OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Goboult Mustang Thunder Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:70 hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Goboult Mustang Thunder Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Goboult Mustang Thunder
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Score components

80%

6.6

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–²Better than 67% of headphones
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 66%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

52%

6.2

Sound

20%

6.3

Features

10%

7.3

Design

8%

7.0

Connectivity

6%

9.4

Battery

4%

7.9

Calls & Controls

â–²Better than 71%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • goboult-mustang-thunder
  • goboult-mustang-thunder
  • goboult-mustang-thunder
  • goboult-mustang-thunder
  • goboult-mustang-thunder
  • goboult-mustang-thunder
  • goboult-mustang-thunder
  • goboult-mustang-thunder
  • goboult-mustang-thunder
  • goboult-mustang-thunder
goboult-mustang-thunder
goboult-mustang-thunder
goboult-mustang-thunder
goboult-mustang-thunder
goboult-mustang-thunder
goboult-mustang-thunder
goboult-mustang-thunder
goboult-mustang-thunder
goboult-mustang-thunder
goboult-mustang-thunder
Where to buy
    N/A~ £25
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Goboult Mustang Thunder

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

52%

6.2

Sound

20%

6.3

Features

10%

7.3

Design

8%

7.0

Connectivity

6%

9.4

Battery

4%

7.9

Calls & Controls

6.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Goboult Mustang Thunder has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 73.4% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.6
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 47.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
?
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
5.4
This pair of headphones uses Bluetooth version 5.4, newer Bluetooth version than 95.2% of headphones and equal to 4.1% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Market range: <10 m – >15 m
This pair of headphones offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.7% of headphones and equal to 80.6% of headphones.
Audio latency
60 ms
Market range: <40 ms – >222 ms
This pair of headphones has audio latency of 60 ms, lower audio latency than 65.5% of headphones and equal to 6.2% of headphones.
Multipoint support
yes
This pair of headphones supports multipoint. 69.4% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
yes
This pair of headphones supports EQ customization. 76.8% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
yes
This pair of headphones works with a companion app. 78.4% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
70 hours
Market range: <10 hours – >70 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life of 70 hours, higher battery life than 87.5% of headphones and equal to 2.9% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
2 hours
Market range: <1.5 hours – >3.5 hours
This pair of headphones needs 2 hours to charge, lower charging time than 47.8% of headphones and equal to 39% of headphones.
Quick charge
yes
This pair of headphones supports quick charge. 67% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Brand name
Goboult
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
234 g
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 234 g, heavier than 55.2% of headphones and equal to 0.2% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
?
Show more

Goboult Mustang Thunder vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • EQ customization
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • Companion app support
    This pair of headphones works with a companion app, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
  • Multipoint support
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • 40 hours longer battery life
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery life than the average pair of headphones (70 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    70 hours vs 30 hours
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • Quick charge support
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • 6 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (108 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    108 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 3.6x cheaper
    Goboult Mustang Thunder is cheaper than the average pair of headphones (£25 vs £90).
    £25 vs £90
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Water resistance
    This pair of headphones is water resistant, the average pair of headphones is not. 20.2% of headphones are water resistant.
  • Better IP rating
    This pair of headphones has a better IP rating than the average pair of headphones (IPX5 vs none). The average headphones have an IP rating of none.
    IPX5 vs none
  • 6 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (108 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    108 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 15 dB SPL higher sound pressure level
    This pair of headphones has a higher sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (118 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    118 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL
  • 40 hours longer battery life
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery life than the average pair of headphones (70 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    70 hours vs 30 hours
  • Quick charge support
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • USB-C charging
    This pair of headphones uses USB-C charging, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.5% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This pair of headphones has a rechargeable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • Multipoint support
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • 90 ms lower audio latency
    This pair of headphones has a lower audio latency than the average pair of headphones (60 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    60 ms vs 150 ms
  • AAC codec support
    This pair of headphones supports AAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 32.2% of headphones support AAC.
  • Fast pairing support
    This pair of headphones supports fast pairing, the average pair of headphones does not. 14% of headphones support fast pairing.
  • Multipoint connections
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint connections, while the average pair of headphones does not. 30.2% of headphones support multipoint connections.
    supports multipoint for up to 2 devices.
  • Low-latency game mode
    This pair of headphones includes a low-latency game mode, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.2% of headphones support low-latency game mode.
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • EQ customization
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • Companion app support
    This pair of headphones works with a companion app, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
  • 9 newer release date
    This pair of headphones was released more recently than the average pair of headphones (2025 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    November 2025
    2025 vs 2016
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 5.87x less popular
    Goboult Mustang Thunder is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 7.3% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (234 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    234 g vs 218 g
  • 5.87x less popular
    Goboult Mustang Thunder is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 7.3% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (234 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    234 g vs 218 g
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
ANUPAM Dev official
≈ estimated
19/11/2025
Unboxing and review · sound, mic, gaming and battery tests
Verdict
Goboult Mustang Thunder offers good value for the price, but shows some distortion at full volume and has a plastic build.
7.0
Jstech
≈ estimated
18/11/2025
Hands-on review · sound, battery and gaming tests
Verdict
Goboult Mustang Thunder is recommended only for heavy-bass fans, not for listeners who want accurate, high-quality sound.
8.0
Techpoke !
≈ estimated
17/11/2025
Hands-on review · sound, controls, gaming mode and call tests
Verdict
Goboult Mustang Thunder is a fair deal for its price bracket, though the bass could have been better.
9.0
Oyesamrat
≈ estimated
09/11/2025
Quick review · unboxing and several days of use
Verdict
Goboult Mustang Thunder is comfortable, bass-rich and long-lasting, and highly recommended for its style and sound.
Overview video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gadgetbridge.com
16/12/2025
Summary of the review
GoBoult Mustang Thunder Review: These high-octane headphones promise a lot of fun
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
24/12/2025
First impressions · Budget over-ear
Verdict
The GoBoult Mustang Thunder is a budget over-ear pair with long battery life and well-balanced sound, suited to daily commutes and casual calls.
M
msn.com
24/12/2025
Summary of the review
GoBoult Mustang thunder headphones first impressions - MSN
english.publictv.in
06/01/2026
Month-long review · Bass-heavy sound
Verdict
The GoBoult Mustang Thunder is a stylish, bass-heavy pair with long battery life and strong value, though calls and audio are not as polished as premium headphones.
techpp.com
01/01/2026
Two-week review · Bass-heavy headphones
Verdict
The GoBoult Mustang Thunder suits bass lovers who want a stylish design and long battery life, though sound leaks at moderate volume and the app often fails to connect.
technerdiness.com
20/07/2026
Multi-week review · Stylish budget pair
Verdict
The GoBoult Mustang Thunder is an eye-catching, bass-heavy pair with long battery life, best for casual listeners and gamers rather than detail-focused fans.
G
gadgetbridge.com
16/12/2025
Summary of the review
GoBoult Mustang Thunder Review: These high-octane headphones promise a lot of fun
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Goboult Mustang Thunder

  • Massive battery life offering up to 70 hours of continuous playback.
  • Fast charging capabilities that yield around 10 hours of use from a 10-minute charge.
  • Unique and appealing aesthetic featuring a breathing LED Mustang logo.
  • Affordable pricing with a solid value-to-money proposition for budget buyers.
  • Punchy, bass-heavy sound signature tailored well for mass consumers and EDM/pop music.
  • Very stable wireless connection utilizing modern Bluetooth 5.4 tech.
  • Offers a low-latency mode (60ms) which is beneficial for basic mobile gaming.

What customers don't like about Goboult Mustang Thunder

  • Call quality struggles in loud environments despite claiming environmental noise cancellation.
  • Sound output lacks the premium clarity and separation expected by critical audiophiles.
  • Hardware relies heavily on plastic construction, raising long-term structural durability concerns.
  • Multiple users reporting high clamping force causing ear and jaw discomfort during longer sessions.
  • Some complaints about loose physical buttons producing a rattling noise inside the earcups.

Verdict

The GoBoult Mustang Thunder is a budget-friendly over-ear headphone featuring 40mm bass-boosted dynamic drivers, a massive 70-hour battery life, and Bluetooth 5.4 connectivity with AAC and SBC codec support. It is designed for both music and gaming with an IPX5 water resistance rating, dual connectivity, and a 60ms low-latency 'Combat Mode', while also incorporating a unique Mustang-licensed aesthetic with a breathing LED pony logo. Main pros include its exceptional battery endurance, quick charging (10 minutes for 100 minutes of play), and comfortable memory foam earcups; however, cons include a mixed-bag call quality through its ENC quad-mic setup and a soundstage that can lack high-frequency refinement due to its heavy bass emphasis.

Compare Goboult Mustang Thunder with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Goboult Mustang Thunder and other products in the Headphones category

No results found