Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,710VRAM:24 GBMemory bus width:384 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):350 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
8.2/10

Overall score

Score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.1

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

▲Better than 71% of graphics cards
6.2

Value for money

Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

1.5

Price

▼Worse than 87%
8.1

Technical score

Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

7.9

Performance

24%

8.7

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

6.0

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 70%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 80%
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3090
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Technical score
Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

7.9

Performance

24%

8.7

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

6.0

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

8.1
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 has a popularity score of 9.1 points, which is higher than that of 85.2% of products in this category.
9.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

1.5

Price

6.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
19,922 points
This graphics card scores 19,922 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 64.3% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
13,828 points
This graphics card scores 13,828 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 65.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
26,588 points
This graphics card scores 26,588 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 59.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
15,194 points
This graphics card scores 15,194 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 62.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
35.58 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 35.58 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
24 GB
This graphics card has 24 GB of VRAM, which is more than 91.1% of graphics cards and equal to 5.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
384 bit
This graphics card uses a 384 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 89.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.3% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 936.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 87.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
350 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 350 W, which is higher than that of 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
350 W
This graphics card draws 350 W under peak load, which is higher than 83.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
350 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 350 W, which is higher than that of 81.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
350 W
Show more
Size
336x 140x 61 mm
This graphics card measures 336x140x 61 mm, which is larger than 77.2% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Length
313 mm
This graphics card is 313 mm long, which is longer than 69% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Height
138 mm
This graphics card is 138 mm tall, which is taller than 76.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
2,189 g
This graphics card weighs 2,189 g, which is heavier than 93.8% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 42 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (82 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    82 vs 40
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 42 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (82 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    82 vs 40
  • 2.09x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (936.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    936.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 144 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (328 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    328 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 184 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (328 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    328 vs 144
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • 10.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.87 vs 8.000).
    8.87 vs 8
  • 2.16x more popular
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is more popular than the average graphics card (9.12 vs 4.2).
    9.12 vs 4.22
  • 42 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (82 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    82 vs 40
  • 42 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (82 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    82 vs 40
  • 144 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (328 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    328 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 184 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (328 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    328 vs 144
  • 45.9% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (556 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    556 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 57.6% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (35.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    35.58 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 6,144 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,496 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,496 vs 4,352
  • 16.3% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (189.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    189.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 50.9% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (13828 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    13,828 points vs 9,166 points
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.09x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (936.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    936.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 32.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1695 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,695 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 27.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1395 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,395 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 62.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (350 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    350 W vs 215 W
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 30.3% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1219 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,219 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 13 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (138 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    138 mm vs 125 mm
  • 3.23x more expensive
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,710 vs £530).
    £1,710 vs £530
  • 16.4% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.18 vs 7.2).
    6.18 vs 7.2
  • 32.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1695 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,695 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 27.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1395 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,395 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 30.3% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1219 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,219 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 75% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (6 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    6 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 3 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    September 2020
    2,020 vs 2,023
  • 2.13x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (628.4 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    628.4 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No 3D output
    This graphics card does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 62.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (350 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    350 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 55.6% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (350 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    350 W vs 225 W
  • 59.1% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 8 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (75 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    75 °C vs 67 °C
  • 13 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (138 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    138 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 28 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (313 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    313 mm vs 285 mm
  • 2.14x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2189 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,189 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcworld.com
24/09/2020
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
09/10/2020
Summary of the review
S
servethehome.com
15/12/2020
Summary of the review
I
itpro.com
09/09/2021
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
09/08/2022
Summary of the review
P
pcworld.com
24/09/2020
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
31/07/2022
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
24/09/2020
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
24/09/2020
Summary of the review
P
pcworld.com
25/09/2020
Summary of the review
S
servethehome.com
15/12/2020
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
24/09/2020
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
24/09/2020
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
04/11/2020
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
24/09/2020
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
24/09/2020
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
24/09/2020
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
24/09/2020
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
24/09/2020
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
24/09/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

  • Massive 24GB GDDR6X VRAM is ideal for heavy creative workloads like 8K video editing, 3D rendering, and AI model training.
  • Exceptional raw performance, delivering high frame rates in 4K and making 8K gaming technically possible in some titles.
  • Effective thermal design in the Founders Edition, which users report remains surprisingly cool and quiet under heavy load.
  • Considered more future-proof than cards with lower memory, especially for VR and high-resolution textures.
  • Includes NVLink support for multi-GPU setups, a feature often restricted in lower-tier 30-series cards.

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

  • Poor value proposition for pure gamers, offering only a marginal 10–15% performance increase over the much cheaper RTX 3080.
  • Extremely high power consumption (350W+ TGP), often requiring a high-wattage PSU and generating significant heat.
  • Physical size is massive (triple-slot design), making it difficult to fit in smaller PC cases and potentially causing PCIe slot sag.
  • High VRAM temperatures have been noted by some users, occasionally requiring manual replacement of thermal pads to prevent throttling in non-gaming tasks.
  • Occasional reports of coil whine under high load.

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 is a powerhouse built on the Ampere architecture, featuring 10,496 CUDA cores and a massive 24GB of GDDR6X VRAM on a 384-bit bus, delivering approximately 936 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Clocked with a base speed of 1.4 GHz and a boost speed of 1.7 GHz, it provides elite performance for 8K gaming and complex workstation tasks like 3D rendering and AI development. Key advantages include its class-leading memory capacity, 2nd gen Ray Tracing cores, and 3rd gen Tensor cores, which make it a highly capable 'Titan-class' solution for professionals and enthusiasts. However, its main drawbacks are the extreme 350W power requirement necessitating at least a 750W power supply, its massive triple-slot physical size that may not fit in smaller cases, and a high launch price that offers diminishing performance returns for average gamers compared to lower-tier models.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found