JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N Review | 93 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price in UK: ~£110
  • Avg. price in US: ~$129
  • Form factor: over-ear
  • Connectivity: wireless
  • Battery life: 44 hours
  • Active noise cancellation (ANC): yes

JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N review. Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among headphones and if it is worth buying.

7.8

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.

Score components:

80.0%

7.8

Technical Score

20.0%

?

User score

Very good
7.8

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the headphones' technical performance, covering key areas such as sound quality, noise cancelling, microphone performance, battery life, comfort, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

52.0%

8.4

Sound

20.0%

7.3

Features

10.0%

6.5

Design

8.0%

5.9

Connectivity

6.0%

8.5

Battery

4.0%

8.3

Calls & Controls

Very good
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.

When it matters: When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 7.4
    Gaming

    Score components:

    35.0%

    3.1

    Audio latency

    25.0%

    10

    Low-latency game mode

    20.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

    12.0%

    10

    Noise-canceling microphone

    8.0%

    7.2

    Battery life

  • 8.4
    Travel

    Score components:

    28.0%

    10

    Active noise cancellation (ANC)

    24.0%

    7.2

    Battery life

    18.0%

    4.8

    Weight

    16.0%

    10

    Multipoint support

    14.0%

    10

    Ambient sound mode

  • 9.6
    Calls

    Score components:

    28.0%

    10

    Noise-canceling microphone

    24.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

    18.0%

    10

    Multipoint support

    16.0%

    7.2

    Battery life

    14.0%

    10

    Companion app

  • 4.8
    Workout

    Score components:

    28.0%

    4.8

    Weight

    24.0%

    1.0

    Water resistance

    20.0%

    4.0

    IP rating

    16.0%

    7.2

    Battery life

    12.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £110

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The JBL Tune 770NC and Sony WH-CH720N are competitive entry-level noise-cancelling headphones that cater to different user priorities. The JBL Tune 770NC excels in endurance with an impressive 70-hour maximum battery life (up to 44 hours with ANC on), Bluetooth 5.3 support, and a foldable design for better portability. It features larger 40mm drivers delivering a signature Pure Bass sound and supports LE audio. Conversely, the Sony WH-CH720N is exceptionally lightweight at just 192g, offering superior all-day comfort and better noise isolation through its Integrated Processor V1. While its battery life is lower at 50 hours (35 with ANC), it supports the DSEE upscaling engine and provides a more natural spatial audio experience. Main pros for the JBL include its class-leading battery and folding frame, while the Sony's strengths lie in its ultra-light build and refined app features. Cons include the JBL's smaller ear cups which may cause discomfort for larger ears, and the Sony's non-foldable design and relatively thin plastic build quality.

Technical Specifications of JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the headphones' technical performance, covering key areas such as sound quality, noise cancelling, microphone performance, battery life, comfort, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

52.0%

?

Sound

20.0%

?

Features

10.0%

?

Design

8.0%

?

Connectivity

6.0%

?

Battery

4.0%

?

Calls & Controls

7.8
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a technical score of 7.78 points, which is higher than that of 92.1% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.

When it matters: When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters: When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
1.0
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a popularity of 1 points, which is lower than 72.7% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

7.8

Overall score

40.0%

9.9

Price

8.4
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a quality-to-price ratio of 8.4 points, which is higher than 92.2% of products in this category.
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
What it is: Reduces background noise using active technology
When it matters: When blocking office, travel, or aircraft noise is a priority.

Importance: HIGH

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports active noise cancellation. 72.6% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
What it is: Type of speaker driver technology used
When it matters: When the underlying sound character and driver technology matter to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

dynamic
Driver size
What it is: Diameter of the speaker driver unit
When it matters: When you want extra hardware context behind how the headphones may handle bass weight, scale, or overall presentation.

Importance: MEDIUM

40 mm
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.2% of headphones and equal to 53.6% of headphones.
Number of drivers
What it is: Total number of speaker drivers per earcup
When it matters: When multi-driver designs are part of your buying criteria.

Importance: LOW

1
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
What it is: Lowest audio frequency the headphones can reproduce
When it matters: When deeper bass extension matters for your music or movie listening.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=10 Hz

20 Hz
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.6% of headphones and equal to 47.5% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
What it is: Built-in microphone reduces background noise during calls
When it matters: When you take calls in busy spaces and want your voice to stay clearer.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports a noise-canceling microphone. 54.5% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
What it is: Shows whether the headphones can handle voice chat and calls in addition to normal audio playback.
When it matters: When one pair needs to cover music, calls, meetings, and gaming chat.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N is headset-ready, 84.7% is not. 15.3% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
What it is: Total number of built-in microphones
When it matters: When call pickup quality and beamforming support matter to you.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=2

8
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has 8 microphones, more microphones than 98.6% of headphones and equal to 1% of headphones.
Boom microphone
What it is: Includes detachable boom microphone for voice clarity
When it matters: When you need stronger voice clarity for gaming, streaming, or work calls.

Importance: LOW

no
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N does not include a boom microphone. 15.6% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
What it is: Signal-to-noise ratio of the microphone
When it matters: When call clarity matters and you want your voice picked up more cleanly instead of buried in background hiss.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >80 dB

?
Show more
Connectivity
What it is: Available connection methods (wired, wireless, Bluetooth, etc.)
When it matters: When the headphones need to match how you listen across wired and wireless devices.

Importance: HIGH

wireless
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 52.6% of headphones and equal to 47.4% of headphones.
supports both wireless and wired connectivity.
Bluetooth version
What it is: Version of Bluetooth technology supported
When it matters: When wireless stability, efficiency, and feature support matter more than treating Bluetooth as a box-check spec.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5.0

5.3
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N uses Bluetooth version 5.3, newer Bluetooth version than 88.6% of headphones and equal to 6.5% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
What it is: Maximum wireless operating distance from source device
When it matters: When you move around rooms and want fewer dropouts from your source device.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=10 m

10 m
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.6% of headphones and equal to 79.9% of headphones.
Audio latency
What it is: Delay between audio and video in wireless mode
When it matters: When you watch video or play games and need sound to stay in sync.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <60 ms

200 ms
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has audio latency of 200 ms, higher audio latency than 72% of headphones and equal to 13.9% of headphones.
Multipoint support
What it is: Supports simultaneous connections to multiple devices
When it matters: When you switch often between a phone and a laptop during the day.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports multipoint. 35% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
What it is: Allows external sounds to pass through for awareness
When it matters: When you need to stay aware of traffic, voices, or announcements.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports ambient sound mode. 23.2% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
What it is: Allows customization of sound profile via equalizer
When it matters: When the stock tuning is not enough and you want to shape bass, mids, or treble to match your taste.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports EQ customization. 76.8% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
What it is: Dedicated mobile app for customization and updates
When it matters: When software customization, updates, and extra controls matter.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N works with a companion app. 55.7% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
What it is: Allows adjustment of noise cancellation intensity levels
When it matters: When you move between quiet rooms, offices, streets, and public transport and do not want one ANC setting for every situation.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=4

N/A
Voice assistant support
What it is: Compatible with voice assistants like Siri, Alexa, or Google Assistant
When it matters: When hands-free control is part of your daily routine.

Importance: LOW

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
What it is: Playback time on a single charge
When it matters: When you commute, travel, or work long shifts and do not want charging breaks to interrupt listening.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >45 hours

44 hours
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers battery life of 44 hours, higher battery life than 68.4% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
What it is: Playback time with active noise cancellation enabled
When it matters: When you plan to keep noise cancellation on for most of the day.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >40 hours

44 hours
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers battery life with ANC of 44 hours, higher battery life with ANC than 73.9% of headphones and equal to 1% of headphones.
Charging time
What it is: Time required for a full battery charge
When it matters: When you often need the headphones ready again after short breaks.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=2 hours

2 hours
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N needs 2 hours to charge, lower charging time than 48.5% of headphones and equal to 39.1% of headphones.
Quick charge
What it is: Provides quick playback time with short charging period
When it matters: When a short top-up needs to deliver useful playback before you leave.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports quick charge. 31% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
What it is: Total energy storage of the internal battery
When it matters: When you are estimating how much battery headroom the design may have before relying only on the official runtime claim.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=720 mAh

1,200 mAh
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a battery capacity of 1,200 mAh, higher battery capacity than 95.1% of headphones and equal to 2.5% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.
When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

JBL
Form factor
What it is: Overall design type of the headphones (over-ear, on-ear, in-ear, etc.)
When it matters: When comfort, portability, and isolation depend on the overall headphone style.

Importance: HIGH

over-ear
Weight
What it is: Total weight of the headphones
When it matters: When long listening sessions make wearing comfort more important.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <150 g

232 g
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N weighs 232 g, heavier than 55% of headphones and equal to 0.1% of headphones.
Acoustic design
What it is: Type of acoustic design (open-back, closed-back, semi-open)
When it matters: When you need the right balance of isolation, leakage, and soundstage.

Importance: HIGH

closed-back
Clamp force
What it is: Amount of clamping pressure applied to the head
When it matters: When comfort and fit security matter during long sessions.

Importance: MEDIUM

5.3
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a clamp force of 5.3, higher clamp force than 72.5% of headphones and equal to 6.4% of headphones.
Show more

JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N vs the average headphone

  • Active noise cancellation
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports active noise cancellation, the average headphone does not. 27.4% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
    What it is: Reduces background noise using active technology
    When it matters: When blocking office, travel, or aircraft noise is a priority.

    Importance: HIGH

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports active noise cancellation, the average headphone does not. 27.4% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
  • EQ customization
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
    What it is: Allows customization of sound profile via equalizer
    When it matters: When the stock tuning is not enough and you want to shape bass, mids, or treble to match your taste.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
  • Spatial audio support
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports spatial audio, the average headphone does not. 30.7% of headphones support spatial audio.
    What it is: Supports immersive surround sound playback
    When it matters: When movies, games, and immersive mixes are part of your listening.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports spatial audio, the average headphone does not. 30.7% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • More flexible connectivity
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    supports both wireless and wired connectivity.
    What it is: Available connection methods (wired, wireless, Bluetooth, etc.)
    When it matters: When the headphones need to match how you listen across wired and wireless devices.

    Importance: HIGH

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.wireless vs wired
  • Clear call microphone
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers a clear call microphone, while the average headphone does not. 45.6% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
    What it is: Built-in microphone reduces background noise during calls
    When it matters: When you take calls in busy spaces and want your voice to stay clearer.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers a clear call microphone, while the average headphone does not. 45.6% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
    What it is: Physical controls available directly on headphones
    When it matters: When you need playback, volume, or call controls to be easy to reach without pulling out your phone.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 14 hours longer ANC battery life
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher battery life with ANC than the average headphone (44 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life with ANC of 30 hours.
    What it is: Playback time with active noise cancellation enabled
    When it matters: When you plan to keep noise cancellation on for most of the day.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >40 hours

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher battery life with ANC than the average headphone (44 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life with ANC of 30 hours.44 hours vs 30 hours
  • 7 more microphones
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has more microphones than the average headphone (8 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    What it is: Total number of built-in microphones
    When it matters: When call pickup quality and beamforming support matter to you.

    Importance: LOW

    Good value: >=2

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has more microphones than the average headphone (8 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.8 vs 1
  • Active noise cancellation
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports active noise cancellation, the average headphone does not. 27.4% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
  • Spatial audio support
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports spatial audio, the average headphone does not. 30.7% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • 14 hours longer ANC battery life
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher battery life with ANC than the average headphone (44 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life with ANC of 30 hours.
  • 2x higher battery capacity
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher battery capacity than the average headphone (1,200 mAh vs 600 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 600 mAh.
  • 14 hours longer battery life
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher battery life than the average headphone (44 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
  • USB-C charging
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N uses USB-C charging, the average headphone does not. 29.4% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Rechargeable battery
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a rechargeable battery, the average headphone does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • More flexible connectivity
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
  • Clear call microphone
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers a clear call microphone, while the average headphone does not. 45.6% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 7 more microphones
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has more microphones than the average headphone (8 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
  • Wind noise reduction
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N reduces wind noise, the average headphone does not. 34.1% of headphones support wind noise reduction.
  • Sidetone support
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports sidetone, the average headphone does not. 29.7% of headphones support sidetone.
  • EQ customization
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
  • 6 mm tighter earcup height
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (54 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
  • 1 higher clamp force
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.3 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
  • No travel bag
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N does not include a travel bag, the average headphone does. 65.2% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • 6 mm tighter earcup width
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (37 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.
  • 6.4% higher weight
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N is heavier than the average headphone (232 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a lower sensitivity than the average headphone (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
  • 16 dB lower max SPL
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a lower max SPL than the average headphone (94 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
  • 72.5 ms higher audio latency
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher audio latency than the average headphone (200 ms vs 127.5 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 127.5 ms.
  • 72.5 ms higher audio latency
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher audio latency than the average headphone (200 ms vs 127.5 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 127.5 ms.
    What it is: Delay between audio and video in wireless mode
    When it matters: When you watch video or play games and need sound to stay in sync.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: <60 ms

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher audio latency than the average headphone (200 ms vs 127.5 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 127.5 ms.200 ms vs 127.5 ms
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    What it is: Lowest audio frequency the headphones can reproduce
    When it matters: When deeper bass extension matters for your music or movie listening.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <=10 Hz

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 6 mm tighter earcup height
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (54 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    What it is: Internal height of the earcup cavity
    When it matters: When larger ears need enough space inside the earcups.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (54 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.54 mm vs 60 mm
  • 1 higher clamp force
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.3 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    What it is: Amount of clamping pressure applied to the head
    When it matters: When comfort and fit security matter during long sessions.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.3 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.5.3 vs 4.3
  • 4.65x less popular
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N is less popular than the average headphone (1.00 vs 4.646).
    What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters: When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N is less popular than the average headphone (1.00 vs 4.646).1 vs 4.65
  • 6 mm tighter earcup width
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (37 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.
    What it is: Internal width of the earcup cavity
    When it matters: When earcup fit affects comfort and pressure around your ears.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (37 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.37 mm vs 43 mm
  • No travel bag
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N does not include a travel bag, the average headphone does. 65.2% of headphones include a travel bag.
    What it is: Comes with a protective carrying case or pouch
    When it matters: When protection in transit matters right out of the box.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N does not include a travel bag, the average headphone does. 65.2% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a lower sensitivity than the average headphone (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    What it is: Sound pressure output level per unit of input power
    When it matters: When you plan to use weaker sources like phones, handhelds, or entry-level dongles and still want enough volume.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: >=106 dB/mW

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a lower sensitivity than the average headphone (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW

Graphic comparison of JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Expert reviews

R
rtings.com
17/04/2026
Summary of the review
C
counterpointresearch.com
25/06/2023
Summary of the review
P
petematheson.com
02/12/2025
Summary of the review
A
audioreviews.org
26/09/2024
Summary of the review
M
majorhifi.com
21/04/2023
Summary of the review
S
soundguys.com
26/09/2023
Summary of the review
W
whathifi.com
16/10/2025
Summary of the review
R
rtings.com
17/04/2026
Summary of the review
F
futurefive.co.nz
30/11/2023
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
20/03/2024
Summary of the review
R
rtings.com
01/08/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
21/03/2023
Summary of the review
K
kopfhoerer.de
16/04/2023
Summary of the review
S
stereoguide.de
11/06/2023
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
21/03/2024
Summary of the review
H
hifi.de
20/02/2026
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
18/03/2026
Summary of the review
Q
quechoisir.org
14/03/2024
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
23/07/2023
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/02/2025
Summary of the review
M
meilleur-casque.fr
15/03/2026
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
09/03/2023
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
21/03/2023
Summary of the review
Z
zdnet.fr
25/04/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
21/03/2023
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
05/01/2024
Summary of the review
C
cuffiewireless.it
Data non disponibile
Summary of the review
C
cuffiewireless.it
Data non disponibile
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
03/04/2023
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
15/03/2023
Summary of the review
R
rtings.com
16/11/2023
Summary of the review
C
consumentenbond.nl
N.v.t.
Summary of the review
H
hln.be
14/03/2023
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
28/06/2023
Summary of the review
A
androidplanet.nl
04/05/2023
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
06/10/2023
Summary of the review

Video reviews

Compare JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N with

VS
VS

Compare