OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,580VRAM:24 GBMemory bus width:384 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):480 W

MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X
8.4/10

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Score components

90%

8.3

Technical score

10%

8.8

User score

â–²Better than 73% of graphics cards
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

2.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 80%
8.3

Technical score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components

44%

8.5

Performance

24%

8.8

Memory

12%

6.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

4.8

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 72%
8.8

User score

User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 80%
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
msi-geforce-rtx-3090-ti-suprim-x
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X

Technical score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components:

44%

8.5

Performance

24%

8.8

Memory

12%

6.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

4.8

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

8.3
User score
User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.8
Popularity
Popularity
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Popularity:
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X has a popularity score of 8.8 points, which is higher than that of 82.4% of products in this category.
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

2.2

Price

6.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
21,556 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 21,556 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 69.9% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,725 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 14,725 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 70.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
29,388 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 29,388 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 69.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
16,689 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 16,689 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 64.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
42.26 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 42.26 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 72% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
24 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 24 GB of VRAM, which is more than 91.1% of graphics cards and equal to 5.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
384 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 384 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 89.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.3% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
1,008 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 1,008 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 93.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
480 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 480 W, which is higher than that of 97.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
480 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 480 W under peak load, which is higher than 96.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
1,000 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 1,000 W PSU, which is higher than that of 95.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
480 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 480 W, which is higher than that of 95% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
480 W
Show more
Size
338x 140x 71 mm
This graphics card measures 338x140x 71 mm, which is larger than 86.4% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Length
338 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 338 mm long, which is longer than 91% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1% of graphics cards.
Height
140 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 140 mm tall, which is taller than 79.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.5 slot/s, which is wider than 90.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 5.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
2,154 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 2,154 g, which is heavier than 92.8% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 2.25x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1008 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,008 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 192 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (336 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    336 vs 144
  • 71.9% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (655.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    655.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 10.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.85 vs 8.000).
    8.85 vs 8
  • 2.09x more popular
    MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X is more popular than the average graphics card (8.82 vs 4.2).
    8.82 vs 4.22
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 192 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (336 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    336 vs 144
  • 71.9% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (655.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    655.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 85.8% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (41.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    41.93 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 33.8% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (218.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    218.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 60.6% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14725 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    14,725 points vs 9,166 points
  • 9.01x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (320 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    320 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 29.7% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (29388 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    29,388 points vs 22,653 points
  • 46.9% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (21556 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    21,556 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 6,400 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,752 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,752 vs 4,352
  • 2.25x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1008 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,008 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 22.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1950 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,950 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2.23x higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (480 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    480 W vs 215 W
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 18.8% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1560 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,560 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 53.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (1000 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    1,000 W vs 650 W
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 53 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (338 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    338 mm vs 285 mm
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2.98x more expensive
    MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,580 vs £530).
    £1,580 vs £530
  • 10.4% worse value for money
    MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.52 vs 7.2).
    6.52 vs 7.2
  • 22.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1950 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,950 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 18.8% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1560 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,560 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 75% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (6 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    6 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2.13x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (628 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    628 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    March 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 2.23x higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (480 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    480 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (1000 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    1,000 W vs 650 W
  • 2.13x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (480 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    480 W vs 225 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 2.18x higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (480 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    480 W vs 220 W
  • 6 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (43 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    43 °C vs 37 °C
  • 53 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (338 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    338 mm vs 285 mm
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 15 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (140 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    140 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2.11x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2154 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,154 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

I
ign.com
11/04/2022
Summary of the review
MSI RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X 24G Review - IGN TechPowerUp
K
kitguru.net
29/03/2022
Summary of the review
Nvidia RTX 3090 TiGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. Review ft. MSI & Palit - KitGuru
I
igorslab.de
29/03/2022
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti SUPRIM X 24 GB Review - igor´sLAB
T
tweaktown.com
29/03/2022
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti SUPRIM X Review - TweakTown
G
guru3d.com
29/03/2022
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti SUPRIM X review - www.guru3d.com
T
techpowerup.com
29/03/2022
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X Review | TechPowerUp
M
me.ign.com
11/04/2022
Summary of the review
MSI RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X 24G Review - IGN Middle East
P
profesionalreview.com
29/03/2022
Summary of the review
MSI RTX 3090 Ti SUPRIM X Review en Español (Análisis completo) y
(Translated)Show original
Q
qualescegliere.it
23/08/2022
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti SUPRIM X 24G - QualeScegliere.it
(Translated)Show original
G
guru3d.com
29/03/2022
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti SUPRIM X review
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X

  • Fastest gaming performance available in the RTX 30-series, excelling at 4K and 8K resolutions
  • Exceptional 24GB GDDR6X VRAM for professional content creation and heavy rendering tasks
  • Highly efficient and quiet cooling system (Tri Frozr 2S) compared to other custom models
  • Premium build quality with a refined aesthetic and integrated ARGB lighting
  • Dual BIOS allows users to switch between high-performance 'Gaming' and quiet 'Silent' modes
  • Excellent VRAM thermal management, running significantly cooler than the base RTX 3090

What we don't like about MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X

  • Extremely high power consumption, often requiring at least an 850W or 1000W power supply
  • Significant heat output that can noticeably warm up a small room during heavy use
  • Prohibitively high retail price, making it poor value for average gamers
  • Massive physical footprint (3.5 slots thick, 13+ inches long) that may not fit in many PC cases
  • Limited overclocking headroom as the card is already pushed close to its limit out of the box
  • Uses the newer 16-pin power connector which requires an adapter for most older power supplies

Verdict

The MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ampere GA102 architecture, featuring 10,752 CUDA cores and 24GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit interface. It offers a factory overclocked boost clock of 1,950 MHz, extendable to 1,965 MHz in Extreme Performance mode via software, with memory speeds reaching 21 Gbps. Main characteristics include the Tri Frozr 2S triple-fan cooling system, dual BIOS for silent or gaming profiles, and a high 480W TDP powered by a single 16-pin connector. Its primary pros are its status as one of the fastest consumer GPUs available, excellent 4K and 8K gaming performance, and robust thermal management for stable overclocking. However, notable cons include its extremely high power consumption requiring a recommended 1,000W PSU, its massive physical size that may not fit in many standard cases, and a premium price point that offers diminishing returns for casual gaming.

Compare MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Suprim X and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found