OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v3.0

Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro review: 196 specs compared

Avg. price:~£120RAM capacity:?Internal storage:?Screen size:5.45 inchesMain camera megapixels:?

Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro Review: Compare 196 technical specifications and 4 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

35%

6.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.7

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 67% of smartphones
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–²Better than 59%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

25%

7.2

Performance

18%

6.5

Camera

15%

5.3

Display

15%

6.9

Battery

10%

8.6

Software

10%

6.9

Connectivity

4%

2.9

Audio

3%

7.1

Design

â–¼Worse than 51%
6.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models

6.7

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

6.4

Popularity

Grades by review (4)
4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 68%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • ulefone-rugking-2-pro
  • ulefone-rugking-2-pro
  • ulefone-rugking-2-pro
  • ulefone-rugking-2-pro
  • ulefone-rugking-2-pro
  • ulefone-rugking-2-pro
  • ulefone-rugking-2-pro
  • ulefone-rugking-2-pro
  • ulefone-rugking-2-pro
ulefone-rugking-2-pro
ulefone-rugking-2-pro
ulefone-rugking-2-pro
ulefone-rugking-2-pro
ulefone-rugking-2-pro
ulefone-rugking-2-pro
ulefone-rugking-2-pro
ulefone-rugking-2-pro
ulefone-rugking-2-pro
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro

Based on 0 · 6

Reviewers agree it is rugged, waterproof and long-lasting, with useful extras that suit tough outdoor use.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components:

25%

7.2

Performance

18%

6.5

Camera

15%

5.3

Display

15%

6.9

Battery

10%

8.6

Software

10%

6.9

Connectivity

4%

2.9

Audio

3%

7.1

Design

6.7
Reviews score
6.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.8
Processor model
?
Storage type
?
RAM capacity
?
Internal storage
?
CPU boost clock speed
1.8 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 1.8 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 92.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.5% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone runs Android, which is more mainstream than the system in 4.8% of smartphones and the same as in 95.2% of smartphones.
Android version
?
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not support direct OS updates. 20.1% of smartphones offer this.
Promised software updates
?
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone runs an open-source operating system. 5.2% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
?
Main camera aperture
?
Main camera sensor area
?
Main camera pixel size
?
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.7% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.2% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
eSIM support
no
Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro does not have eSIM support. 19.9% of smartphones offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not have 5G connectivity. 66.7% of smartphones offer this.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Show more
Screen size
5.45 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 5.45 inches which is smaller than the screens of 97.7% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.4% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
295 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 295 ppi which is lower than that of 77% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.6% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
?
Charging speed
?
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.2% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.1% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
What reviewers say
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not have stereo speakers. 64.3% of smartphones offer this.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.1% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
yes
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.3% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless Bluetooth audio. 12.5% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
Height
159 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 159 mm which is shorter than 83.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
80 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 80 mm which is wider than 89% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Thickness
15.65 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 15.65 mm which is thicker than 93.8% of smartphones.
Weight
?
Device volume
?
Show more
What reviewers say

Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformanceSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 2x more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • Has a rugged design
    This smartphone features a rugged design, the average smartphone does not. 7.9% of smartphones are built for durability.
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.1% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.3% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • 4.6 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (159 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    159 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 2.17x cheaper
    Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro is cheaper than the average smartphone (£120 vs £260).
    £120 vs £260
  • 2.17x cheaper
    Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro is cheaper than the average smartphone (£120 vs £260).
    £120 vs £260
  • 2x more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.1% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.3% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Has a rugged design
    This smartphone features a rugged design, the average smartphone does not. 7.9% of smartphones are built for durability.
  • 4.6 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (159 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    159 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • No ultrawide rear camera
    Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro does not have an ultrawide rear camera, while the average smartphone does. 62.6% of smartphones offer this.
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.6% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 1.22 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (5.5 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    5.45 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.3% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • 8.2% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models

    6.7

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    6.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (4)
    4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.7 vs 7.3
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 25% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 87.5% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (32 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    32 vs 256
  • No ultrawide rear camera
    Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro does not have an ultrawide rear camera, while the average smartphone does. 62.6% of smartphones offer this.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.6% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 1.22 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (5.5 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    5.45 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 25.3% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (295 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    295 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.3% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.1% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.2% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 7.35 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (15.7 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    15.65 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 4 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (80 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    80 mm vs 76 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Sky Vanya
≈ estimated
28/10/2026
Review and unboxing · two weeks of use and gaming tests
Verdict
Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro is a thin, light, durable tablet that suits gaming, video and field work, with a useful docking station.
7.0
Eufracio López 502
≈ estimated
15/07/2026
Hands-on review · gaming, battery and camera tests
Verdict
Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro is not built for photos, but it is fine for field work, emergencies and light remote work.
9.0
Mr.Laowai-English Tech
≈ estimated
02/03/2026
Hands-on review · water test and camera samples
Verdict
Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro is a waterproof rugged tablet with a big battery and solid everyday performance for work and outdoor use.
9.0
TechMagnet
≈ estimated
27/02/2026
Hands-on review · flashlight, camera and car mount tests
Verdict
Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro is a tough tablet with a large battery, a strong flashlight and a sturdy build.
8.0
Mr.Laowai-English Tech
≈ estimated
26/12/2025
Hands-on review · build, display and camera tests
Verdict
Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro is a compact, dependable rugged phone that handles the basics well, though it is not a flagship.
Not graded
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro

  • The rugged body suits work on sites and outdoors.
  • The 90 Hz refresh rate keeps scrolling smooth.
  • GPS works for maps on foot or in the field.
  • Camera and mic privacy switches let you control access.
  • Notification customization lets you decide which alerts get through.
  • HDR mode and phase-detection autofocus help the main camera in tricky light.

What customers don't like about Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro

  • At 15.65 mm thick, it is bulky in a pocket.
  • The 5.45 inch screen is small for films and web pages.
  • There is no 5G, so it stays on LTE networks.
  • There is no optical stabilization, so video shakes.
  • No wireless charging, so it needs a cable.

Verdict

A tough body is the first thing to know about the Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro. Its rugged design is rare in a phone this size, so it suits people who work on sites, farms or boats. The 90 Hz screen refresh keeps scrolling smooth. It is not slim, though: at 15.65 mm thick and 80 mm wide, it sits awkwardly in a jeans pocket. The 5.45 inch screen is small and the 295 ppi sharpness is modest, so long reading is less pleasant. The 12 nm processor is basic, so heavy games feel slow. The main camera has several lenses and HDR, but video stops at 1080 x 30 fps and there is no optical stabilization. It fits a buyer who wants a phone that survives rough days and does not need fast games.

Compare Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ulefone RugKing 2 Pro and other smartphones

No results found