OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£9Connectivity:wirelessMaximum polling rate:250 HzMaximum DPI:2400 DPIWeight:109 g

T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

4.3/10

Overall score

Score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

80%

4.3

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 95% of mice
6.0

Value for money

Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

4.3

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 96%
4.3

Technical score

Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

36%

3.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

2.7

Controls

16%

5.1

Design

14%

3.7

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.6

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 86%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £9
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100

Technical score
Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

36%

3.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

2.7

Controls

16%

5.1

Design

14%

3.7

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.6

Battery & Charging

4.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 83.8% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

70%

4.3

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.0
Brand name
T
Maximum polling rate
250 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 250 Hz, which is lower than 73.8% of mice and equal to 1.8% of mice.
Wired polling rate
N/A
2.4 GHz polling rate
250 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 250 Hz, which is lower than 68% of mice and equal to 2.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
2.4GHz only.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This mouse supports wireless connectivity, which is more versatile than 35% of mice and equal to 21.7% of mice.
connection modes: 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
AA
Rechargeable battery
no
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
yes
This mouse uses a removable battery. 77.8% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
0
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, which is less than 83.4% of mice and equal to 16.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
109 g
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 109 g, which is heavier than 79.7% of mice and equal to 0.7% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
N/A
Cable type
N/A
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
?
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Silent primary switches
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • Removable battery
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • 3.89x cheaper
    T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100 is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 3.89x cheaper
    T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100 is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Removable battery
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • Silent primary switches
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • 25 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 5 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    5 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 32.9% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 109 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    109 g vs 82 g
  • 75% lower maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 250 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    250 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 76% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2,400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 21.2% worse value for money
    T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100 has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.03 vs 7.3).
    6.03 vs 7.31
  • 6.38x less popular
    T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100 is less popular than the average mouse (1 vs 6.4).
    1 vs 6.38
  • 75% lower maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 250 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    250 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 76% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2,400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 75% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 250 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    250 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • No angle snapping support
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 305 DPI coarser step size
    This mouse has a DPI step size of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a DPI step size of 95 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • 25 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 5 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    5 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 32.9% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 109 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    109 g vs 82 g
  • 5 mm wider mouse width
    This mouse has a width of 71 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    71 mm vs 66 mm
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Third-party reviews

What customers like about T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100

  • Highly budget-friendly and super affordable
  • Silent and noiseless click design
  • Ergonomic shape with a comfortable sweat-proof rubberized grip
  • Convenient on-the-fly adjustable DPI settings (800 to 2400 DPI)
  • Smooth gliding movement on mouse pads
  • Reliable and lag-free 2.4GHz wireless connection
  • Power-saving auto-sleep feature after 8 minutes of inactivity
  • Built-in slot to store the compact USB receiver

What customers don't like about T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100

  • Maximum 2400 DPI is too low for high-end or ultra-competitive esports
  • Relies on a single AA battery instead of a built-in rechargeable system
  • Plastic build feels somewhat cheap
  • Wireless connection strength can occasionally be weaker than premium models
  • Lacks fully customizable RGB lighting profiles
  • No onboard memory profiles or advanced programmable software macros

Verdict

The T-Dagger Corporal T-TGWM100 is a budget-friendly 2.4GHz wireless gaming mouse featuring an optical sensor with five adjustable DPI levels ranging from 800 to 2400. It is designed with an ergonomic right-handed shape, weighing approximately 109g, and includes six programmable buttons, a dedicated DPI switch, and silent-click switches for quiet operation in public spaces. Main pros include its highly affordable price point, a stable wireless connection, long battery life powered by a single AA battery, and a dedicated auto-sleep mode for power efficiency. However, potential cons include its relatively low maximum DPI of 2400 compared to other gaming models, reports of noticeable input lag during intense gaming, and the lack of a rechargeable battery or RGB lighting customization.

Compare T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of T-Dagger Corporal T TGWM100 and other products in the Mice category

No results found