OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Shark AV2800ZEBK review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~£440Max suction power:?Runtime:120 minDustbin capacity:300 mLMax threshold height:20 mm

Shark AV2800ZEBK Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

Shark AV2800ZEBK
7.6/10

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Score components

80%

7.7

Technical score

20%

7.6

User score

▲Better than 70% of robot vacuums
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 60% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

▲Better than 60%
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
Score components

30%

8.6

Cleaning

23%

8.2

Navigation

18%

8.2

Mopping

12%

5.0

Battery

10%

8.1

Smart Features

7%

4.6

Design

▲Better than 72%
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

3.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 74%
  • shark-av2800zebk
  • shark-av2800zebk
  • shark-av2800zebk
  • shark-av2800zebk
  • shark-av2800zebk
  • shark-av2800zebk
  • shark-av2800zebk
  • shark-av2800zebk
shark-av2800zebk
shark-av2800zebk
shark-av2800zebk
shark-av2800zebk
shark-av2800zebk
shark-av2800zebk
shark-av2800zebk
shark-av2800zebk
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum Shark AV2800ZEBK

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
Score components:

30%

8.6

Cleaning

23%

8.2

Navigation

18%

8.2

Mopping

12%

5.0

Battery

10%

8.1

Smart Features

7%

4.6

Design

7.7
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

3.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
3.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Popularity:
Shark AV2800ZEBK has a popularity index of 3.3, lower than that of 67.9% of robot vacuums.
3.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 60% of models
Score components:

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

7.8
Max suction power
?
N. of suction power levels
3
Market range: <2 – >4
This robot vacuum has 3 suction power levels, which is fewer than 50.5% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 35.5% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushless
This robot vacuum uses a brushless motor, a type that is generally more efficient than those used by 2.7% of robot vacuums and also used by 97.3% of robot vacuums.
Power
?
Cleaning modes
4
Market range: <2 – >5
This robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes, which is more than 38.2% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 47.5% of robot vacuums offer.
Show more
Mopping capability
yes
This robot vacuum can mop floors. 78.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
vibrating pad
This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping. This system is more effective than those on 66.9% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 12.5% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
arc-shaped
Mop pad material
microfiber
Mop pressure
?
Show more
Primary navigation technology
LiDAR
This robot vacuum uses LiDAR as its primary navigation system, which is more capable than the systems in 34.7% of robot vacuums and matched by 60.4% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
yes
This robot vacuum maps the floor. 74% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
no
This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, although 68.7% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
no
This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, although 56.6% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
no
This robot vacuum does not support map editing, although 64% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
SharkClean
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Bluetooth connectivity. 35.5% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,900 mAh
Market range: <2.4k mAh – >5.2k mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 2,900 mAh, which is lower than 57.2% of robot vacuums and equal to 1% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.8 V
Runtime
120 min
Market range: <90 min – >240 min
This robot vacuum runs for 120 min per charge, which is shorter than 57.6% of robot vacuums and equal to 19.8% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
yes
This robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging. 83.1% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
104.9 mm
Width
340 mm
Length
340 mm
Weight
7.58 kg
Market range: <2.59 kg – >4.76 kg
This robot vacuum weighs 7.58 kg, making it heavier than 99.8% of robot vacuums.
Show more

Shark AV2800ZEBK vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Lifts its mop over carpets
    This robot vacuum lifts its mop over carpets, while the average robot vacuum does not lift its mop automatically.
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • Cleans its mop automatically at the dock
    This robot vacuum cleans its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not clean its mop automatically at the dock.
  • Detects dirtier areas
    This robot vacuum detects dirtier areas, while the average robot vacuum does not detect dirtier areas.
  • Adjusts its cleaning height automatically
    This robot vacuum adjusts its cleaning height automatically, while the average robot vacuum uses a fixed cleaning height.
  • Refills its water tank automatically
    This robot vacuum refills its water tank automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual water refilling.
  • 1 more side brushes
    This robot vacuum has more side brushes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 1). The average robot vacuum has 1 side brushes.
    2 vs 1
  • 0.5 h shorter charging time
    This robot vacuum takes less time to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (4 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    4 h vs 4.5 h
  • Newer model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2024, later than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2024 vs 2023
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • Detects dirtier areas
    This robot vacuum detects dirtier areas, while the average robot vacuum does not detect dirtier areas.
  • Adjusts its cleaning height automatically
    This robot vacuum adjusts its cleaning height automatically, while the average robot vacuum uses a fixed cleaning height.
  • 1 more side brushes
    This robot vacuum has more side brushes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 1). The average robot vacuum has 1 side brushes.
    2 vs 1
  • Lifts its mop over carpets
    This robot vacuum lifts its mop over carpets, while the average robot vacuum does not lift its mop automatically.
  • Cleans its mop automatically at the dock
    This robot vacuum cleans its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not clean its mop automatically at the dock.
  • Refills its water tank automatically
    This robot vacuum refills its water tank automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual water refilling.
  • Better mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    vibrating pad vs static pad
  • Dispenses cleaning solution automatically
    This robot vacuum dispenses cleaning solution automatically, while the average robot vacuum does not. 26.4% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • Supports cleaning solution
    This robot vacuum supports cleaning solution for mopping, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.8% of robot vacuums support this.
  • Does not support map editing
    This robot vacuum does not support map editing, while the average robot vacuum lets you edit maps.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • 2,300 mL less clean water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller base station clean water tank than the average robot vacuum (1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL). The average base station clean water tank holds 4,000 mL.
    1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • 33 mm narrower main brush
    This robot vacuum has a narrower main brush than the average robot vacuum (145 mm vs 178 mm). The average robot vacuum has a main brush 178 mm wide.
    145 mm vs 178 mm
  • 2.12x heavier
    This robot vacuum is heavier than the average robot vacuum (7.6 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    7.58 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • 69.2% more expensive
    Shark AV2800ZEBK is more expensive than the average robot vacuum (£440 vs £260).
    £440 vs £260
  • 5.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Shark AV2800ZEBK
    the average robot vacuum
    Shark AV2800ZEBK has a lower user score than the average robot vacuum (7.56 vs 8.000).
    7.56 vs 8
  • 99.7% less popular
    Shark AV2800ZEBK is less popular than the average robot vacuum (3.27 vs 6.5).
    3.27 vs 6.53
  • 30 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (120 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    120 min vs 150 min
  • 60 m² smaller cleaning area
    This robot vacuum has a smaller maximum cleaning area than the average robot vacuum (120 m² vs 180 m²). The average robot vacuum has a maximum cleaning area of 180 m².
    120 m² vs 180 m²
  • 300 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (2,900 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    2,900 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • 2.12x heavier
    This robot vacuum is heavier than the average robot vacuum (7.6 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    7.58 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • 7.03 kg heavier base station
    This robot vacuum has a heavier base station than the average robot vacuum (11.3 kg vs 4.3 kg). The average robot vacuum's base station weighs 4.3 kg.
    11.33 kg vs 4.3 kg
  • 4 dB louder
    This robot vacuum has a higher reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (69 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    69 dB vs 65 dB
  • No voice prompts
    This robot vacuum does not provide voice prompts, while the average robot vacuum does. 76.3% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • 14 fewer languages supported
    This robot vacuum supports fewer languages than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 17). The average robot vacuum supports 17 languages.
    3 vs 17
  • Does not support map editing
    This robot vacuum does not support map editing, while the average robot vacuum lets you edit maps.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • 33 mm narrower main brush
    This robot vacuum has a narrower main brush than the average robot vacuum (145 mm vs 178 mm). The average robot vacuum has a main brush 178 mm wide.
    145 mm vs 178 mm
  • 100 mL smaller dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (300 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    300 mL vs 400 mL
  • Does not include a cleaning tool
    This robot vacuum does not include a cleaning tool, while the average robot vacuum includes a cleaning tool.
  • 2,300 mL less clean water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller base station clean water tank than the average robot vacuum (1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL). The average base station clean water tank holds 4,000 mL.
    1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

V
vacuumwars.com
20/01/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro Review: Best for Hands Free Cleaning?
T
trustedreviews.com
15/11/2024
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro RV2800ZEUK Review
W
wired.com
15/09/2024
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop Review: Good Cleaning, Clunky Software
V
vacuumwars.com
27/12/2024
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect Robot Vacuum Review
E
etm-testmagazin.de
06/01/2025
Summary of the review
Review of the Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop RV2800ZEEU
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
06/11/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro (RV2800ZEEU) review
(Translated)Show original
H
handelsblatt.com
29/05/2026
Summary of the review
Shark Robot Vacuum Review: Experiences with the RV3000XEEU, RV2900, and RV2800 Models
(Translated)Show original
N
nomadeurbain.fr
03/03/2026
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 Review: A True Mid-Range Alternative
(Translated)Show original
O
ouest-france.fr
19/06/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro review: Our thoughts on this robot vacuum and mop
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
20/12/2024
Summary of the review
Review of the Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 (RV2800ZEEU)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Shark AV2800ZEBK

  • Excellent suction on carpets and hard floors, capable of reviving old carpets.
  • Compact design that easily fits beneath low furniture such as beds and sofas.
  • Very quiet operation.
  • Good value for money compared with high-end robot vacuums.
  • Very responsive and effective customer service when problems arise.

What customers don't like about Shark AV2800ZEBK

  • Mapping can sometimes lack precision or consistency.
  • It cannot save multiple maps for multi-storey homes.
  • DirtDetect sensors are very sensitive and may report sensor-cleaning errors even after being wiped.
  • Spot cleaning can take unusually long.
  • Difficulty vacuuming larger debris such as wood chips.

Verdict

The Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro (AV2800ZEBK) is a high-tier 2-in-1 black robot vacuum and mop operating on a 650W power system with 360° LiDAR vision and 3D laser navigation. It features an advanced bagless auto-empty base equipped with an odor-neutralizing cartridge, an integrated 1.7-liter clean water tank, a 2-liter auto-empty dock capacity, and a 312ml onboard dustbin. Key pros include its 60-day hands-free debris emptying, 30-day automatic water refilling, automated mop pad washing/drying, and dynamic NeverStuck technology capable of climbing thresholds up to 38mm while lifting the mop pad to protect carpets. However, primary cons include a below-average battery run time of roughly 100 to 120 minutes, relatively slow and inefficient navigation routing, and a barebones SharkClean smartphone app that lacks live progress tracking, customizable room-specific settings, and multi-level mapping.

Compare Shark AV2800ZEBK with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Shark AV2800ZEBK and other robot vacuums

No results found