OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Moor Echobeatz Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£190Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:15 hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):yes

Moor Echobeatz Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Moor Echobeatz
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

80%

7.5

Technical score

20%

6.8

User score

â–²Better than 80% of headphones
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

â–²Better than 78%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

52%

8.3

Sound

20%

6.3

Features

10%

6.5

Design

8%

8.0

Connectivity

6%

4.5

Battery

4%

8.4

Calls & Controls

â–²Better than 84%
6.8

User score

User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

3.5

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 89%
  • moor-echobeatz
  • moor-echobeatz
  • moor-echobeatz
  • moor-echobeatz
  • moor-echobeatz
  • moor-echobeatz
  • moor-echobeatz
  • moor-echobeatz
  • moor-echobeatz
moor-echobeatz
moor-echobeatz
moor-echobeatz
moor-echobeatz
moor-echobeatz
moor-echobeatz
moor-echobeatz
moor-echobeatz
moor-echobeatz
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Moor Echobeatz

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components:

52%

8.3

Sound

20%

6.3

Features

10%

6.5

Design

8%

8.0

Connectivity

6%

4.5

Battery

4%

8.4

Calls & Controls

7.5
User score
User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

3.5

Number of reviews

6.8
Popularity
Popularity
3.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Popularity:
Moor Echobeatz has a popularity score of 3.5 points, which is lower than that of 68% of products in this category.
3.5
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

8.0
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
yes
This pair of headphones supports active noise cancellation. 72.6% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 47.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
5.3
This pair of headphones uses Bluetooth version 5.3, newer Bluetooth version than 88.7% of headphones and equal to 6.5% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
20 m
Market range: <10 m – >15 m
This pair of headphones offers a Bluetooth range of 20 m, higher Bluetooth range than 91.8% of headphones and equal to 3% of headphones.
Audio latency
20 ms
Market range: <40 ms – >222 ms
This pair of headphones has audio latency of 20 ms, lower audio latency than 96.7% of headphones and equal to 1.7% of headphones.
Multipoint support
yes
This pair of headphones supports multipoint. 69.4% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
yes
This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode. 75.2% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
yes
This pair of headphones works with a companion app. 78.4% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
15 hours
Market range: <10 hours – >70 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life of 15 hours, lower battery life than 79.3% of headphones and equal to 3.8% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
12 hours
Market range: <15 hours – >55 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life with ANC of 12 hours, lower battery life with ANC than 92.3% of headphones and equal to 2.1% of headphones.
Charging time
3 hours
Market range: <1.5 hours – >3.5 hours
This pair of headphones needs 3 hours to charge, higher charging time than 66.7% of headphones and equal to 20.8% of headphones.
Quick charge
yes
This pair of headphones supports quick charge. 67% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Brand name
Moor
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
287 g
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 287 g, heavier than 76.6% of headphones and equal to 0.2% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
?
Show more

Moor Echobeatz vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Active noise cancellation
    This pair of headphones supports active noise cancellation, the average pair of headphones does not. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
  • Ambient sound mode
    This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode, the average pair of headphones does not. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
  • Companion app support
    This pair of headphones works with a companion app, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
  • 130 ms lower audio latency
    This pair of headphones has a lower audio latency than the average pair of headphones (20 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    20 ms vs 150 ms
  • Multipoint support
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • LE Audio support
    This pair of headphones supports LE Audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 11.6% of headphones support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • Active noise cancellation
    This pair of headphones supports active noise cancellation, the average pair of headphones does not. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
  • Quick charge support
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • USB-C charging
    This pair of headphones uses USB-C charging, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.5% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This pair of headphones has a rechargeable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • 130 ms lower audio latency
    This pair of headphones has a lower audio latency than the average pair of headphones (20 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    20 ms vs 150 ms
  • Multipoint support
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • LE Audio support
    This pair of headphones supports LE Audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 11.6% of headphones support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • 10 m longer Bluetooth range
    This pair of headphones has a higher Bluetooth range than the average pair of headphones (20 m vs 10 m). The average headphones offer a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    20 m vs 10 m
  • AAC codec support
    This pair of headphones supports AAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 32.2% of headphones support AAC.
  • Auracast support
    This pair of headphones supports Auracast, the average pair of headphones does not. 3.6% of headphones support Auracast.
  • Dongle included
    This pair of headphones includes a dongle, the average pair of headphones does not. 4.6% of headphones include a dongle.
  • Multipoint connections
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint connections, while the average pair of headphones does not. 30.2% of headphones support multipoint connections.
    supports multipoint for up to 2 devices.
  • Low-latency game mode
    This pair of headphones includes a low-latency game mode, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.2% of headphones support low-latency game mode.
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • Wind noise reduction
    This pair of headphones reduces wind noise, the average pair of headphones does not. 34.3% of headphones support wind noise reduction.
  • Sidetone support
    This pair of headphones supports sidetone, the average pair of headphones does not. 25.3% of headphones support sidetone.
  • Ambient sound mode
    This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode, the average pair of headphones does not. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
  • Companion app support
    This pair of headphones works with a companion app, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
  • 8 newer release date
    This pair of headphones was released more recently than the average pair of headphones (2024 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    June 2024
    2024 vs 2016
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (3 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 2 hours
  • 31.7% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (287 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    287 g vs 218 g
  • 18 hours shorter ANC battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life with ANC than the average pair of headphones (12 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life with ANC of 30 hours.
    12 hours vs 30 hours
  • 15 hours shorter battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life than the average pair of headphones (15 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    15 hours vs 30 hours
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 17.6% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Moor Echobeatz
    the average pair of headphones
    Moor Echobeatz has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.8 vs 8).
    6.8 vs 8
  • No neodymium magnet
    This pair of headphones does not use neodymium magnets, the average pair of headphones does. 81.9% of headphones use neodymium magnets.
  • 2.11x more expensive
    Moor Echobeatz is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£190 vs £90).
    £190 vs £90
  • 17.6% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Moor Echobeatz
    the average pair of headphones
    Moor Echobeatz has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.8 vs 8).
    6.8 vs 8
  • 2.11x more expensive
    Moor Echobeatz is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£190 vs £90).
    £190 vs £90
  • 69.8% less popular
    Moor Echobeatz is less popular than the average pair of headphones (3.46 vs 5.9).
    3.46 vs 5.87
  • 31.7% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (287 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    287 g vs 218 g
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • No neodymium magnet
    This pair of headphones does not use neodymium magnets, the average pair of headphones does. 81.9% of headphones use neodymium magnets.
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (3 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 2 hours
  • 18 hours shorter ANC battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life with ANC than the average pair of headphones (12 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life with ANC of 30 hours.
    12 hours vs 30 hours
  • 15 hours shorter battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life than the average pair of headphones (15 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    15 hours vs 30 hours

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Moor Echobeatz

  • Effective Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) that significantly reduces background noise
  • Versatile connectivity options including Bluetooth, wired, and a low-latency dongle
  • Impressive battery life that often exceeds the manufacturer's 15-hour rating
  • Robust build quality with a foldable design and included hard-shell carrying case
  • Support for Auracast technology and ultra-low latency (20ms) for gaming and TV
  • Comfortable for long sessions with soft, breathable protein leather ear pads

What customers don't like about Moor Echobeatz

  • Bass-heavy sound profile can occasionally sound boomy or overshadow the mids
  • Transparency mode can be notably 'hissy' or have an 'AM radio' sound quality
  • Power button requires a long press (approx. 5 seconds) to turn off
  • Ear pads could be slightly thicker for enhanced long-term comfort
  • Touch/off functions can sometimes be overly sensitive
  • Wired performance can be inconsistent due to an internal protection circuit

Verdict

The MoerLab EchoBeatz (AH181) is a pair of over-ear wireless headphones featuring 40mm dynamic drivers and an impedance of 32 Ohms, designed for high-quality audio with advanced connectivity options like Bluetooth 5.3, Auracast, and an ultra-low latency (ULL) mode of 20ms. Its primary characteristics include active noise cancellation (ANC) that blocks approximately 95% of background noise, a 20-meter range, and protein ear pads for long-term comfort. Main pros include its multi-mode versatility (Bluetooth Classic, Auracast, and ULL), broad audio codec support (AAC, LC3), and a quick 3-hour USB-C charging time. However, notable cons include a relatively short battery life of 12 to 15 hours depending on ANC use, a lack of folding capability for portability, and reported issues with wired audio quality when powered by high-output external amplifiers.

Compare Moor Echobeatz with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Moor Echobeatz and other products in the Headphones category

No results found