OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£970RAM capacity:12 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.8 inchesMain camera megapixels:12 MP & 12 MP & 16 MP & 0.3 MP

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

7.3

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components

90%

7.2

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

â–²Better than 69% of smartphones
7.2

Technical score

Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

25%

6.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.1

Camera

15%

6.9

Display

15%

7.0

Battery

10%

7.9

Software

10%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Audio

3%

7.4

Design

â–²Better than 68% of smartphones
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

8.1

Number of reviews

Based on 1,183 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 71% of smartphones
  • samsung-galaxy-note-10-plus
  • samsung-galaxy-note-10-plus
samsung-galaxy-note-10-plus
samsung-galaxy-note-10-plus

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components:

25%

6.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.1

Camera

15%

6.9

Display

15%

7.0

Battery

10%

7.9

Software

10%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Audio

3%

7.4

Design

7.2
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

8.1

Number of reviews

Based on 1,183 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 8.1 points, which is higher than 77.3% of smartphones.
8.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components:

60%

7.3

Overall score

40%

5.4

Price

6.7
Brand name
Samsung
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
â–² Better than 55% of models
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 processor which is faster than processors in 55.2% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.8% of smartphones.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 or Samsung Exynos 9,825
RAM capacity
12 GB
RAM capacity
12 GB
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 12 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 59% of smartphones and equal to that of 24.3% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Internal storage
256 GB
â–² Better than 39% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.73 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
2.73 GHz
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.73 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 63.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 12 which is older than that found in 67.1% of smartphones and equal to that in 13.2% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
12 MP & 12 MP & 16 MP & 0.3 MP
Main camera megapixels
12 MP & 12 MP & 16 MP & 0.3 MP
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 12 MP & 12 MP & 16 MP & 0.3 MP which is lower than that of 86.1% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.5 & f/2.1 & f/2.2
Main camera aperture
f/1.5 & f/2.1 & f/2.2
★ Better than 98% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.5 & f/2.1 & f/2.2 which is wider than that of 97.5% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
31.4 mm²
Main camera sensor area
31.4 mm²
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 31.4 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 57.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.8% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.4 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.4 µm
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.4 µm which is larger than in 92.7% of smartphones and equal to the size in 4% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
5G connectivity
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.8 inches
Screen size
6.8 inches
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.8 inches which is larger than the screens of 84.4% of smartphones and equal to those of 4.6% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1440x 3040 px
Screen resolution
1440x 3040 px
★ Better than 93% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1440x3040 px which is higher than that of 93.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Pixel density
498 ppi
Pixel density
498 ppi
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 498 ppi which is higher than that of 92.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
â–² Better than 41% of models
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,300 mAh
Battery capacity
4,300 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,300 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 86.9% of smartphones and equal to those in 1% of smartphones.
Charging speed
45 W
Charging speed
45 W
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 57.1% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 6.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
65 min
GSMArena full wired charge time
65 min
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <36 min – >120 min
This smartphone reaches a full wired charge in 65 min which is slower than 53.9% of smartphones and equal to the time of 1.2% of smartphones.
Wireless charging
yes
Wireless charging
yes
â–² Better than 75% of models
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
Stereo speakers
yes
â–² Better than 36% of models
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Number of microphones
3
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
â–² Better than 66% of models
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
162.3 mm
Height
162.3 mm
â–² Better than 65% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 162.3 mm which is shorter than 65.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Width
77.2 mm
Width
77.2 mm
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 77.2 mm which is wider than 76% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.2% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.9 mm
Thickness
7.9 mm
â–² Better than 72% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.9 mm which is thinner than 72.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 5% of smartphones.
Weight
196 g
Weight
196 g
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 196 g which is lighter than 50.1% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 2.3% of smartphones.
Device volume
87,318 cm³
Device volume
87,318 cm³
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 87,318 cm³ which is smaller than 75.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1440 x 3040 px
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3040 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3040 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    2 x
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >3 x
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    Main camera pixel size
    1.4 µm
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 26.1% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    498 ppi
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (498 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    498 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 4 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    12 GB
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 0.13 inches inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    6.8 inches
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 1.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.14 vs 8.000).
    8.14 vs 8
  • 49.6% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (8.13 vs 5.4).
    8.13 vs 5.44
  • 4 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    12 GB
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 50% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    9 W
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (9 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    9 W vs 6 W
  • 2 more memory channels
    Memory channels
    4
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <2 – >4
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    2 x 2.73 GHz & 2 x 2.4 GHz & 4 x 1.95 GHz
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2.73 GHz & 2x2.4 GHz & 4x1.95 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2.73 GHz & 2x2.4 GHz & 4x1.95 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 13.8% higher CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    2.73 GHz
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.73 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 2x more shader units
    N. of shading units
    512
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (512 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    512 vs 256
  • Supports desktop mode
    Desktop mode
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This smartphone includes desktop mode, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones support desktop functionality.
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    2 x
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >3 x
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    Main camera pixel size
    1.4 µm
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.5 & f/2.1 & f/2.2
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.5 & f/2.1 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.5 & f/2.1 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    Multi-lens front camera
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Supports 360° panorama
    360° panorama
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • Better main camera video
    Main camera video
    2160 x 60 fps
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 22.60x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    2160x60 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    Manual shutter speed
    yes
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    Number of flash LEDs
    2
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    HDR10 video recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    Dual-tone LED flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    3.1
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.1 vs 2.0
  • Supports motion tracking
    Motion tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartphone supports motion tracking, the average smartphone does not. 22% of smartphones offer motion tracking capabilities.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Supports ANT+
    ANT+
    yes
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This smartphone supports ANT+ technology, the average smartphone does not. 6% of smartphones are ANT+ compatible.
  • Has a barometer
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1440 x 3040 px
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3040 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3040 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 26.1% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    498 ppi
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (498 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    498 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 0.13 inches inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    6.8 inches
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Has a curved display
    Curved display
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • 308 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    1,308 nits
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <480 nits – >3.6k nits
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (1308 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    1,308 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 20.2% higher screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    793 nits
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (793 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    793 nits vs 660 nits
  • Better display glass type
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 6
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass 6 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 6 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    Reverse wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 36.4% faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    45 W
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (45 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    45 W vs 33 W
  • 1 more microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    3
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Has FM radio
    FM radio
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Supports aptX
    aptX
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >2 m
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • Includes a stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This smartphone includes a stylus, the average smartphone does not. 1.4% of smartphones come with a stylus.
  • 0.4 mm thinner
    Thickness
    7.9 mm
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Better IP rating
    IP rating
    IP68
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • 1.3 mm shorter
    Height
    162.3 mm
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (162.3 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    162.3 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • 26.1% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    702 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (702 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    702 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    12 MP & 12 MP & 16 MP & 0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (12 MP & 12 MP & 16 MP & 0.3 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    12 MP & 12 MP & 16 MP & 0.3 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 14% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,300 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4300 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 or Samsung Exynos 9,825
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • 50% less L3 cache
    L3 cache
    2048 KB
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 3.73x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£970 vs £260).
    £970 vs £260
  • 9% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.73 vs 7.3).
    6.73 vs 7.34
  • 26.1% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    702 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (702 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    702 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 or Samsung Exynos 9,825
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 50% less L3 cache
    L3 cache
    2048 KB
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 23.9% slower memory speed
    Memory speed
    2093 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2093 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    2,093 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 16.7% larger process node
    Process node
    7 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (7 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    7 nm vs 6 nm
  • 17.5% fewer transistors
    Number of transistors
    8,500 million
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <5.3k million – >19k million
    This smartphone contains fewer transistors than the average smartphone (8500 million vs 10300 million). The average smartphone has 10300 million transistors.
    8,500 million vs 10,300 million
  • 14.3% lower maximum RAM capacity
    Maximum RAM
    12 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 14 GB
  • 6.1% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    10,130
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <7.1k – >15.9k
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (10,130 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    10,130 vs 10,783
  • 35.5% lower 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    392
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <133 – >2.4k
    This smartphone performs worse in 3DMark Steel Nomad than the average smartphone (392 vs 608). The average smartphone scores 608.
    392 vs 608
  • 20.4% lower 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    3,045
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <975 – >12.4k
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (3,045 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    3,045 vs 3,825
  • 28.4% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    878
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <313 – >4.7k
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (878 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    878 vs 1,226
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    Android version
    Android 12
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 12 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 12 vs Android 14
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    12 MP & 12 MP & 16 MP & 0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (12 MP & 12 MP & 16 MP & 0.3 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    12 MP & 12 MP & 16 MP & 0.3 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    10 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (10 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    10 MP vs 16 MP
  • 1.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    31.4 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 3.3% lower DxOMark Mobile score
    DxOMark Mobile score
    116
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <89 – >153
    This smartphone has a lower DxOMark Mobile score than the average smartphone (116 vs 120). The average smartphone scores 120.
    116 vs 120
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 99.5 nits lower GSMArena max display brightness
    GSMArena max display brightness
    794 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <537 nits – >1.4k nits
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (794 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average smartphone scores 893.5 nits.
    794 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • 14% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,300 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4300 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    Wireless charging speed
    15 W
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >50 W
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • 3 min slower full wired charge time
    GSMArena full wired charge time
    65 min
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <36 min – >120 min
    This smartphone has a slower full wired charge time than the average smartphone (65 min vs 62 min). The average smartphone takes 62 min to charge.
    65 min vs 62 min
  • 5 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2019
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2019 vs 2024). 5.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    August 2019
    2019 vs 2024
  • 1.2 mm wider
    Width
    77.2 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (77.2 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    77.2 mm vs 76 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    Brand origin
    South Korea
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnn.com
22/08/2019
Summary of the review
CNN Underscored: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review: Top hardware and a...
F
forbes.com
18/08/2019
Summary of the review
Forbes Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus – Past Mistakes Fixed
P
pcmag.com
20/08/2019
Summary of the review
PCMag: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review
W
wired.com
31/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus review: overloaded, but still the one to beat
C
cnet.com
27/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus review: The most premium Android phone for your money
T
thegate.ca
24/10/2019
Summary of the review
The GATE Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+
W
whathifi.com
02/09/2019
Summary of the review
What Hi-Fi? Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+
C
cnbc.com
22/08/2019
Summary of the review
CNBC Review: Samsung’s Galaxy Note 10+ is the best Android phone you can buy
T
theguardian.com
12/09/2019
Summary of the review
The Guardian Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ – bigger and now with a magic wand
T
tomsguide.com
11/08/2020
Summary of the review
Tom's Guide Review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus
A
androidheadlines.com
21/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus - The Good Review
S
sammobile.com
28/02/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ review: Big, beautiful, and powerful
I
in.mashable.com
01/08/2019
Summary of the review
Mashable India: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ review: an evolutionary Note for Samsung loyalists Would you like to see a comparison of these reviews focusin...
A
androidcentral.com
14/01/2020
Summary of the review
Android Central: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ review, 4 months later: Even better with...
S
spiegel.de
27/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review - DER SPIEGEL
(Translated)Show original
N
netzpiloten.de
26/09/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus Review - Netzpiloten Magazin
(Translated)Show original
A
areadvd.de
08/11/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus Review: The XXL All-Rounder
(Translated)Show original
S
smartzone.de
12/03/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review | Smartzone
(Translated)Show original
H
hifitest.de
17/12/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 and Note 10 Plus review: Series test
(Translated)Show original
W
watson.ch
22/09/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review: Better than iPhone 11 and Huawei P30 Pro?
(Translated)Show original
N
nextpit.fr
23/08/2019
Summary of the review
Pushing the Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ to its limits
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
29/06/2021
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus Review: Our Full Verdict
(Translated)Show original
D
digitec.ch
21/10/2019
Summary of the review
On the Samsung Galaxy Note 10+, the S Pen makes all the difference
(Translated)Show original
L
lemondeinformatique.fr
07/09/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review: A smartphone that pushes the boundaries
(Translated)Show original
C
charlestech.fr
02/03/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review: Full and Detailed Opinion
(Translated)Show original
A
android-mt.ouest-france.fr
04/11/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Review: Top of the Class
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
02/09/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review: A Little Closer to the Stars
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
07/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review: A touch of S Pen and a lot of joy
(Translated)Show original
T
tf1info.fr
09/09/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note10+: the smartphone that thinks bigger for productivity
(Translated)Show original
P
presse-citron.net
06/09/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 and 10 Plus Review: Excellent, but...
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
18/09/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review: A Very Convincing Giant
(Translated)Show original
J
journaldugeek.com
27/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Review: Almost Perfect
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
28/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus Review: A Colossal Screen for a High-Performance Smartphone
(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
07/02/2021
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus review - TechRadar
(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
18/01/2022
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ review after one month: the experience with the most ambitious Note to date
(Translated)Show original
G
gadgerss.com
05/09/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review
(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
06/09/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus review - TechRadar
(Translated)Show original
A
androidiani.com
02/10/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus: A king, with some compromises
(Translated)Show original
T
tuttoandroid.net
30/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review - TuttoAndroid
(Translated)Show original
T
techprincess.it
30/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus review: a true powerhouse for work
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
27/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review (photos and videos) - SmartWorld
(Translated)Show original
A
andreagaleazzi.com
22/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Review - Andrea Galeazzi
(Translated)Show original
W
want.nl
23/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus review: best smartphone of 2019?
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
20/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus review: big, but not great
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
28/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ – fantastic device isn't for everyone
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
27/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus review: smartphone is for a niche audience
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
28/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus review: great value for a lot of money
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
19/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus has the best screen ever
(Translated)Show original
G
galaxyclub.nl
13/12/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 review: Three months later with Android 10
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,183 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB)

  • Stunning 6.8-inch Dynamic AMOLED display with Quad HD resolution that remains vibrant and sharp even by modern standards
  • Versatile S Pen stylus with unique features like air gestures, screen-off memo, and remote camera control
  • Sleek and premium design that is significantly thinner and lighter than newer 'Ultra' models
  • Generous memory and storage with 12GB of RAM and 256GB base internal storage plus microSD expansion
  • Support for 45W fast charging and wireless PowerShare for other devices
  • Generally snappy performance for daily tasks and gaming despite its age

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB)

  • Removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack, requiring an adapter or wireless buds
  • End of life for software updates, stuck on Android 12/One UI 4 with no further security patches
  • Lack of modern display technology like 120Hz high refresh rate, limited to standard 60Hz
  • Camera performance, particularly in low light and zoom, falls behind newer flagship sensors
  • Fingerprint scanner (ultrasonic) is often reported as slower or less reliable than newer optical sensors
  • Battery life tends to degrade over time, leading to frequent charging for long-term users

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB) is an ultra-premium, big-screen flagship smartphone featuring a stunning 6.8-inch QHD+ Dynamic AMOLED display and an integrated S Pen stylus with productivity-enhancing Air Actions. Key specifications include 12GB of RAM, 256GB of expandable internal storage (up to 1TB via microSD), a powerful Exynos 9825/Snapdragon 855 processor, a versatile quad-camera system with a DepthVision camera, a 4,300mAh battery with 45W fast charging support (25W charger in the box), and an IP68 water resistance rating. Pros include a beautiful display, excellent overall performance, a highly functional S Pen, and solid battery life. Cons include the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor that is not always consistently fast, and the phone no longer receives major software updates as it has reached its end-of-life cycle.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (12GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found