OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£790RAM capacity:6 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:6.3 inchesMain camera megapixels:16 MP & 12.2 MP

Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 50% of models
Score components

90%

6.6

Technical score

10%

7.9

User score

▲Better than 50% of smartphones
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

6.3

Price

▼Worse than 93%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

25%

5.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.8

Camera

15%

7.0

Display

15%

4.5

Battery

10%

8.1

Software

10%

7.6

Connectivity

4%

6.9

Audio

3%

7.5

Design

▼Worse than 51%
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

▼Worse than 73%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components:

25%

5.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.8

Camera

15%

7.0

Display

15%

4.5

Battery

10%

8.1

Software

10%

7.6

Connectivity

4%

6.9

Audio

3%

7.5

Design

6.6
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

7.9
Popularity
Popularity
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models
Popularity:
Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB) has a popularity of 7 points, which is higher than 65.1% of smartphones.
7.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

6.3

Price

6.6
Brand name
Google
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 processor which is faster than processors in 55.2% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.8% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
6 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 6 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 71.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 10.8% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.84 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.84 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 68.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 10
Android version
Android 10
This smartphone runs Android version Android 10 which is older than that found in 88.8% of smartphones and equal to that in 5.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
yes
This smartphone receives direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
16 MP & 12.2 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 16 MP & 12.2 MP which is lower than that of 85.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 79.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
31.4 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 31.4 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 57.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.8% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.4 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.4 µm which is larger than in 92.7% of smartphones and equal to the size in 4% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.3 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.3 inches which is smaller than the screens of 89% of smartphones and equal to those of 1.8% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1440x 3040 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1440x3040 px which is higher than that of 93.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Pixel density
537 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 537 ppi which is higher than that of 98.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,700 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 3,700 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 93.6% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.4% of smartphones.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 18 W which is slower than in 76% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 11.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
80 min
Market range: <36 min – >120 min
This smartphone reaches a full wired charge in 80 min which is slower than 69.4% of smartphones and equal to the time of 1.2% of smartphones.
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
160.4 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 160.4 mm which is shorter than 78.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Width
75.1 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 75.1 mm which is narrower than 66.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.7% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.2 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.2 mm which is thinner than 51.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 6.1% of smartphones.
Weight
193 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 193 g which is lighter than 56.8% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 1.9% of smartphones.
Device volume
96,000 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 96,000 cm³ which is smaller than 57.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.6% of smartphones.
Show more

Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3040 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3040 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 35.9% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (537 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    537 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Has 3D facial recognition
    This smartphone features 3D facial recognition, the average smartphone does not. 4.3% of smartphones support 3D face unlock.
  • 28.4% more popular
    Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (6.98 vs 5.4).
    6.98 vs 5.44
  • 66.7% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (10 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    10 W vs 6 W
  • 18.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.84 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x2.84 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz & 4x1.78 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x2.84 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz & 4x1.78 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • 2x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (512 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    512 vs 256
  • 24.2% higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (31.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    31.79 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Night Sight, Super Res Zoom, Live HDR+, Google Assistant on-device processing, Recorder live transcription
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Supports 360° panorama
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.7 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Has 3D facial recognition
    This smartphone features 3D facial recognition, the average smartphone does not. 4.3% of smartphones support 3D face unlock.
  • Includes crash detection
    This smartphone features crash detection, the average smartphone does not. 5.7% of smartphones include automatic crash detection.
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.1 vs 2
  • Supports motion tracking
    This smartphone supports motion tracking, the average smartphone does not. 22% of smartphones offer motion tracking capabilities.
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • Has an infrared sensor
    This smartphone includes an infrared sensor, the average smartphone does not. 33.3% of smartphones feature an IR blaster.
  • 1 more external displays supported
    This smartphone supports more external displays than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone supports 1 external displays.
    2 vs 1
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3040 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3040 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 35.9% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (537 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    537 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 3.2 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (160.4 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    160.4 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • 0.9 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (75.1 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    75.1 mm vs 76 mm
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 72.9% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (257 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    257 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Lower GSMArena battery endurance score
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery endurance score than the average smartphone (73 vs 99.5). The average smartphone scores 99.5.
    73 vs 99.5
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 26% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (3,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    3,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (16 MP & 12.2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    16 MP & 12.2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 3.04x more expensive
    Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£790 vs £260).
    £790 vs £260
  • 11.2% worse value for money
    Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.6 vs 7.3).
    6.6 vs 7.34
  • 1.2% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Google Pixel 4 XL
    the average smartphone
    Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.91 vs 8).
    7.91 vs 8
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 72.9% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (257 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    257 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (6 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 8 GB
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 50% less L3 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4,096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 16.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (7 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    7 nm vs 6 nm
  • 35% fewer transistors
    This smartphone contains fewer transistors than the average smartphone (6,700 million vs 10,300 million). The average smartphone has 10,300 million transistors.
    6,700 million vs 10,300 million
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 21.4% lower 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (3,007 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    3,007 vs 3,825
  • 29.4% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (866 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    866 vs 1,226
  • 4.5% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (900 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    900 vs 942
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 10 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 10 vs Android 14
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (16 MP & 12.2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    16 MP & 12.2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (10 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    10 MP vs 16 MP
  • 1.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 6.1% lower DxOMark Selfie score
    This smartphone has a lower DxOMark Selfie score than the average smartphone (92 vs 98). The average smartphone scores 98.
    92 vs 98
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5 vs 5.2
  • No fingerprint scanner
    This smartphone does not have a fingerprint scanner, the average smartphone does. 96.4% of smartphones include a fingerprint scanner.
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 0.37 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.3 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.3 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 32.7% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (444 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    444 nits vs 660 nits
  • Lower GSMArena battery endurance score
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery endurance score than the average smartphone (73 vs 99.5). The average smartphone scores 99.5.
    73 vs 99.5
  • 26% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (3,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    3,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 40.6% lower PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark than the average smartphone (467 min vs 786 min). The average smartphone scores 786 min.
    467 min vs 786 min
  • 45.5% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (18 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    18 W vs 33 W
  • 45% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (11 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    11 W vs 20 W
  • 18 min slower full wired charge time
    This smartphone has a slower full wired charge time than the average smartphone (80 min vs 62 min). The average smartphone takes 62 min to charge.
    80 min vs 62 min
  • 5 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2019 vs 2024). 5.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    October 2019
    2019 vs 2024

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
PhoneArena
≈ estimated
07/12/2020
Long-term review · about two weeks of use after one year
Verdict
Google Pixel 4 XL is still recommended as a flagship-level phone, despite battery and bezel issues.
8.0
6 Months Later
≈ estimated
24/04/2020
Long-term review · six months of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel 4 XL is recommended for buyers who want the latest Pixel tech, despite battery and notification quirks.
7.0
Explore Gadgets
≈ estimated
05/01/2020
Long-term review · about one month of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel 4 XL is good enough for its purpose, but not the best choice; the camera is its standout feature.
7.0
Jabber Tech
≈ estimated
22/11/2019
Full review · daily use since launch
Verdict
Google Pixel 4 XL is overpriced and not the newest hardware, but a good pick for people who mainly take photos.
8.0
zollotech
≈ estimated
21/10/2019
Review · days of daily use and battery tests
Verdict
Google Pixel 4 XL offers a great experience overall, but the price makes it a hard sell unless discounted.
6.0
TheUnlockr
≈ estimated
21/10/2019
Real-world test · battery drain and camera comparison
Verdict
Google Pixel 4 XL has a nice design and is better than the previous Pixel generation, but battery life is still disappointing.
9.0
Technically Speaking
≈ estimated
21/10/2019
Long-term test · one month of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel 4 XL is a fast, smooth daily driver with great photos, best suited to upgrading from older Pixel models.
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

theverge.com
21/10/2019
Full review · Camera deep dive
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL has strong white balance and zoom, but its video is only passable and its portrait blur still trails the iPhone 11 Pro.
techradar.com
21/10/2019
Full review · Android flagship
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a simple, handsome Android phone with a strong camera and early updates, but its battery and 64GB base storage hold it back.
thurrott.com
30/10/2019
Week-long test · Daily driver
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a solid, reliable phone with a bright display and full-day battery, but its bland, fragile design and missing ultra-wide lens hold it back.
hothardware.com
07/11/2019
Full review · Speakers and display
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL shines with an accurate 90Hz screen and full-sounding speakers, but it is dimmer than rivals and face unlock can open with eyes closed.
Z
zoneoftech.com
14/12/2019
Summary of the review
Google Pixel 4 XL - The ZONEofTECH Review! - ZoneOfTech
androidcentral.com
20/12/2019
One-month review · Camera phone
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL has the best portrait and low-light photos on Android, but its short battery life and 64GB storage hold it back.
techadvisor.com
03/01/2020
Full review · Clean Android phone
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a clean Android phone with a smooth 90Hz screen, but its Motion Sense gestures are hit-and-miss and it has no headphone jack.
wired.com
22/10/2019
Full review · Camera and battery
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an excellent camera and quick face unlock, but 64GB of storage and erratic battery life hold it back from being a top pick.
androidcentral.com
27/10/2020
Full review · Low-light camera
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL has the best Android camera in all lighting, but battery life that often drops to 5% by evening makes it stressful to rely on.
tomsguide.com
25/02/2020
Full review · Display and software
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL offers solid hardware and smart software, with smooth 90Hz scrolling, but its dim screen and short battery life hold it back.
mobilesyrup.com
21/10/2019
Review · Camera upgrade focus
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a better camera and a smooth 90Hz screen, but its battery and unreliable face unlock hold it back.
whathifi.com
16/11/2020
Expert review · Android for camera fans
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL suits Android purists and photo fans, with a clean software experience and an excellent camera, but its sound lacks life.
androidauthority.com
02/10/2021
Full review · Camera-first Android phone
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an excellent camera, software and screen, but at launch its battery and price made it hard to recommend.
D
digitalcameraworld.com
11/07/2021
Summary of the review
Google Pixel 4 XL review - Digital Camera World Would you like a similar list for its successor, the Pixel 5, or perhaps more long-term "revisited" re...
frandroid.com
23/10/2019
Full review · Photo and video focus
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL suits photo and video lovers who want pure Android and a battery that lasts a day, though its design looks dated.
lesnumeriques.com
30/10/2019
Lab test · Camera and battery
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL is an excellent camera phone with a well-calibrated 90Hz screen, but its battery is its weak point.
01net.com
13/12/2019
Expert review · Camera over battery
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a superb camera and lasts a day for most people, but its dim screen, 64GB storage and high price disappoint.
phototrend.fr
14/11/2019
Review · Night photography focus
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a camera phone whose night shots look rich and natural, but battery life and charging let it down.
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
14/02/2020
Summary of the review
Google Pixel 4 XL Lab Test: A photo genius with some flaws
(Translated)Show original
presse-citron.net
18/03/2020
Review · Camera and software focus
Verdict
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a camera phone with clean Android and a smooth 90Hz screen, but its design, storage and missing ultra-wide lens disappoint.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB)

  • Exceptional camera quality, particularly for still photography and Night Sight
  • Smooth 90Hz refresh rate display providing a fluid user experience
  • Industry-leading Face Unlock that is noted for being extremely fast and responsive
  • Clean, bloatware-free stock Android software experience
  • Fast and responsive performance powered by the Snapdragon 855 processor
  • Premium build quality with a comfortable, grippy matte finish on certain models
  • Useful unique features like the Use code with caution.jsonGoogle Recorder appUse code with caution.json and Call Screening

What customers don't like about Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB)

  • Below-average battery life that often struggles to last a full day of moderate use
  • Lack of a fingerprint sensor, which is missed by many users for app compatibility
  • Limited base storage (64GB) with no option for expandable storage via SD card
  • Maximum screen brightness is lower than many competitors, making outdoor viewing difficult
  • Lack of an ultra-wide angle camera lens, which was standard on other flagships at the time
  • Motion Sense (Soli radar) gestures are often described as finicky or of limited utility
  • Video recording capabilities are limited compared to rivals, specifically lacking 4K at 60fps

Verdict

The Google Pixel 4 XL (6GB + 64GB) is a flagship smartphone from late 2019, featuring a 6.3-inch QHD+ P-OLED 90Hz display for smooth visuals, powered by a Snapdragon 855 processor and 6GB of RAM. Its main pros are the exceptional dual-camera system (12.2MP main and 16MP telephoto lens) with industry-leading computational photography features like Night Sight and Astrophotography mode, a clean, bloatware-free stock Android experience with prompt updates, and secure, very fast Face Unlock technology with Motion Sense gestures. However, significant cons include a disappointing 3,700mAh battery life that struggles with all-day heavy use, the lack of expandable storage via microSD card slot, and the absence of an ultra-wide camera lens, which was common on competing phones at the time.

Compare Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Google Pixel 4 XL (64GB) and other smartphones

No results found