Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£250VRAM:11 GBMemory bus width:352 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):250 W

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.8

Technical score

10%

8.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 75% of graphics cards
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 62%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

6.8

Power & Cooling

11%

7.4

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

8.3

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 76%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 73%
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

6.8

Power & Cooling

11%

7.4

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

8.3

Connectivity & Media

5.8
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has a popularity score of 7.8 points, which is higher than that of 73.1% of products in this category.
7.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
10,556 points
This graphics card scores 10,556 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 68.7% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
18,597 points
This graphics card scores 18,597 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
9,608 points
This graphics card scores 9,608 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 61.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
11.34 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 11.34 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 72.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
11 GB
This graphics card has 11 GB of VRAM, which is less than 54.6% of graphics cards and equal to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5X
GDDR version
GDDR5X
This graphics card uses GDDR5X memory, which is older than on 84.2% of graphics cards and equal to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
352 bit
This graphics card uses a 352 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 87.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.5% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
484 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 484 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 52.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
250 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 250 W, which is higher than that of 58.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
250 W
This graphics card draws 250 W under peak load, which is higher than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
300 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 300 W, which is higher than that of 67.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
250 W
Show more
Size
267x 112x 40 mm
Length
267 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
111.2 mm
This graphics card is 111.2 mm tall, which is shorter than 80% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,360 g
This graphics card weighs 1,360 g, which is heavier than 67.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 96 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (352 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    352 bit vs 256 bit
  • 24 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (88 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    88 vs 64
  • 13.8 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.2 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111.2 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.56 vs 8.000).
    8.56 vs 8
  • 7% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.56 vs 8.000).
    8.56 vs 8
  • 2.12x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is cheaper than the average graphics card (£250 vs £530).
    £250 vs £530
  • 24 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (88 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    88 vs 64
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 96 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (352 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    352 bit vs 256 bit
  • 8% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (484 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    484 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 13.8 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.2 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111.2 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 36.8% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1582 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,582 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 3.2x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    16 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 12 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    28 vs 40
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 36.8% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1582 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,582 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 12 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    28 vs 40
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 22.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1480 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,480 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 49.8% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (11.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    11.34 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 20.2% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (130.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    130.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 17.9% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (18597 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    18,597 points vs 22,653 points
  • 28.1% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (10556 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    10,556 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 99.4% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    0.18 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (354.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    354.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 42.1% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (11000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    11,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 1 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (11 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    11 GB vs 12 GB
  • 62.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    48 vs 128
  • 3.2x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    16 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • 6 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2017 vs 2023).
    March 2017
    2,017 vs 2,023
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    4 vs 8
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Lower VRS tier
    This graphics card supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
    Tier 1 vs Tier 2
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 59.7% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (471 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    471 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 47.6% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (12000 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    12,000 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    3 vs 6
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 33.3% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    300 W vs 225 W
  • 16 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (83 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    83 °C vs 67 °C
  • 8.1 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (43.5 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    43.5 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 27 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (27 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    27 dB vs 0 dB
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techadvisor.com
23/03/2017
Summary of the review
W
wccftech.com
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
A
arstechnica.com
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
06/05/2024
Summary of the review
T
techgage.com
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
T
tomsguide.com
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
13/10/2017
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
29/04/2024
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
13/11/2017
Summary of the review
G
gamespot.com
16/05/2017
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
07/07/2018
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
23/10/2017
Summary of the review
H
hardwarezone.com.sg
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
T
tech-critter.com
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
O
overclockers.com
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
09/03/2017
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

  • Legendary performance for its era, often matching the much more expensive Titan X
  • Generous 11GB VRAM, which has helped the card stay relevant in modern games longer than its peers
  • Excellent value at launch ($699), offering a massive 30-35% performance jump over the standard GTX 1080
  • Strong 1440p and entry-level 4K gaming capabilities that hold up surprisingly well today
  • High overclocking headroom, with many units capable of reaching over 2GHz
  • Widely regarded as one of the best price-to-performance flagship GPUs ever released

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

  • Lacks support for modern features like hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing and DLSS
  • High power consumption (250W TDP) compared to modern cards with similar performance
  • Founders Edition (blower style) cooler can be loud and prone to thermal throttling under heavy load
  • No native DVI connector on the Founders Edition models
  • Diminishing driver support focus from Nvidia as the architecture ages
  • Struggles with some modern DX12-intensive titles and newer high-resolution games at Ultra settings

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is an enthusiast-class graphics card based on the 16nm Pascal architecture, featuring 3,584 CUDA cores, a base clock of 1481 MHz (boostable to 1582 MHz), and a substantial 11GB of GDDR5X memory on a 352-bit bus. Its main pros include massive 484 GB/s memory bandwidth, exceptional raw performance that still handles modern 1080p and 1440p gaming reliably, and a large VRAM buffer that outlasts many successors. However, its main cons are a high 250W power draw, lack of hardware-accelerated ray tracing (RTX) and DLSS support, and the recent discontinuation of official Game Ready driver updates.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found