OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£600RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:1 TBScreen size:6.31 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP

vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

8.6

Overall score

Score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

90%

8.6

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 96% of smartphones
8.6

Technical score

Technical score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

25%

9.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

9.2

Camera

15%

8.6

Display

15%

8.4

Battery

10%

8.0

Software

10%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

7.0

Audio

3%

8.1

Design

★Better than 96% of smartphones
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • vivo-x200-pro-mini
vivo-x200-pro-mini

Best prices

    N/A~ £600

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components:

25%

9.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

9.2

Camera

15%

8.6

Display

15%

8.4

Battery

10%

8.0

Software

10%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

7.0

Audio

3%

8.1

Design

8.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components:

60%

8.6

Overall score

40%

7.4

Price

8.2
Brand name
vivo
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
★ Better than 95% of models
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 processor which is faster than processors in 94.5% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
16 GB
RAM capacity
16 GB
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 83.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12% of smartphones.
Internal storage
1 GB
Internal storage
1 GB
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 1 TB which is larger than the storage of 94.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.6% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
3.63 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
3.63 GHz
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 3.63 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 93.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
â–² Better than 71% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 15 which is newer than that found in 70.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 25.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP
â–² Better than 72% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP which is higher than that of 72.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.5% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.57 & f/2.0 & f/2.57
Main camera aperture
f/1.57 & f/2.0 & f/2.57
★ Better than 97% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.57 & f/2.0 & f/2.57 which is wider than that of 96.5% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
74.4 mm²
Main camera sensor area
74.4 mm²
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 74.4 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 94.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.5% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.22 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.22 µm
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.22 µm which is larger than in 88.8% of smartphones and equal to the size in 3% of smartphones.
2.44 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
5G connectivity
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.31 inches
Screen size
6.31 inches
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.31 inches which is smaller than the screens of 88.7% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.3% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1216x 2640 px
Screen resolution
1216x 2640 px
â–² Better than 75% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1216x2640 px which is higher than that of 75.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Pixel density
460 ppi
Pixel density
460 ppi
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 460 ppi which is higher than that of 88.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
â–² Better than 41% of models
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Refresh rate
120 Hz
â–² Better than 35% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,700 mAh
Battery capacity
5,700 mAh
â–² Better than 72% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,700 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 71.6% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.5% of smartphones.
Charging speed
90 W
Charging speed
90 W
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 90 W which is faster than in 86.6% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 3.5% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
Wireless charging
yes
â–² Better than 75% of models
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
Stereo speakers
yes
â–² Better than 36% of models
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 34% of models
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
?
Show more
Height
150.8 mm
Height
150.8 mm
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 150.8 mm which is shorter than 95.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
71.8 mm
Width
71.8 mm
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 71.8 mm which is narrower than 93.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.6% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.2 mm
Thickness
8.2 mm
â–² Better than 52% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.2 mm which is thinner than 51.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 6.1% of smartphones.
Weight
187 g
Weight
187 g
â–² Better than 73% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 187 g which is lighter than 73.1% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 2.4% of smartphones.
Device volume
85,200 cm³
Device volume
85,200 cm³
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 85,200 cm³ which is smaller than 82.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Show more

vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 8 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    16 GB
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2.33x larger main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    74.4 mm²
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 3 x higher optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    3 x
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >3 x
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (3 x vs 0 x).
    3 x vs 0 x
  • 4x more storage
    Internal storage
    1 TB GB
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (1 TB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    1 TB vs 256 GB
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 50% smaller process node
    Process node
    3 nm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 2.73x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    90 W
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (90 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    90 W vs 33 W
  • 51.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    3.63 GHz
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    3.63 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 12% better value for money
    vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (8.21 vs 7.3).
    8.21 vs 7.34
  • 8 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    16 GB
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 4x more storage
    Internal storage
    1 TB GB
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (1 TB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    1 TB vs 256 GB
  • 50% smaller process node
    Process node
    3 nm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 51.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    3.63 GHz
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    3.63 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 2.84x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    2,675
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <392 – >2.2k
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (2,675 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    2,675 vs 942
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    1 x 3.63 GHz & 4 x 3.3 GHz & 3 x 2.4 GHz
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x3.63 GHz & 4x3.3 GHz & 3x2.4 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x3.63 GHz & 4x3.3 GHz & 3x2.4 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Better processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Dimensity 9400
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 9,400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 6x more shader units
    N. of shading units
    1,536
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,536 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,536 vs 256
  • 3.88x faster memory speed
    Memory speed
    10,667 MHz
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (10667 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2750 MHz memory speed.
    10,667 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 3.37x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    8,536
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >6.7k
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (8,536 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    8,536 vs 2,533
  • 3x more L3 cache
    L3 cache
    12,288 KB
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (12288 KB vs 4096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4096 KB.
    12,288 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 36.8% faster GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    1,300 MHz
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a higher GPU frequency than the average smartphone (1300 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone GPU frequency is 950 MHz.
    1,300 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    5
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 71.4% higher maximum RAM
    Maximum RAM
    24 GB
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (24 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    24 GB vs 14 GB
  • 2 more memory channels
    Memory channels
    4
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <2 – >4
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • 4x more L1
    L1 cache
    128 KB
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <32 KB – >192 KB
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (128 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    128 KB vs 32 KB
  • Supports newer OpenCL version
    OpenCL version
    3.0
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer OpenCL version than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average version is 2.0.
    3.0 vs 2.0
  • 95.3% more L2 cache
    L2 cache
    2000 KB
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <512 KB – >4.1k KB
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (2000 KB vs 1024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1024 KB.
    2,000 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Circle to Search, AI Note Assist, AI Transcript Assist, Live Call Translation, AI Photo Enhance, AI Erase, Origin Island
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Newer Android version
    Android version
    Android 15
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 15 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 15 vs Android 14
  • 2.33x larger main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    74.4 mm²
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    74.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 3 x higher optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    3 x
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >3 x
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (3 x vs 0 x).
    3 x vs 0 x
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 0.42 µm larger main camera pixel size
    Main camera pixel size
    1.22 µm
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.2 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    2.44 binned
    1.22 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.57 & f/2.0 & f/2.57
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.57 & f/2 & f/2.57 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.57 & f/2.0 & f/2.57 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Supports Dolby Vision video recording
    Dolby Vision video recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision video recording, the average smartphone does not. 10.7% of smartphones support Dolby Vision.
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    Multi-lens front camera
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Supports laser autofocus
    Laser autofocus
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • Better main camera video
    Main camera video
    2160 x 60 fps
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 22.60x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    2160x60 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    Manual shutter speed
    yes
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    Number of flash LEDs
    2
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    50 MP & 50 MP & 50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    HDR10 video recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    Dual-tone LED flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    32 MP
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Has a pro camera setup
    Pro camera setup
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This smartphone features a pro camera setup, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones include professional-grade camera hardware.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.4
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • 3,500 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    4,500 nits
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <480 nits – >3.6k nits
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (4500 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 16.5% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    460 ppi
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (460 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    460 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    8000000:1
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (8000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    AMOLED/OLED displays have an effectively infinite contrast ratio
    8,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Supports Dolby Vision support
    Dolby Vision support
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision, the average smartphone does not. 17.3% of smartphones are Dolby Vision compatible.
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    HDR10+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Better display glass type
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Tempered Glass
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1216 x 2640 px
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1216x2640 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1216x2640 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Has an always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 2.73x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    90 W
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (90 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    90 W vs 33 W
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 14% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    5,700 mAh
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5700 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    5,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 50% faster wireless charging speed
    Wireless charging speed
    30 W
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >50 W
    This smartphone supports a faster wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (30 W vs 20 W). The average speed is 20 W.
    30 W vs 20 W
  • Supports aptX
    aptX
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >2 m
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 12.8 mm shorter
    Height
    150.8 mm
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (150.8 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    150.8 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 4.2 mm narrower
    Width
    71.8 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (71.8 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    71.8 mm vs 76 mm
  • 4.7% lighter
    Weight
    187 g
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (187 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    187 g vs 196.2 g
  • Better IP rating
    IP rating
    IP68
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • 0.36 inches inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    6.31 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.3 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.31 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • No memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 5.44x less popular
    vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 2.31x more expensive
    vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£600 vs £260).
    £600 vs £260
  • 5.44x less popular
    vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 2.31x more expensive
    vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£600 vs £260).
    £600 vs £260
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 0.36 inches inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    6.31 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.3 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.31 inches vs 6.67 inches

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
smartzone.de
12/12/2024
Summary of the review
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Review – Smartzone
(Translated)Show original
D
digitalcameraworld.com.en2nl.search.translate.goog
20/10/2024
Summary of the review
Vivo X200 Pro Review: I spent five days with the 200MP Zeiss camera...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB)

  • Compact form factor and comfortable one-handed use, a key selling point for users who prefer smaller phones.
  • Exceptional rear camera system (main and telephoto lenses), praised for image clarity, detail, portrait mode, zoom capabilities, and low-light performance.
  • Long and reliable battery life (5,700mAh capacity), with some users noting it lasts all day even with heavy use.
  • Powerful performance due to the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 processor, ensuring smooth daily use and gaming without significant lag or overheating.
  • High-quality, bright AMOLED display with ultra-narrow bezels, 120Hz refresh rate, and good eye care features.
  • Premium design and build quality, featuring an aluminum alloy frame and frosted glass back, with IP68/IP69 water and dust resistance.
  • Fast wired (90W) and wireless (30W) charging speeds.
  • OriginOS/FunTouch OS is generally considered smooth and customizable, with useful AI features and timely updates for global variants.
  • Strong network stability and connectivity features, including Wi-Fi 7 and 5G support.

What we don't like about vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB)

  • Mediocre to poor front/selfie camera performance, with issues like lack of autofocus, soft details, and unnatural skin tone processing.
  • Speaker quality is considered average or 'tinny' compared to other flagship phones.
  • Some users reported potential 5G data bandwidth/throttling issues in specific regions.
  • Certain software aspects, like the browser app notifications or the presence of bloatware on Chinese models, can be annoying out of the box.
  • Worse vibration and haptic feedback compared to competitors like the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra.
  • Fingerprint sensor performance is considered slightly worse or positioned too low by some users.
  • Photos and videos posted on social media apps (TikTok, Facebook, Instagram) may experience quality reduction due to app optimization issues.
  • The phone does not have a 3.5mm headphone jack.

Verdict

The Vivo X200 Pro Mini is a high-end compact flagship smartphone, featuring a 6.31-inch 1.5K LTPO AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a stunning 4500 nits peak brightness, powered by the flagship MediaTek Dimensity 9400 processor. This configuration includes a generous 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM and 1TB (1TB) of UFS 4.0 internal storage, running on Android 15-based OriginOS 5 in China. A major pro is its powerful triple 50MP Zeiss camera system (main with OIS, ultrawide, and 3x optical periscope telephoto), a substantial 5,700mAh battery for long endurance, and support for both 90W wired and 30W wireless fast charging, all within a compact and lightweight (187g) IP68/IP69-rated body. Potential cons include its limited global availability (primarily a China ROM device with potential Google services/network band issues if imported) and speakers which some reviews note are average at best.

Compare vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of vivo X200 Pro Mini (16GB + 1TB) and other smartphones

No results found