OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£440RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.5 inchesMain camera megapixels:48 MP & 13 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP

Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

90%

5.6

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 86% of smartphones
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

25%

4.9

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.3

Camera

15%

5.6

Display

15%

5.0

Battery

10%

3.8

Software

10%

6.9

Connectivity

4%

4.6

Audio

3%

6.4

Design

â–¼Worse than 86% of smartphones
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on 100 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 81% of smartphones
  • oppo-reno2
  • oppo-reno2
  • oppo-reno2
  • oppo-reno2
  • oppo-reno2
  • oppo-reno2
  • oppo-reno2
oppo-reno2
oppo-reno2
oppo-reno2
oppo-reno2
oppo-reno2
oppo-reno2
oppo-reno2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

25%

4.9

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.3

Camera

15%

5.6

Display

15%

5.0

Battery

10%

3.8

Software

10%

6.9

Connectivity

4%

4.6

Audio

3%

6.4

Design

5.6
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on 100 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Popularity:
Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 5.2 points, which is lower than 51.6% of smartphones.
5.2
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

8.2

Price

6.5
Brand name
Oppo
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 processor which is faster than processors in 50.4% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
RAM capacity
8 GB
â–¼ Worse than 41% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Internal storage
256 GB
â–² Better than 39% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.2 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
2.2 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.2 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 68.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 14.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 9 Pie
Android version
Android 9 Pie
Android version
Android 9 Pie
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 9 Pie which is older than that found in 93.9% of smartphones and equal to that in 2.6% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
no
Dark mode
no
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
This smartphone does not offer dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
48 MP & 13 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
Main camera megapixels
48 MP & 13 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 48 MP & 13 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP which is lower than that of 77% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
â–² Better than 87% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 87.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
30.7 mm²
Main camera sensor area
30.7 mm²
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 30.7 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 63.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 6.3% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.5 inches
Screen size
6.5 inches
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.5 inches which is smaller than the screens of 80% of smartphones and equal to those of 3.9% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2400 px which is higher than that of 36.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 20.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
401 ppi
Pixel density
401 ppi
â–² Better than 58% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 401 ppi which is higher than that of 58.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
â–² Better than 41% of models
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,000 mAh
Battery capacity
4,000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 90.2% of smartphones and equal to those in 2.6% of smartphones.
Charging speed
20 W
Charging speed
20 W
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 20 W which is slower than in 74.3% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 1.5% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
Stereo speakers
no
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
â–² Better than 55% of models
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
â–² Better than 66% of models
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
160 mm
Height
160 mm
â–² Better than 80% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 160 mm which is shorter than 79.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Width
74.3 mm
Width
74.3 mm
â–² Better than 79% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 74.3 mm which is narrower than 79% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.4% of smartphones.
Thickness
9.5 mm
Thickness
9.5 mm
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 9.5 mm which is thicker than 85.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 1% of smartphones.
Weight
189 g
Weight
189 g
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 189 g which is lighter than 68% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 1.9% of smartphones.
Device volume
106,560 cm³
Device volume
106,560 cm³
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 106,560 cm³ which is larger than 79.2% of smartphones.
Show more

Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    2 x
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >3 x
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • Supports Dolby Vision support
    Dolby Vision support
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision, the average smartphone does not. 17.3% of smartphones are Dolby Vision compatible.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Has a front LED flash
    Front LED flash
    yes
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This smartphone features a front-facing LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 7.8% of smartphones include a front flash.
  • Has an always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    3.1
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.1 vs 2.0
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    2 x
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >3 x
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Has a front LED flash
    Front LED flash
    yes
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This smartphone features a front-facing LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 7.8% of smartphones include a front flash.
  • Supports 360° panorama
    360° panorama
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    Number of flash LEDs
    2
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    HDR10 video recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    Dual-tone LED flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    3.1
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.1 vs 2.0
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Supports Dolby Vision support
    Dolby Vision support
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartphone supports Dolby Vision, the average smartphone does not. 17.3% of smartphones are Dolby Vision compatible.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 1.5% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    401 ppi
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (401 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    401 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Better display glass type
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 6
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass 6 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 6 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Higher GSMArena battery life endurance score
    GSMArena battery life endurance score
    102
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <74 – >125
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena battery life endurance score than the average smartphone (102 vs 99.5). The average endurance score is 99.5.
    102 vs 99.5
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    FM radio
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Supports aptX
    aptX
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.7 mm narrower
    Width
    74.3 mm
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (74.3 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    74.3 mm vs 76 mm
  • 3.6 mm shorter
    Height
    160 mm
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (160 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    160 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 3.7% lighter
    Weight
    189 g
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (189 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    189 g vs 196.2 g
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 47.4% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    500 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (500 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    500 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 37% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    6,794
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <7.1k – >15.9k
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (6,794 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    6,794 vs 10,783
  • 20% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4000 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • 50% higher TDP (less efficient)
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    3 W
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (3 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    3 W vs 6 W
  • 12.7% worse value for money
    Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.51 vs 7.3).
    6.51 vs 7.34
  • 69.2% more expensive
    Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£440 vs £260).
    £440 vs £260
  • 5.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Oppo Reno 2
    the average smartphone
    Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.58 vs 8.000).
    7.58 vs 8
  • 47.4% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    500 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (500 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    500 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 37% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    6,794
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <7.1k – >15.9k
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (6,794 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    6,794 vs 10,783
  • 50% higher TDP (less efficient)
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    3 W
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (3 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    3 W vs 6 W
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less L3 cache
    L3 cache
    1,024 KB
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (1024 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    1,024 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 42.9% lower maximum RAM capacity
    Maximum RAM
    8 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (8 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 14 GB
  • 33.3% larger process node
    Process node
    8 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (8 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    8 nm vs 6 nm
  • 32.1% slower memory speed
    Memory speed
    1,866 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1866 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    1,866 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 83% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    209
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <313 – >4.7k
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (209 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    209 vs 1,226
  • 25.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    701
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <392 – >2.2k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (701 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    701 vs 942
  • 93.8% fewer shader units
    N. of shading units
    16
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (16 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    16 vs 256
  • 8.3% lower CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    2.2 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 41.8% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    14.9 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <13.41 GB/s – >76.6 GB/s
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (14.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    14.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 34.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,660
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >6.7k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,660 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,660 vs 2,533
  • 26.4% lower PassMark benchmark
    PassMark benchmark
    3,229
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2.2k – >10.5k
    This smartphone has a lower PassMark score than the average smartphone (3,229 vs 4,389). The average smartphone scores 4,389 in PassMark.
    3,229 vs 4,389
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    Android version
    Android 9 Pie
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 9 Pie vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 9 Pie vs Android 14
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    App tracking protection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Lacks focus mode
    Focus mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    Wi-Fi password sharing
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Lacks dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartphone does not support dark mode, the average smartphone does. 95.8% of smartphones have dark mode.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    App offloading
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • Lacks instant markup
    Instant markup
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    Scrolling screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • No theme customization
    Theme customization
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartphone does not support theme customization, the average smartphone does. 91% of smartphones allow theme customization.
  • No offline voice commands
    Offline voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartphone does not support offline voice commands, the average smartphone does. 90.4% of smartphones offer offline voice control.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    Play while downloading
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    Dynamic theme
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    Extra dim mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    48 MP & 13 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (48 MP & 13 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    48 MP & 13 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartphone does not have a manual focus mode, the average smartphone does. 91.2% of smartphones offer manual focus.
  • 4.1% smaller main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    30.7 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (30.7 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    30.7 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • No continuous autofocus in video
    Continuous autofocus in video recording
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average smartphone does. 94.2% of smartphones have continuous AF.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone does not offer manual exposure control, the average smartphone does. 94% of smartphones have manual exposure.
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 0.17 inches inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    6.5 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.5 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.5 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 384.5 nits lower GSMArena max display brightness
    GSMArena max display brightness
    509 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <537 nits – >1.4k nits
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (509 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average smartphone scores 893.5 nits.
    509 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • 27.3% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    480 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (480 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    480 nits vs 660 nits
  • 491 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    509 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <480 nits – >3.6k nits
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (509 nits vs 1000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    509 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 20% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4000 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No reverse wired charging
    Reverse wired charging
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 39.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    20 W
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (20 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    20 W vs 33 W
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    LDAC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • 5 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2019
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2019 vs 2024). 5.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    September 2019
    2019 vs 2024
  • 1.2 mm thicker
    Thickness
    9.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (9.5 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    9.5 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 9% larger volume
    Device volume
    106,560 cm³
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (106560 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    106,560 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

F
forbes.com
10/09/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review: India-Specific Flagship Gets One More Camera - Forbes
S
stuff.tv
16/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 review - Stuff
T
trustedreviews.com
16/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review - Trusted Reviews
G
galaxus.de
15/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2: The little sister tested in London Would you like me to: Find comparison reviews between this and specific rivals (like the Pixel 3a XL)?...
E
esquireme.com
08/09/2021
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 review: five cameras are better than one - Esquire Middle East
T
testedtechnology.co.uk
04/04/2020
Summary of the review
Welcome to the Oppo Reno 2 [part two]
T
techadvisor.com
16/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review: Cameras Galore
I
itpro.com
20/11/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno2 review: A mid-tier marvel | IT Pro
T
t3.com
26/01/2021
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 review: this could be the best-value phone in Oppo's line-up - T3
N
nextpit.com
22/11/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 review: a beautiful endurance runner - nextpit
A
androidauthority.com
30/08/2021
Summary of the review
[Android Authority] OPPO Reno 2 Review: A great option amidst excellent competition Would you like me to find video reviews with hands-on footage, or...
P
pcmag.com
28/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review - PCMag
T
techradar.com
16/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 review - TechRadar
G
gsmarena.com
08/10/2019
Summary of the review
[GSMArena] Oppo Reno2 review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
06/07/2020
Summary of the review
[Expert Reviews] Oppo Reno 2 review: Flagship features for less
X
xda-developers.com
21/01/2020
Summary of the review
[XDA Developers] OPPO Reno2 Review - A Solidly Mid-Range Smartphone
T
testedtechnology.co.uk
21/12/2019
Summary of the review
[Tested Technology] Welcome to the Oppo Reno 2 (part one)
P
pocket-lint.com
16/10/2019
Summary of the review
[Pocket-lint] Oppo Reno 2 review
T
tagblatt.ch
23/11/2019
Summary of the review
Tested: The new Oppo Reno 2 is affordable and powerful
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
07/04/2020
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review - Connect
(Translated)Show original
W
watson.ch
01/12/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review: Better than iPhone 11, Galaxy S10 or Huawei Mate 30?
(Translated)Show original
N
nextpit.de
20/11/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno2 Review: A Stunning Endurance Champion
(Translated)Show original
A
android-mt.ouest-france.fr
15/12/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno2 Review: A Near-Perfect Balance
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
05/12/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno2 Lab Test: A globally balanced performance
(Translated)Show original
N
nextpit.fr
18/02/2020
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review: Impressive Battery Life
(Translated)Show original
L
lemondenumerique.ouest-france.fr
03/01/2020
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review - Le Monde Numérique
(Translated)Show original
U
universfreebox.com
10/12/2019
Summary of the review
Univers Freebox tests the Oppo Reno2
(Translated)Show original
C
clubic.com
04/12/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review: Versatility, Illustrated by Oppo
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
18/11/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review: One of the most balanced smartphones of 2019
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
25/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review: Fin, Fin, Little Fins
(Translated)Show original
J
journaldugeek.com
16/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2: The Right Evolution
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
16/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review: Our Full Verdict
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno2 Review: The brand's most accomplished smartphone
(Translated)Show original
E
es.gizmodo.com
28/08/2019
Summary of the review
The Oppo Reno 2 is as crazy as it is sophisticated
(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
07/02/2021
Summary of the review
TechRadar: Oppo Reno 2: Review
(Translated)Show original
E
elespanol.com
7 de noviembre de 2019
Summary of the review
El Androide Libre (El Español): OPPO Reno2 Review, outstanding cameras without compromise
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
28/10/2019
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno 2 Review: Elegance Keeps Pace with Time (Photos and Video)
(Translated)Show original
G
gqitalia.it
06/11/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2, the smartphone with the shark fin
(Translated)Show original
D
dday.it
11/11/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 review: A Reno with two extra cameras
(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
16/01/2020
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review - TechRadar Italy
(Translated)Show original
W
wired.it
17/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno2: Is It the King of the Mid-Range?
(Translated)Show original
T
tech.everyeye.it
31/10/2019
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno2 Review: A good step forward at the right price
(Translated)Show original
I
it.mashable.com
24/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2, near-perfect video and photos: our review - Tech
(Translated)Show original
T
thegeekerz.it
03/11/2019
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno2 review by The Geekerz
(Translated)Show original
I
it.mashable.com
24/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 review: Our hands-on experience
(Translated)Show original
T
tuttoandroid.net
25/10/2019
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno 2 Review: Design, Balance, and... Camera
(Translated)Show original
A
andreagaleazzi.com
16/10/2019
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno 2 Review - Andrea Galeazzi
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
17/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 preview: fast successor with more cameras
(Translated)Show original
I
id.nl
15/11/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno2 - the refined successor
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
17/10/2019
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno2 first impressions: packed with powerful camera features
(Translated)Show original
R
rush.nl
28/11/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 review: Premium look with a friendly price tag
(Translated)Show original
G
gadgetgear.nl
25/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno2 Review: Dangerously Good Mid-Ranger
(Translated)Show original
W
want.nl
12/11/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review: Great value at an affordable price
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
30/10/2019
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 2 Review: For Smartphone Photographers
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
14/11/2019
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno 2 review: budget flagship, better in every aspect
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 100 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB)

  • Striking, premium design and build quality with a seamless, notch-less full AMOLED screen achieved via the 'shark-fin' pop-up selfie camera, which users find visually impressive and unique.
  • Solid overall performance and a smooth, lag-free user experience for everyday tasks and gaming, thanks to the Snapdragon 730G processor and 8GB of RAM.
  • Versatile and capable camera system that produces crisp, detailed photos in good lighting conditions, featuring a 48MP main sensor, ultra-wide, and telephoto lenses, plus useful modes like Ultra Dark mode and Ultra Steady video.
  • Excellent battery life that reliably lasts a full day, even with heavy usage, complemented by fast 20W VOOC 3.0 wired charging.
  • Inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable storage (microSD slot), features often missing in competitors, which users appreciate.
  • Good quality audio output through both the single speaker and the headphone jack, with support for Dolby Atmos.
  • Fast and reliable in-display fingerprint scanner and face unlock (via the pop-up camera).

What we don't like about Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB)

  • ColorOS software is polarizing, often criticized for having a significant amount of bloatware, an unrefined/complex interface, and an iOS-like look that some users dislike.
  • The 20x digital zoom is largely considered a gimmick and not impressive in quality; images beyond 5x zoom often look grainy or low-resolution.
  • Lack of an official IP water resistance rating, making durability a concern despite the Gorilla Glass construction.
  • Average low-light camera performance, with photos sometimes appearing noisy or over-softened, and the ultra-wide lens being particularly weak in these conditions.
  • Call quality can be lackluster, with reports of robotic-sounding audio and background noise.
  • The phone's aspect ratio can cause some apps or media to display with black bars or cut off corners.
  • While performance is good for a mid-range phone, it uses a less powerful processor (Snapdragon 730G) compared to some similarly priced competitors that feature flagship chipsets.

Verdict

The Oppo Reno 2 is a stylish upper-midrange smartphone launched in late 2019, featuring a sleek, notchless 6.5-inch AMOLED display achieved through a unique "shark-fin" pop-up 16MP selfie camera. Key internal specifications include a capable Snapdragon 730G processor, a substantial 8GB of RAM, and a generous 256GB of internal storage, delivering smooth performance for gaming and multitasking. Its main pro is a versatile quad-camera system (48MP primary lens) known for strong zoom capabilities and effective Ultra Steady Video stabilization. Potential cons involve its lack of official IP water resistance rating, the absence of wireless charging, and the older Android 9 software it originally shipped with.

Compare Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo Reno 2 (8GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found