than 96% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.6 & f/1.75 & f/2.0 which is wider than that of 95.8% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
128 mm²
Main camera sensor area
128 mm²
★ Better than 99% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 128 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 99% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.6 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.6 µm
★ Better than 97% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.6 µm which is larger than in 97% of smartphones and equal to the size in 1.2% of smartphones.
3.2 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
5G connectivity
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.78 inches
Screen size
6.78 inches
â–² Better than 73% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.78 inches which is larger than the screens of 73.5% of smartphones and equal to those of 9.5% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1260x 2800 px
Screen resolution
1260x 2800 px
â–² Better than 84% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1260x2800 px which is higher than that of 83.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Pixel density
453 ppi
Pixel density
453 ppi
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 453 ppi which is higher than that of 83.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
â–² Better than 41% of models
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Refresh rate
120 Hz
â–² Better than 35% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,870 mAh
Battery capacity
4,870 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,870 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 72.4% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.1% of smartphones.
Charging speed
120 W
Charging speed
120 W
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 120 W which is faster than in 94.4% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 4.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
Wireless charging
yes
â–² Better than 75% of models
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
Stereo speakers
yes
â–² Better than 36% of models
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Number of microphones
3
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 34% of models
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
164.1 mm
Height
164.1 mm
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 164.1 mm which is taller than 58.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.2% of smartphones.
Width
74.5 mm
Width
74.5 mm
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 74.5 mm which is narrower than 76.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.3% of smartphones.
Thickness
9.3 mm
Thickness
9.3 mm
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 9.3 mm which is thicker than 83.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Weight
214.9 g
Weight
214.9 g
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 214.9 g which is heavier than 77.4% of smartphones.
Device volume
109,224 cm³
Device volume
109,224 cm³
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 109,224 cm³ which is larger than 81% of smartphones.
Show more

vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 4x larger main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    128 mm²
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (128 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    128 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 3.64x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    120 W
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (120 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    120 W vs 33 W
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    512 GB
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (512 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 256 GB
  • 3.97x higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    12,376
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <661 – >11.1k
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (12,376 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    12,376 vs 3,115
  • 0.8 µm larger main camera pixel size
    Main camera pixel size
    1.6 µm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.6 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    3.2 binned
    1.6 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    2 x
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >3 x
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • 7.2% better value for money
    vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (7.86 vs 7.3).
    7.86 vs 7.34
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    512 GB
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (512 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 256 GB
  • 3.97x higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    12,376
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <661 – >11.1k
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (12,376 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    12,376 vs 3,115
  • 2.18x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    2058
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <392 – >2.2k
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (2058 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    2,058 vs 942
  • 4 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    12 GB
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 3.1x faster memory speed
    Memory speed
    8,533 MHz
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (8533 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2750 MHz memory speed.
    8,533 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 33.3% smaller process node
    Process node
    4 nm
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (4 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    4 nm vs 6 nm
  • Better processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Dimensity 9200
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 9,200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 25% higher CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    3.0 GHz
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    3.0 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 5.5x more shader units
    N. of shading units
    1,408
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,408 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,408 vs 256
  • 3.32x higher 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    12,714
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <975 – >12.4k
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (12,714 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    12,714 vs 3,825
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    1 x 3 GHz & 3 x 2.85 GHz & 4 x 1.8 GHz
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x3 GHz & 3x2.85 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x3 GHz & 3x2.85 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 2.16x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    5,465
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >6.7k
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (5,465 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    5,465 vs 2,533
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    5
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 71.4% higher maximum RAM
    Maximum RAM
    24 GB
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (24 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    24 GB vs 14 GB
  • 65% more transistors
    Number of transistors
    17,000 million
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <5.3k million – >19k million
    This smartphone has more transistors than the average smartphone (17000 million vs 10300 million). The average smartphone includes 10300 million transistors.
    17,000 million vs 10,300 million
  • 2x more L3 cache
    L3 cache
    8,192 KB
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (8192 KB vs 4096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4096 KB.
    8,192 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    V2 Chip, AI-ISP, AI Noise Reduction, AI Night View, ZEISS Cine-flare Portrait, Handheld Astro
    productivity vs fundamental
  • 4x larger main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    128 mm²
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (128 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    128 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 0.8 µm larger main camera pixel size
    Main camera pixel size
    1.6 µm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.6 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    3.2 binned
    1.6 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    2 x
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >3 x
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • Better main camera video
    Main camera video
    4320 x 30 fps
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 44.20x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    4320x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 2 more flash LEDs
    Number of flash LEDs
    3
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (3 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    3 vs 1
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.6 & f/1.75 & f/2.0
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.6 & f/1.75 & f/2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.6 & f/1.75 & f/2.0 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    Multi-lens front camera
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Supports laser autofocus
    Laser autofocus
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    HDR10 video recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    Dual-tone LED flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • 16.7% higher DxOMark Mobile score
    DxOMark Mobile score
    140
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <89 – >153
    This smartphone has a higher DxOMark Mobile score than the average smartphone (140 vs 120). The average smartphone scores 120.
    140 vs 120
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    50 MP & 50 MP & 12 MP
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (50 MP & 50 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    50 MP & 50 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    32 MP
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Has a pro camera setup
    Pro camera setup
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This smartphone features a pro camera setup, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones include professional-grade camera hardware.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.3 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.3 vs 5.2
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    8000000:1
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (8000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    AMOLED/OLED displays have an effectively infinite contrast ratio
    8,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1260 x 2800 px
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1260x2800 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1260x2800 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 14.7% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    453 ppi
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (453 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    453 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • 0.11 inches inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    6.78 inches
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.78 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Has an always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Has a curved display
    Curved display
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • 25% higher touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    300 Hz
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <120 Hz – >480 Hz
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (300 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    300 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • 300 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    1,300 nits
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <480 nits – >3.6k nits
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (1300 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    1,300 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 3.64x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    120 W
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (120 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    120 W vs 33 W
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 2.5x faster wireless charging speed
    Wireless charging speed
    50 W
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >50 W
    This smartphone supports a faster wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (50 W vs 20 W). The average speed is 20 W.
    50 W vs 20 W
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    aptX Adaptive
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This smartphone supports aptX Adaptive, the average smartphone does not. 34.5% of smartphones include aptX Adaptive support.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    3
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    aptX
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >2 m
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 1.5 mm narrower
    Width
    74.5 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (74.5 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    74.5 mm vs 76 mm
  • Better IP rating
    IP rating
    IP68
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 10.5% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    850 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (850 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    850 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.5
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.5 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.5 vs f/2.2
  • 21.7% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    517 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (517 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    517 nits vs 660 nits
  • 9.5% heavier
    Weight
    214.9 g
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (214.9 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    214.9 g vs 196.2 g
  • 2.58x more expensive
    vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£670 vs £260).
    £670 vs £260
  • 5.44x less popular
    vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 2.58x more expensive
    vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£670 vs £260).
    £670 vs £260
  • 5.44x less popular
    vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 10.5% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    850 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (850 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    850 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    Android version
    Android 13
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 13 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 13 vs Android 14
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.5
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.5 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.5 vs f/2.2
  • No memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 21.7% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    517 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (517 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    517 nits vs 660 nits
  • 2.6% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,870 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4870 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,870 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Lower GSMArena battery endurance score
    GSMArena battery life endurance score
    96
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <74 – >125
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery endurance score than the average smartphone (96 vs 99.5). The average smartphone scores 99.5.
    96 vs 99.5
  • 9.5% heavier
    Weight
    214.9 g
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (214.9 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    214.9 g vs 196.2 g
  • 1 mm thicker
    Thickness
    9.3 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (9.3 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    9.3 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 2 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2022
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2022 vs 2024). 2.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    December 2022
    2022 vs 2024
  • 11.7% larger volume
    Device volume
    109,224 cm³
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (109224 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    109,224 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
stuff.tv
10/02/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro review: another Zeiss zinger
A
androidpolice.com
18/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro review: I’m in love with the camera
G
gsmarena.com
16/02/2023
Summary of the review
vivo X90 Pro review
I
indiatoday.in
26/04/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro review: Best camera phone money can buy Would you like to compare the camera performance of this model against other 1-inch sensor phones...
A
androidheadlines.com
17/02/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: Pushing the limits of smartphone photography
G
gizchina.com
19/02/2023
Summary of the review
VIVO X90 Pro review: as good as it gets!
F
forbes.com
19/02/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: 1-Inch Sensor Matters
P
petapixel.com
07/04/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: Back on Track
A
androidcentral.com
27/05/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro long-term review: Stylish design, stellar cameras
T
techadvisor.com
11/05/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: Good Phone, Incredible Camera
P
pocket-lint.com
10/02/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro review: Setting a new standard in mobile photography
A
androidauthority.com
06/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro review: Creature of the night
C
cnet.com
15/02/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: 'Xtreme Imagination' in an Above-Average Phone
F
futurezone.at
03/04/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: A Step Backward Despite a Flawless Camera
(Translated)Show original
P
pcwelt.de
02/05/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: This Phone Beats Every Rival in One Specific Category
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
22/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: High-End Insider Tip with Zeiss Camera
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
12/05/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: The competition should be worried
(Translated)Show original
T
techadvisor.com
25/04/2023
Summary of the review
Test du Vivo X90 Pro - Tech Advisor
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro review: An excellent camera phone that still lacks stamina
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
07/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: Samsung Galaxy S23, Watch Out!
(Translated)Show original
L
lesmobiles.com
05/05/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Smartphone Review
(Translated)Show original
L
lemon.fr
N/A
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review
(Translated)Show original
P
phototrend.fr
22/02/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro: New premium smartphone with a 1-inch sensor designed with Zeiss
(Translated)Show original
T
tomsguide.fr
04/05/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: cheaper, better battery life... a solid alternative to the Xiaomi 13 Pro
(Translated)Show original
P
presse-citron.net
17/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: A Bold Show of Strength
(Translated)Show original
C
clubic.com
07/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra should be worried!
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
09/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: Major improvements at the cost of big compromises
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
27/08/2024
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro review: our verdict on this premium camera phone
(Translated)Show original
C
charlestech.fr
18/05/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review - Android Smartphone - Charles Tech
(Translated)Show original
M
movilzona.es
01/07/2024
Summary of the review
What users think of the vivo X90 Pro and its camera
(Translated)Show original
E
elespanol.com
27/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: A strange evolution that surprises us
(Translated)Show original
E
elespanol.com
27/03/2023
Summary of the review
We test the vivo X90 Pro: the high-end smartphone with a great camera that you still don't know
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshw.it
27/06/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro review: the excellent camera phone that leaves a slightly bitter taste
(Translated)Show original
T
tech.everyeye.it
16/05/2023
Summary of the review
vivo X90 Pro Review: The cameraphone that doesn't compromise on performance
(Translated)Show original
C
corriere.it
26/04/2026
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro, a camera disguised as a smartphone: field test
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
15/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: A True Camera Phone
(Translated)Show original
D
dday.it
15/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro review: The flagship with a 1-inch sensor and Zeiss superpowers
(Translated)Show original
T
tuttoandroid.net
15/03/2023
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Review: Spectacular photos, but it’s also a victim of 2023
(Translated)Show original
C
cashify.in.en2nl.search.translate.goog
14/08/2024
Summary of the review
Vivo X90 Pro Long-Term Review: A Complete Flagship Package
(Translated)Show original

Verdict

The vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) is a premium flagship featuring a 6.78-inch curved AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, 1260p resolution, and 1,300 nits peak brightness. It is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 chipset (4nm) paired with high-speed LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 storage. Its defining characteristic is the Zeiss-co-engineered triple camera system, headlined by a massive 1-inch Sony IMX989 50MP main sensor, a 50MP portrait lens with 2x optical zoom, and a 12MP ultra-wide sensor. Key pros include exceptional low-light photography, IP68 water and dust resistance, and ultra-fast charging capabilities (120W wired and 50W wireless) for its 4,870mAh battery. However, cons include significant amounts of pre-installed bloatware in Funtouch OS, an underwhelming ultra-wide camera compared to the main sensor, and the lack of a dedicated periscope telephoto lens for long-range zoom.

Compare vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of vivo X90 Pro (12GB + 512GB) and other smartphones

No results found