OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Inphic DR8 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£9Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:1600 DPIWeight:84 g

Inphic DR8 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

80%

5.6

Technical Score

20%

8.8

User score

â–²Better than 53% of mice
5.6

Technical Score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

36%

4.7

Performance & Sensor

22%

4.9

Controls

16%

7.3

Design

14%

3.7

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

9.1

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 52% of mice
8.8

User score

User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on 12,335 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 81% of mice
  • inphic-dr8
  • inphic-dr8
  • inphic-dr8
  • inphic-dr8
  • inphic-dr8
  • inphic-dr8
inphic-dr8
inphic-dr8
inphic-dr8
inphic-dr8
inphic-dr8
inphic-dr8

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Inphic DR8 is a versatile, right-handed tri-mode wireless mouse that supports 2.4GHz, Bluetooth 5.0, and Bluetooth 4.0 connectivity, allowing it to switch seamlessly between up to three devices. It features an ergonomic, contoured design with a wide finger rest and a weight of approximately 84g, paired with a 500mAh rechargeable battery that offers up to 720 hours of life and supports usage while charging via Type-C. Performance highlights include adjustable DPI levels (800/1200/1600), a 1000Hz polling rate, and six buttons featuring ultra-silent left and right clicks to reduce noise by 90%. Pros include its multi-device connectivity, long battery life, and comfortable ergonomic grip, while notable cons include a relatively low maximum DPI of 1600 compared to dedicated gaming mice and a lack of RGB lighting or gesture support.

Technical Specifications of mouse Inphic DR8

Technical Score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

36%

4.7

Performance & Sensor

22%

4.9

Controls

16%

7.3

Design

14%

3.7

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

9.1

Battery & Charging

5.6
Inphic DR8 has a technical score of 5.6 points, which is lower than that of 52% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on 12,335 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.8
Inphic DR8 has a user score of 8.82 points, which is higher than that of 81.4% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Popularity:
Inphic DR8 has a popularity score of 9.3 points, which is higher than that of 85.5% of products in this category.
9.3
Inphic DR8 has a popularity score of 9.3 points, which is higher than that of 85.5% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.4
Inphic DR8 has a value-for-money score of 7.4 points, which is higher than that of 51.6% of products in this category.
Brand name
Inphic
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
125 Hz
Wired polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 89.2% of mice and equal to 10.8% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 71.1% of mice and equal to 28.8% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
115 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
115 Hz
â–² Better than 66% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 115 Hz, which is higher than 65.8% of mice and equal to 1.9% of mice.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
Connectivity
wireless+wired
â–² Better than 57% of models
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
Bluetooth support
yes
â–² Better than 65% of models
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
â–² Better than 74% of models
This mouse uses Bluetooth 5, which is newer than 73.9% of mice and equal to 12.3% of mice.
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
720 hours
Battery life
720 hours
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
This mouse lasts 720 hours on a charge, which is longer than 99.7% of mice and equal to 0.3% of mice.
Battery capacity
500 mAh
Battery capacity
500 mAh
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh, which is larger than 48.2% of mice and equal to 22.1% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 78% of models
This mouse uses a removable battery. 77.8% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
N. of buttons
6
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
6
N. of programmable buttons
6
â–² Better than 36% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 6 programmable buttons, which is more than 35.6% of mice and equal to 31.2% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
84 g
Weight
84 g
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 84 g, which is heavier than 51.1% of mice and equal to 1.6% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–² Better than 18% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
N/A
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Onboard memory size
0 KB
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
N/A
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Inphic DR8 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 635 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    720 hours
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 720 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    720 hours vs 85 hours
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • 3.89x cheaper
    Inphic DR8 is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • 3.89x cheaper
    Inphic DR8 is cheaper than the average mouse (£9 vs £35).
    £9 vs £35
  • 10.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Inphic DR8
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Inphic DR8 has a higher user score than the average mouse (8.82 vs 8.000).
    8.82 vs 8
  • 46.2% more popular
    Inphic DR8 is more popular than the average mouse (9.34 vs 6.4).
    9.34 vs 6.38
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Versatile connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless+wired
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 635 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    720 hours
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 720 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    720 hours vs 85 hours
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 27 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    3 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 3 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    3 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 87.5% lower wired polling rate
    Wired polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
    This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a wired polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 84% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    1,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 1600 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    1,600 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 0.5 hours longer full charge time
    Full charge time
    2.5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.5 hours – >4 hours
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 2.5 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    source range 2-3 h.
    2.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 87.5% lower wired polling rate
    Wired polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
    This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a wired polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 84% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    1,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 1600 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    1,600 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 305 DPI coarser step size
    DPI step size
    400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >400 DPI
    This mouse has a DPI step size of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a DPI step size of 95 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • 2 fewer stored DPI steps
    DPI steps stored
    3
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <3 – >6
    This mouse stores 3 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    3 vs 5
  • 0.5 hours longer full charge time
    Full charge time
    2.5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.5 hours – >4 hours
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 2.5 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    source range 2-3 h.
    2.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • 27 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    3 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 3 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    3 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 9 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    75 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 75 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    75 mm vs 66 mm
  • 2.3 mm taller mouse height
    Height
    42 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <36 mm – >43 mm
    This mouse has a height of 42 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    42 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 2.4% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    84 g
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 84 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    84 g vs 82 g
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Graphic comparison of Inphic DR8 and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 12,335 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Inphic DR8?

  • Versatile connectivity with support for USB, 2.4GHz wireless, and Bluetooth
  • Rechargeable battery that allows for use while charging via USB-C
  • Long manufacturer-rated battery life of up to 720 hours
  • Includes a dedicated DPI switching button for on-the-fly sensitivity adjustments
  • Silent clicking design (left and right buttons) suitable for quiet work environments
  • Ergonomic, contoured shape designed for comfort during extended use
  • Budget-friendly price point offering features typically found in more expensive models

What customers dislike about Inphic DR8?

  • Lower maximum DPI (1600) compared to many modern gaming-specific mice
  • Heavier than many lightweight 'competitive' alternatives, weighing approximately 84g
  • Lacks advanced features such as RGB lighting or a tilting/thumb scroll wheel
  • No onboard memory for saving multiple custom user profiles
  • Reports of a relatively short included charging cable
  • Lacks dedicated gesture support found on some productivity-focused mice

Compare Inphic DR8 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)