OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Mars Gaming MM55 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£9Connectivity:wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:12800 DPIWeight:55 g

Mars Gaming MM55 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Score components

80%

5.6

Technical Score

20%

8.7

User score

â–²Better than 51% of mice
5.6

Technical Score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

36%

5.8

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.3

Controls

16%

9.0

Design

14%

5.2

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 53% of mice
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on 3,256 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 77% of mice
  • mars-gaming-mm55
  • mars-gaming-mm55
  • mars-gaming-mm55
  • mars-gaming-mm55
  • mars-gaming-mm55
  • mars-gaming-mm55
mars-gaming-mm55
mars-gaming-mm55
mars-gaming-mm55
mars-gaming-mm55
mars-gaming-mm55
mars-gaming-mm55

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Mars Gaming MM55 is an ultra-lightweight gaming mouse featuring a distinctive 55-gram aerodynamic Hive design shell and a high-precision A825PRO optical sensor with up to 12,800 DPI and a 1,000Hz polling rate. Key characteristics include seven programmable buttons, high-performance Huano mechanical switches for increased durability, and a flexible Feather Paracord cable that mimics a wireless experience by reducing drag. Its main pros are the extreme lightness for fast movements, extensive 16.8 million color RGB Chroma lighting customizable via software, and compatibility across Windows, Mac, Linux, and major consoles. However, some cons include a relatively low maximum tracking speed of 60 IPS and 20G acceleration compared to premium models, and some users have noted the mouse skates can feel mediocre or less smooth on certain surfaces.

Technical Specifications of mouse Mars Gaming MM55

Technical Score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components:

36%

5.8

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.3

Controls

16%

9.0

Design

14%

5.2

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

5.6
Mars Gaming MM55 has a technical score of 5.6 points, which is lower than that of 53.2% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on 3,256 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.7
Mars Gaming MM55 has a user score of 8.68 points, which is higher than that of 76.9% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Popularity:
Mars Gaming MM55 has a popularity score of 8.4 points, which is higher than that of 76% of products in this category.
8.4
Mars Gaming MM55 has a popularity score of 8.4 points, which is higher than that of 76% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.3
Mars Gaming MM55 has a value-for-money score of 7.3 points, which is higher than that of 48% of products in this category.
Brand name
Mars
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 13% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
N/A
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wired
Connectivity
wired
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This mouse supports wired connectivity, which is less versatile than 65.1% of mice and equal to 34.9% of mice.
connection modes: wired.
Bluetooth support
no
Bluetooth support
no
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
no
Receiver included
no
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
This mouse does not include a receiver. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
N/A
Rechargeable battery
no
Rechargeable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
7
N. of buttons
7
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 7 buttons, which is more than 63.3% of mice and equal to 15.1% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
7
N. of programmable buttons
7
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, which is more than 66.9% of mice and equal to 12.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
55 g
Weight
55 g
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 55 g, which makes it lighter than 84.6% of mice and equal to 1.8% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.7 m
Cable length
1.7 m
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse has a cable length of 1.7 m, which is less than 82.4% of mice and equal to 1.1% of mice.
Cable type
paracord
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
Mars Gaming Software
Firmware upgradable
yes
Firmware upgradable
yes
â–² Better than 22% of models
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Mars Gaming MM55 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 32.9% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    55 g
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 55 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    55 g vs 82 g
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • Adjustable debounce time
    Debounce time adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 3.89x cheaper
    Mars Gaming MM55 is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • 28% higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    12,800 DPI
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 12800 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    12,800 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 8.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Mars Gaming MM55
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Mars Gaming MM55 has a higher user score than the average mouse (8.68 vs 8.000).
    8.68 vs 8
  • 3.89x cheaper
    Mars Gaming MM55 is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • 8.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Mars Gaming MM55
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Mars Gaming MM55 has a higher user score than the average mouse (8.68 vs 8.000).
    8.68 vs 8
  • 28% higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    12,800 DPI
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 12800 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    12,800 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • Adjustable debounce time
    Debounce time adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 32.9% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    55 g
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 55 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    55 g vs 82 g
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • 85% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    60 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 60 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    60 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • No automatic sleep mode
    Auto-sleep
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No receiver included
    Receiver included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    20 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 50% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    20 G
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 20 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    20 G vs 40 G
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 85% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    60 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 60 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    60 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 50% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    20 G
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 20 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    20 G vs 40 G
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No receiver included
    Receiver included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • Limited connectivity
    Connectivity
    wired
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • No automatic sleep mode
    Auto-sleep
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    20 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 0.1 m shorter cable
    Cable length
    1.7 m
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
    This mouse has a cable length of 1.7 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    1.7 m vs 1.8 m
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Graphic comparison of Mars Gaming MM55 and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 3,256 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Mars Gaming MM55?

  • Extremely lightweight at only 55g, ideal for fast movements
  • Affordable price point for budget-conscious gamers
  • High-quality Huano mechanical switches known for durability
  • Flexible 'Feather' paracord cable that reduces drag and feels close to wireless
  • Extensive RGB Chroma lighting with 16.8 million color options
  • User-friendly downloadable software for macro and DPI customization

What customers dislike about Mars Gaming MM55?

  • The A825PRO optical sensor is considered lower-tier and may lose tracking during intense gaming
  • Honeycomb 'Hive' design can collect dust and debris over time
  • Stock mouse feet (skates) are reported to feel scratchy on some surfaces
  • Wired-only connection limits portability compared to wireless alternatives
  • Software has been reported by some users to be buggy or prone to crashing

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Mars Gaming MM55 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)