OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£960VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):140 W

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA RTX A4000
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

90%

6.8

Technical score

10%

7.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 54% of graphics cards
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

5.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 80%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

44%

5.2

Performance

24%

7.5

Memory

12%

7.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

9.3

Design

4%

9.0

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 53%
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

6.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 92%
  • nvidia-rtx-a4000
  • nvidia-rtx-a4000
  • nvidia-rtx-a4000
  • nvidia-rtx-a4000
  • nvidia-rtx-a4000
nvidia-rtx-a4000
nvidia-rtx-a4000
nvidia-rtx-a4000
nvidia-rtx-a4000
nvidia-rtx-a4000
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA RTX A4000

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components:

44%

5.2

Performance

24%

7.5

Memory

12%

7.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

9.3

Design

4%

9.0

Connectivity & Media

6.8
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

6.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.5
Popularity
Popularity
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
NVIDIA RTX A4000 has a popularity score of 6.3 points, which is higher than that of 60.5% of products in this category.
6.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

5.4

Price

6.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
10,968 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 10,968 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 66.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
9,500 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 9,500 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 51.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
19,468 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 19,468 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 63.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
9,672 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 9,672 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 61.5% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
19.2 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 19.2 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 59.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
4
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 4 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 97.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
140 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 140 W, which is lower than that of 78.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
140 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 140 W under peak load, which is lower than 79.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
300 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 300 W PSU, which is lower than that of 94.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.5% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
140 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 140 W, which is lower than that of 79.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
140 W
Show more
Size
?
Length
241 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 241 mm long, which is shorter than 75% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Height
112 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 112 mm tall, which is shorter than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
1 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 1 slot/s, which is slimmer than 96.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Weight
500 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 500 g, which is lighter than 91.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 53.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    300 W vs 650 W
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 34.9% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (140 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    140 W vs 215 W
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • 44 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    241 mm vs 285 mm
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 8 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    48 vs 40
  • 8 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    48 vs 40
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • 5.16x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (153.4 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    153.4 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 4.32x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (153.4 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    153.4 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (Unlimited vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    Unlimited vs 8
  • 53.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    300 W vs 650 W
  • 34.9% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (140 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    140 W vs 215 W
  • 37.8% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (140 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    140 W vs 225 W
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 44 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    241 mm vs 285 mm
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 51% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (500 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    500 g vs 1,021 g
  • 37.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1560 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,560 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 61.7% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (735 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    735 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 57.4% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (162.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    162.36 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 81.1% more expensive
    NVIDIA RTX A4000 is more expensive than the average graphics card (£960 vs £530).
    £960 vs £530
  • 11.2% worse value for money
    NVIDIA RTX A4000 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.47 vs 7.2).
    6.47 vs 7.2
  • 6.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA RTX A4000
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA RTX A4000 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.48 vs 8.000).
    7.48 vs 8
  • 37.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1560 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,560 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 61.7% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (735 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    735 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 57.4% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (162.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    162.36 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 14.9% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (19.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    19.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 14.1% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (19468 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    19,468 points vs 22,653 points
  • 25.3% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (10968 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    10,968 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 8.2% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (149.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    149.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    April 2021
    2,021 vs 2,023
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • 33.1% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (392.5 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    392.5 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2 vs 2.1).
    2.0 vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 13 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (80 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    80 °C vs 67 °C
  • 11.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (47 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    47 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 30 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (30 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    30 dB vs 0 dB
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
develop3d.com
30/06/2021
Summary of the review
Nvidia RTX A4000 / RTX A5000 review - DEVELOP3D
A
aecmag.com
05/06/2021
Summary of the review
Nvidia RTX A4000Go to product viewer dialogue for this item. / RTX A5000Go to product viewer dialogue for this item. review - AEC Magazine
S
storagereview.com
03/11/2021
Summary of the review
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Review - StorageReview.com
T
techspot.com
15/10/2021
Summary of the review
Nvidia RTX A4000Go to product viewer dialogue for this item. Review - TechSpot
S
storagereview.com
03/11/2025
Summary of the review
Revisión de NVIDIA RTX A4000 - StorageReview.com
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.it
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
Schede grafiche- Benchmark List (Updated with RTX A4000 benchmark scores) If you would like to expand your search, I can provide: International review...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA RTX A4000

  • Ultra-compact single-slot design allows for high-density multi-GPU setups in standard workstations.
  • Generous 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM with Error Correction Code (ECC) is ideal for complex 3D rendering and professional CAD datasets.
  • High energy efficiency with a low 140W TDP, requiring only a single 6-pin power connector.
  • Professional-grade driver stability and ISV certifications for mission-critical software like SolidWorks and Revit.
  • Strong performance leap over previous generation Quadro cards, offering nearly double the speed in some CUDA and ray-tracing tests.
  • Capable of light to moderate 4K gaming, performing similarly to an RTX 3060 Ti or 3070.

What we don't like about NVIDIA RTX A4000

  • Small blower-style fan can become loud and run hot under heavy workloads like 4K video rendering.
  • Significantly higher price-to-performance ratio for gaming compared to consumer GeForce cards.
  • Limited overclocking headroom due to strictly locked voltage and thermal constraints of the single-slot cooler.
  • Lacks native HDMI ports, necessitating the use of active adapters for certain displays or TVs.
  • Does not support NVLink, preventing memory pooling between multiple cards.

Verdict

The Nvidia RTX A4000 is a professional-grade workstation GPU based on the Ampere architecture, featuring 6,144 CUDA cores, 192 third-generation Tensor cores, and 48 second-generation RT cores. It is equipped with 16GB of GDDR6 memory with Error-Correcting Code (ECC) on a 256-bit interface, delivering a bandwidth of 448 GB/s and a single-precision performance of 19.2 TFLOPS. Its primary advantages include a compact single-slot form factor suitable for diverse workstation chassis, high power efficiency with a maximum TGP of 140W, and support for four simultaneous 5K or two 8K displays via DisplayPort 1.4a. However, main drawbacks include a blower-style cooling system that can become loud or prone to thermal throttling under heavy loads, a higher price point compared to equivalent gaming-focused GPUs, and the absence of NVLink support for multi-GPU scaling.

Compare NVIDIA RTX A4000 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found