OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N Review | 93 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price in UK: ~£110
  • Avg. price in US: ~$129
  • Form factor: over-ear
  • Connectivity: wireless
  • Battery life: 44 hours
  • Active noise cancellation (ANC): yes

JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N review. Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among headphones and if it is worth buying.

7.8

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.

Score components:

80.0%

7.8

Technical Score

20.0%

?

User score

Very good
7.8

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the headphones' technical performance, covering key areas such as sound quality, noise cancelling, microphone performance, battery life, comfort, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

52.0%

8.4

Sound

20.0%

7.3

Features

10.0%

6.5

Design

8.0%

5.9

Connectivity

6.0%

8.5

Battery

4.0%

8.3

Calls & Controls

Very good
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.

When it matters: When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 7.4
    Gaming

    Score components:

    35.0%

    3.1

    Audio latency

    25.0%

    10

    Low-latency game mode

    20.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

    12.0%

    10

    Noise-canceling microphone

    8.0%

    7.2

    Battery life

  • 8.4
    Travel

    Score components:

    28.0%

    10

    Active noise cancellation (ANC)

    24.0%

    7.2

    Battery life

    18.0%

    4.8

    Weight

    16.0%

    10

    Multipoint support

    14.0%

    10

    Ambient sound mode

  • 9.6
    Calls

    Score components:

    28.0%

    10

    Noise-canceling microphone

    24.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

    18.0%

    10

    Multipoint support

    16.0%

    7.2

    Battery life

    14.0%

    10

    Companion app

  • 4.8
    Workout

    Score components:

    28.0%

    4.8

    Weight

    24.0%

    1.0

    Water resistance

    20.0%

    4.0

    IP rating

    16.0%

    7.2

    Battery life

    12.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £110

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The JBL Tune 770NC and Sony WH-CH720N are competitive entry-level noise-cancelling headphones that cater to different user priorities. The JBL Tune 770NC excels in endurance with an impressive 70-hour maximum battery life (up to 44 hours with ANC on), Bluetooth 5.3 support, and a foldable design for better portability. It features larger 40mm drivers delivering a signature Pure Bass sound and supports LE audio. Conversely, the Sony WH-CH720N is exceptionally lightweight at just 192g, offering superior all-day comfort and better noise isolation through its Integrated Processor V1. While its battery life is lower at 50 hours (35 with ANC), it supports the DSEE upscaling engine and provides a more natural spatial audio experience. Main pros for the JBL include its class-leading battery and folding frame, while the Sony's strengths lie in its ultra-light build and refined app features. Cons include the JBL's smaller ear cups which may cause discomfort for larger ears, and the Sony's non-foldable design and relatively thin plastic build quality.

Technical Specifications of JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the headphones' technical performance, covering key areas such as sound quality, noise cancelling, microphone performance, battery life, comfort, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

52.0%

?

Sound

20.0%

?

Features

10.0%

?

Design

8.0%

?

Connectivity

6.0%

?

Battery

4.0%

?

Calls & Controls

7.8
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a technical score of 7.78 points, which is higher than that of 92.1% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.

When it matters: When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters: When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
1.0
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a popularity of 1 points, which is lower than 72.7% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

7.8

Overall score

40.0%

9.9

Price

8.4
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a quality-to-price ratio of 8.4 points, which is higher than 92.2% of products in this category.
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
What it is: Reduces background noise using active technology
When it matters: When blocking office, travel, or aircraft noise is a priority.

Importance: HIGH

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports active noise cancellation. 72.6% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
What it is: Type of speaker driver technology used
When it matters: When the underlying sound character and driver technology matter to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

dynamic
Driver size
What it is: Diameter of the speaker driver unit
When it matters: When you want extra hardware context behind how the headphones may handle bass weight, scale, or overall presentation.

Importance: MEDIUM

40 mm
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.2% of headphones and equal to 53.6% of headphones.
Number of drivers
What it is: Total number of speaker drivers per earcup
When it matters: When multi-driver designs are part of your buying criteria.

Importance: LOW

1
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N uses 1 drivers, equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
What it is: Lowest audio frequency the headphones can reproduce
When it matters: When deeper bass extension matters for your music or movie listening.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=10 Hz

20 Hz
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.6% of headphones and equal to 47.5% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
What it is: Built-in microphone reduces background noise during calls
When it matters: When you take calls in busy spaces and want your voice to stay clearer.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports a noise-canceling microphone. 54.5% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
What it is: Shows whether the headphones can handle voice chat and calls in addition to normal audio playback.
When it matters: When one pair needs to cover music, calls, meetings, and gaming chat.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N is headset-ready, 84.7% is not. 15.3% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
What it is: Total number of built-in microphones
When it matters: When call pickup quality and beamforming support matter to you.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=2

8
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has 8 microphones, more microphones than 98.6% of headphones and equal to 1% of headphones.
Boom microphone
What it is: Includes detachable boom microphone for voice clarity
When it matters: When you need stronger voice clarity for gaming, streaming, or work calls.

Importance: LOW

no
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N does not include a boom microphone. 15.6% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
What it is: Signal-to-noise ratio of the microphone
When it matters: When call clarity matters and you want your voice picked up more cleanly instead of buried in background hiss.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >80 dB

?
Show more
Connectivity
What it is: Available connection methods (wired, wireless, Bluetooth, etc.)
When it matters: When the headphones need to match how you listen across wired and wireless devices.

Importance: HIGH

wireless
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 52.6% of headphones and equal to 47.4% of headphones.
supports both wireless and wired connectivity.
Bluetooth version
What it is: Version of Bluetooth technology supported
When it matters: When wireless stability, efficiency, and feature support matter more than treating Bluetooth as a box-check spec.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5.0

5.3
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N uses Bluetooth version 5.3, newer Bluetooth version than 88.6% of headphones and equal to 6.5% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
What it is: Maximum wireless operating distance from source device
When it matters: When you move around rooms and want fewer dropouts from your source device.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=10 m

10 m
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.6% of headphones and equal to 79.9% of headphones.
Audio latency
What it is: Delay between audio and video in wireless mode
When it matters: When you watch video or play games and need sound to stay in sync.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <60 ms

200 ms
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has audio latency of 200 ms, higher audio latency than 72% of headphones and equal to 13.9% of headphones.
Multipoint support
What it is: Supports simultaneous connections to multiple devices
When it matters: When you switch often between a phone and a laptop during the day.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports multipoint. 35% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
What it is: Allows external sounds to pass through for awareness
When it matters: When you need to stay aware of traffic, voices, or announcements.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports ambient sound mode. 23.2% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
What it is: Allows customization of sound profile via equalizer
When it matters: When the stock tuning is not enough and you want to shape bass, mids, or treble to match your taste.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports EQ customization. 76.8% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
What it is: Dedicated mobile app for customization and updates
When it matters: When software customization, updates, and extra controls matter.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N works with a companion app. 55.7% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
What it is: Allows adjustment of noise cancellation intensity levels
When it matters: When you move between quiet rooms, offices, streets, and public transport and do not want one ANC setting for every situation.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=4

N/A
Voice assistant support
What it is: Compatible with voice assistants like Siri, Alexa, or Google Assistant
When it matters: When hands-free control is part of your daily routine.

Importance: LOW

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
What it is: Playback time on a single charge
When it matters: When you commute, travel, or work long shifts and do not want charging breaks to interrupt listening.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >45 hours

44 hours
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers battery life of 44 hours, higher battery life than 68.4% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
What it is: Playback time with active noise cancellation enabled
When it matters: When you plan to keep noise cancellation on for most of the day.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >40 hours

44 hours
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers battery life with ANC of 44 hours, higher battery life with ANC than 73.9% of headphones and equal to 1% of headphones.
Charging time
What it is: Time required for a full battery charge
When it matters: When you often need the headphones ready again after short breaks.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=2 hours

2 hours
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N needs 2 hours to charge, lower charging time than 48.5% of headphones and equal to 39.1% of headphones.
Quick charge
What it is: Provides quick playback time with short charging period
When it matters: When a short top-up needs to deliver useful playback before you leave.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports quick charge. 31% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
What it is: Total energy storage of the internal battery
When it matters: When you are estimating how much battery headroom the design may have before relying only on the official runtime claim.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=720 mAh

1,200 mAh
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a battery capacity of 1200 mAh, higher battery capacity than 95.1% of headphones and equal to 2.5% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.
When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

JBL
Form factor
What it is: Overall design type of the headphones (over-ear, on-ear, in-ear, etc.)
When it matters: When comfort, portability, and isolation depend on the overall headphone style.

Importance: HIGH

over-ear
Weight
What it is: Total weight of the headphones
When it matters: When long listening sessions make wearing comfort more important.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <150 g

232 g
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N weighs 232 g, heavier than 55% of headphones and equal to 0.1% of headphones.
Acoustic design
What it is: Type of acoustic design (open-back, closed-back, semi-open)
When it matters: When you need the right balance of isolation, leakage, and soundstage.

Importance: HIGH

closed-back
Clamp force
What it is: Amount of clamping pressure applied to the head
When it matters: When comfort and fit security matter during long sessions.

Importance: MEDIUM

5.3
JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a clamp force of 5.3, higher clamp force than 72.5% of headphones and equal to 6.4% of headphones.
Show more

JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N vs the average headphone

  • Active noise cancellation
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports active noise cancellation, the average headphone does not. 27.4% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
    What it is: Reduces background noise using active technology
    When it matters: When blocking office, travel, or aircraft noise is a priority.

    Importance: HIGH

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports active noise cancellation, the average headphone does not. 27.4% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
  • EQ customization
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
    What it is: Allows customization of sound profile via equalizer
    When it matters: When the stock tuning is not enough and you want to shape bass, mids, or treble to match your taste.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
  • Spatial audio support
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports spatial audio, the average headphone does not. 30.7% of headphones support spatial audio.
    What it is: Supports immersive surround sound playback
    When it matters: When movies, games, and immersive mixes are part of your listening.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports spatial audio, the average headphone does not. 30.7% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • More flexible connectivity
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    supports both wireless and wired connectivity.
    What it is: Available connection methods (wired, wireless, Bluetooth, etc.)
    When it matters: When the headphones need to match how you listen across wired and wireless devices.

    Importance: HIGH

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.wireless vs wired
  • Clear call microphone
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers a clear call microphone, while the average headphone does not. 45.6% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
    What it is: Built-in microphone reduces background noise during calls
    When it matters: When you take calls in busy spaces and want your voice to stay clearer.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers a clear call microphone, while the average headphone does not. 45.6% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
    What it is: Physical controls available directly on headphones
    When it matters: When you need playback, volume, or call controls to be easy to reach without pulling out your phone.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 14 hours longer ANC battery life
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher battery life with ANC than the average headphone (44 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life with ANC of 30 hours.
    What it is: Playback time with active noise cancellation enabled
    When it matters: When you plan to keep noise cancellation on for most of the day.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >40 hours

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher battery life with ANC than the average headphone (44 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life with ANC of 30 hours.44 hours vs 30 hours
  • 7 more microphones
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has more microphones than the average headphone (8 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    What it is: Total number of built-in microphones
    When it matters: When call pickup quality and beamforming support matter to you.

    Importance: LOW

    Good value: >=2

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has more microphones than the average headphone (8 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.8 vs 1
  • Active noise cancellation
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports active noise cancellation, the average headphone does not. 27.4% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
  • Spatial audio support
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports spatial audio, the average headphone does not. 30.7% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • 14 hours longer ANC battery life
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher battery life with ANC than the average headphone (44 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life with ANC of 30 hours.
  • 2x higher battery capacity
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher battery capacity than the average headphone (1,200 mAh vs 600 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 600 mAh.
  • 14 hours longer battery life
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher battery life than the average headphone (44 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
  • USB-C charging
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N uses USB-C charging, the average headphone does not. 29.4% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Rechargeable battery
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a rechargeable battery, the average headphone does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • More flexible connectivity
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
  • Clear call microphone
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N offers a clear call microphone, while the average headphone does not. 45.6% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 7 more microphones
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has more microphones than the average headphone (8 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
  • Wind noise reduction
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N reduces wind noise, the average headphone does not. 34.1% of headphones support wind noise reduction.
  • Sidetone support
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports sidetone, the average headphone does not. 29.7% of headphones support sidetone.
  • EQ customization
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.

Total
Overall
Sound
Battery
Connectivity
Calls & Controls
Features
  • 6 mm tighter earcup height
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (54 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
  • 1 higher clamp force
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.3 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
  • No travel bag
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N does not include a travel bag, the average headphone does. 65.2% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • 6 mm tighter earcup width
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (37 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.
  • 6.4% higher weight
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N is heavier than the average headphone (232 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a lower sensitivity than the average headphone (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
  • 16 dB lower max SPL
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a lower max SPL than the average headphone (94 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
  • 72.5 ms higher audio latency
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher audio latency than the average headphone (200 ms vs 127.5 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 127.5 ms.
  • 72.5 ms higher audio latency
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher audio latency than the average headphone (200 ms vs 127.5 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 127.5 ms.
    What it is: Delay between audio and video in wireless mode
    When it matters: When you watch video or play games and need sound to stay in sync.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: <60 ms

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher audio latency than the average headphone (200 ms vs 127.5 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 127.5 ms.200 ms vs 127.5 ms
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    What it is: Lowest audio frequency the headphones can reproduce
    When it matters: When deeper bass extension matters for your music or movie listening.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <=10 Hz

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 6 mm tighter earcup height
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (54 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    What it is: Internal height of the earcup cavity
    When it matters: When larger ears need enough space inside the earcups.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (54 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.54 mm vs 60 mm
  • 1 higher clamp force
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.3 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    What it is: Amount of clamping pressure applied to the head
    When it matters: When comfort and fit security matter during long sessions.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.3 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.5.3 vs 4.3
  • 4.65x less popular
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N is less popular than the average headphone (1.00 vs 4.646).
    What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters: When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N is less popular than the average headphone (1.00 vs 4.646).1 vs 4.65
  • 6 mm tighter earcup width
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (37 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.
    What it is: Internal width of the earcup cavity
    When it matters: When earcup fit affects comfort and pressure around your ears.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (37 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.37 mm vs 43 mm
  • No travel bag
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N does not include a travel bag, the average headphone does. 65.2% of headphones include a travel bag.
    What it is: Comes with a protective carrying case or pouch
    When it matters: When protection in transit matters right out of the box.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N does not include a travel bag, the average headphone does. 65.2% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a lower sensitivity than the average headphone (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    What it is: Sound pressure output level per unit of input power
    When it matters: When you plan to use weaker sources like phones, handhelds, or entry-level dongles and still want enough volume.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: >=106 dB/mW

    JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N has a lower sensitivity than the average headphone (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
Total
Overall
Design
Sound
Connectivity

Graphic comparison of JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Expert reviews

R
rtings.com
17/04/2026
Sony WH-CH720N Wireless vs JBL Tune 770NC - RTINGS.com Comparison Would you like a summary of the key differences in noise cancellation performance or...

The RTINGS comparison finds the JBL Tune 770NC slightly outperforms the Sony WH-CH720N due to a massive 70-hour battery life, support for modern LE audio codecs, and a collapsible design. Conversely, the JBL is hampered by smaller ear cups, higher clamping force, and a microphone that lacks functionality during wired playback. The Sony WH-CH720N excels in comfort with larger, oval...Read more

C
counterpointresearch.com
25/06/2023
Sony WH-CH720N Review: Good Sound, Effective ANC, Long Battery

The Counterpoint Research review by Ritesh Bendre highlights the Sony WH-CH720N as a highly capable pair of mid-range, over-ear wireless headphones that inherit several premium capabilities from Sony's flagship lines. A major highlight of the review is the integration of the Sony Integrated Processor V1, which delivers remarkably effective Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) and a...Read more

P
petematheson.com
02/12/2025
The Ultimate Sony WH-CH720n Review - Pete Matheson

The Sony WH-CH720N over-ear headphones offer remarkable value at around £130 / $150 by delivering approximately 70% of the flagship XM-series experience at a fraction of the cost. Weighing just 192 grams, their lightweight, minimalist plastic design makes them exceptionally comfortable for all-day wear, outperforming even the premium XM5s in long-session comfort. Additionally, they...Read more

A
audioreviews.org
26/09/2024
Sony WH-CH720N Review Over-Ear Headphones Review

The AudioReviews.org review highlights the Sony WH-CH720N as a lightweight (192g), budget-friendly option featuring comfortable materials and stable physical controls. Pros include an exceptional battery life (up to 35 hours with ANC), multipoint Bluetooth pairing, and app-based custom EQ adjustments. Sonically, they offer an engaging, warm sound profile with a prominent mid-bass...Read more

M
majorhifi.com
21/04/2023
Sony WH-CH720N Review - Major HiFi

The Sony WH-CH720N is a budget-friendly, over-ear wireless headphone that retails for around $150, offering a lightweight and comfortable 6-ounce plastic design with physical button controls instead of touch panels. A major standout feature is its impressive battery life, which delivers 35 hours of playback with Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) activated—surpassing Sony's flagship...Read more

S
soundguys.com
26/09/2023
Sony WH-CH720N review: Sony's sweet spot? - SoundGuys

The SoundGuys review of the Sony WH-CH720NGo highlights these headphones as a comfortable, lightweight option featuring exceptional battery life lasting over 40 hours with ANC active, along with convenient multipoint Bluetooth connectivity and customizable EQ via the Sony Sound Connect app. Despite these strengths, the review notes drawbacks including a heavily bass-heavy, congested...Read more

W
whathifi.com
16/10/2025
Sony WH-CH720N review - What Hi-Fi?

The Sony WH-CH720N is a highly recommended, budget-friendly pair of over-ear wireless headphones that delivers a strong feature set and active noise cancellation (ANC) at an affordable price point. Retaining its What Hi-Fi? Award for best budget wireless headphones, these cans provide a forceful, robust, and energetic sound presentation that excels with rock, hip-hop, and pop music....Read more

R
rtings.com
17/04/2026
Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Review - RTINGS.com

The Sony WH-CH720N Wireless headphonesGo offer an impressive 38-hour battery life, a lightweight design, and app-based EQ customization suitable for long-term use. They also feature low audio leakage and convenient multi-device Bluetooth pairing. RTINGS.comConversely, the headphones lack a folding design and included carrying case, limiting portability, while their active noise...Read more

F
futurefive.co.nz
30/11/2023
Hands-on Review: JBL Tune 770NC - FutureFive New Zealand

The FutureFive New Zealand review highlights the JBL Tune 770NC as an affordable, lightweight, and versatile pair of mid-range, noise-canceling headphones priced under NZD $200. Main pros include an exceptional battery life of up to 70 hours with ANC off (or 44 hours with ANC on), a fast-charging feature that gives 3 hours of power from a 5-minute charge, and highly capable Active...Read more

U
uk.pcmag.com
20/03/2024
JBL Tune 770NC - Review 2024 - PCMag UK

The JBL Tune 770NC over-ear headphones ($129.95) are budget-friendly wireless headphones that deliver a heavy, sculpted sound signature with powerful sub-bass and crisp, accentuated highs. Their strong points include an incredibly long battery life—yielding up to 44 hours with ANC on or 70 hours with it turned off—as well as a highly responsive 10-band companion app EQ for audio...Read more

R
rtings.com
01/08/2024
JBL Tune 770NC Headphones Review - RTINGS.com

The JBL Tune 770NC Wireless are lightweight over-ear headphones featuring an accurate, balanced sound profile, a highly functional app with a parametric EQ, and exceptional battery life. They offer intuitive, tactile button controls, multi-device pairing, and an analog cable for wired use. However, the ANC system is sub-par and struggles to block low-pitched ambient noise....Read more

D
digitec.ch
21/03/2023
The Sony WH-CH720N: Affordable and Capable

The Digitec review frames the Sony WH-CH720N as a capable, entry-level option offering excellent price-to-performance compared to flagship models. Key pros include clear, customizable sound, exceptional battery life, and effective Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) powered by the V1 processor. However, the review notes significant cons, specifically poor microphone quality for calls...Read more

(Translated)Show original
K
kopfhoerer.de
16/04/2023
Sony WH-CH720N review on kopfhoerer.de

Summary of Pros & Cons Pros: Highly efficient ANC performance for its price class, excellent 35-hour battery capacity, dual-device multipoint connectivity, ultra-lightweight and comfortable design, and crisp vocal clarity with a robust bass response. Cons: Total omission of premium high-res audio codecs (like LDAC), cheap non-folding build structure without an included storage...Read more

(Translated)Show original
S
stereoguide.de
11/06/2023
Sony WH-CH720N with ANC Review - STEREO GUIDE

The Sony WH-CH720N is a lightweight, budget-friendly over-ear Bluetooth 5.2 headphone that packs premium features like Active Noise Cancelling (ANC) and an advanced companion app for an entry-level price. Weighing only 192 grams, it offers exceptional battery life of up to 35 hours with ANC enabled and 50 hours without it. Its 30mm drivers support standard SBC and AAC codecs, allow...Read more

(Translated)Show original
H
heise.de
21/03/2024
Sony WH-CH720N review | heise online leaderboards", "Sony WH-CH720N under test | heise online best lists

The Sony WH-CH720N is a budget-friendly, over-ear Bluetooth headphone that offers an affordable alternative to Sony's flagship WH-1000XM5, retailing for well under €100. Weighing only 186 grams, it is notably lightweight, sturdy, and exceptionally comfortable for daily wear and activities like jogging, though users may experience some heat and ear sweating during extended use. It...Read more

(Translated)Show original
H
hifi.de
20/02/2026
Sony WH-CH720N Review: A Pro in Its Price Range

The Sony WH-CH720N is a budget-friendly over-ear headphone designed to deliver solid everyday performance without the premium price tag of flagship models like the WH-1000XM6. In terms of pros, the headphones are highly praised for being exceptionally lightweight (approximately 192 grams) and comfortable, featuring highly flexible ear cups that adapt well to different head shapes...Read more

(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
18/03/2026
JBL Tune 770NC Review: Strong Sound, Great App

The JBL Tune 770NC is a budget-friendly over-ear Bluetooth 5.3 headphone that delivers very good, natural, and spatially spacious sound quality. While the factory presets feature a slightly weak sub-bass, overemphasized mids, and sharp highs, the "JBL Headphones" companion app allows users to finely adjust the frequencies with an equalizer. It also boasts exclusive features like...Read more

(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
14/03/2024
JBL Tune 770NC review - headphones - UFC-Que Choisir

The Que Choisir review evaluates the JBL Tune 770NC as a functional, lightweight (228g) wireless headset featuring a foldable design, robust Bluetooth 5.3 multipoint connectivity, and the ability to operate passively via a wired connection. It is noted for its strong, precise bass performance, low distortion, and capable adaptive Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) for its price point....Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
23/07/2023
JBL Tune 770 NC Review: A Classic but Effective Headphone

The JBL Tune 770 NC is an affordable, foldable, over-ear Bluetooth headphone that received a low 2 out of 5 stars from Labo Fnac due to major audio performance shortcomings. Its strongest advantages include a very budget-friendly price tag, powerful bass delivery, and an exceptional battery life that clocks in at an impressive 66 hours and 35 minutes on a full 2-hour-and-20-minute...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/02/2025
JBL Tune 770NC Review: Simple Bluetooth headphones with (very) long battery life

The JBL Tune 770NC is a budget-friendly, over-ear Bluetooth 5.3 headset that balances strong performance with lightweight, plastic construction weighing 232g. On the positive side, it features an impressive active noise cancellation (ANC) system that significantly dampens low-frequency street noises, even beating some premium competitors in the 200 Hz range. Furthermore, it supports...Read more

(Translated)Show original
M
meilleur-casque.fr
15/03/2026
JBL Tune 770NC Review: 2026 Full Test | Better Than the Sony WH-CH720N?

The JBL Tune 770NC is reviewed as a champion of value, scoring 4.3 out of 5 stars for offering essential features at an affordable price of €79. A major highlight is its impressive battery life of 44 hours without active noise cancellation (ANC) and 34 hours with ANC enabled, supplemented by a fast charge capability that gives 3 hours of playback from just a 5-minute charge. Audio...Read more

(Translated)Show original
C
clubic.com
09/03/2023
Sony WH-CH720N Review: Low Price and High-End Performance?

The Sony WH-CH720N is a lightweight, 192-gram over-ear Bluetooth 5.2 headset that blends modern styling with a budget-friendly, 100% plastic construction. Its standout strength is exceptional comfort, achieved through a well-calibrated clamping force and soft ear pads, paired with highly impressive battery life that clocks in at roughly 34.5 hours with Active Noise Cancellation...Read more

(Translated)Show original
D
digitec.ch
21/03/2023
The Sony WH-CH720N: Affordable and Practical", "Sony WH-CH720N: Affordable and Convenient

The Sony WH-CH720N headphones offer excellent value, featuring a lightweight design, long battery life, and clear, balanced sound enhanced by the V1 processor for effective, low-frequency active noise cancellation. While praised for performance at a sub-150 franc price point, the headset's ANC is merely satisfactory against high-frequency sounds, and passive, unpowered wired audio...Read more

(Translated)Show original
Z
zdnet.fr
25/04/2024
Sony WH-CH720N Review: It's Almost as Good as the XM5", "Sony WH-CH720N Review: It Performs Almost as Well as the XM5

The Sony WH-CH720N over-ear headphones offer premium sound features at a budget-friendly launch price of €150. A major plus is the V1 processor, which gives you great active noise cancellation (ANC) and rich, bass-heavy audio. The bass is strong enough for hip-hop and electronic music. They are also Sony's lightest wireless headphones, making them very comfortable for hours of use....Read more

(Translated)Show original
D
digitec.ch
21/03/2023
Sony WH-CH720N: Affordable and useful", "Sony WH-CH720N: Practical and budget-friendly

The Sony WH-CH720N over-ear wireless headphones offer clear, balanced sound and a lightweight, 192-gram design suitable for long-term comfort. Key advantages include long battery life, app-based EQ customization, and high-precision audio when using the wired connection. Budget-focused compromises include satisfactory, rather than premium, active noise cancellation, along with poor...Read more

(Translated)Show original
D
digitec.ch
05/01/2024
JBL Live 770NC review: affordable over-ear headphones - Digitec

According to a Galaxus review 1.2.10, the JBL Live 770NC offers a balanced sound with 40mm drivers,50-hour ANC battery life, and a comfortable 256-gram design, making it a competitive, budget-friendly over-ear option. The headphones feature robust app integration, including EQ, Bluetooth 5.3, and Personi-Fi testing. Conversely, the review notes the sound can feel slightly muffled...Read more

(Translated)Show original
C
cuffiewireless.it
Data non disponibile
JBL Tune 770NC - The review on CuffieWireless.it

The JBL Tune 770NC is an affordable pair of over-ear wireless headphones that delivers a bass-heavy, dynamic audio profile suited for pop, hip-hop, and electronic music. Equipped with Bluetooth 5.3 and multipoint connectivity, these headphones pair seamlessly with two devices simultaneously. One of their most notable technical highlights is the exceptional battery life, providing up...Read more

(Translated)Show original
C
cuffiewireless.it
Data non disponibile
Sony WH-CH720N - The review on CuffieWireless.it

The Sony WH-CH720N over-ear wireless headphones are positioned as a highly accessible alternative to premium flagship models like the WH-1000XM5, focusing on a strong balance of price and performance. Weighing just 192 grams, they are exceptionally lightweight and comfortable for multi-hour sessions, making them ideal for daily commuting, studying, or office work. They feature...Read more

(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
03/04/2023
Sony WH-CH720N review - TechRadar

The Sony WH-CH720N over-ear wireless headphones offer highly competitive audio quality and top-tier active noise cancellation (ANC) at an affordable mid-range price point of approximately €119. Equipped with the same V1 processor found in Sony's premium WH-1000XM5 model, these headphones deliver a rich, full sound with notable passive isolation due to their newly designed, fully...Read more

(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
15/03/2023
Sony WH-CH720N Review: Low Price, High Quality

The Sony WH-CH720N represents an affordable, wireless over-ear headphone option that integrates the same Sony V1 chip found in premium models to deliver impressive audio and adaptive active noise cancellation (ANC) for its budget class. The main strengths (pros) of these headphones are their exceptionally lightweight build at just 192 grams, making them highly comfortable for long...Read more

(Translated)Show original
R
rtings.com
16/11/2023
Sony WH-CH720N Wireless vs JBL Tune 770NC

The Sony WH-CH720N and JBL Tune 770NC are entry-level ANC headphones, with the Sony offering superior noise isolation, a lighter frame, and more spacious ear cups, though its plastic construction feels cheaper. Conversely, the JBL boasts significantly longer battery life, Bluetooth 5.3, and LE audio support, but features a tighter clamping force with smaller ear cups that may cause...Read more

(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
N.v.t.
JBL Tune 770NC - Test, Reviews & Prices - Consumentenbond

The Consumentenbond product page evaluates the JBL Tune 770NCGo as a lightweight, over-ear wireless headphone priced around €69.99. The review outlines standard technical features, including a USB-C charging port, a built-in microphone for hands-free smartphone calling, and integrated active noise cancelling (ANC) designed to dampen ambient environment noises. While the full test...Read more

(Translated)Show original
H
hln.be
14/03/2023
Sony WH-CH720N review: Shut out the world without breaking the bank

The HLN review highlights the Sony WH-CH720N as a comfortable, lightweight headset offering exceptional value, featuring effective multi-point Bluetooth pairing for simultaneous device connection and good sound tuning. While active noise cancellation (ANC) handles low-level background noise well, the review notes it is not as robust as premium models, and the headset lacks smart...Read more

(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
28/06/2023
Sony WH-CH720N review

Sony WH-CH720N Review Summary The Sony WH-CH720N is a highly capable, lightweight over-ear wireless headphone option that provides premium-tier functionalities at a budget-friendly price point. Weighing only 192 grams, it provides a highly comfortable, non-fatiguing fit for long listening sessions, alongside an impressive 35-hour battery life with active noise cancellation (ANC)...Read more

(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
04/05/2023
Nice sound, poorer controls

The Sony WH-CH720N is a highly capable and affordable mid-range headphone option reviewed by Android Planet. It stands out as an excellent value-for-money choice, delivering high-quality, full sound that can be easily customized using the Sony Headphones Connect app equalizer. Its active noise cancellation (ANC) and ambient modes provide a solid listening experience for daily work...Read more

(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
06/10/2023
JBL Tune 770NC review: Reliable, appealing and well-priced

JBL Tune 770NC Review Summary The JBL Tune 770NC is a reliable, budget-friendly pair of over-ear wireless headphonesthat launched in August 2023 for €129.99, though it is frequently found heavily discounted online. Its standout pros include an exceptional battery life that lasts up to 70 hours with ANC turned off (and 44 hours with ANC enabled), alongside a fast-charging capability...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

jbl-tour-one-m2
JBL Tour One M2

Headphones

8.7
edifier-wh950nb
Edifier WH950NB

Headphones

8.4
anker-soundcore-life-q35
Anker Soundcore Life Q35

Headphones

8.4
jbl-tune-780nc
JBL Tune 780NC

Headphones

8.3
sony-wh-h910n
Sony WH H910N

Headphones

8.2
skullcandy-aviator-20
Skullcandy Aviator 2.0

Headphones

8.7
sony-wh-ult900n
Sony WH ULT900N

Headphones

8.9
jbl-live-770nc
JBL Live 770NC

Headphones

8.7
sennheiser-pxc-550-ii
Sennheiser PXC 550 II

Headphones

7.7
raycon-fitness-headphones
Raycon Fitness Headphones

Headphones

7.6
skullcandy-crusher
Skullcandy Crusher

Headphones

7.6
acefast-h7
Acefast H7

Headphones

7.6

Compare JBL Tune 770NC Vs Sony WH CH720N with

VS
VS

Compare