OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£80PassMark multi-core score:17674N. of physical cores:6CPU boost clock speed:4.2 GHzCPU socket:AM4TDP (Thermal design power):65 W

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Compare 74 technical specifications, 52 expert and video reviews and 2 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

7.2/10

▲Better than 67% of processors

8.0

▲Better than 86%

6.1

▲Better than 55%

9.0

★Better than 100%

6.1

★Better than 94%

4.7
Gaming
Gaming
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
4.7
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
4.9
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
5.5
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
4.0
L3 cache
8.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
5.2
Video editing
Video editing
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
5.8
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
20.0%
6.6
CPU threads
15.0%
4.0
L3 cache

Where to buy

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Based on 9 · 39

Strong gaming and multi-core performance for the money with a solid upgrade path, but the stock cooler and overclocking disappoint.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Based on 178 owners sharing their experience in online comments

88%positive9%mixed3%negative

Owners mostly praise its lasting gaming performance and strong value, while cooling can take tuning to manage heat.

What owners like

Owners with a 1440p or 4K setup say the 3600 still keeps frame rates above 100 fps in most games, so it rarely holds a GPU back at those resolutions.57
Owners say it delivers strong gaming and workload performance for its price, often well below the cost of comparable Intel chips.33
Owners who bought it years ago say it still handles 1440p and 1080p gaming well and is only held back by the newest, fastest GPUs.27
Many owners report stable all-core overclocks around 4.1 to 4.4 GHz, though some need more voltage to stay stable and run hot doing it.12
Owners say the stock cooler keeps it around 60 to 70 °C under gaming load, and a basic air or AIO cooler keeps it cooler still.9
Owners who upgraded from Ryzen 2000-series, Ryzen 1000-series or older Intel chips report clearly higher frame rates, especially in open-world games.8
Owners doing rendering, video editing or coding say it finishes those tasks quickly thanks to its high thread count.7
Owners report it runs fine on older AM4 boards such as A320, B350 and X370, usually after a BIOS update.5
Owners say it runs well with fast DDR4 memory, and enabling the XMP profile in the BIOS is enough to reach the higher speeds.3

What owners dislike

Owners say the stock cooler runs hot and loud, often idling at 55 °C and reaching the 80s or 90s °C under load, so an aftermarket cooler is recommended.10
Owners report that some CPU-heavy games, such as Cyberpunk 2077 and Warzone, struggle to hold 60 or 100+ fps, especially with ray tracing on.7
Owners say the 3600's price has risen well above its launch price, and upgrades to the 5800X3D or newer chips cost a lot.7
Owners say it often will not run stable beyond about 4.15 to 4.2 GHz all-core, and pushing it further needs more voltage and heat.4
Automatic boost and voltage can misbehave3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Processors model ranking

Ranked #99 of 558 models in Processors (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600

7.2

Show more

Hide

Platform

8.4

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

What reviewers say

Performance

5.7

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

6.1

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

7.3

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

?

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated graphics

4.0

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

N/A

Integrated GPU execution units

N/A

Integrated GPU base frequency

N/A

Integrated media encoders/decoders

N/A

Show more

Power & Thermal

7.1

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

N/A

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600 better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

8 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
20 usable lanes
24 vs 16
34.3% higher review score
Reviews score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 100% of models
80%
8.8
Average grade
20%
9.9
Popularity
Grades by review (52)
16 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 11 estimated from the review. 36 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
9.0 vs 6.7
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
2.88x more L3 per core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (5.3 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
5.33 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
2 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
6 vs 4
54.1% higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (17,674 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
17,674 vs 11,469
Includes a cooler
This processor includes a cooler, while the average processor does not. 26.9% of processors include a cooler.
Newer PCIe version
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
4 vs 3

34.3% higher review score
Reviews score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 100% of models
80%
8.8
Average grade
20%
9.9
Popularity
Grades by review (52)
16 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 11 estimated from the review. 36 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
9.0 vs 6.7
38.9% higher sentiment score
10.0 vs 7.2
3.13x cheaper
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is cheaper than the average processor (£80 vs £250).
£80 vs £250
10.5% better value for money
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has better value for money than the average processor (8.05 vs 7.3).
8.05 vs 7.29

Modern CPU socket
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM4 vs FP5).
AM4 vs FP5
Broader instruction support
This processor supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V

Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
54.1% higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (17,674 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
17,674 vs 11,469
2 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
6 vs 4
4 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (12 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
12 vs 8
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x3.6 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
6x3.6 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
32.3% higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (6,891 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
6,891 vs 5,209
2.08x faster classroom rendering
This processor has a lower Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (705.9 vs 340.1). The average processor needs 340.075 for the Blender Classroom test.
705.9 vs 340.075
31.5% better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (3,689 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
3,689 vs 2,804.5
2x higher bus transfer rate
This processor has a higher bus transfer rate than the average processor (16 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
16 GT/s vs 8 GT/s

2.88x more L3 per core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (5.3 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
5.33 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
3.56x larger L3 cache
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
32 MB vs 9 MB
58.2% smaller die size
This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (74 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
74 mm² vs 177 mm²
41.7% smaller process node
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (7 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
7 nm vs 12 nm
More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Matisse vs Kaby Lake).
Matisse vs Kaby Lake
More advanced foundry
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm

8 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
20 usable lanes
24 vs 16
Newer PCIe version
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
4 vs 3
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
2x more memory capacity
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
128 GB vs 64 GB
Supports ECC memory
This processor supports ECC memory, while the average processor does not. 32% of processors support it.

Includes a cooler
This processor includes a cooler, while the average processor does not. 26.9% of processors include a cooler.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600 worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

21.8% lower list score
List score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 87 lists (2%)
6.1 vs 7.8
No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Boot, SME, TSME vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Boot, SME, TSME vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x16, x8/x8 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4
4.5% lower boost clock
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
4.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
No integrated graphics
This processor does not include integrated graphics, while the average processor does. 85.4% of processors include integrated graphics.

21.8% lower list score
List score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 87 lists (2%)
6.1 vs 7.8

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Boot, SME, TSME vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Boot, SME, TSME vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

4.5% lower boost clock
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
4.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz

Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x16, x8/x8 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4

No integrated graphics
This processor does not include integrated graphics, while the average processor does. 85.4% of processors include integrated graphics.

No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
44.4% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0

Iceberg Tech

≈ estimated

15/05/2026

Benchmark test · ten games and gaming CPU limits

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is good enough as a minimum gaming CPU in 2026, though its lows drop and some games need settings changes.

7.0

RandomGaminginHD

≈ estimated

06/02/2026

Upgrade review · GPU swap in a Ryzen 5 3600 PC

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 still does a decent job for the price, though faster DDR4 would help.

9.0

Older Tech Today

≈ estimated

15/03/2025

Hands-on testing · game FPS, rendering and SMT

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 offers good performance for the price, but its 65 W rating is misleading.

8.0

eTeknix

≈ estimated

08/03/2024

Benchmark revisit · 42 games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is still more than capable, though aging, and the Ryzen 5 7600 clearly outpaces it in many games.

9.0

RA Tech

≈ estimated

20/01/2024

Hands-on test · gaming FPS and temperatures on budget build

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is very good value for its price, though some games like Hogwarts Legacy need lower settings.

7.0

TechLabUK

≈ estimated

03/04/2023

Benchmark review · 1080p gaming and temperature checks

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is still a capable budget gaming chip, but the newer Ryzen 5 5600 offers better value for new buyers.

6.0

Tech YES City

≈ estimated

17/01/2023

Troubleshooting · overheating fix and undervolt test

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 runs hot with a stock-style cooler, but a temperature limit and undervolting bring it under control.

9.0

Linus Tech Tips

≈ estimated

21/10/2020

Hands-on review · budget workstation use and comparisons

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is the best all-rounder for the price with good value, though it is not the top pick at any single task.

9.0

PCWizKids Tech Talk

≈ estimated

01/02/2020

Hands-on review · gaming system build and benchmarks

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 gives good 1080p gaming and benchmark results, but 4K needs a faster graphics card.

9.5

RageQuitters UK

≈ estimated

31/07/2019

Real rig upgrade · build and benchmarks

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and the MSI board earn praise for build quality and performance.

9.0

Tech YES City

≈ estimated

25/07/2019

Hands-on review · motherboard pairing, benchmarks and temperatures

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a good value combo for a one-time PC, though the stock cooler runs warm and the board can't take 8 or 12 core upgrades.

9.5

Hardware Unboxed

≈ estimated

09/07/2019

Full review · benchmarks, cooler tests and value

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 offers strong value and remains a good pick for new builds, ahead of its Intel rival.

More graded video reviews (5)

RandomGaminginHD

creator’s own scoreestimated by us

AndrosCroll Hardware · 30/10/2025

Hands-on review · gaming FPS tests in several titles

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 runs demanding games well and is a good buy, with only a minor GPU bottleneck.

Likes

High frame rates in Red Dead Redemption 2 and Fortnite
Handles modern games well despite being mid-range when released
Stays smooth in 1440p gaming tests
Good value for the price paid

Dislikes

Graphics card is the main bottleneck in some games
Mid-range chip for its original release era

GashetaYT · 12/09/2024

Overclock test · stock vs overclocked gaming and temperatures

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 gets better frame rates and lower temperatures at a 4.5 GHz overclock, and still handles 2024 games well.

Likes

Runs modern games smoothly at 1080p
Overclock improves frame rates in most tests
Overclocked chip runs cooler than stock
Still a capable processor for 2024

Dislikes

Stock chip runs hotter under load
Some games show almost no difference from overclocking
Budget B320 boards reportedly lack overclocking support

Cabra SMM · 08/09/2024

Budget PC upgrade · game benchmarks with Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 gives a clear boost over the old Ryzen 3 1200, and AM4 still leaves room to upgrade.

Likes

Clear frame rate gains over the old Ryzen 3 1200
Faster 3200 MHz RAM adds noticeable performance
Big gains in several tested games like Apex Legends
Room to upgrade within the AM4 platform

Dislikes

GTX 1650 becomes the limit in some games
Small difference in Alone in the Dark

Pepelpro · 11/11/2023

Hands-on review · stress test, benchmarks and games

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 still holds up in 2023 games at its price, though heavy 4K editing can slow it down.

Likes

High multi-core scores in Cinebench
Good gaming performance for the price
Handles editing and gaming well overall
Stays fairly cool under full load

Dislikes

Slows down during heavy 4K editing with many clips
Temperatures rise noticeably with the stock cooler
Hard to find, as it is nearly discontinued

PCrifericos · 08/04/2021

Hands-on review · AliExpress purchase · temperatures and game tests

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has good temperatures and game performance, and is worth buying from a trusted seller at this price.

Likes

Low temperatures under load for a budget CPU
Good frame rates in several modern games
Lower price than from official shops
Arrived new and unused

Dislikes

No cooler included, so an aftermarket one is needed
Ultra settings in Red Dead Redemption 2 need a more powerful GPU

TecnoLider · 02/08/2019

Gaming benchmarks · PC build and setup

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 strikes a good balance of gaming and productivity for a budget build, with ray tracing as the main limit.

Likes

Smooth frame rates in CS:GO and Fortnite
Benchmark results above the previous 2700 generation
Good balance for gaming and productivity
Good value for a budget build

Dislikes

Ray tracing games drop to around 50 to 60 FPS
Port Royal runs at only 24 FPS

Toro Tocho Reviews · 12/07/2019

Budget build · benchmarks, temperatures and BIOS tips

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is recommended as a budget gaming base, with 1080p performance that is more than enough, though older boards need a BIOS update.

Likes

Smooth 1080p gaming at high settings
Quiet cooler keeps temperatures under control
Good value inside a budget build

Dislikes

Older 450 and 470 boards need a BIOS update first
Automatic voltage settings on some motherboards need refining

Toro Tocho Reviews · 07/07/2019

Hands-on review · temperatures, cooler and value

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a good processor overall, but its stock cooler runs hot and needs a better cooler.

Likes

Good performance for a six-core processor
Temperatures stay around 60 to 70 degrees with a better cooler
Solid choice for gaming builds

Dislikes

The stock cooler gets very hot under load
Value over the cheaper 2600 is hard to justify
Some B450 boards may lack the required BIOS support

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0

gamersnexus.net

≈ estimated

07/07/2019

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 CPU Review & Benchmarks: Strong Gaming & Value

Hands-on test · Gaming and rendering

Verdict

The Ryzen 5 3600 is the better all-rounder for video editing and rendering, while the Core i5-9600K remains the stronger choice for pure gaming.

10

techspot.com

✓ explicit

09/07/2019

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Best All-Round Value CPU(www.tomshardware.com) | 20/10/2020 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Non-X Marks the Spot

Lab test · Gaming benchmarks

Verdict

The Ryzen 5 3600 is a strong all-round pick for AM4 upgrades and new builds, trailing the Core i5-9600K only slightly in games but clearly ahead in application tests.

9.0

rockpapershotgun.com

≈ estimated

29/07/2019

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 review: A great value gaming CPU

Gaming test · 1080p benchmarks

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 nearly matches the 3600X in 1080p gaming while using 65W instead of 95W, making it a strong pick for gamers.

10

techradar.com

✓ explicit

07/10/2019

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 review

Lab test · Mid-range gaming

Verdict

The Ryzen 5 3600 suits gamers upgrading an AM4 PC, offering high frame rates, though its six cores trail the Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 chips.

9.5

pcgamesn.com

≈ estimated

01/11/2019

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 review: the Ryzen king is dead, long live Ryzen !

Lab test · Gaming CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a strong pick for a new gaming PC, matching the Ryzen 5 3600X in games while drawing less power than the Ryzen 5 2600X.

8.6

chip.de

✓ explicit

09/03/2021

AMD-Ryzen-5-3600-im-Test_183303578 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 im Test

Lab test · Gaming and everyday use

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a strong six-core chip for gaming and everyday work, but it has no integrated graphics, so you need a graphics card.

9.0

gamestar.de

≈ estimated

08/07/2021

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Test 2021 - Dauerbrenner gegen aktuelle Top -CPUs

Lab test · Gaming CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 suits gamers upgrading from Ryzen 1000 or older Intel chips; six cores should handle games for years, but rendering or streaming needs eight or more.

9.0

obtenerpc.com

≈ estimated

26/03/2023

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review en Español: CPU de Mejor Valor

Summary review · Gaming CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a strong, efficient gaming chip that nearly matches the Ryzen 5 3600X, though it trails faster Ryzen 3000 models overall.

9.0

hwupgrade.it

≈ estimated

22/07/2019

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X and Ryzen 5 3600: the new best buys

Feature review · Mid-range Zen 2

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a six-core Zen 2 chip that keeps the Ryzen 5 line's mid-range appeal, but has fewer cores than Ryzen 7 and 9.

10

global.techradar.com

✓ explicit

13/01/2020

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review - TechRadar

Lab test · Gaming and efficiency

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is not a top-end chip, but its strong gaming frame rates and modest power draw suit gamers and professional software users.

9.0

hwupgrade.it

≈ estimated

22/07/2019

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X and Ryzen 5 3600: The New Best Buys

Benchmark review · Zen 2 mid-range CPU

Verdict

The Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy than the 3600X, delivering about 14% more average performance than the Ryzen 5 2600 at a 65W TDP.

9.0

giochipertutti.org

≈ estimated

07/08/2019

Recensione AMD Ryzen 5 3600 : Ryzen è morto, lunga vita a Ryzen !

Full review · Gaming CPU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a six-core chip that matches the Ryzen 5 3600X in games, draws less power than the Ryzen 5 2600X, and fits older motherboards.

9.0

hardware.info

≈ estimated

17/07/2019

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 & 3600X review: Blowing the Core i5s away!

Benchmark review · Zen 2 six-core

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a 65W six-core chip with a 4.2 GHz boost, well suited to gaming and lighter everyday work.

tweakers.net

19/07/2019

Ryzen 5 3600 and 3600X Review - New budget Ryzens

Not graded yet

Read full review →

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Exceptional price-to-performance ratio, often cited as a 'value champ' for mid-range builds
Excellent gaming performance, particularly at 1080p and 1440p, often rivaling more expensive Intel counterparts
Strong multi-threaded capabilities suitable for video editing, 3D rendering, and streaming
Broad compatibility with existing AM4 motherboards, offering a solid upgrade path for older systems
Energy efficient with a 65W TDP, maintaining high performance in a small thermal envelope
Includes a stock cooler (Wraith Stealth) that is adequate for non-overclocked usage

What customers don't like about AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Stock cooler can be loud under heavy load and may struggle to keep temperatures low during intensive tasks
Limited overclocking headroom, with many users finding minimal gains over stock performance
Lacks integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for any display output
Starting to show its age in highly CPU-intensive modern titles like Starfield or Cyberpunk 2077
Some users reported difficult installation with the stock cooler's spring-loaded screws
Currently overshadowed by newer generations like the Ryzen 5 5600, which offers better performance for a similar used price

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a highly popular 3rd Gen desktop processor based on the 7nm Zen 2 architecture, featuring 6 cores and 12 threads with a base clock of 3.6 GHz and a max boost clock of up to 4.2 GHz. It is equipped with a significant 32 MB of L3 cache, supports PCIe 4.0 (on compatible X570 or B550 motherboards), and operates within a power-efficient 65W TDP. Main pros include exceptional price-to-performance value, strong multi-threaded performance for both gaming and productivity, and compatibility with the long-lived AM4 socket which allows for easy upgrades from older Ryzen generations. Additionally, it comes bundled with a capable Wraith Stealth stock cooler. However, notable cons include its lack of integrated graphics (requiring a dedicated GPU), limited overclocking headroom, and the fact that the stock cooler can become quite loud and may lead to high temperatures under heavy, sustained workloads.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

Processors

Intel Core i3-14100F

Processors

Intel Core i3-12100F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

Processors

Intel Core i7-4790

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Processors

Intel Pentium G3430

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 3600 with other processors

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and other processors

No results found