OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price: ~£95
PassMark benchmark result: 14761
N. of physical cores: 8
CPU boost clock speed: 3.7 GHz

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

5.5

Good

5.0

Good

9.6

Exceptional

3.2
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
3.0
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
2.8
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
3.7
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
3.3
L3 cache
8.0%
3.5
N. of physical cores
3.5
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
2.9
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
3.5
N. of physical cores
20.0%
5.2
CPU threads
15.0%
3.3
L3 cache

Best prices in UK

£?

Best rankings

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor based on the 14nm Zen architecture and the AM4 socket. It features a base clock speed of 3.0 GHz, a maximum boost clock of 3.7 GHz, and 20MB of combined L2 and L3 cache, all within a highly efficient 65W TDP. Its primary advantages include exceptional multi-threaded performance for productivity tasks like video encoding, an unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking, and a significantly lower launch price compared to competing high-core-count Intel chips. However, it is noted for trailing behind Intel's contemporary flagships in single-threaded performance and 1080p gaming, and early models were often sensitive to specific DDR4 memory speeds and compatibility.

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700

Overall score

5.5

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

8.6

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

AMD

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Performance

4.3

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

5.1

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

Show more

Memory & PCIe

6.7

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

3.4

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

N/A

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

N/A

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

?

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

N/A

Show more

Power & Thermal

6.4

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

?

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

N/A

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 1700 better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Unlocked for overclocking
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not.
What it is: Has an unlocked CPU multiplier, which makes manual CPU overclocking much easier on supported platforms.
When it matters: When you plan to push clock speeds beyond stock settings instead of leaving the processor completely at default behavior.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not.
8 more PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
20 usable lanes
What it is: The number of PCIe lanes provided directly by the processor.
When it matters: When you connect fast GPUs, SSDs, or expansion cards.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=20
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.24 vs 16
Includes stock cooler
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not.
What it is: A stock CPU cooler is included in the box with the processor.
When it matters: When total build cost matters and you need to know whether separate cooling must be bought right away.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not.
8 more CPU threads
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 16+
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.16 vs 8
Supports memory overclocking
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not.
What it is: Allows memory speeds beyond official stock settings through manual tuning or profile-based overclocking.
When it matters: When you want to push RAM performance higher than stock support allows, especially in enthusiast or gaming builds.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
What it is: The reported operating temperature of the processor.
When it matters: When you monitor thermals, cooling, or system stability.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <100 °C
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.95 °C vs 100 °C
Advanced security extensions
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Memory Guard, SME, SEV, SKINIT vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
What it is: The supported hardware security extensions provided by the processor.
When it matters: When you care about security, encryption, or enterprise features.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Memory Guard, SME, SEV, SKINIT vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Memory Guard, SME, SEV, SKINIT vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor
Broader instruction support
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, ABM, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
What it is: The supported CPU instruction sets and extensions.
When it matters: When you run software that depends on specific CPU instructions.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, ABM, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, ABM, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
Broader instruction support
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, ABM, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
Advanced security extensions
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Memory Guard, SME, SEV, SKINIT vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
Modern CPU socket
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM4 vs FP2).
Unlocked for overclocking
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not.
8 more CPU threads
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
2 more CPU cores
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
40.1% higher PassMark score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (14,761 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
2x larger L1 cache
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (768 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
2x larger L3 cache
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
16.7% more L3 per core
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
60% larger L2 cache
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (4 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
8 more PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
Supports memory overclocking
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not.
2x more memory capacity
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
Supports ECC memory
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 supports ECC memory, the average processor does not.
Includes stock cooler
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.

Cache & Architecture

Power & Thermal

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 1700 worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

3 year/s older release date
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has an older release date than the average processor (2017 vs 2020).
March 2017
Older TPM support
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0).
31.6% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (331 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
30.2% lower single-core score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,027 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
14% lower boost clock
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
19.6% weaker single-core performance
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1997 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
23.9% slower Blender rendering
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (252.5 vs 331.88). The average processor needs 331.88 for the Blender BMW27 test.
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Summit Ridge vs Kaby Lake).
16.7% larger process node
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
7.9% larger die size
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher die size than the average processor (192 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².
Lower JEDEC memory speed
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR4-2666 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
No integrated graphics
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does.
44.4% higher base power
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
No configurable TDP
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
5 °C lower TJ Max
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
44.4% higher TDP
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
31.6% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (331 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about lighter workloads, interface responsiveness, or software that still depends heavily on one fast core.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >600
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (331 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.331 vs 484
30.2% lower single-core score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,027 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2000
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,027 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.1,027 vs 1,471
14% lower boost clock
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4.7 GHz
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.3.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
19.6% weaker single-core performance
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1997 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >3200
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1997 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.1,997 vs 2,483
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Summit Ridge vs Kaby Lake).
What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.
Importance: LOW
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Summit Ridge vs Kaby Lake).Summit Ridge vs Kaby Lake
16.7% larger process node
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <10 nm
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.14 nm vs 12 nm
44.4% higher base power
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <30 W
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.65 W vs 45 W
No configurable TDP
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.
When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.
Importance: LOW
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Power & Thermal

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 7 1700 and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 7 1700?

Exceptional multi-threaded performance for the price, ideal for workstations and content creation
High value proposition, offering 8 cores and 16 threads at a much lower cost than competing Intel chips
Low 65W TDP makes it power-efficient and easy to cool compared to its higher-end siblings
Unlocked multiplier allows for significant overclocking potential, often matching the performance of the more expensive 1800X
Includes a capable and aesthetically pleasing stock cooler (Wraith Spire with RGB)

What customers dislike about AMD Ryzen 7 1700?

Lower single-threaded performance and clock speeds compared to Intel's Kaby Lake competitors
Lags behind Intel in 1080p gaming scenarios, particularly in older or less optimized titles
Early platform issues included memory compatibility limitations and buggy BIOS firmware
Overclocking headroom is often limited to around 3.9 - 4.0 GHz across all cores
Lack of 'XFR' (Extended Frequency Range) support found in higher-tier 'X' models

Expert reviews

digitalfoundry.net

05/12/2017

Summary of the review

Ryzen 7 1700 and 1700X review: better than the 1800X? - Digital Foundry

Digital Foundry's review identifies the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 as the standout, high-value choice among the initial Ryzen 7 lineup, delivering eight-core performance for £299/$330. While the 1800X serves as the flagship, the 1700 offers identical core architecture and, with manual overclocking, can match the performance of more expensive models, making it the superior choice for enthusiasts. Key benefits of the 1700 include high efficiency with a 65W TDP and exceptional multi-threaded performance, though it suffers from lower stock clock speeds and limited automatic XFR boosting compared to "X" models. Gaming performance is a notable limitation, with all Ryzen 7 chips trailing Intel in 1080p scenarios due to lower single-thread speeds, and the 1800X provides almost no gaming advantage over the 1700. Digital Foundry

kitguru.net

15/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 CPU Review - KitGuru

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is identified as a high-value 8-core/16-thread processor in the Zen lineup, offering an unlocked multiplier and an efficient 65W TDP at a competitive price point. It excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks, outperforming competing Intel chips in benchmarks, though it faces lower 1080p gaming performance. Key advantages include its capable stock cooler and significant overclocking potential, often reaching 4.0GHz to match higher-tier models.

tomshardware.com

06/04/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 CPU Review - Tom's Hardware

The Tom's Hardware review positions the $330 AMD Ryzen 7 1700 as a high-value, 65W, eight-core champion, offering nearly the same multi-threaded performance as the 1800X, particularly when overclocked to bridge the 3.0 GHz base clock gap. Key pros include exceptional rendering and encoding capability, a low power draw (29.3W–44.3W), and the inclusion of the Wraith Spire cooler, making it an efficient workstation chip. Conversely, cons include lower stock gaming performance compared to Intel counterparts due to lower IPC and clock speeds, alongside early launch-day memory compatibility issues and slightly less overclocking headroom than X-series models.

pcmag.com

08/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Review - PCMag

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is highlighted by PCMag as an impressive, cost-effective eight-core processor that brings high-end performance to a more accessible price point. A key advantage is its exceptional multi-core performance, making it an excellent choice for workstation tasks like video rendering and encoding, while maintaining efficiency with a low 65-watt TDP. Additionally, the inclusion of a functional stock cooler increases the value proposition for builders. PCMagHowever, the review points to lower single-core performance compared to Intel’s contemporary "Kaby Lake" processors, resulting in weaker performance for 1080p gaming and light-threaded applications. While the chip is overclockable, reaching maximum potential requires aftermarket cooling, and early adopters may face memory compatibility challenges on the new AM4 platform. PCMagUltimately, the Ryzen 7 1700 is recognized as a superior price-to-performance option for productivity-focused users and content creators. The CPU offers versatility for multi-purpose workstations, often making it a better value than higher-priced AMD models if the user is willing to overclock.

guru3d.com

14/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Review - Guru3D

The Guru3D review highlights the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 as a highly disruptive, budget-friendly 8-core/16-thread processor ($329 USD) offering impressive multi-threaded performance. Operating at a low 65W TDP with 3.0/3.7 GHz clocks, the chip excels in content creation and productivity, often challenging significantly more expensive alternatives. Key advantages include its unlocked nature, allowing overclocking to 4.0 GHz, and the inclusion of a competent Wraith Spire cooler. Performance in raw workstation tasks is excellent, but the review notes it often lags behind Intel competition in 1080p gaming due to lower IPC and high memory latency. While this gap closes at higher resolutions, it is a key limitation for gamers, alongside the platform's sensitivity to high-speed DDR4 memory for optimal performance. Ultimately, the Ryzen 7 1700 is recommended as a high-value, efficient CPU for multi-core workloads rather than high-refresh gaming. The main pros include its incredible value and overclocking potential, while the main cons are lower gaming performance and strict memory speed requirements.

notyouraveragetech.wordpress.com

06/03/2018

Summary of the review

REVIEW | AMD Ryzen 7 1700: 8-core CPU for gaming and productivity - Not Your Average Tech Would you like me to find overclocking guides or specific ga...

The Ryzen 7 1700 review from Not Your Average Tech highlights the 8-core/16-thread processor as a highly efficient, value-oriented option, boasting a 65W TDP. It delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance for workstation tasks, often matching the more expensive 1800X when overclocked, and includes a capable stock cooler. While it excels in production, potential downsides include lower gaming performance compared to Intel counterparts and early, minor BIOS-related memory compatibility issues.

relaxedtech.com

26/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Review - RelaxedTech

The RelaxedTech review highlights the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 as a high-value 8-core, 16-thread processor that disrupts the high-end market with performance comparable to Intel’s i7-6900K. Operating at a 3.0GHz base clock with a 65W TDP, this 14nm Zen chip boasts exceptional energy efficiency, running cooler than its competitors. pros include an incredible price-to-performance ratio, particularly in multi-threaded tasks, alongside an unlocked multiplier that enables easy overclocking to 3.8GHz or higher, rivaling the more expensive 1800X. The platform is highly recommended for workstations requiring heavy video encoding or 3D rendering capabilities. the review notes cons including lower single-core performance compared to Intel’s i7-7700K in some 1080p gaming scenarios. Additionally, early AM4 platform, or "growing pains," meant that memory compatibility initially limited RAM speeds to around 2667MHz in testing.

servethehome.com

03/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Linux Benchmarks - ServeTheHome

The ServeTheHome review identifies the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 as a high-value "Zen" CPU for Linux users, offering 8-core/16-thread performance at a 65W TDP that nears the higher-priced 1800X. Benchmarks show it excels in multi-threaded tasks like code compilation, though it requires a Linux kernel of 4.10 or newer for stability. While offering excellent multi-core performance, the 1700 lacks integrated graphics and trails in single-threaded tasks compared to Intel counterparts.

pcworld.com

02/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs. a 5-year-old gaming PC, or why you should never preorder Would you like to see gaming benchmarks specifically at 1080p or 4K for...

PCWorld’s review of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 against a five-year-old Intel i5-3570K revealed that, despite high-core-count hype, the older chip outperformed the new CPU in most 1080p gaming scenarios at launch. While the Ryzen 7 1700 achieved a win in Ashes of the Singularity due to superior threading, the overall gaming experience at standard resolutions was lackluster, often acting as a "massacre" of the new architecture. The Ryzen 7 1700 demonstrated significant pros in power efficiency and thermals, running exceptionally cool at 28°C with an aftermarket cooler. Furthermore, its multi-threaded performance excels in workstation tasks like video encoding, delivering high value for content creators compared to aging quad-core alternatives. The primary cons centered on lower-than-expected clock speeds and a lack of game-specific optimizations at launch, which led to a, CPU-bound performance disadvantage at 1080p. The review advises against pre-ordering based on hype, suggesting gamers wait for software maturity, though the 1700 remains a strong, value-focused choice for productivity, as shown in analysis from sources like PCWorld.

tweaktown.com

06/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 and 1700X CPU Review - TweakTown

TweakTown's review of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 and 1700X highlights these processors as highly efficient, 8-core, 16-thread CPUs that offer exceptional, high-end multi-threaded performance at mainstream prices. A major pro is their ability to rival or outperform expensive Intel Broadwell-E chips in productivity tasks, with the 1700X offering 1800X-level performance at a lower cost, and the 1700 providing great value with a 65W TDP. While delivering strong 1440p and 4K gaming, a notable con is that they lag behind Intel's Kaby Lake in 1080p gaming due to lower clock speeds and IPC, coupled with a more complex, "tinkering"-heavy overclocking process. TweakTownDespite early BIOS and platform "growing pains," the 1700 is recommended for its efficiency and value, while the 1700X is deemed a strong alternative for users who overclock, making them formidable choices against Intel.

overclockers.com

27/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD RYZEN 7 1700x and 1700 CPU Review

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X and 1700 CPUs provide exceptional value, offering 8-core, 16-thread performance at a lower price point than competitors. Both processors utilize the Zen architecture to deliver significant IPC gains over prior generations with improved power efficiency. While the 1700X offers high performance for its price, the 65W Ryzen 7 1700 is highlighted for its strong value and overclocking potential, often reaching speeds similar to higher-end models. Key advantages include superior multi-threaded performance, making them excellent for productivity, along with a significantly lower cost compared to the 1800X. The 1700’s 65W TDP is also a notable highlight, delivering high performance with lower power consumption. The primary drawbacks involve platform maturity, including initial memory compatibility challenges and the requirement for specific, faster DDR4 memory to ensure optimal stability. Additionally, overclocking is limited, with most chips reaching a 4.0 GHz ceiling, and they fall slightly short of top-tier Intel alternatives in raw gaming scenarios. Copy

winfuture.de

20/03/2017

Summary of the review

How the AMD Ryzen 7 performs in video editing

The WinFuture video review highlights the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X as a high-performance, cost-effective processor for video editing, competing directly with the more expensive Intel Core i7-6900K. With 8 cores and 16 threads, the CPU demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded rendering capabilities, particularly in DaVinci Resolve, while operating with a efficient 95W TDP. Pros of the system include significantly faster rendering times for 1080p and 4K content, beating Intel in multi-threaded benchmarks, along with the benefit of unlocked multipliers for overclocking on affordable B350/X370 motherboards. Cons, however, center on lower single-core performance, which can slightly impact performance in applications like Adobe Premiere Pro that require higher clock speeds rather than just core count. Additionally, the review noted early platform-level challenges regarding BIOS updates and memory compatibility, though these are expected to improve. Overall, the Ryzen 7 1800X is positioned as a powerful, value-driven alternative for professional, multi-threaded content creation workloads.

chip.de

12/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Review: Giant Performance with One Weakness", "AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Tested - The Secret Star?

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is an eight-core, 16-thread processor offering significant multi-threaded value at a 65W TDP, making it a highly efficient option, particularly for users interested in overclocking to 3.8–4.0 GHz to match higher-end models. While the chip delivers strong productivity performance, it struggles in single-threaded tasks and 1080p gaming compared to Intel competitors. The package includes the capable Wraith Spire cooler, though the platform may face early RAM compatibility challenges.

lesnumeriques.com

03/04/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Review: The Best Deal in the Series

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is highlighted as a groundbreaking processor that brought high-end 8-core/16-thread performance to a mainstream price point, excelling significantly in productivity tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, often surpassing costlier Intel quad-core competitors from its era. Built on the 14nm Zen architecture, it offers excellent energy efficiency with a 65W TDP. Key advantages include its outstanding price-to-performance ratio, an unlocked multiplier for overclocking to 1800X speeds, and the capable included Wraith Spire cooler. While the chip is highly capable in multi-threaded scenarios for creators and streamers, it faces drawbacks in stock gaming performance, where it can trail higher-clocked competitors in 1080p scenarios. Early AM4 platform maturity issues, specifically regarding dependency on fast memory for optimal performance, were also noted. Ultimately, while overclocking closes the gap, the 1700 is positioned more for productivity, offering limited advantages for pure, high-frame-rate gaming over competitive Intel options. For more details, visit Les Numeriques.

hardware.fr

15/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 7 1700 review - printable version

The Hardware.fr review of Intel's Skylake architecture highlights the Core i7-6700K and i5-6600K as 14nm processors offering moderate 5-10% performance gains over Haswell, supported by the new LGA 1151 socket, Z170 chipset, and DDR4 memory. Key pros include enhanced energy efficiency, superior multitasking, and improved integrated Intel HD Graphics 530 performance, making it a strong option for users upgrading from older systems. Conversely, cons focus on the high cost of a required platform change, minimal gaming gains for existing Haswell/Broadwell users, and limited overclocking headroom compared to previous generations. For more details, visit Hardware.fr.

tomshardware.fr

15/03/2017

Summary of the review

Ryzen 1800X, 1700X, and 1700: Our New Comprehensive Benchmarks

The Tom's Hardware review highlights that the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X, and 1700 processors deliver a significant 52% IPC improvement via the Zen architecture, offering strong competition to higher-priced Intel chips in multithreaded tasks. The Ryzen 7 1700 stands out for its price-to-performance, delivering, when overclocked to 3.9–4.0 GHz, performance levels comparable to the more expensive 1800X. Despite strong rendering capabilities, the lineup shows weaknesses in 1080p gaming, lower single-core performance compared to Intel's Kaby Lake, and early platform, memory, and BIOS maturity issues. Copy

hardware.fr

15/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 7 1700 Review

The Hardware.fr review characterizes the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X and 1700 as disruptive, mainstream-priced 8-core/16-thread CPUs that offer near-identical performance to the flagship 1800X. While the 1700X (3.4-3.8 GHz) offers higher clocks, the 1700 is highlighted for its excellent efficiency with a 65W TDP. Performance-wise, both chips excel as productivity "monsters," leading in multi-threaded tasks like Cinebench and Handbrake. However, the review notes lower gaming performance at 1080p compared to Intel's i7-7700K due to IPC and frequency limitations. Initial AM4 platform issues, including memory compatibility and necessary Windows power adjustments, were identified as drawbacks. The Ryzen 7 1700 is positioned as the best value for enthusiasts because, when overclocked, it matches the performance of the more expensive 1700X and 1800X. Consequently, the review finds the higher-tier 1700X and 1800X, while capable, offer diminished value in comparison. Copy

tech.everyeye.it

03/04/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Review: High Efficiency and Great Multi-Core Performance

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is highlighted as a landmark, highly efficient 8-core/16-thread CPU offering exceptional multi-core performance for video editing and rendering at a 65W TDP. While excelling in productivity, it trails slightly in single-core tasks and 1080p gaming compared to contemporary Intel alternatives, but its overclocking potential enables it to match higher-end models. The CPU is praised for its value and the longevity of the AM4 platform, though it requires high-speed RAM to maximize its potential.

tomshw.it

07/04/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 CPU Review - Tom's Hardware

The Tom's Hardware review highlights the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 as an exceptional value proposition, offering 8-core/16-thread performance with a 65W TDP. It excels in heavily threaded productivity tasks, often outperforming higher-priced competitors, while its overclocking potential allows it to match the more expensive 1700X and 1800X models. Despite weak gaming performance and low stock frequencies, the chip’s efficiency and bundled Wraith Spire cooler make it a compelling choice, particularly for workstations.

hwupgrade.it

18/01/2021

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Processors: Comparing 38 CPUs from the 1000 to 5000 Series

This HWUpgrade analysis compares 38 AMD Ryzen processors, tracking performance evolution from the original Zen architecture through Zen 3 (Ryzen 5000) and highlighting a 52% IPC increase over that period. While early Ryzen 1000/2000 chips improved multi-core tasks, the Zen 3 generation achieved top-tier gaming performance and superior single-threaded speed. Key pros include exceptional platform longevity with the AM4 socket and high efficiency, though some 5000-series chips run hot and lack DDR5 support. Glenn's Copy

tweakers.net

02/03/2017

Summary of the review

Ryzen 7 Processors Review: AMD is Back in the Race

The launch of the Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X, and 1700 marked AMD's successful return to the high-end CPU market, utilizing the Zen architecture to deliver 8 cores and 16 threads at a competitive price point, with a major pro being a 52% IPC increase that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks. While excelling in workstation applications, a notable con was the, at launch, relatively weaker gaming performance at 1080p compared to Intel, largely due to lower clock speeds and optimization issues. The Ryzen 7 1700 stands out as the best value option, offering high performance and low power consumption, despite initial platform "growing pains" like memory compatibility issues and BIOS updates required for optimal performance.

tweakers.net

13/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Boxed with Wraith Spire Cooler - Product reviews

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is highlighted as a revolutionary 8-core, 16-thread processor offering exceptional value with a 65W TDP, making it highly power-efficient. A major advantage is the included Wraith Spire cooler, which provides capable and quiet cooling, even for moderate overclocks. While dominating in multi-threaded tasks like video rendering and multitasking, the processor faces a disadvantage in single-core performance and 1080p gaming, lagging behind competitors with higher clock speeds. However, this gap is mitigated through overclocking, as the 1700 can frequently reach 3.8 to 4.0 GHz, matching higher-tier models. Platform-level "growing pains," specifically regarding DDR4 memory compatibility and required BIOS updates for stability, are listed as downsides, though the processor is ultimately deemed a "best buy" for price-to-performance.

tweakers.net

31/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD's Ryzen 7 1700 Review - Plus Ryzen's gaming performance

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor designed for efficiency with a 65W TDP, offering strong multi-threaded performance in rendering (Cinebench) and video transcoding (Handbrake) at a competitive price point. While stock speeds (3.0-3.7 GHz) are lower than competitors, it excels in productivity applications, providing an excellent price-to-performance ratio. In gaming, the Ryzen 7 1700 offers a solid experience but generally trails the Intel i7-7700K in 1080p performance by 7% to 15%, primarily due to lower single-threaded speed. However, this gap significantly closes at higher resolutions (1440p/4K) where the bottleneck shifts to the GPU. Key advantages include its high overclocking potential (nearly 4.0 GHz) and the inclusion of the capable Wraith Spire cooler, allowing it to compete with more expensive, higher-TDP models. Notable drawbacks include weaker single-core performance compared to top-tier Intel chips and early platform memory speed limitations, often requiring BIOS updates for optimal RAM speeds. You can find the full review at Tweakers.net.

tweakers.net

25/09/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Boxed with Wraith Spire cooler - Tweakers

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is highlighted as a groundbreaking processor that brought 8-core, 16-thread performance to the mainstream market at a disruptive price point. It operates at a base clock of 3.0 GHz, features a 65W TDP, and includes the capable Wraith Spire cooler, offering high value and overclocking potential. The processor excels in multi-threaded tasks, often rivaling more expensive alternatives, though it faces challenges with lower single-core performance and early memory compatibility issues. Copy

Video reviews

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

Processors

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 3 5300G

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT

Processors

Intel Pentium G3420t

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Processors

Compare AMD Ryzen 7 1700 with other processors

Compare