Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£400VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):225 W

XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.0

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 69% of graphics cards
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 65%
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.5

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.8

Power & Cooling

11%

8.4

Platform & Features

5%

6.2

Design

4%

8.6

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 74%
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 92%
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-iii-ultra
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.5

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.8

Power & Cooling

11%

8.4

Platform & Features

5%

6.2

Design

4%

8.6

Connectivity & Media

6.0
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

6.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
9,885 points
This graphics card scores 9,885 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 72.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
9,611 points
This graphics card scores 9,611 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 51.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
16,554 points
This graphics card scores 16,554 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 72.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
11,500 points
This graphics card scores 11,500 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 53% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
10.37 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 10.37 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 74.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12.1
This graphics card supports DirectX 12.1, which is older than on 77.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
225 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 225 W, which is higher than that of 54.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
230 W
This graphics card draws 230 W under peak load, which is higher than 53% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
337 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 337 W, which is higher than that of 80.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
230 W
Show more
Size
315x 131x 57 mm
This graphics card measures 315x131x 57 mm, which is larger than 62% of graphics cards.
Length
315 mm
This graphics card is 315 mm long, which is longer than 69.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
131 mm
This graphics card is 131 mm tall, which is taller than 61.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.75 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.75 slot/s, which is wider than 67.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,100 g
This graphics card weighs 1,100 g, which is heavier than 54.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 16.3% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra
    the average graphics card
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.30 vs 8.000).
    9.3 vs 8
  • 2.37x more popular
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
    10 vs 4.22
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 16.3% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra
    the average graphics card
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.30 vs 8.000).
    9.3 vs 8
  • 2.37x more popular
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
    10 vs 4.22
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 19.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2025 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,025 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • 3.8% worse value for money
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.93 vs 7.2).
    6.93 vs 7.2
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 19.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2025 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,025 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 54.1% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (10.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    10.37 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 15% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (324 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    324 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 20.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (129.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    129.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 26.9% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (16554 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    16,554 points vs 22,653 points
  • 32.7% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (9885 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    9,885 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 5.7% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1810 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,810 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    2.0 vs 8
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    October 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12.1 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12.1 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3.0
  • 55% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 49.8% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (337 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    337 W vs 225 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 13 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (50 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    50 °C vs 37 °C
  • 4.7% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (225 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    225 W vs 215 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 30 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (315 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    315 mm vs 285 mm
  • 6 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (131 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    131 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.25 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.8 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.75 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
overclockersclub.com
18/11/2019
Summary of the review
V
vortez.net
11/11/2019
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
08/11/2019
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
04/11/2019
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
01/11/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
31/10/2019
Summary of the review
O
overclockersclub.com
18/11/2019
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
19/02/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra

  • Significantly improved cooling over the Thicc II model, specifically addressing VRM and memory temperatures with a revamped copper heatsink.
  • High out-of-the-box performance with a substantial factory overclock (boost up to 2025 MHz).
  • Unique 'muscle car' aesthetic featuring a matte black shroud with chrome accents and a premium metal backplate.
  • Quiet operation under most gaming loads, aided by a triple-fan design and 'Zero DB' fan technology that stops fans during idle.
  • Dual-BIOS switch allowing users to toggle between high-performance and quieter, more efficient modes.
  • Competitive pricing compared to other flagship custom 5700 XT models like the Sapphire Nitro+.

What we don't like about XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra

  • Very large physical dimensions (over 31 cm long and 3 slots thick), which may not fit in smaller PC cases.
  • High power consumption, requiring two 8-pin connectors and a recommended 600W+ power supply.
  • The BIOS switch is poorly placed under the shroud, making it difficult to access without a tool like a pen.
  • Lack of hardware-accelerated real-time ray tracing, which is a standard feature on competing NVIDIA cards.
  • No RGB lighting, which may be a drawback for users who prefer customisable aesthetics.
  • Some users reported significant GPU sag due to the card's weight, occasionally requiring additional support brackets.

Verdict

The XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra is a factory-overclocked graphics card featuring 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, built on AMD's 7nm RDNA architecture. It boasts impressive clock speeds with a base of 1810MHz and a boost up to 2025MHz, supported by a 2.7-slot triple-fan cooling system (two 90mm and one 100mm) and a dual BIOS switch for performance or quiet modes. Main characteristics include its sleek 'muscle car' aesthetic with a full metal backplate and Zero DB fan technology for silent idle operation. Its primary pros are excellent 1440p gaming performance, significantly improved thermals over its predecessor, and high out-of-the-box boost clocks. However, cons include its massive 31.5cm length which may not fit in smaller cases, high power consumption requiring a minimum 600W PSU, and a lack of dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing.

Compare XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc III Ultra and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found