OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Uciefy Q5 Slim Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£9Connectivity:wirelessMaximum polling rate:125 HzMaximum DPI:1600 DPIWeight:69.45 g

Uciefy Q5 Slim Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

80%

5.7

Technical Score

20%

9.1

User score

â–²Better than 55% of mice
5.7

Technical Score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

36%

4.6

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.6

Controls

16%

8.2

Design

14%

2.8

Features

7%

9.7

Connectivity

5%

8.6

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 50% of mice
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 47,470 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 87% of mice
  • uciefy-q5-slim
  • uciefy-q5-slim
  • uciefy-q5-slim
  • uciefy-q5-slim
  • uciefy-q5-slim
  • uciefy-q5-slim
  • uciefy-q5-slim
uciefy-q5-slim
uciefy-q5-slim
uciefy-q5-slim
uciefy-q5-slim
uciefy-q5-slim
uciefy-q5-slim
uciefy-q5-slim

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Uciefy Q5 Slim is a highly portable, ultra-thin wireless optical mouse featuring 2.4GHz connectivity with a 10-meter range and a 1600 DPI maximum sensitivity adjustable across three levels (800/1200/1600). Key characteristics include a lightweight 50g ambidextrous design, silent-click buttons for quiet environments, and a built-in rechargeable lithium-ion battery offering up to 360 hours of life with an auto-sleep power-saving mode. Main pros include its slim 20mm profile for easy travel, broad compatibility via the included USB Nano receiver and Type-C adapter, and the ability to be used while charging. Cons include a lack of RGB lighting, no programmable buttons or horizontal scroll wheel, and a requirement to charge only via computer USB ports to avoid damaging the internal charging IC.

Technical Specifications of mouse Uciefy Q5 Slim

Technical Score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components:

36%

4.6

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.6

Controls

16%

8.2

Design

14%

2.8

Features

7%

9.7

Connectivity

5%

8.6

Battery & Charging

5.7
Uciefy Q5 Slim has a technical score of 5.7 points, which is lower than that of 50.2% of products in this category.
User score
User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 47,470 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.1
Uciefy Q5 Slim has a user score of 9.06 points, which is higher than that of 87.5% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
Uciefy Q5 Slim has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.5% of products in this category.
10
Uciefy Q5 Slim has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.5% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Uciefy Q5 Slim has a value-for-money score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 54.6% of products in this category.
Brand name
Uciefy
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 75.8% of mice and equal to 23.9% of mice.
Wired polling rate
?
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 33% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
Connectivity
wireless
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This mouse supports wireless connectivity, which is more versatile than 35% of mice and equal to 21.7% of mice.
connection modes: 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
Bluetooth support
yes
â–² Better than 65% of models
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
â–² Better than 74% of models
This mouse uses Bluetooth 5, which is newer than 73.9% of mice and equal to 12.3% of mice.
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
?
Battery capacity
?
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
4
N. of buttons
4
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 4 buttons, which is less than 86.6% of mice and equal to 4.3% of mice.
N. of side buttons
0
N. of side buttons
0
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 0 side buttons, which is less than 85.3% of mice and equal to 14.7% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
0
N. of programmable buttons
0
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, which is less than 83.4% of mice and equal to 16.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
69.45 g
Weight
69.45 g
â–² Better than 65% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 69.45 g, which makes it lighter than 64.8% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–² Better than 18% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
N/A
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Onboard memory size
0 KB
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
N/A
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
no
Suitable for gaming
no
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
This mouse is not suitable for gaming. 76.2% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Uciefy Q5 Slim vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 15.3% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    69.45 g
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 69.5 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    69.45 g vs 82 g
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 3.89x cheaper
    Uciefy Q5 Slim is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 13.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Uciefy Q5 Slim
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Uciefy Q5 Slim has a higher user score than the average mouse (9.06 vs 8.000).
    9.06 vs 8
  • 56.6% more popular
    Uciefy Q5 Slim is more popular than the average mouse (10 vs 6.4).
    10 vs 6.38
  • 3.89x cheaper
    Uciefy Q5 Slim is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • 13.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Uciefy Q5 Slim
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Uciefy Q5 Slim has a higher user score than the average mouse (9.06 vs 8.000).
    9.06 vs 8
  • 56.6% more popular
    Uciefy Q5 Slim is more popular than the average mouse (10 vs 6.4).
    10 vs 6.38
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    50 G
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 15.3% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    69.45 g
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 69.5 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    69.45 g vs 82 g
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 19.7 mm lower mouse height
    Height
    20 mm
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <36 mm – >43 mm
    This mouse is 20 mm tall, while the average mouse is 39.7 mm tall.
    20 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 10 mm narrower mouse width
    Width
    56 mm
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse is 56 mm wide, while the average mouse is 66 mm wide.
    56 mm vs 66 mm
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 84% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    1,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 1600 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    1,600 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • Not suitable for gaming
    Suitable for gaming
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 2 fewer side buttons
    N. of side buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This mouse has 0 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    0 vs 2
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 84% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    1,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 1600 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    1,600 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 305 DPI coarser step size
    DPI step size
    400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >400 DPI
    This mouse has a DPI step size of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a DPI step size of 95 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • 2 fewer stored DPI steps
    DPI steps stored
    3
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <3 – >6
    This mouse stores 3 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    3 vs 5
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • 2 fewer side buttons
    N. of side buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This mouse has 0 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    0 vs 2
  • 2 fewer buttons
    N. of buttons
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <4 – >9
    This mouse has 4 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    4 vs 6
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • Not suitable for gaming
    Suitable for gaming
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Graphic comparison of Uciefy Q5 Slim and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 47,470 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Uciefy Q5 Slim?

  • Ultra-slim and lightweight design ideal for travel
  • Silent click buttons prevent disturbing others in quiet environments
  • Dual connectivity via 2.4GHz USB receiver and Type-C adapter
  • Long-lasting rechargeable battery with the ability to use while charging
  • Adjustable DPI settings (800/1200/1600) for customizable sensitivity
  • Symmetrical, ergonomic shape suitable for both right and left-handed users

What customers dislike about Uciefy Q5 Slim?

  • Reports of durability issues, specifically the scroll wheel breaking within months
  • Connectivity can be inconsistent, with some users experiencing random disconnections
  • Sleep mode may trigger too quickly, requiring a click to wake the mouse
  • Included charging cable is considered too short by some users
  • Build quality feels 'cheap' or 'plasticky' to some reviewers
  • Mixed responsiveness, with occasional lag or failure to register clicks

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Uciefy Q5 Slim with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)