Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£350VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):160 W

Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.5

Technical score

10%

7.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 62% of graphics cards
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 52%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

6.0

Performance

24%

4.1

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

9.0

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 62%
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

4.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 92%
  • palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
  • palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
  • palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
  • palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
  • palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
  • palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
palit-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-8gb
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

6.0

Performance

24%

4.1

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

9.0

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

6.5
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

4.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.5
Popularity
Popularity
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB has a popularity score of 4.7 points, which is higher than that of 51.7% of products in this category.
4.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

7.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
12,500 points
This graphics card scores 12,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 59.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
7,934 points
This graphics card scores 7,934 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,604 points
This graphics card scores 22,604 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 52.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
15,139 points
This graphics card scores 15,139 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 62.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
22.06 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 22.06 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 53.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
288 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 288 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 69.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
160 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 160 W, which is lower than that of 68% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
160 W
This graphics card draws 160 W under peak load, which is lower than 71.2% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
160 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 160 W, which is lower than that of 71.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
160 W
Show more
Size
249.9x 123.5x 40.1 mm
Length
249.9 mm
This graphics card is 249.9 mm long, which is shorter than 69.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
123.5 mm
This graphics card is 123.5 mm tall, which is shorter than 54% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
920 g
This graphics card weighs 920 g, which is lighter than 61.8% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 35.1 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (249.9 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    249.9 mm vs 285 mm
  • 1.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2535 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,535 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 1.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2535 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,535 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 28.9% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (160 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    160 W vs 225 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 35.1 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (249.9 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    249.9 mm vs 285 mm
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 56 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (128 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    128 vs 184
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 7.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB
    the average graphics card
    Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.47 vs 8.000).
    7.47 vs 8
  • 56 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (128 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    128 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 25.4% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (121.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    121.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 14.9% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (324.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    324.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 6 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    34 vs 40
  • 14.8% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (12500 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    12,500 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 13.4% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (7934 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    7,934 points vs 9,166 points
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 15 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (82 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    82 °C vs 67 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techpowerup.com
24/05/2023
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
24/05/2023
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
27/05/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB

  • Excellent power efficiency, consuming significantly less power than previous generation equivalents
  • Support for DLSS 3 Frame Generation which provides massive framerate boosts in supported titles
  • Compact dual-slot design that fits easily in smaller PC cases
  • Remains cool and relatively quiet during operation thanks to the Dual fan cooling system
  • Strong 1080p gaming performance, capable of running most modern AAA titles at maximum settings
  • Uses a standard 8-pin PCIe power connector for better compatibility with older power supplies
  • Includes AV1 encoding support, which is highly beneficial for streaming and video creation

What we don't like about Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB

  • 8GB of VRAM is considered insufficient for many modern games at higher settings or future-proofing
  • Limited 128-bit memory bus causes performance to drop off significantly at 1440p and 4K resolutions
  • Marginal generational performance uplift (only ~10-12%) over the older RTX 3060 Ti in raw rasterization
  • High launch price relative to its performance gains, making it a poor value proposition for those with mid-range 30-series cards
  • Palit Dual model uses a plastic backplate and shroud, giving it a less premium feel compared to other cards
  • Lack of DisplayPort 2.0 support, sticking with the older DisplayPort 1.4 standard

Verdict

The Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB is a compact, dual-slot graphics card built on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 4,352 CUDA cores, a 2310 MHz base clock, and a 2535 MHz boost clock. It is equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit interface, delivering a memory speed of 18 Gbps and a bandwidth of 288 GB/s with a low TDP of 160W. Main pros include exceptional power efficiency, support for DLSS 3 frame generation, improved ray tracing performance, and a quiet dual 95mm fan cooling system with temperature-reactive RGB lighting. However, it faces criticism for its limited 8GB VRAM and narrow memory bus which can bottleneck performance at 1440p or higher resolutions, alongside a relatively small performance gain over the previous generation.

Compare Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Dual 8GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found