OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£90PassMark multi-core score:15973N. of physical cores:6CPU boost clock speed:4.2 GHzCPU socket:AM4TDP (Thermal design power):65 W

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G Review: Compare 74 technical specifications and 14 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

7.2/10

▲Better than 65% of processors

8.0

▲Better than 86%

6.2

▲Better than 56%

8.1

▲Better than 78%

?

Not in any best-of list yet

4.3
Gaming
Gaming
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
4.9
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
4.7
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
5.5
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
1.8
L3 cache
8.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
4.6
Video editing
Video editing
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
5.2
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
20.0%
6.6
CPU threads
15.0%
1.8
L3 cache

Where to buy

Check price

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

Based on 2 · 15

Praised for its low price and solid CPU performance, while gaming splits opinion and the older architecture and cache draw criticism.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

Based on 167 owners sharing their experience in online comments

63%positive6%mixed31%negative

Owners praise its smooth, affordable gaming and useful integrated graphics, though low frame rates and startup problems frustrate some buyers.

What owners like

Runs many games well, including demanding titles at 1080p with medium or low settings, and often above 60 fps with a dedicated card.54
Sold at a low price, it gives good gaming and everyday performance for the money, often close to the Ryzen 5 5600G for less.16
Pairs well with dedicated graphics cards such as the RX 6600, RX 580 or RTX 3060 Ti, which handle games at 1080p while the CPU has spare capacity.13
Useful integrated graphics without a separate card12
Handles office work, photo and video editing, streaming and multitasking smoothly, with only light gaming on the integrated graphics.10
Runs cool with the stock cooler, around 40 to 50 °C in games, and a basic fan curve or a larger cooler lowers temperatures further.8
Owners moving from old laptops or older PCs with Celeron, Pentium or Core i3 chips report a very large jump in speed and smoothness.6
Owners report it running reliably for a year or more across repeated builds and daily use without problems.5
Gaming results are almost the same as the Ryzen 5 5600G, usually only 3 to 5 fps apart, at a noticeably lower price.4

What owners dislike

Some owners see low frame rates in demanding or older games, such as Dota 2 or GTA V, when using the integrated graphics without a dedicated card.14
Some owners get no display output after assembly, even though the PC powers on; they suspect the motherboard BIOS needs an update to support this CPU.13
Some owners report stuttering and freezes in games, sometimes after a short time of play, and a few say a graphics card did not fix it.7
Some owners get only about 30 to 60 fps in Fortnite, even with updated drivers and 16 GB of RAM.6
Some owners get driver crashes, black screens, flickering or Windows instability, especially after installing graphics drivers, and reinstalling or changing the driver version helped some.6
Some owners find the CPU reaches 100% load while the graphics card sits lower, causing a bottleneck in certain games.4
Some owners report games crashing, such as Red Dead Redemption 2 at its opening cutscene, with AMD driver timeout errors.3
Some owners find the graphics memory allocation is low, with only 512 MB of VRAM set or about 1 to 2 GB usable, which limits graphics.3
Some owners see poor or pixelated graphics on the integrated GPU, and one owner links it to having only 8 GB of RAM.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

7.2

Show more

Hide

Platform

8.4

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

Performance

5.9

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

5.5

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

What reviewers say

Memory & PCIe

6.9

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

?

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

What reviewers say

Integrated graphics

6.3

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

What reviewers say

Power & Thermal

8.0

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

N/A

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 4600G better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

8 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
20 usable lanes
24 vs 16
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
2 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
6 vs 4
Includes a cooler
This processor includes a cooler, while the average processor does not. 26.9% of processors include a cooler.
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
20.9% higher review score
Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
80%
7.9
Average grade
20%
8.9
Popularity
Grades by review (14)
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 13 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
8.1 vs 6.7
39.3% higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (15,973 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
15,973 vs 11,469
More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Renoir vs Kaby Lake).
Renoir vs Kaby Lake

20.9% higher review score
Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
80%
7.9
Average grade
20%
8.9
Popularity
Grades by review (14)
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 13 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
8.1 vs 6.7
2.78x cheaper
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is cheaper than the average processor (£90 vs £250).
£90 vs £250
10.2% better value for money
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G has better value for money than the average processor (8.02 vs 7.3).
8.02 vs 7.29
13.9% higher sentiment score
8.2 vs 7.2

Modern CPU socket
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM4 vs FP5).
AM4 vs FP5
Broader instruction support
This processor supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V

Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
2 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
6 vs 4
39.3% higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (15,973 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
15,973 vs 11,469
4 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (12 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
12 vs 8
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x3.7 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
6x3.7 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
17% higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (6,096 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
6,096 vs 5,209

More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Renoir vs Kaby Lake).
Renoir vs Kaby Lake
41.7% smaller process node
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (7 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
7 nm vs 12 nm
More advanced foundry
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm

8 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
20 usable lanes
24 vs 16
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
2x more memory capacity
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
128 GB vs 64 GB

Includes a cooler
This processor includes a cooler, while the average processor does not. 26.9% of processors include a cooler.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 4600G worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
28.1% less L3 per core
This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
1.33 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)
44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
4.5% lower boost clock
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
4.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
44.4% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
7.8% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
This processor has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (452 vs 490). The average processor scores 490 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
452 vs 490

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

4.5% lower boost clock
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
4.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
7.8% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
This processor has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (452 vs 490). The average processor scores 490 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
452 vs 490

28.1% less L3 per core
This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
1.33 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core

Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)
70.8% fewer GPU execution units
This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (7 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
7 vs 24

44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
44.4% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

4.0

Older Tech Today

≈ estimated

17/01/2026

Hands-on review · iGPU benchmarks versus used GPUs

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G isn't worth paying extra for its iGPU; a used GPU with a full-power CPU is better.

6.0

Older Tech Today

≈ estimated

03/01/2026

Hands-on review · CPU and game benchmarks vs Ryzen 5 3600

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is acceptable for space-limited builds, but its CPU compromises make it a questionable stopgap for gaming.

7.0

thecodblackopskid

≈ estimated

28/05/2025

Hands-on review · gaming benchmarks on integrated graphics

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G plays many games at low settings on integrated graphics, but 1080p high is not realistic.

9.0

Mike's unboxing, reviews and how to

≈ estimated

03/07/2023

Hands-on review · game benchmarks and idle power

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is hard to beat on price for a low-power media centre or basic 1080p build.

8.0

ThatPaulGuy

≈ estimated

08/06/2021

Hands-on test · desktop benchmarks against Ryzen 3 and Ryzen 5

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is good value and keeps up with mainstream Ryzen 5 chips once paired with a graphics card.

8.0

Count Beanz

≈ estimated

25/08/2020

Hands-on review · benchmarks and game tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a solid budget APU for occasional gaming, though the price is the key question.

9.0

Omer Design

≈ estimated

16/08/2026

Hands-on review · AI training and daily desktop use

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is still a solid choice in 2026 for AI training and daily use, if you can find it at a good price.

Shop video

Shop video

Not graded

Not graded

Not graded

Andres G · 03/06/2025

Hands-on review · gaming tests and integrated graphics setup

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is good value for light gaming at 720p, but demanding games need a dedicated graphics card.

Likes

Fortnite is playable with the frame rate capped to match the monitor
Lowering resolution to 720p improves stability and smoothness
Low-cost way to play favourite games without a graphics card

Dislikes

GTA V drops to around 50 fps in cities at 1080p
Default 512 MB video memory must be raised in the BIOS
Serious gaming requires a dedicated graphics card

INKISIDOR PC · 14/01/2025

Hands-on review · game tests and 2025 value check

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is fine for basic or entry builds in 2025, but not for demanding modern games.

Likes

Radeon Vega 7 graphics handle light and popular games well
Six cores and 12 threads suit multitasking and light work
Good option for a basic PC with a GPU added later
AM4 motherboards are cheap and widely available

Dislikes

Zen 2 architecture is showing its age in efficiency and performance
Struggles with demanding titles like Cyberpunk and Starfield
Best suited only to basic or entry-level builds
Newer options like the Ryzen 5 5600G are noticeably faster

PipetasSoft · 06/12/2024

Budget build test · game FPS and conclusions

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is fine for starting out on a tight budget, but the Ryzen 5 5600G is the better buy.

Likes

Fortnite and GTA V playable at 1080p on low to normal settings
Minecraft runs very smoothly at high frame rates
Runs cool enough to keep the stock cooler
Good starter PC for a tight budget

Dislikes

Warzone and GTA V settle around 50 to 60 fps at 1080p
PCIe 3.0 limits newer high-end graphics cards
Ryzen 5 5600G gives 10 to 15 more fps for a bit more money

DistritoGamer · 09/05/2024

Real-world review · budget builds and game FPS tests

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is an excellent budget CPU that performs like the 5600G, a solid choice for affordable gaming PCs.

Likes

Same gaming performance as the 5600G
No issues in PCs built and sold to clients
Runs all games at lower resolution and settings
Very good value for a budget gaming build

Dislikes

Becomes a mid-range build once paired with an RTX 3070
PCIe 4.0 brings no real gain over PCIe 3.0
Demanding games need lower settings or resolution

Andres G · 06/03/2024

Hands-on review · gaming tests after three months

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a good budget gaming choice, especially for light games.

Likes

Very good performance in light games
Good integrated graphics for a budget gaming PC
Reliable over months of daily use

Dislikes

Demanding games need low settings to stay smooth
Browser video showed white boxes until settings were changed

TUTO-TECNO · 03/02/2024

Hands-on review · gaming tests and value assessment

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is still a very good value for a first gaming PC, though its integrated graphics limit demanding titles.

Likes

Good value for a first budget gaming PC
Solid 1080p results in GTA V and Valorant
Fast enough to drive 144 Hz monitors in Valorant

Dislikes

Demanding games like Fortnite need a dedicated graphics card
Cyberpunk only runs smoothly at 720p with low settings
Older design, so its hardware is not the best

Andres G · 24/01/2024

Hands-on review · gaming tests after one month

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a solid budget choice, with strong gaming performance for the price, especially in lighter titles.

Likes

Good value for the price
Smooth frame rates in many games at medium settings
Strong integrated graphics for a budget PC

Dislikes

Demanding games need reduced settings for smooth play
Not ideal for 144 Hz displays at high settings

Glitch hardware · 10/12/2023

Hands-on review · game tests and streaming

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is recommended for gaming and 3D work, especially on a tight budget.

Likes

Playable frame rates in popular games at medium settings
Smooth streaming performance at lower resolution
Good for 3D work and editing on a budget

Dislikes

Integrated graphics share system RAM, so memory matters
Best results need 16 GB in dual channel
Full HD results are lower than in the 1366x768 tests

Sumocomputacion · 13/05/2023

Build video · synthetic benchmarks and temperature checks

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a very good budget chip with graphics that match the 5600G, though its CPU is slightly slower.

Likes

Strong performance for a budget processor
Integrated graphics identical to the Ryzen 5 5600G
Good temperatures under load
Good value for money

Dislikes

CPU performance slightly below the Ryzen 5 5600G
Overall performance trails the 5600G, so it is worth a little less

INKISIDOR PC · 26/10/2024

Long-term use · 4 months of gaming and editing

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G performs better than expected for its very low cost, handling gaming and video editing well.

Likes

Fortnite above 100 fps in performance mode
Video editing with effects runs without slowdowns
Good value for a very cheap build

Dislikes

Warzone needs FSR and still drops below 60 fps
Low 1366x768 monitor resolution limits the experience
Default 512 MB of graphics memory must be raised to 2 GB

Andres G · 20/06/2024

Hands-on review · gaming FPS, temperatures and power

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is still worth it for budget PCs: it stays cool, runs efficiently and handles light gaming at low settings.

Likes

Comfortable temperatures and moderate power draw
Good price for the performance it delivers
Smooth 60 FPS in Forza Horizon 5 at low settings
Solid 1080p Minecraft performance with balanced settings

Dislikes

Demanding games need low resolution and low settings
GTA V at 720p on high settings drops frame rate in busy areas
Browser flickering that needed an AMD settings workaround

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0

ct.nl

≈ estimated

03/12/2022

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G review: a processor that is both efficient and affordable

Lab test · Desktop processor

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a low-power chip for office PCs and media players, but its built-in graphics fall short for demanding 3D games.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

Excellent value for money for budget-conscious builders
Strong performance for office and daily tasks like Excel and Word
Capable of handling 4K video playback smoothly
Good entry-level gaming performance (720p/1080p low settings) without a dedicated GPU
Low power consumption and runs cool (low TDP)
Provides a reliable backup/troubleshooting option if a dedicated GPU fails
6 cores and 12 threads offer decent multitasking capabilities for its price point

What customers don't like about AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

Compromised CPU performance compared to standard Ryzen 3600/5000 series
Small L3 cache (8MB) can bottleneck CPU-intensive tasks and modern games
Limited to PCIe Gen 3, which can restrict performance of newer high-end GPUs
Integrated graphics (Vega 7) struggle with AAA titles and intensive 3D workloads
Dependent on high-speed dual-channel RAM for optimal performance
Newer models like the Ryzen 5 5600G often offer better value and architecture for a similar price
May experience occasional stuttering in games if VRAM allocation is not manually increased in BIOS

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a budget-friendly desktop APU based on the 7nm Zen 2 architecture, featuring 6 cores, 12 threads, a base clock of 3.7 GHz, and a boost clock of up to 4.2 GHz. Its standout feature is the integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics with a 1,900 MHz clock speed, which allows for playable 1080p entry-level gaming in popular titles like Fortnite and League of Legends without a dedicated GPU. Key advantages include low power consumption with a 65W TDP, an unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking, and excellent value for home office or media center builds. However, notable drawbacks include a significantly smaller 8 MB L3 cache compared to non-G Ryzen 3000/5000 counterparts, a limitation to PCIe 3.0 instead of the newer PCIe 4.0 standard, and reduced performance in modern AAA games without a discrete graphics card.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

Processors

Intel Core i3-12100F

Processors

Intel Core i3-14100F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

Processors

Intel Core i5-9400F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Processors

AMD Ryzen 3 5300G

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 4600G with other processors

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and other processors

No results found