OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,320VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:384 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):350 W

EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming
7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

90%

7.7

Technical score

10%

7.7

User score

▲Better than 61% of graphics cards
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

3.5

Price

▼Worse than 80%
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

7.7

Memory

12%

5.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

7.2

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 61%
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

4.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 87%
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3080-ti-ftw3-ultra-hydro-copper-gaming
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components:

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

7.7

Memory

12%

5.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

7.2

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

7.7
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

4.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 53% of models
Popularity:
EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming has a popularity score of 4.8 points, which is higher than that of 52.5% of products in this category.
4.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

3.5

Price

6.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
19,000 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 19,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 62.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,804 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 14,804 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 71.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
26,825 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 26,825 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 61.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
21,446 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 21,446 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 84.9% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
36.86 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 36.86 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 68% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
384 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 384 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 89.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.3% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
912.4 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 912.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 87% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
20 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 20 Gbps, which is faster than on 42.9% of graphics cards and equal to 7.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
350 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 350 W, which is higher than that of 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
350 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 350 W under peak load, which is higher than 83.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
450 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 450 W, which is higher than that of 92.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
350 W
Show more
Size
288.9x 157.3x 26 mm
Length
289 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 289 mm long, which is longer than 51.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
157.3 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 157.3 mm tall, which is taller than 98.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
1.2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 1.2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 96.1% of graphics cards.
Weight
1900 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1900 g, which is heavier than 86.5% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 2.04x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (912.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    912.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1.3 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1.2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1.2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 51.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (576 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    576 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 51.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (576 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    576 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 63.3% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (36.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    36.86 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 23.5% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (201.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    201.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 61.5% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14804 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    14,804 points vs 9,166 points
  • 5,888 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,240 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,240 vs 4,352
  • 77.6% higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (21446 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    21,446 points vs 12,074 points
  • 2.04x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (912.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    912.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 17 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (50 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    50 °C vs 67 °C
  • 10 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (27 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    27 °C vs 37 °C
  • 1.3 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1.2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1.2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 28.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1800 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,800 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 3 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (0 vs 3).
    0 vs 3
  • 28.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 62.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (350 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    350 W vs 215 W
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 32.3 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (157.3 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    157.3 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2.49x more expensive
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,320 vs £530).
    £1,320 vs £530
  • 11.3% worse value for money
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.47 vs 7.2).
    6.47 vs 7.2
  • 3.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming
    the average graphics card
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.74 vs 8.000).
    7.74 vs 8
  • 28.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1800 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,800 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 28.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 32 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (112 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    112 vs 144
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1188 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 75% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (6 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    6 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    June 2021
    2,021 vs 2,023
  • 2.13x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (628 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    628 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 3 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (0 vs 3).
    0 vs 3
  • 62.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (350 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    350 W vs 215 W
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 2x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (450 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    450 W vs 225 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 2x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (24 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    24 W vs 12 W
  • 59.1% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 32.3 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (157.3 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    157.3 mm vs 125 mm
  • 86.1% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1900 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,900 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming

  • Excellent thermal performance, typically maintaining temperatures under 40-50°C in custom loops.
  • High power limit of 450W allows for significant overclocking headroom.
  • Space-saving single-slot design which is rare for such high-end performance.
  • Stunning aesthetics with a large RGB light bar and translucent water block.
  • EVGA's industry-leading customer support and robust 3-year warranty.
  • Performance that closely rivals the RTX 3090 at a lower price point.

What we don't like about EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming

  • Extreme power draw requiring at least an 850W PSU and three 8-pin connectors.
  • Prohibitive requirement for an existing custom water-cooling loop; not usable out-of-the-box for air-cooled setups.
  • High MSRP and even higher market prices due to limited availability.
  • Reported issues with manufacturer warranty claims regarding perceived 'liquid damage' on water-cooled units.
  • PCI-e power connectors are not reversed, which can complicate cable management in some cases.

Verdict

The EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper is a high-performance enthusiast graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ampere architecture, featuring 10,240 CUDA cores and 12GB of GDDR6X VRAM on a 384-bit memory bus with a 912 GB/s bandwidth. This specialized 'Hydro Copper' edition is designed for custom water-cooling loops, utilizing a full-cover CNC-machined copper water block that enables a slim 1.2-slot form factor and high overclocking potential via a boosted 1800 MHz clock and a 450W power limit. Main pros include exceptional 4K gaming performance comparable to an RTX 3090, superior thermal management for the GPU and VRMs when integrated into a custom loop, and extensive ARGB lighting. Key cons include a staggering power draw requiring at least a 750W PSU, the necessity of an existing custom liquid cooling system for operation, and high MSRP compared to air-cooled alternatives.

Compare EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found