Samsung Galaxy A51 (4GB + 128GB) review. Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among smartphones and if it's worth buying.
Overall score
What it is: An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score components:
90.0%
Technical Score
10.0%
User score
Technical Score
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
User score
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.
#113 in Best Samsung Phones
#418 in Best Smartphones Under £200
#567 in Best Smartphones Under £250
#677 in Best Smartphones Under £300
#821 in Best Smartphones Under £400
#894 in Best Smartphones Under £500
#930 in Best Large-Screen Smartphones
#1002 in Best NFC Smartphones
#1036 in Best Battery Life Smartphones
#1056 in Best Value Smartphones
#1090 in Best Android Smartphones
#1140 in Best AI Smartphones
#1145 in Best Smartphones
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
What it is: An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters: When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score components:
60.0%
Overall score
40.0%
Price
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >256 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3.2 GHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >1500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >4000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 8+
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >950 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >700
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >2500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >6000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >8000
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >5000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1800
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3200 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 5
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: > 50 GB/s
Importance: LOW
Good value: 4
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >16 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <6 nm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >9 W
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >8192 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >2048 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >512 KB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >100000 million
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.3
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.2
Importance: LOW
Good value: 2.0/3.0
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >50 MP
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >60
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥1.2 µm
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2.5x
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >16 MP
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >130
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >120
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >5.2
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.1/3.2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥6.6 inches
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >400 ppi
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: ≥120 Hz
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >300 Hz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1300 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1000 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >60 W
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <45 min
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >40 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >10 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥3
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: <162 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <75 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <8 mm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <190 g
Importance: LOW
Good value: <98cm³
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥1.5 m
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >8
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <190 g
Importance: LOW
Good value: 4
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >16 MP
Importance: LOW
Good value: <75 mm
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: ≥120 Hz
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >256 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <45 min
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
(Reviews last updated: August 2026)
The -inch Super AMOLED display and a stylish design to the mid-range market, though it is powered by chipset that causes interface lag. While the phone offers a versatile GB of storage, it lacks premium materials, wireless charging, and is hindered by a slow in-display fingerprint sensor. Battery life is notably minutes in testing, making it a "jack of all trades, master of none" that struggles to compete with faster alternatives like the iPhone SE. Tom's Guide +2
The Samsung Galaxy A51, reviewed by NextPit, is described as a former bestseller that showed its age by 2021, despite featuring a high-quality 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and a versatile quad-camera setup. Key pros highlighted include the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and Samsung’s promise of four years of security updates. However, the device is criticized for its weak Exynos 9611 processor, which causes lag and poor gaming performance. Additionally, the 4,000 mAh battery offers only average life, and the 15W charging is considered outdated, alongside a plastic build that lacks IP certification for water resistance. Consequently, NextPit concludes that by 2021, the A51 was a difficult recommendation due to better-performing, faster-charging competitors in the same price range.
The Samsung Galaxy A51, as reviewed by Android Authority, is defined by its vibrant 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and modern, lightweight design. Despite these visual pros, the device is held back by the Exynos 9611 chipset and 4GB of RAM, which cause significant lag in daily tasks, multitasking, and gaming. The camera system features a versatile 48MP main sensor that captures sharp, bright daylight photos, though it struggles with noise in low-light conditions. While the 4,000mAh battery provides reliable, all-day power, the 15W charging speed is considered slow for the market. Ultimately, the device offers a premium viewing experience but suffers from subpar, sluggish performance, according to Android Authority.
The Consumer Reports review highlights the Samsung Galaxy A51 as a top-performing mid-range device, specifically praising its excellent 6.4-inch Super AMOLED screen, which offers high resolution and superior outdoor visibility. The phone demonstrates exceptional durability, passing rigorous 100-drop tumble tests and rain testing with minimal functional damage. However, notable cons include the absence of an official IP water-resistance rating and the lack of wireless charging, along with a non-removable battery. Performance is a key strength, with the device delivering an impressive 39.5-hour battery life and a capable 48MP main camera that provides very good color and sharpness in well-lit, studio-like conditions. While the processor handles everyday tasks efficiently, the camera system lacks optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in potential blur in low-light, handheld shots. Overall, the device offers a "very good" experience rather than "excellent" compared to higher-end, top-tier flagships. Consumer Reports
The Mashable India review highlights the Samsung Galaxy A51 as a stylish, premium-looking mid-range device featuring an exceptional 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and a versatile quad-camera setup with a dedicated macro lens. While praised for its sleek design, one-day battery life, and smooth OneUI 2.0 interface, the phone is significantly hampered by the underwhelming performance of its Exynos 9611 chipset, resulting in lag during intensive tasks. Additional drawbacks include a slow in-display fingerprint sensor and limited video recording capabilities, making it a difficult recommendation for power users despite its solid daily performance.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is described as a "mixed bag," offering flagship-like design with a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display but featuring underwhelming performance due to its aging Exynos 9611 chipset and 4GB of RAM. Pros include a gorgeous display and practical features like a headphone jack and microSD slot. Cons highlight sluggish performance, poor low-light camera quality, and slow 15W charging.
According to TechRadar, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is a mid-range phone praised for its striking visual design, mimicking premium aesthetics, and a vibrant 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display. Its build is noted as solid with an attractive finish, despite being plastic and lacking water resistance. However, performance is a significant drawback due to the Exynos 9611 chipset, which often causes lag and stuttering, and the in-screen fingerprint scanner is described as slow and unreliable. While the quad-lens camera includes a respectable 48MP main sensor and a decent macro lens, it lacks a telephoto lens and has limitations in video recording stabilization. Despite offering reliable one-day battery life and a beautiful screen, the inconsistent performance makes it hard for TechRadar to fully recommend the device over faster rivals.
Wired reviewed the Samsung Galaxy A51, highlighting its stunning 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display, 3.5mm headphone jack, 128GB of internal storage (with microSD expansion), and a polished One UI 2.0 interface as key advantages. However, the review critically notes the phone's Exynos 9611 chipset causes performance issues like stuttering and lag, and its quad-camera array produces unremarkable photos that are often over-sharpened and overexposed, lacking the sharpness of competitors like the Pixel 3a's night mode. The device received a 5/10 rating due to lacking the speed and camera consistency of rivals, and missing features like water resistance and wireless charging found on similarly priced phones such as the iPhone SE.
According to a CNET review, the is a strong mid-range phone at $, offering pros -inch Super AMOLED display, GB storage, mm headphone jack, and expandable storage. Its four-camera system provides versatility with ultra-wide and macro lenses, and its hours in video tests. However, key cons include slower performance compared to the iPhone SE, lack of water resistance (no official IP rating), and no wireless charging. You can find the full review at CNET.
PCMag describes the Samsung Galaxy A51 as a solid mid-range phone with a premium aesthetic and an excellent 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display but notes significant drawbacks in performance and biometric reliability. While it offers a versatile quad-camera and strong battery life, the Exynos 9611 chipset results in sluggish performance, and the in-display fingerprint sensor is unreliable. Despite the lack of wireless charging or a formal water-resistance rating, it is considered a capable option for users prioritizing display and camera over processing power.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a premium, slim design with a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display, offering flagship-level visuals with a modern punch-hole camera. The device boasts a 48MP main camera and retains functional features like a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD slot. However, performance is limited by the Exynos 9611 chipset, causing system lag and, combined with a slow in-display fingerprint sensor, compromises the user experience compared to competitors. While the battery lasts only a single day, the A51 is considered a stylish, media-focused choice over a high-performance one.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is reviewed by GIGA as a strong mid-range contender, featuring a high-quality 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and a sleek, modern design with a centered punch-hole camera. While praised for its aesthetics, 3.5mm headphone jack, and NFC capability, the device is criticized for a sluggish, occasionally stuttering performance from its Exynos 9611 processor, making it less ideal for heavy gaming. The camera system delivers excellent, vibrant photos in daylight with a capable 5MP macro lens, but struggles in low-light conditions and lacks robust video stabilization.
The Heise review highlights the Samsung Galaxy A51 as a strong mid-range contender, featuring a lightweight design, "Prism Crush" finish, and a vibrant 6.5-inch Super AMOLED Infinity-O display. Key advantages include a versatile quad-camera system with a 48MP main sensor, along with practical features like a 3.5mm headphone jack, dual SIM, and microSD expansion. However, the review notes significant drawbacks, particularly regarding the sluggish performance of the Exynos 9611 processor, which causes noticeable UI lag. Furthermore, the in-display fingerprint sensor is described as slow and unreliable, and the device lacks water resistance and wireless charging. For more details, visit Heise.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a mid-range, budget-friendly smartphone featuring a 6.4-inch Super AMOLED "Infinity-O" display that is highly reactive and readable, paired with a lightweight "glass-like" plastic back. While the device provides solid daily performance with its Exynos 9611 processor and 4000 mAh battery offering 40 hours of use, it lacks modern, high-end features such as wireless charging. Key pros include a durable build and, at the time of review, a superior display, though it faces cons like slow processing speeds, lacking optical image stabilization, and no IP water-resistance rating.
The TechRadar review describes the Samsung Galaxy A51 as an affordable mid-range device with a premium design, highlighted by a vibrant 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and a "glasstic" back with a geometric pattern. Key pros include this high-quality screen and versatile quad-camera system, which make it a strong option for media consumption and photography. Performance is a major con, with the Exynos 9611 chipset causing noticeable UI lag, slow camera response, and stuttering, making it feel slower than cheaper competitors. Additionally, the in-screen fingerprint scanner is criticized for being sluggish and unreliable compared to traditional sensors. The 4,000mAh battery offers solid, all-day life, but the 15W charging speed is relatively slow, taking roughly two hours to fully recharge. Ultimately, the review concludes that while the A51 is a great "media monster," users must weigh its beautiful screen and camera versatility against its inconsistent, underperforming processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a mid-range smartphone featuring a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED Infinity-O display with vibrant colors and a slim, lightweight "Glasstic" design. It is powered by the Exynos 9611 processor, paired with 4GB of RAM and 128GB of expandable storage, providing a solid, balanced user experience. The device features an L-shaped quad-camera setup with a 48MP main sensor, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and a dedicated microSD slot, which are considered significant pros. However, the in-display fingerprint sensor is noted as a con, with reports of it being somewhat sluggish and less reliable. Running on One UI 2.0 with a 4,000 mAh battery, the A51 offers a polished user interface and reliable day-long battery life. The review concludes it is an excellent all-rounder for average users who prioritize screen quality and versatile photography over high-end gaming performance.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is characterized by a high-quality 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and a lightweight "Glasstic" design featuring an Infinity-O cutout. While the phone excels in aesthetics and screen quality, it is hindered by the underwhelming Exynos 9611 chipset, which causes significant UI lag and slow performance. The camera system offers versatility, but photo quality is described as only average, with poor low-light performance. Furthermore, the 4,000 mAh battery delivers only average battery life, in contrast to the phone's strengths, which include a 3.5mm headphone jack, NFC, and an in-display fingerprint sensor. Ultimately, the device is considered a solid multimedia experience, but is not recommended for performance-sensitive users due to its inconsistency.
Andrea Galeazzi's review of the Samsung Galaxy A51 highlights its excellent, bright 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and light, "glasstic" design, making for a compelling visual experience. However, the device is severely hindered by the Exynos 9611 chipset and 4GB of RAM, which struggle with daily tasks, multitasking, and gaming, creating a sluggish user experience that falls short of its €359 launch price. While the quad-camera setup provides a decent upgrade over the A50, and the 4,000 mAh battery offers reasonable, though not exceptional, daily stamina, the overall performance issues make it difficult to recommend at full price.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is highlighted as a stylish, potential "best-seller" featuring a modern Infinity-O Super AMOLED display and a high-quality "3D Glasstic" build. It offers a solid software experience with Android 10 and One UI 2.0, along with a versatile quad-camera system that delivers convincing photo results. However, the device is held back by the mediocre performance of its Exynos 9611 processor, which can exhibit lag, alongside a high initial launch price of €379. Key drawbacks noted include the lack of water resistance, a slower fingerprint sensor, and processor performance that lacks the "extra gear" found in competitors. Despite these cons, it is considered a solid, well-rounded mid-range option, particularly when its price drops below €300. The review concludes that while it boasts excellent design and display, current Galaxy A50 owners may not find the upgrade necessary.
User reviews on Tweakers for the Samsung Galaxy A51 highlight a high-quality Super AMOLED display, premium feel despite plastic construction, and solid battery life. The camera system is generally praised for sharp, daylight performance, though some users reported issues in lower light. However, the device is frequently criticized for sluggish performance caused by the Exynos 9611 processor and limited RAM, as well as a slow in-display fingerprint sensor. Additionally, users noted occasional connectivity issues and a lack of features like water resistance found in competitors. Ultimately, the A51 is considered a balanced, "safe" choice for everyday users, though it may feel like a downgrade in speed for those coming from older flagships. For more details, visit Tweakers.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a centered punch-hole, offering a high-end visual experience and a versatile quad-camera setup. However, the device is hindered by the sluggish Exynos 9611 processor, which causes noticeable lag in multitasking and One UI, alongside a slow in-display fingerprint sensor. While the 4,000mAh battery and 3.5mm headphone jack are positive, the high launch price and stiff competition make it a better choice for those prioritizing display quality over performance.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a mid-range device prioritizing a premium 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display, slim bezels, and a "Prism" finish plastic design, offering an attractive, lightweight build with an unobtrusive punch-hole camera. Despite the aesthetic appeal, performance is a major drawback; the Exynos 9611 chipset often suffers from UI lag, stuttering, and slow app loading, while the in-display fingerprint scanner is slow and unreliable compared to competitors. The device features a versatile 48MP main camera that shoots well in daylight and includes a 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable storage, though it lacks water resistance and is limited by 15W charging.
The Techzine review positions the Samsung Galaxy A51 as a capable, secure mid-range device for employees, highlighting its stunning 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and Samsung Knox integration. While praised for its software support, the device features a "Glasstic" (plastic) build that feels less premium than competitors. Performance is a noted drawback, with the Exynos 9611 chipset and 4GB RAM struggling under heavy loads, further hindered by a sluggish, inconsistent in-display fingerprint scanner. The 48MP camera offers versatile shooting with vibrant, albeit sometimes inconsistent, results, complemented by a 4,000mAh battery that easily lasts a full workday.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is highlighted as a mid-range device with a premium 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display, though its aesthetic appeal is dampened by a less durable, all-plastic build. Performance-wise, the Exynos 9611 chipset handles daily tasks well but suffers from lag under heavy use, while the in-display fingerprint scanner is noted as inconsistent. Camera capabilities are generally positive, featuring a 48MP main sensor and functional wide-angle lens, though the macro lens and selfie camera perform inconsistently, contributing to a "typical" mid-ranger assessment.
The GalaxyClub.nl review characterizes the Samsung Galaxy A51 as a worthy successor to the A50, highlighting a refined design, excellent Super AMOLED display, and reliable battery life. Key advantages include solid camera performance from the main and ultra-wide sensors, alongside modern software and the retention of a 3.5mm headphone jack. However, the review notes drawbacks, including a slow in-display fingerprint sensor, slight performance lag during multitasking, and a plastic "Glasstic" build.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is praised for its vibrant 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display, modern "Infinity-O" design, and a durable 4,000mAh battery that lasts a full day or more. Key advantages include a rare 3.5mm headphone jack and a triple-card slot, though the "Glasstic" body feels like plastic. The device, however, is heavily criticized for performance issues, specifically lagging with its Exynos 9611 chip and 4GB of RAM, along with a slow, unreliable in-display fingerprint sensor. While the 48MP camera performs well in daylight and the 5MP macro lens is effective, the camera struggles in low light, and the lack of water resistance and wireless charging makes it feel overpriced compared to competitors like the Pixel 4a.
Compare
