OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Shark RV2800ZEEUWH review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ470Max suction power:20000 PaRuntime:110 minDustbin capacity:300 mLMax threshold height:20 mm

Shark RV2800ZEEUWH Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 75% of models
Score components

80%

7.8

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–˛Better than 75% of robot vacuums
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 66% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

â–˛Better than 66%
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 77% of models
Score components

30%

8.6

Cleaning

23%

7.6

Navigation

18%

8.2

Mopping

12%

5.6

Battery

10%

8.5

Smart Features

7%

6.4

Design

â–˛Better than 77%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ ÂŁ470
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum Shark RV2800ZEEUWH

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 77% of models
Score components:

30%

8.6

Cleaning

23%

7.6

Navigation

18%

8.2

Mopping

12%

5.6

Battery

10%

8.5

Smart Features

7%

6.4

Design

7.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Shark RV2800ZEEUWH has a popularity index of 1, lower than that of 70.7% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 29.3% of robot vacuums.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 66% of models
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

7.9
Max suction power
20,000 Pa
Market range: <1.6k Pa – >12k Pa
This robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 20,000 Pa, which is higher than 94.3% of robot vacuums and equal to 1.8% of robot vacuums.
N. of suction power levels
4
Market range: <2 – >4
This robot vacuum has 4 suction power levels, which is more than 49.7% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 43.8% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
?
Power
?
Cleaning modes
3
Market range: <2 – >5
This robot vacuum offers 3 cleaning modes, which is fewer than 62% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 27.7% of robot vacuums offer.
Show more
Mopping capability
yes
This robot vacuum can mop floors. 78.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
vibrating pad
This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping. This system is more effective than those on 66.9% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 12.5% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
rectangular
Mop pad material
microfiber
Mop pressure
?
Show more
Primary navigation technology
LiDAR
This robot vacuum uses LiDAR as its primary navigation system, which is more capable than the systems in 34.7% of robot vacuums and matched by 60.4% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
yes
This robot vacuum maps the floor. 74% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
no
This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, although 68.7% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
no
This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, although 56.6% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
no
This robot vacuum does not support map editing, although 64% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
SharkClean
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Bluetooth connectivity. 35.5% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,900 mAh
Market range: <2.4k mAh – >5.2k mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 2,900 mAh, which is lower than 57.2% of robot vacuums and equal to 1% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.8 V
Runtime
110 min
Market range: <90 min – >240 min
This robot vacuum runs for 110 min per charge, which is shorter than 77.6% of robot vacuums and equal to 5.2% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
yes
This robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging. 83.1% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
101.6 mm
Width
340 mm
Length
364 mm
Weight
3.89 kg
Market range: <2.59 kg – >4.76 kg
This robot vacuum weighs 3.89 kg, making it heavier than 66.6% of robot vacuums and the same weight as 0.6% of robot vacuums.
Show more

Shark RV2800ZEEUWH vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • 16,000 Pa stronger maximum suction
    This robot vacuum has stronger maximum suction than the average robot vacuum (20,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa). The average robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 4,000 Pa.
    20,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Lifts its mop over carpets
    This robot vacuum lifts its mop over carpets, while the average robot vacuum does not lift its mop automatically.
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • Cleans its mop automatically at the dock
    This robot vacuum cleans its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not clean its mop automatically at the dock.
  • Detects dirtier areas
    This robot vacuum detects dirtier areas, while the average robot vacuum does not detect dirtier areas.
  • Adjusts its cleaning height automatically
    This robot vacuum adjusts its cleaning height automatically, while the average robot vacuum uses a fixed cleaning height.
  • Dries the mop automatically
    This robot vacuum dries its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not. 18.5% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • 0.5 h shorter charging time
    This robot vacuum takes less time to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (4 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    4 h vs 4.5 h
  • Newer model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2024, later than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2024 vs 2023
  • 16,000 Pa stronger maximum suction
    This robot vacuum has stronger maximum suction than the average robot vacuum (20,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa). The average robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 4,000 Pa.
    20,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • Detects dirtier areas
    This robot vacuum detects dirtier areas, while the average robot vacuum does not detect dirtier areas.
  • Adjusts its cleaning height automatically
    This robot vacuum adjusts its cleaning height automatically, while the average robot vacuum uses a fixed cleaning height.
  • 0.9 % higher filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has higher filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (99.9 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    99.9 % vs 99 %
  • Dustbin full alert
    This robot vacuum alerts you when its dustbin is full, while the average robot vacuum does not. 19.5% of robot vacuums offer a dustbin full indicator.
  • Lifts its mop over carpets
    This robot vacuum lifts its mop over carpets, while the average robot vacuum does not lift its mop automatically.
  • Cleans its mop automatically at the dock
    This robot vacuum cleans its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not clean its mop automatically at the dock.
  • Dries the mop automatically
    This robot vacuum dries its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not. 18.5% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • Refills its water tank automatically
    This robot vacuum refills its water tank automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual water refilling.
  • Vibrating mop
    This robot vacuum has a vibrating mop, while the average robot vacuum does not. 11.3% of robot vacuums have a vibrating mop.
  • Better mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    vibrating pad vs static pad
  • Supports cleaning solution
    This robot vacuum supports cleaning solution for mopping, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.8% of robot vacuums support this.
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • 1 fewer cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers fewer cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    3 vs 4
  • Does not support map editing
    This robot vacuum does not support map editing, while the average robot vacuum lets you edit maps.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • 2,300 mL less clean water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller base station clean water tank than the average robot vacuum (1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL). The average base station clean water tank holds 4,000 mL.
    1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL
  • 2,550 mL less dirty water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller base station dirty water tank than the average robot vacuum (950 mL vs 3,500 mL). The average base station dirty water tank holds 3,500 mL.
    950 mL vs 3,500 mL
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • 6.53x less popular
    Shark RV2800ZEEUWH is less popular than the average robot vacuum (1 vs 6.5).
    1 vs 6.53
  • 80.8% more expensive
    Shark RV2800ZEEUWH is more expensive than the average robot vacuum (ÂŁ470 vs ÂŁ260).
    ÂŁ470 vs ÂŁ260
  • 40 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (110 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    110 min vs 150 min
  • 300 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (2,900 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    2,900 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • 9% heavier
    This robot vacuum is heavier than the average robot vacuum (3.9 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    3.89 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • 3.36 kg heavier base station
    This robot vacuum has a heavier base station than the average robot vacuum (7.7 kg vs 4.3 kg). The average robot vacuum's base station weighs 4.3 kg.
    7.66 kg vs 4.3 kg
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • Does not support map editing
    This robot vacuum does not support map editing, while the average robot vacuum lets you edit maps.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • 1 fewer cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers fewer cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    3 vs 4
  • 38 mm narrower main brush
    This robot vacuum has a narrower main brush than the average robot vacuum (140 mm vs 178 mm). The average robot vacuum has a main brush 178 mm wide.
    140 mm vs 178 mm
  • 100 mL smaller dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (300 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    300 mL vs 400 mL
  • Does not include a cleaning tool
    This robot vacuum does not include a cleaning tool, while the average robot vacuum includes a cleaning tool.
  • Non-washable dustbin
    This robot vacuum does not have a washable dustbin, while the average robot vacuum does. 83.6% of robot vacuums have a washable dustbin.
  • 2,300 mL less clean water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller base station clean water tank than the average robot vacuum (1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL). The average base station clean water tank holds 4,000 mL.
    1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL
  • 2,550 mL less dirty water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller base station dirty water tank than the average robot vacuum (950 mL vs 3,500 mL). The average base station dirty water tank holds 3,500 mL.
    950 mL vs 3,500 mL
  • 30 mL less onboard water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard water tank than the average robot vacuum (210 mL vs 240 mL). The average robot vacuum's onboard water tank holds 240 mL.
    210 mL vs 240 mL

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
trustedreviews.com
15/11/2024
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro RV2800ZEUK Review
V
vacuumwars.com
20/01/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro Review: Best for Hands-Free?
C
chip.de
06/11/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro (RV2800ZEEU) review
(Translated)Show original
E
etm-testmagazin.de
06/01/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop RV2800ZEEU Review 2025
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
20/12/2024
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 Review (RV2800ZEEU)
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
30/01/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro Review
(Translated)Show original
N
nomadeurbain.fr
03/03/2026
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 Review
(Translated)Show original
O
ouest-france.fr
19/06/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro review: our thoughts on this robot vacuum and mop
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Shark RV2800ZEEUWH

  • Excellent cleaning performance on hard floors and carpets, with high deep-clean scores.
  • Bagless, self-emptying base station reduces maintenance.
  • Advanced mopping system scrubs side-to-side and lifts mop pads over carpets.
  • Mopping pads extend automatically to clean edges and corners.
  • Anti-Hair Wrap brush roller performs well with pet hair.
  • Good obstacle avoidance with front-mounted sensor.

What customers don't like about Shark RV2800ZEEUWH

  • App is considered basic and sometimes slow compared to competitors.
  • Can struggle to cross high thresholds despite advertised capability.
  • Base station can be loud during the auto-empty process.
  • Mop pad cleaning can sometimes cause smearing, requiring maintenance.
  • High price point for the flagship model.

Verdict

The Shark RV2800ZEEUWH PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro is a 650-watt, 2-in-1 robot vacuum and mop featuring a multi-functional base station equipped with a 1.7-litre clean water tank and a bagless dustbin that holds up to 60 days of debris. Operating on 360° LiDAR vision for precise home mapping, it utilizes five deep-cleaning technologies to detect dirt, hardfloor stains, and floor types, while its sonic mopping feature scrubs hard floors 100 times per minute and an air-blasting Edge Detect system clears out corner debris. Key advantages include an anti-tangle brush roll with Anti Hair Wrap technology, 110 minutes of runtime, automated mop pad washing, air-drying, and refilling, alongside NeverStuck technology that raises the chassis over carpet and high thresholds. However, notable drawbacks include a relatively long 4-hour recharge time, loud operation during its self-cleaning base cycles, and a basic companion app that lacks advanced customisation features like scheduling multiple consecutive passes.

Compare Shark RV2800ZEEUWH with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Shark RV2800ZEEUWH and other robot vacuums

No results found