Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,250VRAM:20 GBMemory bus width:160 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):130 W

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.8

Technical score

10%

7.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 54% of graphics cards
6.0

Value for money

Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

3.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 91%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

5.5

Performance

24%

6.8

Memory

12%

7.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.6

Design

4%

9.3

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 53%
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

5.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 89%
  • nvidia-rtx-4000-ada-generation
  • nvidia-rtx-4000-ada-generation
  • nvidia-rtx-4000-ada-generation
  • nvidia-rtx-4000-ada-generation
nvidia-rtx-4000-ada-generation
nvidia-rtx-4000-ada-generation
nvidia-rtx-4000-ada-generation
nvidia-rtx-4000-ada-generation
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

5.5

Performance

24%

6.8

Memory

12%

7.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.6

Design

4%

9.3

Connectivity & Media

6.8
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

5.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a popularity score of 5.7 points, which is higher than that of 57.2% of products in this category.
5.7
Value for money
Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

3.9

Price

6.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
11,154 points
This graphics card scores 11,154 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 65.6% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,108 points
This graphics card scores 14,108 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 67% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
24,054 points
This graphics card scores 24,054 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 55.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
12,161 points
This graphics card scores 12,161 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 51% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
26.7 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 26.7 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 55.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
20 GB
This graphics card has 20 GB of VRAM, which is more than 90.1% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
160 bit
This graphics card uses a 160 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
360 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 360 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 62% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
4
This graphics card offers 4 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 97.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
1.62 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 1.62 Gbps, which is slower than on 95.3% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
130 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 130 W, which is lower than that of 79.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
130 W
This graphics card draws 130 W under peak load, which is lower than 80.8% of graphics cards and equal to 3.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
450 W
This graphics card recommends a 450 W PSU, which is lower than that of 84.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
130 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 130 W, which is lower than that of 81.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
130 W
Show more
Size
111.7x 241.3x 34.8 mm
Length
241 mm
This graphics card is 241 mm long, which is shorter than 75% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Height
112 mm
This graphics card is 112 mm tall, which is shorter than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
1 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 1 slot/s, which is slimmer than 96.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Weight
528 g
This graphics card weighs 528 g, which is lighter than 90.3% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 8 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (20 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    20 GB vs 12 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 30.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (450 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    450 W vs 650 W
  • 39.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (130 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    130 W vs 215 W
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • 44 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    241 mm vs 285 mm
  • 8 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    48 vs 40
  • 8 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    48 vs 40
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • 9.23x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (327.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    327.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 11.02x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (327.6 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    327.6 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 53.9% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14108 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    14,108 points vs 9,166 points
  • 8 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (20 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    20 GB vs 12 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 8 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (8 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    8 vs 0
  • Supports virtual GPU
    This graphics card supports virtual GPU features, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (Unlimited vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    Unlimited vs 8
  • 30.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (450 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    450 W vs 650 W
  • 39.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (130 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    130 W vs 215 W
  • 42.2% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (130 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    130 W vs 225 W
  • 50% lower idle power draw
    This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    6 W vs 12 W
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 44 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    241 mm vs 285 mm
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 48.3% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (528 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    528 g vs 1,021 g
  • 38.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1545 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,545 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 96 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (160 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    160 bit vs 256 bit
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 21.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1500 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,500 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 2.36x more expensive
    NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,250 vs £530).
    £1,250 vs £530
  • 19.5% worse value for money
    NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.02 vs 7.2).
    6.02 vs 7.2
  • 4.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.66 vs 8.000).
    7.66 vs 8
  • 38.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1545 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,545 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1500 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,500 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 14.7% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (139.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    139.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 24% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (11154 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    11,154 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 96 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (160 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    160 bit vs 256 bit
  • 19.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (360 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    360 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
    1.4a vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 91.9% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (1.6 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    1.62 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 35 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (35 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    35 dB vs 0 dB
  • 6 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (73 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    73 °C vs 67 °C
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
architosh.com
30/12/2024
Summary of the review
P
phoronix.com
19/08/2024
Summary of the review
P
pugetsystems.com
12/01/2024
Summary of the review
D
develop3d.com
08/02/2024
Summary of the review
A
aecmag.com
01/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.fr
16/05/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

  • Most powerful single-slot GPU for professional workstation computing
  • Substantial performance gains (25-30% faster than previous RTX A4000) in apps like V-Ray and Blender
  • Equipped with 20 GB GDDR6 ECC memory, capable of handling large datasets
  • Support for DLSS 3 Frame Generation, which can significantly boost frame rates
  • Excellent ventilation with a blower-style thermal design for workstation environments
  • Features dual encode and decode engines with AV1 support for video production

What we don't like about NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

  • High price point, making it a lower value proposition compared to the older RTX A4000 for budget users
  • Performance lead over the SFF (Small Form Factor) version is minimal in some offline rendering tasks
  • Requires a 16-pin 12VHPWR connector (though an adapter is usually included)
  • Lack of NVLink support, which may disappoint some virtual production users
  • Marginal performance increase in certain specific workflows like Twinmotion with path tracing

Verdict

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a professional single-slot workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 6,144 CUDA cores, 192 fourth-generation Tensor cores, and 48 third-generation RT cores. It is equipped with 20GB of GDDR6 memory with ECC on a 160-bit interface, delivering a memory bandwidth of 360 GB/s and a peak single-precision performance of 26.7 TFLOPS. Its main pros include exceptional power efficiency with a 130W maximum power consumption, a compact single-slot form factor that fits most workstations, and significant performance leaps in generative AI and real-time rendering over its predecessor. However, its primary cons are its high professional-tier pricing compared to consumer equivalents and the potential bandwidth limitations of its 160-bit memory bus for extremely data-heavy tasks.

Compare NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found