OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Mars Gaming mm XT Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£9Connectivity:wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:12800 DPIWeight:94 g

Mars Gaming mm XT Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

80%

5.8

Technical Score

20%

8.7

User score

â–²Better than 56% of mice
5.8

Technical Score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

36%

6.2

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.0

Controls

16%

6.7

Design

14%

4.7

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 53% of mice
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on 2,910 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 76% of mice
  • mars-gaming-mm-xt
  • mars-gaming-mm-xt
  • mars-gaming-mm-xt
  • mars-gaming-mm-xt
  • mars-gaming-mm-xt
  • mars-gaming-mm-xt
  • mars-gaming-mm-xt
mars-gaming-mm-xt
mars-gaming-mm-xt
mars-gaming-mm-xt
mars-gaming-mm-xt
mars-gaming-mm-xt
mars-gaming-mm-xt
mars-gaming-mm-xt

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Mars Gaming MM-XT is an ergonomic right-handed gaming mouse featuring a high-precision optical sensor with up to 12800 DPI, 20G acceleration, and a 1000Hz polling rate. Its main characteristics include an advanced RGB lighting system, durable Huano mechanical switches, and a set of 9 programmable buttons manageable via dedicated control software. Built with high-quality ABS material and weighing approximately 94g, it features a thumb rest and an ultra-flexible braided cable for improved comfort and glide. The primary pros are its customisable button layout and high DPI range at a competitive price point; however, some cons include a relatively low tracking speed of 60 IPS compared to high-end models and its strictly right-handed ergonomic design which excludes left-handed users.

Technical Specifications of mouse Mars Gaming mm XT

Technical Score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

36%

6.2

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.0

Controls

16%

6.7

Design

14%

4.7

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

5.8
Mars Gaming mm XT has a technical score of 5.8 points, which is higher than that of 52.8% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on 2,910 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.7
Mars Gaming mm XT has a user score of 8.66 points, which is higher than that of 76.3% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Popularity:
Mars Gaming mm XT has a popularity score of 8.4 points, which is higher than that of 76% of products in this category.
8.4
Mars Gaming mm XT has a popularity score of 8.4 points, which is higher than that of 76% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Mars Gaming mm XT has a value-for-money score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 54.6% of products in this category.
Brand name
Mars
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 13% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
N/A
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wired
Connectivity
wired
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This mouse supports wired connectivity, which is less versatile than 65.1% of mice and equal to 34.9% of mice.
connection modes: wired.
Bluetooth support
no
Bluetooth support
no
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
no
Receiver included
no
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
This mouse does not include a receiver. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
N/A
Rechargeable battery
no
Rechargeable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
9
N. of buttons
9
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 9 buttons, which is more than 88.3% of mice and equal to 3.5% of mice.
N. of side buttons
4
N. of side buttons
4
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 4 side buttons, which is more than 92.5% of mice and equal to 4.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
9
N. of programmable buttons
9
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 9 programmable buttons, which is more than 88.6% of mice and equal to 3.2% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
94 g
Weight
94 g
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 94 g, which is heavier than 63% of mice and equal to 0.3% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.55 m
Cable length
1.55 m
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse has a cable length of 1.55 m, which is less than 86.9% of mice.
Cable type
paracord
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
?
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Mars Gaming mm XT vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 3 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    9
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 9 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    9 vs 6
  • 2 more side buttons
    N. of side buttons
    4
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This mouse has 4 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    4 vs 2
  • 3.89x cheaper
    Mars Gaming mm XT is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • 28% higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    12,800 DPI
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 12800 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    12,800 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 3 more buttons
    N. of buttons
    9
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <4 – >9
    This mouse has 9 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    9 vs 6
  • 100 DPI lower minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    100 DPI
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse goes as low as 100 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    100 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 3 newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This mouse was released in 2024, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    2024 vs 2021
  • 8.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Mars Gaming mm XT
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Mars Gaming mm XT has a higher user score than the average mouse (8.66 vs 8.000).
    8.66 vs 8
  • 3.89x cheaper
    Mars Gaming mm XT is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • 8.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Mars Gaming mm XT
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Mars Gaming mm XT has a higher user score than the average mouse (8.66 vs 8.000).
    8.66 vs 8
  • 28% higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    12,800 DPI
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 12800 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    12,800 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 100 DPI lower minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    100 DPI
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse goes as low as 100 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    100 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 3 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    9
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 9 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    9 vs 6
  • 2 more side buttons
    N. of side buttons
    4
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This mouse has 4 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    4 vs 2
  • 3 more buttons
    N. of buttons
    9
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <4 – >9
    This mouse has 9 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    9 vs 6
  • 3 newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This mouse was released in 2024, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    2024 vs 2021
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • 85% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    60 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 60 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    60 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • No automatic sleep mode
    Auto-sleep
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No receiver included
    Receiver included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • 14.6% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    94 g
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 94 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    94 g vs 82 g
  • 50% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    20 G
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 20 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    20 G vs 40 G
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 85% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    60 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 60 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    60 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 50% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    20 G
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 20 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    20 G vs 40 G
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No receiver included
    Receiver included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • Limited connectivity
    Connectivity
    wired
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • No automatic sleep mode
    Auto-sleep
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 14.6% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    94 g
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 94 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    94 g vs 82 g
  • 19 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    85 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 85 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    85 mm vs 66 mm
  • 3.3 mm taller mouse height
    Height
    43 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <36 mm – >43 mm
    This mouse has a height of 43 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    43 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 0.25 m shorter cable
    Cable length
    1.55 m
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
    This mouse has a cable length of 1.6 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    1.55 m vs 1.8 m
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Graphic comparison of Mars Gaming mm XT and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 2,910 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Mars Gaming mm XT?

  • Ergonomic design with a dedicated thumb rest for long-term comfort
  • High versatility with 9 programmable buttons, including an extra trigger/rapid-fire button
  • Lightweight and flexible 'Feather Paracord' braided cable that reduces drag
  • Durable HUANO mechanical switches providing a tactile click response
  • Customizable RGB lighting with multiple modes and dedicated software for macros
  • Broad multi-platform compatibility (PC, Mac, PS4, PS5, Xbox)

What customers dislike about Mars Gaming mm XT?

  • The A825PRO optical sensor is considered entry-level, with some users reporting tracking issues in high-intensity gaming
  • Build quality is described as inconsistent, with reports of flimsy switches or early button failure
  • Maximum tracking speed is relatively low (60 IPS) compared to higher-end gaming mice
  • Software is noted by some users to be simple or occasionally buggy
  • Mouse skates/feet are described as mediocre or scratchy on certain surfaces

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Mars Gaming mm XT with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)