Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£320VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):192 W

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.7

Technical score

10%

8.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 55% of graphics cards
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

â–²Better than 64%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

5.8

Performance

24%

5.8

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.1

Design

4%

9.0

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 57%
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 74%
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7600-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7600-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7600-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7600-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7600-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7600-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7600-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7600-xt
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

5.8

Performance

24%

5.8

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.1

Design

4%

9.0

Connectivity & Media

6.7
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT has a popularity score of 7.4 points, which is higher than that of 69% of products in this category.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

7.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
10,000 points
This graphics card scores 10,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 70.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
5,913 points
This graphics card scores 5,913 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 68.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
17,278 points
This graphics card scores 17,278 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 67.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
8,966 points
This graphics card scores 8,966 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
23.02 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 23.02 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
288 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 288 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 69.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
13.5 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 13.5 Gbps, which is slower than on 60.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
192 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 192 W, which is lower than that of 55.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
192 W
This graphics card draws 192 W under peak load, which is lower than 58.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
192 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 192 W, which is lower than that of 58.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
192 W
Show more
Size
250x 129x 45 mm
Length
250 mm
This graphics card is 250 mm long, which is shorter than 68.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Height
129.25 mm
This graphics card is 129.25 mm tall, which is taller than 58.4% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 51.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Weight
792 g
This graphics card weighs 792 g, which is lighter than 72.6% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 12.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2810 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,810 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 35 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (250 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    250 mm vs 285 mm
  • 8.2% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT
    the average graphics card
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.66 vs 8.000).
    8.66 vs 8
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 8.2% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT
    the average graphics card
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.66 vs 8.000).
    8.66 vs 8
  • 12.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2810 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,810 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 10.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (179.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    179.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 8x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    32 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 35 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (250 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    250 mm vs 285 mm
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 56 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (128 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    128 vs 184
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 56 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (128 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    128 vs 184
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • 80 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (64 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    64 vs 144
  • 8 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    32 vs 40
  • 23.7% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (17278 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    17,278 points vs 22,653 points
  • 31.9% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (10000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    10,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 35.5% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (5913 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    5,913 points vs 9,166 points
  • 7.5% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (352.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    352.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 2,304 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (2048 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    2,048 vs 4,352
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 20% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (6 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    6 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 3).
    2.2 vs 3.0
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 4.25 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (129.3 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    129.25 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gamersnexus.net
07/03/2024
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
30/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
25/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
H
hwcooling.net
29/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
G
gamestar.de
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
C
cowcotland.com
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
25/01/2024
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
24/01/2024
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT

  • Generous 16 GB VRAM provides headroom for high-resolution textures and future games
  • Compact dual-fan design fits easily into most small form factor cases
  • Excellent cooling solution that remains quiet even under heavy load
  • Solid 1080p and 1440p performance in rasterised titles
  • Improved productivity and AI workload performance due to higher memory capacity
  • Includes modern features like DisplayPort 2.1 support

What we don't like about Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT

  • High launch price makes it a poor value compared to the standard RX 7600
  • Underwhelming ray tracing performance compared to NVIDIA's RTX 4060
  • Narrow 128-bit memory bus can bottleneck the 16 GB of VRAM in some scenarios
  • Higher power consumption (190W TBP) with lower efficiency than competitors
  • Lacks premium features like RGB lighting or a dual-BIOS switch
  • Marginal performance gain over the non-XT model in most 1080p benchmarks

Verdict

The Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT is an RDNA 3 architecture graphics card featuring 2,048 stream processors, 32 compute units, and a substantial 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. Designed for ultimate 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, it operates with a game clock up to 2,539 MHz and a boost clock of 2,810 MHz, requiring a minimum 600W power supply via two 8-pin connectors for its 192W TBP. Main pros include its generous VRAM for future-proofing modern titles, highly efficient Dual-X cooling that remains quiet under load, and a compact 2.2-slot design (250mm length) suitable for smaller builds. However, notable cons include its limited 128-bit memory bus which can bottleneck performance at higher resolutions, the use of a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface that may impact older systems, and a relatively high price point compared to the performance gains over the standard 8GB model.

Compare Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found